Parathyroid hormone attenuates osteoarthritis pain by remodeling subchondral bone in mice

Osteoarthritis, a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder, is characterized by joint pain and disability. Available treatments fail to modify osteoarthritis progression and decrease joint pain effectively. Here, we show that intermittent parathyroid hormone (iPTH) attenuates osteoarthritis pain by inhibiting subchondral sensory innervation, subchondral bone deterioration, and articular cartilage degeneration in a destabilized medial meniscus (DMM) mouse model. We found that subchondral sensory innervation for osteoarthritis pain was significantly decreased in PTH-treated DMM mice compared with vehicle-treated DMM mice. In parallel, deterioration of subchondral bone microarchitecture in DMM mice was attenuated by iPTH treatment. Increased level of prostaglandin E2 in subchondral bone of DMM mice was reduced by iPTH treatment. Furthermore, uncoupled subchondral bone remodeling caused by increased transforming growth factor β signaling was regulated by PTH-induced endocytosis of the PTH type 1 receptor–transforming growth factor β type 2 receptor complex. Notably, iPTH improved subchondral bone microarchitecture and decreased level of prostaglandin E2 and sensory innervation of subchondral bone in DMM mice by acting specifically through PTH type 1 receptor in Nestin+ mesenchymal stromal cells. Thus, iPTH could be a potential disease-modifying therapy for osteoarthritis.


Sample-size estimation
• You should state whether an appropriate sample size was computed when the study was being designed • You should state the statistical method of sample size computation and any required assumptions • If no explicit power analysis was used, you should describe how you decided what sample (replicate) size (number) to use Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission:

Replicates
• You should report how often each experiment was performed • You should include a definition of biological versus technical replication • The data obtained should be provided and sufficient information should be provided to indicate the number of independent biological and/or technical replicates • If you encountered any outliers, you should describe how these were handled • Criteria for exclusion/inclusion of data should be clearly stated • High-throughput sequence data should be uploaded before submission, with a private link for reviewers provided (these are available from both GEO and ArrayExpress) Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: Sample size was determined empirically. Sample size is clearly indicated in each figure legend. Sample size is shown to be adequate for all distributions in all animal and cell experiments.
Number of specimens / samples used to generate distributions is specified within the figure and figure legends. Outliers below 5th or above 95th percentile were considered to be random noise in all distributions, and not considered for analysis or comparisons.

Statistical reporting
• Statistical analysis methods should be described and justified • Raw data should be presented in figures whenever informative to do so (typically when N per group is less than 10) • For each experiment, you should identify the statistical tests used, exact values of N, definitions of center, methods of multiple test correction, and dispersion and precision measures (e.g., mean, median, SD, SEM, confidence intervals; and, for the major substantive results, a measure of effect size (e.g., Pearson's r, Cohen's d) • Report exact p-values wherever possible alongside the summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals. These should be reported for all key questions and not only when the p-value is less than 0.05.
Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: (For large datasets, or papers with a very large number of statistical tests, you may upload a single table file with tests, Ns, etc., with reference to sections in the manuscript.)

Group allocation
• Indicate how samples were allocated into experimental groups (in the case of clinical studies, please specify allocation to treatment method); if randomization was used, please also state if restricted randomization was applied • Indicate if masking was used during group allocation, data collection and/or data analysis Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: Additional data files ("source data") • We encourage you to upload relevant additional data files, such as numerical data that are represented as a graph in a figure, or as a summary table • Where provided, these should be in the most useful format, and they can be uploaded as "Source data" files linked to a main figure or table • Include model definition files including the full list of parameters used • Include code used for data analysis (e.g., R, MatLab) • Avoid stating that data files are "available upon request" Please indicate the figures or tables for which source data files have been provided: Raw data is provided in the data package accompanying the manuscript (Figures show information processed for visual representation.). Statistical analysis methods are described in the text and methods section.
Mice were labeled and allocate into treatment groups by using random number generator. In our studies, masking is not used during data collection and data analysis.
Source data has been provided in the data package for Figures using statistical analysis