Calcium signaling through a transient receptor channel is important for Toxoplasma gondii growth

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels participate in calcium ion (Ca2+) influx and intracellular Ca2+ release. TRP channels have not been studied in Toxoplasma gondii or any other apicomplexan parasite. In this work, we characterize TgGT1_310560, a protein predicted to possess a TRP domain (TgTRPPL-2), and determined its role in Ca2+ signaling in T. gondii, the causative agent of toxoplasmosis. TgTRPPL-2 localizes to the plasma membrane and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of T. gondii. The ΔTgTRPPL-2 mutant was defective in growth and cytosolic Ca2+ influx from both extracellular and intracellular sources. Heterologous expression of TgTRPPL-2 in HEK-3KO cells allowed its functional characterization. Patching of ER-nuclear membranes demonstrates that TgTRPPL-2 is a non-selective cation channel that conducts Ca2+. Pharmacological blockers of TgTRPPL-2 inhibit Ca2+ influx and parasite growth. This is the first report of an apicomplexan ion channel that conducts Ca2+ and may initiate a Ca2+ signaling cascade that leads to the stimulation of motility, invasion, and egress. TgTRPPL-2 is a potential target for combating toxoplasmosis.


eLife's transparent reporting form
We encourage authors to provide detailed information within their submission to facilitate the interpretation and replication of experiments. Authors can upload supporting documentation to indicate the use of appropriate reporting guidelines for health-related research (see EQUATOR Network), life science research (see the BioSharing Information Resource), or the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting work involving animal research. Where applicable, authors should refer to any relevant reporting standards documents in this form.
If you have any questions, please consult our Journal Policies and/or contact us: editorial@elifesciences.org.

Sample-size estimation
• You should state whether an appropriate sample size was computed when the study was being designed • You should state the statistical method of sample size computation and any required assumptions • If no explicit power analysis was used, you should describe how you decided what sample (replicate) size (number) to use Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission:

Replicates
• You should report how often each experiment was performed • You should include a definition of biological versus technical replication • The data obtained should be provided and sufficient information should be provided to indicate the number of independent biological and/or technical replicates • If you encountered any outliers, you should describe how these were handled • Criteria for exclusion/inclusion of data should be clearly stated • High-throughput sequence data should be uploaded before submission, with a private link for reviewers provided (these are available from both GEO and ArrayExpress) Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: Sample size is indicated in the figure legends and in the Experimental Methods section.
For each experiment presented the sample size was a minimum of three independent experiments.

Statistical reporting
• Statistical analysis methods should be described and justified • Raw data should be presented in figures whenever informative to do so (typically when N per group is less than 10) • For each experiment, you should identify the statistical tests used, exact values of N, definitions of center, methods of multiple test correction, and dispersion and precision measures (e.g., mean, median, SD, SEM, confidence intervals; and, for the major substantive results, a measure of effect size (e.g., Pearson's r, Cohen's d) • Report exact p-values wherever possible alongside the summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals. These should be reported for all key questions and not only when the p-value is less than 0.05.
Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: (For large datasets, or papers with a very large number of statistical tests, you may upload a single table file with tests, Ns, etc., with reference to sections in the manuscript.)

Group allocation
• Indicate how samples were allocated into experimental groups (in the case of clinical studies, please specify allocation to treatment method); if randomization was used, please also state if restricted randomization was applied • Indicate if masking was used during group allocation, data collection and/or data analysis Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission:

Additional data files ("source data")
A biological replicate represents an experiment performed on a specific day. Plaque, egress and invasion assays were repeated a minimum of three independent times. Each fluorometric experiments was repeated a minimum of three times with a different set of parasites. For each experiment, two technical replicates were done. Technical replicates are experiments performed in the same day. For the electrophysiological analysis three biological replicates were done and for each biological replicate three different cells with 5 technical replicates per cell were performed. The information is described in the figure legends and the Experimental Methods section. The immunoprecipitation assay was repeated three independent times and two of those samples were analyzed by mass spec.
The statistical test used through the study was the Student's t-test. n was equal to the number of biological experiments. Error bars in each bar graphs represent the standard error of the mean. The information is described in figures legends as well as the methodology section.
In this study we did not perform group allocation. • We encourage you to upload relevant additional data files, such as numerical data that are represented as a graph in a figure, or as a summary table • Where provided, these should be in the most useful format, and they can be uploaded as "Source data" files linked to a main figure or table • Include model definition files including the full list of parameters used • Include code used for data analysis (e.g., R, MatLab) • Avoid stating that data files are "available upon request" Please indicate the figures or tables for which source data files have been provided: