Discovering novel calcineurin inhibitors through quantitative mapping of protein-peptide affinity landscapes

Weak, transient binding of globular protein domains to Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) in disordered regions of other proteins drive cellular signaling. Mapping the energy landscape of such interactions is essential for deciphering signaling networks and developing therapeutic inhibitors, but is complicated by technical challenges associated with quantitatively measuring weak interactions in high-throughput. Here, we synthesize peptide libraries on spectrally encoded beads with each peptide sequence uniquely linked to a spectral code (MRBLE-pep), allowing high-throughput quantification of protein-peptide binding via imaging. Using computational modeling and MRBLE-pep assays, we map the affinity landscape for human calcineurin (CN), a conserved protein phosphatase essential for the immune response and target of immunosuppressants, interacting with a known SLiM (PxIxIT). We find that PxIxIT recognition depends critically on flanking residues and is regulated by post-translational modifications. Using this information, we designed PxIxIT peptides with unprecedented affinity and therapeutic potential that strongly inhibit CN function in vivo . and CMV-Renilla in a 6-well plate format. 18 hours post transfection, 1uM FK506 or DMSO (vehicle) was added to the media as needed. 36 hours post transfection, cells were treated with 1mM Ionomycin and 1mM phorbol 12,13 di-butyrate to activate calcineurin and AP-1 (via PKC) respectively. 6 hours after pathway activation, cells were collected, washed in PBS and re-suspended in DMEM media. 80% of the cells were used to measure luciferase activity and renilla using the Dual-Glo assay system (Promega) with 3 technical replicates. The remaining cells were frozen and stored at -80°C. Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer. 15-20 μg of lysate was analyzed by Western for expression of GFP. GFP signal was normalized to either actin or tubulin. Luciferase activity (normalized to renilla expression) was further normalized to eGFP expression. Data represent at least 3 experimental replicates.


Introduction
In vivo, rapid regulation of weak, transient protein-protein interactions is essential for dynamically shaping cellular responses. Nearly 40% of these interactions are mediated by 3-10 amino acid Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) interacting with protein globular domains (e.g. SH3, SH2, and PDZ domains) or enzymes (e.g. kinases and phosphatases) [1][2][3] . The human proteome is estimated to contain more than 100,000 of these SLiMs, many of which are highly regulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation 3 . Measuring and predicting binding affinities for known and as-yet-undiscovered SLiM-binding interactions is essential for predicting signal strengths within signaling networks, understanding how these networks are perturbed by human disease, and identifying new therapeutic inhibitors 4 . Calcineurin (CN) is a conserved Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent phosphatase that plays critical roles in the human immune, nervous, and cardiovascular systems, and is the target of the immunosuppressants CysA and FK506. Although CN likely dephosphorylates hundreds of downstream targets, only ~50 are known to date 5 . These known substrates include the NFAT family of transcription factors, whose dephosphorylation by CN is required for T-cell activation and adaptive immunity. CN dephosphorylates sites with little sequence similarity, instead recognizing substrates by binding to two characterized SLiMs (PxIxIT and LxVP) located at variable distances from the phosphosite 6 . Blocking SLiM binding to CN prevents dephosphorylation, as exemplified by the viral inhibitor A238L, which contains both a PxIxIT and LxVP, but does not interact with the enzyme active site. PxIxIT peptides bind with low affinity (K d s of ~1-250 µM) to a conserved groove on the CN catalytic subunit (CN A) that is unaffected by the enzyme active state; consequently, expression of PVIVIT, a PxIxIT peptide selected in vitro for high affinity, sequesters CN and prevents it from dephosphorylating multiple substrates 7 . Furthermore, the underlying PxIxIT sequence drives CN-substrate affinity and determines biological output (e.g. the Ca 2+ concentration-dependence of substrate dephosphorylation) 8,9 . By contrast, LxVP peptides bind to a hydrophobic groove formed by the CN A and B subunits that is accessible only after Ca 2+ /calmodulin binding activates the enzyme and releases an autoinhibitory peptide (AIS) from this site 10 . Engagement of the LxVP binding site is required for dephosphorylation and is thought to orient the phosphorylated residue toward the catalytic center 11 . In combination with an immunophilin, FK506 and CysA binds to this LxVP-binding site, thus inhibiting CN by blocking its interaction with NFAT and other substrates 8,11,12 . Unfortunately, inhibition of the ubiquitous CN in non-immune tissues often leads to kidney failure, diabetes, pain, or seizures 13 , presumably due to interaction with as-yet-unidentified substrates. An enhanced mechanistic understanding of CN PxIxIT binding could both aid in substrate identification to elucidate the etiologies of these adverse effects and enable rational design of novel CN inhibitors with enhanced specificity.
Unfortunately, the low affinities of SLiM-mediated interactions (K d values of ~1 to 250 µM) and the widespread prevalence of PTMs within them render SLiMs difficult to characterize experimentally. High-throughput approaches such as affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) and yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays fail to capture these weak interactions, with only ~1% of Y2H associations relying on SLiMs 2 . Proteome peptide phage display (Pro-PD), which presents peptides from all disordered proteome regions, is sensitive enough to detect low affinity interactions; however, this technique does not provide binding affinities, and identified peptides do not include PTMs, are biased towards the strongest binders, and include many false positives, requiring downstream validation of hundreds to thousands of candidate peptide 'hits' 14 . In addition, a failure to observe a given peptide sequence in the bound population could result from a true lack of binding or simply poor expression or display. Parallel chemical synthesis approaches (e.g. SPOT arrays) allow testing of peptides including PTMs, but cannot provide quantitative information about affinities, require large amounts of purified protein, and lack in-line quality controls to ensure that the correct peptides were synthesized at each spot 15 .
Here, we present a novel technology for quantitatively profiling SLiM-mediated protein-peptide interactions in high-throughput using very small amounts of material. Peptides are synthesized directly on spectrally encoded beads (MRBLEs, for Microspheres with Ratiometric Barcode Lanthanide Encoding) 16,17 with a unique linkage between each peptide sequence and a given spectral code. MRBLE-pep libraries can then be pooled and assayed for protein binding in a single small volume before being imaged to identify the peptide sequence associated with each bead and quantify the amount of protein bound. On-MRBLE chemical synthesis allows for precise control of peptide density, incorporation of PTMs at known locations, and in-line assessment of peptide quality via mass spectrometry to identify amino acids that ablate and promote protein binding with equal confidence.
We combine MRBLE-pep assays with structure-based computational modeling to systematically and quantitatively characterize the CN PxIxIT binding specificity landscape. By mutating residues at each position within and flanking three previously-characterized PxIxIT sequences and quantifying their effects on affinity, we find that flanking amino acids play surprisingly critical and previously unappreciated roles in determining interaction strengths. Through iterative cycles of mutagenesis, in vitro analysis, and in vivo validation, we identify several PxIxIT peptides of unprecedented binding affinity, providing novel candidate scaffolds for the development of potent CN inhibitors. We also establish this approach can be applied in the future to map binding energy landscapes, model signaling networks, and identify novel inhibitors for a broad range of protein-SLiM interactions.

MRBLE-pep experimental assay overview
We developed a new high-throughput protein-peptide interaction assay based on spectrally encoded hydrogel beads containing unique ratios of lanthanide nanophosphors (MRBLEs) 16,17 . MRBLEs containing a given code are output to a particular filtered-tip in a 96-well format or two 48-2mL reaction tubes (Fig. 1A), which is then transferred to a peptide synthesizer for functionalization and solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), thereby uniquely linking peptide sequences with spectral codes (Fig. 1A) [18][19][20][21][22] . Following SPPS, MRBLE-bound peptide libraries are pooled, incubated with an epitope-tagged protein of interest and a fluorescently-labeled antibody, washed, and imaged to reveal the peptide sequence associated with each bead (by quantifying lanthanide emissions) and the amount of protein bound (by quantifying fluorescence) (Figs. 1B,C). Unlike commercially available spectrally encoded beads (e.g. Luminex), spectral codes can be 'read' using a single UV excitation source, preserving the ability to multiplex binding measurements using up to 3 detection antibodies 23 .
Integrated synthesis quality control ensures production of full-length, correct peptide sequences Computational prediction of novel substrates in vivo can be improved by including information about residues that ablate binding. However, experimentally identifying disfavored residues requires confidence that observed nonbinding results from a true absence of interaction and not a failure to synthesize the correct peptide. To facilitate in-line quality assessment, MRBLEs were first functionalized with an acid-labile rink amide linker within the bead core and a non-labile glycine linker on the outer bead shell (Fig. S1) 24 ; varying the ratio of extendible to nonextendible glycine linkers in the bead shell allows tuning of displayed peptide density 19,25 . Next, peptides were synthesized on both linkers via standard Fmoc SPPS. Peptides coupled to the MRBLE core via the acid-labile linker were eluted during the final acid global deprotection step and can be verified via MALDI mass spectrometry (Figs. S1, S2a-d). As peptides within the core are inaccessible to large proteins, elution allows sequence verification without reducing binding signal in downstream binding assays. Measured MRBLE lanthanide ratios before, during, and after SPPS remained constant, (Fig. S3), establishing that embedded codes are unchanged by chemical exposures.
Measuring binding affinities from a single pooled assay requires reliable estimates of the effective concentration of each peptide, which could be skewed by sequence-dependent differences in SPPS efficiency. To detect any large differences, a portion of each MRBLE-pep library was biotinylated, incubated with labeled streptavidin (DyLight650-SA), washed, and imaged to quantify bound streptavidin. Bound DyLight650-SA intensities were relatively consistent between sequences (Fig. S4) and saturated at ~20 nM DyLight650-SA for ~7100 beads in a 100 µL reaction volume (Fig. S5), establishing a surface density of ~2 x 10 8 peptide molecules per MRBLE.

MRBLE-pep yields quantitative measurements of calcineurin binding affinities
Measuring CN-PxIxIT binding affinities represents a demanding test for a new protein-peptide interaction assay, as CN binds PxIxIT peptide with weak affinities ( Fig. 2A) via surface interactions (Fig. 2B). To determine MRBLE-pep assay sensitivity, we performed a pooled assay in which MRBLEs bearing 10 peptides (each synthesized on 3 spectral codes) were incubated with varying concentrations of His-tagged CN complexed with fluorescently-labeled anti-His antibody. These 10 peptides ('triplicate low') included the known NFATc1, NFATc2, AKAP79, and RCAN1 natural CN-interacting PxIxIT binding sites ( Fig. 2A, Table S2) 11,12,26,27 , a set of 5 PVIVIT peptide mutants previously characterized via competitive fluorescence polarization assays 7,26 , and a scrambled negative control sequence. Consistent with previous observations, the high-affinity PVIVIT and PVIVVT variants showed strong binding, a scrambled peptide showed no binding, and the PVIAVT and PVIVIN variants showed low to intermediate binding ( Fig 2C), with consistent results for the same peptide sequence synthesized on MRBLEs with different codes. NFATc2 and AKAP79 showed measurable binding and were therefore selected for further systematic mutagenesis. Although MALDI mass spectrometry confirmed successful synthesis of both RCAN1 and NFATc1 full-length peptides, binding was near the limit of detection in this assay ( Fig 2C).
Examination of known CN PxIxIT motifs (NFATc1, NFATc2) and a viral inhibitor (A238L) suggested a potential preference for positively charged (R, K) or hydroxyl (S) residues in the degenerate PxIxIT position 2 ( Fig. 2A). To evaluate assay reproducibility and whether these substitutions enhance binding, we performed an additional experiment measuring binding to these same 10 peptides plus an additional 3 PVIVIT variants (PSIVIT, PRIVIT, PKIVIT) ('triplicate high') (Figs. 2E, Table S3). These data reproduce previously observed trends and additionally suggest that the PKIVIT peptide binds slightly more strongly than PVIVIT; therefore, we also selected PKIVIT for additional systematic mutagenesis.
To determine binding affinities for each peptide, we globally fit all data from a given assay to a single-site binding model with the assumption that while individual K d values may differ between peptides, the stoichiometry of binding remains constant (see Methods). Although these measurements take place out of equilibrium due to the need to wash beads prior to imaging, measured on-and off-rates for CN-MRBLE interactions are slow (Figs. S6, S7), suggesting that measured intensities approximate equilibrium values to yield apparent dissociation constants (Figs. S8). Slow on-and off-rates have previously been observed for hydrogel particles and are known to scale with particle radius, as proteins initially encounter and bind bead-bound ligands and then slowly diffuse into the particle via iterative dissociation and rebinding events 28 . Resultant apparent K d s largely agree with previously published values ( Fig. 2D; Tables S1-3) and establish that MRBLE-pep can resolve differences in weak affinities spanning from ~0.20 to ~50 µM (a dynamic range > 2 orders of magnitude, comparable to SPR and FP 29 ). However, MRBLE-pep apparent K d s slightly underestimate affinities relative to published values while preserving rank order and relative differences; therefore, we provide relative affinity differences (ΔΔG) in all subsequent analyses, which are unaffected by this shift.
Using structure-based modeling to predict energetic effects of potential substitutions To identify and prioritize substitutions most likely to return useful information about CN specificity, we leveraged high-resolution co-crystal structures and recently-developed computational modeling techniques 30,31 to estimate the effects of each mutation. Co-crystal structures of CN bound to PVIVIT 26 (PDB: 2P6B) and AKAP79 32 (PDB: 3LL8) reveal that the conserved P1, I3, and I5 residues are buried in hydrophobic pockets on the CN surface in all three structures; for AKAP79, an I1 residue occupies the pocket typically occupied by a P1 residue. In both structures, the less-conserved solvent-exposed (positions 2 and 4) and flanking (positions -1 and 7-9) residues adopt variable side chain orientations.
We used two computational methods implemented in the protein structure prediction and design program Rosetta, the Backrub "Sequence Tolerance" protocol 30 and a more recent "flex_ddG" method 31 . The Sequence Tolerance protocol samples rotamers of different amino acid residues at each position and returns the frequencies of amino acid residue types observed at each position in low energy sequences, thereby providing a qualitative estimate of effects of substitutions on binding. As expected, known invariant residues (P1 and I3) appeared most frequently at their respective positions; the I5 and T6 positions also tolerated I5V and T6E substitutions, respectively ( Fig. 3B. These calculations additionally suggested that mutations at the variable position 2 should have little effect, but that substitution of a charged residue (E) at positions 8 and 9 could improve binding.
While the Sequence Tolerance protocol returns ranked preferences for amino acids, it does not quantitatively predict the energetic effect of individual substitutions. To address this issue, we used the Rosetta "flex_ddG" protocol 31 that uses protein conformational ensembles to estimate effects of mutations on binding free energies (ΔΔG = ΔG %&' − ΔG )' ). We predicted these effects for CN-PxIxIT complexes containing systematic mutations at each position (Figs. 3D, Supplementary Files). Consistent with the results of the Sequence Tolerance protocol and initial experimental results, substitutions at positions P1, I3, and I5 were generally predicted to be destabilizing (Figs. 3C,D), while changes to the solvent-exposed, degenerate x2 and x4 positions were predicted to have minimal effects (Figs. 3C,D). Intriguingly, mutations within upstream and downstream flanking residues were frequently predicted to enhance binding. Mutations to more hydrophobic or aromatic residues (W,F,Y,I,V) in the -1 position for the PVIVIT motif (

High-throughput MRBLE-pep mapping of the CN-PxIxIT binding energy landscape
Using these computational predictions as a guide, we experimentally mapped the CN-PxIxIT binding energy landscape by measuring CN binding to two MRBLE-pep libraries for each of the PVIVIT, PKIVIT, NFATc2, and AKAP79 sequences containing systematic mutations in either the "core" (positions 1-6) or "flanking" PxIxIT residues (positions -1 and 7-9) (~368 peptides total) (Figs. 4A, S9-S16, Tables S12-19). The optimal number of peptides to screen per assay depends on the competing effects of ligand depletion and competition, the fraction of peptides expected to bind, the range of interaction strengths, and the statistical robustness of each measurement 33 . To reduce error and maximize the ability to resolve subtle differences, we profiled 48 peptides per reaction, with ~100 beads per sequence in each assay. To ensure that measured binding resulted from a true CN-PxIxIT interaction and not nonspecific binding, we repeated all experiments at a single, high concentration (250 nM) using a CN N330A/I1331A/R332A mutant defective in PxIxIT binding (CN NIR) 34 and labeled antibody alone (Figs. S17-20, Tables S20-27). Several peptides were strongly bound by anti-His antibody but did not show binding when the antibody was pre-incubated with His-tagged CN; peptides strongly bound by the CN NIR mutant (e.g. PRIRIT) were removed from downstream analysis. All PVIVIT, PKIVIT, and NFATc2 libraries and the AKAP79 "core" mutation library were fit by a single-site binding model, permitting direct measurement of ΔΔG for each substitution. As measured intensities for the AKAP79 "flank" mutation library never reached saturation, MRBLE-pep measurements provide only qualitative estimates of effects on affinity.
To visualize the binding affinity landscape of CN-PxIxIT interactions, we generated graphs showing the relative change in affinity upon substitution to each mutant amino acid at each position (Figs. 4B, S21-29); information at all positions can be combined to produce a heat map of relative changes in binding energies (ΔΔG) (Fig. 4C) or scaled logos (Fig. S30). Consistent with computational predictions, the conserved P1, I3, and I5 residues in the core tolerate few substitutions, with nearly all mutations leading to a dramatic loss in affinity. The sole exception to this rule is the previously identified I5V mutation in both the PVIVIT and PKIVIT libraries that bound with an affinity similar to WT (Figs. 4C, S21-24) 26 . In contrast with computational predictions, substitutions at the variable x2 and x4 solvent-exposed positions strongly influenced affinity in a context-dependent manner. In particular, V2R and V2K mutations in the PVIVIT scaffold significantly enhanced binding, consistent with previous observations of highaffinity CN binding to the viral inhibitor containing a positively-charged residue at this position (PKIIIT) 11 .
Flanking residues play a major role in defining binding affinity and specificity Although Rosetta modeling predicted that changes to PxIxIT 'flanking' residues (positions -1 and 7-9) would affect interaction affinities, the experimental impact of sequences flanking the core 'PxIxIT' residues on CN binding has never been probed systematically. At the -1 position, MRBLE-pep data revealed a clear CN preference for hydrophobic residues (V,L,I) and a weak preference for polar residues (T, Y, H, N, and R) for all three of the PVIVIT, PKIVIT, and NFATc2 scaffolds. By contrast, substitution to acidic (D, E) residues at this position strongly reduced binding (Figs. 4C, S9-16, S21-29). At position 9, the majority of mutations in the PVIVIT scaffold increased affinity. Substitution of phosphomimetic residues (D, E) or unphosphorylated serine increased affinity slightly and not at all, respectively, but substitution of phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues (X, Z) increased affinity nearly 50fold (from K d = 170 +/-40 nM to K d = 3.4 +/-0.2 nM) (Figs. 4C-D, S10). This effect was specific to the PVIVIT sequence, with significantly less drastic increases and decreases in affinity observed for the same substitutions in the NFATc2 and AKAP79 scaffolds, respectively (Fig. S14, S16, S31). These MRBLE-pep data establish that flanking residues make major contributions to affinity and the PxIxIT SLiM is significantly longer than previously thought.

Effects of individual substitutions show evidence of non-additivity
Understanding the degree to which CN-SLiM binding specificity can be explained by a linear additive model is critical for estimating the likely accuracy of downstream efforts to identify substrates or design therapeutics. Deviations from additivity can be quantified via double-mutant cycle (DMC) analysis, in which the effects of individual mutations are measured alone and in combination and then compared. DMC analysis between the PVIVIT and PKIVIT scaffolds revealed that the I3Y substitution resulted in a significant loss of affinity within the PVIVIT context but had only minor effects on PKIVIT binding; by contrast, V4F and V4I mutations of this solventexposed position significantly increased binding only within the PKIVIT sequence (Fig. 4E). This last substitution suggests that the high affinity of the PKIIIT sequence in the A238L inhibitor in particular relies on cooperativity between the position 2 and 3 residues.
Computational methods have limited predictive power for solvent-exposed and flexible residues To determine the degree to which Rosetta modeling successfully predicts observed binding, we generated scatter plots showing relationships between measured affinities and predicted frequencies or changes in free energy of binding (ΔΔG), respectively, for each residue at each position (Figs. 5A, S32-33). Both the Sequence Tolerance and the flex_ddG methods correctly predicted that I3 and I5 mutations decrease affinity, and Rosetta correctly predicted that substitution to a hydrophobic I or aromatic Y residue at the -1 position would improve binding while substitution to the acidic residue E would reduce binding. However, computational modeling predicted that variations at solvent-exposed positions (V2 and V4) would have little effect on affinity, in direct contrast to experimental observations (Figs. 5A, right panels, S32-33). These results highlight the difficulties associated with modeling binding contributions for substitutions at solvent-exposed as well as flanking positions (shown in S32-S33), where effects on conformations in the bound and unbound state ensembles are unlikely to be correctly modeled.
To derive a quantitative metric for the overall predictive power of Rosetta modeling, we employed receiveroperator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. For the predictions of the Sequence Tolerance protocol, PVIVIT variants were classified as 'bound' or 'unbound' according to whether experimentally measured K d s were 4-fold lower than the K d measured for a 'scrambled' peptide sequence; for the flex_ddG predictions, mutations were classified according to whether they enhanced or decreased binding relative to wild-type, yielding negative or positive ΔΔG values (Fig. 5B, C). In both cases, in silico predictions based on actual paired measurements modestly outperformed predictions based on shuffled data, with area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.6 and 0.7.

Absolute binding affinities confirm that mutations to flanking residues dramatically change affinities
To determine absolute affinities for peptides spanning a range of binding behaviors, we performed 2 experiments measuring concentration-dependent CN binding to an additional 'calibration' library containing ~6 peptides from each core and flank library (Figs. S34-S35, Tables S4-S5). These experiments represented full technical replicates in which peptides were synthesized de novo on MRBLEs produced at different times and assayed for binding using different batches of purified calcineurin. Measured ΔΔG values relative to the PVIVIT variant between experiments showed strong agreement (Pearson r 2 = 0.72 (Fig. S36)), demonstrating the robustness of the assay (Fig. S37). Averaged absolute affinities estimated for all variants using these ΔΔG values and the known literature K d for PVIVIT confirm that hydrophobic residues at position -1 and phosphorylated residues at position 9 significantly increase affinity by 10-fold and 100-fold, respectively ( Fig. S37-S39).

Validation of in vitro results using in vivo calcineurin activity assays
The ultimate goal of mapping CN-SLiM binding energy landscapes is to improve understanding of CN target substrate recognition and enable rational design of in vivo inhibitors. To test the degree to which in vitro MRBLEpep affinities predict in vivo inhibition, we used a previously developed dual luciferase reporter assay to assess the activity of the NFAT2 transcription factor in HEK293T cells (Fig. 6A) 11 . NFAT2 must be dephosphorylated by CN to accumulate in the nucleus, where it activates transcription of its target genes, and this interaction can be inhibited by peptides or small molecules that binds to CN. Reduction of NFAT2-dependent transcriptional activity upon expression of a competing PxIxIT peptide therefore reflects, quantitatively, the affinity of the inhibitor peptide for CN. Candidate PxIxIT inhibitors were co-expressed as GFP-fusion proteins within cells to enhance their stability and facilitate direct measurement of inhibitor concentrations.
We compared levels of NFAT-driven luciferase activity in the presence of empty vector, vectors driving expression of the 4 PxIxIT peptide scaffolds probed extensively in vitro (PVIVIT, PKIVIT, NFATc2, and AKAP79), or FK506, a small-molecule inhibitor of CN with a previously measured IC 50 of ~0.5 nM (Fig. 6B) 35 . All 4 PxIxIT peptides substantially inhibited NFAT-driven luciferase activity, confirming competitive inhibition of CN-NFAT-(PxIxIT) binding in vivo. Consistent with MRBLE-pep measurements, PKIVIT was the most effective inhibitor, followed closely by PVIVIT. NFATc2 and AKAP79 showed weaker in vivo inhibition, consistent with MRBLE-pep results and in contrast with prior work suggesting that AKAP79 binds with equal affinity to PVIVIT (K d ~500 nM) 32 . Co-expression of the PKIVIT peptide resulted in greater inhibition than FK506, which interferes with CN-substrate interactions by occluding the LxVP-SLiM binding site 36 and is a potent CN inhibitor.
We next examined the importance of PxIxIT flanking residues by creating substitutions in the -1 and 9 positions (Fig.  6C,D). Consistent with in silico predictions and MRBLE-pep affinities, substitution of a hydrophobic residue (IPKIVIT or LPRIEIT) at the -1 position significantly increased inhibition, whereas incorporating an acidic residue (EPKIVIT or DPRIEIT) greatly diminished inhibition. As predicted computationally and observed in the MRBLE-pep assays, introduction of the phosphomimetic mutation H9D resulted in slightly increased inhibition; it was not possible to directly test the extremely high affinity phosphoserine or phosphothreonine in vivo. Taken together, in silico modeling, the MRBLE-pep affinities, and in vivo results suggest that phosphorylation at position 9 may be a key determinant of modulating PxIxIT-CN affinity.
Finally, we sought to test whether MRBLE-pep in vitro affinity measurements could identify initial peptide scaffolds exhibiting strong inhibition in vivo for future optimization as peptide or small-molecule inhibitors. PKIVIT was a significantly stronger in vivo inhibitor than the previously patented PVIVIT peptide 37 , with activity comparable to the PKIIIT site within the known A238L inhibitor. As predicted, both the IPKIVITGPH and HPKIVITGPD variants exhibited even stronger binding and inhibition (Fig. 6D); similarly, mutating the I1 and A2 residues in the AKAP79 PIAIIIT motif to create a novel PxIxIT sites with adjacent prolines and a positively charged residue in the second position (PPKIIIT) greatly enhanced inhibition. Overall, MRBLE-pep in vitro measurements were strongly predictive of in vivo inhibition (Fig. 6E) Identification of high-affinity scaffolds with therapeutic potential Although cyclosporin A and FK506 are routinely prescribed to transplant patients to inhibit CN-dependent immune response activation, both drugs are associated with adverse effects that likely result from inhibition of CN-substrate dephosphorylation in non-immune tissues. High-affinity peptides that inhibit a particular subset of CN-SLiM interactions could therefore serve as initial scaffolds for medicinal chemistry efforts to identify inhibitors with improved specificity. To identify candidate with high-affinity variants, we measured CN binding to a final MRBLEpep library containing the set of 36 'calibration' peptides along with 11 peptides containing combinations of mutations previously shown to increase affinity (Figs. S38-S39). Measured ΔΔGs for these full technical replicates again showed remarkable agreement (r 2 = 0.83) (Fig. S40). PVIVIT variants combining a phosphothreonine (Z) at position 9 with hydrophobic residues (I, V) at position -1 showed the strongest binding, with measured K d values of ~ 10 nM (50x stronger than the measured PVIVIT affinity), and multiple PVIVIT, PKIVIT, and AKAP79 variants also showed enhanced binding (Figs. 6E, S39). Together, these in vitro and in vivo measurements demonstrate that systematic determination of CN-SliM binding yields peptides with a continuous range of affinities for testing in therapeutic applications.

Discussion
Here, we demonstrate a novel strategy to quantitatively profile the binding specificity landscape for a peptideprotein interaction, thereby generating key insights required to map, model and therapeutically perturb essential signaling networks in healthy and diseased cells. Compared to existing technologies, our approach has several advantages. Although yeast and phage display can powerfully discriminate between 'bound' and 'unbound' peptide populations 38,39 for > 10 8 protein-peptide interactions, these high-throughput screening methods cannot quantitatively measure affinities and are unable to probe the effects of PTMs or unnatural amino acids with therapeutic potential. The MRBLE-pep assay is also faster and requires less in material than alternative methods: measuring interaction affinities for 384 peptides using MRBLE-pep requires ~400x, ~700x, and ~9600x less purified protein than surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence polarization, and isothermal calorimetry, respectively, with savings increasing with library size (Table S6). This reduction in material should allow future profiling of a wide range of biologically important SLiM-binding domains, including those that are unstable and/or difficult to express recombinantly. MRBLE-pep libraries can be synthesized and imaged over the course of days, facilitating iterative rounds of synthesis and measurement for efficient landscape mapping. Finally, the results presented here highlight the limitations of existing in silico modeling methods for accurately predicting peptide-protein interactions, particularly for solvent-exposed and flexible residues. By iteratively generating and experimentally testing quantitative computational predictions of how amino acid sequence affects SLiM affinity, analyses such as these can simultaneously map a specific protein-SLiM interaction landscape and provide critical experimental data for use in revising and refining computational algorithms.
Our findings reveal biologically significant insights into CN-PxIxIT specificity and illustrate the power of systematic analyses to shed light on elusive SLiM-protein interactions. The in silico modeling, MRBLE-pep data, and in vivo validation presented here are the first to systematically capture the impact of PxIxIT flanking residues on affinity, allowing identification of several peptides whose affinity for CN is two orders of magnitude higher than that of PVIVIT that are more potent inhibitors of CN-NFAT signaling in vivo. Furthermore, we identify a collection of peptides with a continuous spectrum of affinities for CN, which may allow inhibition to be fine-tuned in vivo. Currently, doctors monitor the dosage of CN inhibitors to minimize adverse consequences of these drugs. Instead, a peptide that selectively perturbs CN binding to a subset of its targets could maximize therapeutic effects, while minimizing the disruption of CN signaling events that promote health.
In addition to identifying candidates for therapeutic manipulation of CN signaling, the demonstration that residues both upstream and downstream contribute to PxIxIT-CN affinity expands the definition of this motif. Current computational strategies attempt to identify novel CN substrates by searching for sequences within the proteome that match a consensus expression for the six core residues alone. The expanded 10-residue definition of the PxIxIT motif derived here will enhance future computational efforts to comprehensively map the calcineurin signaling . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license certified by peer review) is the author/funder. It is made available under a The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 23, 2018. . https://doi.org/10.1101/306779 doi: bioRxiv preprint network, reducing the number of both false positive and false negative substrates. In particular, MRBLE-pep provides critical Information about residues that reduce affinity (e.g. acidic residues at the -1 position reduces affinity) that is never revealed by positive screening methods and is rarely collected due to the resource-intensive nature of such analyses using established techniques. Finally, the ability to predict affinity based on SLiM sequence is an essential step toward accurate modeling of signaling dynamics in vivo, as the extent of in vivo dephosphorylation has previously been shown to depend on primary PxIxIT amino acid sequence (and the associated interaction affinity) 8 . Even subtle (~2-fold) differences in binding could have profound effects on downstream signaling under physiologic conditions given the low affinities of CN-PxIxIT interaction.
Establishing the impact of post translational modifications on SLiM-protein affinity is critical for understanding cross talk between signaling networks in vivo. Consistent with our findings that acidic residues at the -1 position decrease affinity, JNK kinase regulates CN signaling by phosphorylating a serine that immediately precedes the PxIxIT of NFAT4 40 . Similarly, our demonstration that phosphorylated residues downstream of the core PxIxIT sequence at position 9 enhance PVIVIT affinity echoes observations that phosphorylation of at threonine in this position is required for binding of CN to a PxIxIT site in C16ORF74, and for its ability to promote invasiveness of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) 41 . This positive effect on binding is context-dependent, increasing PVIVIT binding 50-fold but having little or no effect on other PxIxIT sequences, reinforcing the importance of systematic analyses for generating predictive information.
Beyond improving the ability to reconstruct downstream CN signaling networks in vivo and identifying candidate therapeutic inhibitors, these results also have direct relevance to precision medicine. Current annotations of 2RQ, 7PA, and 7PL missense mutations within the NFATc2 PxIxIT site recovered from sequenced lung and breast adenocarcinomas describe them as unlikely to have functional effects in vivo 42 . While the experiments presented here did not directly test the functional consequences of a R2Q mutation, all mutations away from the native residue at this position resulted in a dramatic loss of binding (Fig. S25), and the P7A substitution led to a nearly complete loss of binding (Figs. S13, S25-26). Thus, binding specificity maps like those obtained here could both help clinicians identify functionally significant missense mutations, and refine the computational algorithms that predict the impact of such alleles. Overall, the approaches outlined here will help decipher the language of SLiM-domain binding events, and of the cellular signaling networks they define in both healthy and diseased cells.

Methods
Reagents for peptide synthesis were purchased and used without further purification from NovaBiochem, AnaSpec (Fremont, CA), and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other solvents and chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

On-bead peptide synthesis:
Peptide synthesis was performed using a Biotage™ Syro II automated peptide synthesizer following instructions from the manufacturer (Biotage, Charlotte, NC). During coupling steps, Fmoc-protected amino acids (10 eq) were activated with HCTU (9.8 eq) and NMM (20 eq) with coupling times of 8 minutes for standard amino acids and 25 minutes for phosphorylated amino acids. Each coupling round comprised of 2 sequential coupling reactions with the addition of fresh amino acid and coupling reagents. Deprotection was performed initially with 40% 4-MP for 2 minutes and then followed with 20% 4-MP for an additional 6 minutes. MRBLEs were then washed thoroughly with 6 rounds of DMF (~0.4mL) before the next coupling step. Before global deprotection with TFA, ~50 µL from a volume of 400 µL for each code was saved for biotin conjugation (described below).
To perform the global deprotection step, MRBLEs were washed with DCM and dried under vacuum before the addition of 0.5 mL of TFA cocktail (Reagent B, TFA:phenol:ddH 2 O:triisopropylsilane, 88:5:5:2, v/m/v/v) was added to each reaction tube and reacted with shaking (15 seconds shaking and 1 minute rest) for 1.5 hours. After TFA deprotection, MRBLEs containing deprotected peptides were washed with TFA (~0.5 mL, and collected for MALDI analysis), DCM (~2 mL), neutralized with 10% DIPEA in DMF twice (~1 mL), and then finally washed with storage buffer (1 mL, 0.1% TBST with 0.02% NaN 3 ) 3 times 44 . To assess peptide quality, the TFA solution containing cleaved/unprotected peptide was transferred to 15 mL falcon tubes using the provided liquid transfer system from Biotage. Peptides were triturated with cold diethylether (~1 mL), pelleted, decanted, and repeated these steps 3 times before preparing for MALDI analysis using a general protocol described below.
After biotin conjugation, a 40 μL aliquot from a 600 μL suspension of beads was passivated with 0.1% PBST containing 5% BSA in a 150 μL PCR strip tube on a rotator overnight at ~5 °C. The beads were then washed with 0.1% PBST containing 2% BSA 3 times (~100 μL), followed by incubation with 1 μL of labeled streptavidin (final concentration = ~189 nM, Abcam, ab134241) in 0.1% PBST containing 2% BSA (99 μL) for 30 minutes on a rotator at ambient temperature. After incubation, MRBLEs were pelleted and washed with 0.1% PBST once and then imaged to obtain binding data.

MALDI quality control:
After global deprotection, supernatants collected in 15 mL Falcon tubes for each code were placed into a freezer for 1 hour; these tubes were then centrifuged (4000 g for 20 minutes at 4 °C) and decanted (repeated 3 times). Peptides were then dissolved with 60% ACN/H 2 O (20 μL, phosphopeptides were dissolved with 50% acetic acid) for MALDI analysis using THAP (250 mM in ACN) as the matrix. To prepare the MALDI plate (microScout Target MSP 96 target polished steel BC, part #8280800), 0.5 μL of sodium citrate (250 mM in H 2 O containing 0.1% TFA) was spotted on to the plate surface and allowed to dry. After drying, 1 μL of a 1:1 mixture of the peptide solution with a solution of sodium citrate:THAP (1:1) was spotted onto the plate and allowed to dry again before analysis. Data was obtained using a Bruker microflex MALDI-TOF (Billerica, MA, USA). The instrument was run on positive-ion reflector mode with a laser setting of 1,810 V and data averaged over 100 scans. Raw data was analyzed using FlexAnalysis and mMass (ver. 5.5, www.mmass.org).

Purification of calcineurin:
N-terminally, 6-His-tagged human calcineurin A isoforms (truncated at residue 400), either wild-type or containing the mutation 330 NIR 333 -AAA, were expressed in tandem with the calcineurin B subunit in E.coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Invitrogen) and cultured in LB medium containing carbenicillin (50 mg/ml) at 37°C to mid-log phase. Expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl 1-thio-b--galactosidase at 16°C for 18 hours. Cells were pelleted, washed and frozen at -80°C for at least 12 hours. Thawed cell pellets were re-suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, 1mM β-mercapto ethanol, protease inhibitors) and lysed by sonication using four 1 minute pulses at 40% output. Extracts were clarified using two rounds of centrifugation (20,000 X g, 20 min) and then bound to 1 ml of Ni-NTA beads in lysis buffer containing 5 mM imidazole. Beads were washed with lysis buffer containing 20 mM imidazole and eluted with lysis buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Purified calcineurin heterodimer were dialyzed in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM β-mercapto ethanol) and stored in 10-15% glycerol at -80°C.
To perform binding assays, the CN:αHisAb650 complex (at 2.5 μM) was serially diluted into tubes containing BSApassivated MRBLEs and CN buffer (2 μM, 1μM, 500 nM, 250 nM, 125 nM, 62.5 nM) and incubated for 5 hours on a rotator at ~5 °C. After incubation, MRBLEs were pelleted, decanted, and washed once with 0.1% PBST (100 μL). After a final round of pelleting and decanting, 20 μL of 0.1% PBST was added and the beads were transferred to a quartz microscope slide for imaging. To confirm equilibrium conditions, we measured CN:MRBLE interactions for 6 peptides after incubation times ranging from 30 minutes to 24 hours. Binding appeared to reach equilibrium after ~5 hours (Fig. S6), so all following experiments were performed after an incubation time of 5-6 hours.

Image processing (code calling):
Bead images were processed using a custom-built open-source Python software package freely available through PyPI and regularly maintained (Source-code: https://github.com/FordyceLab/MRBLEs). Briefly, MRBLE boundaries were identified from bright field images, followed by quantification of median lanthanide intensities in each channel to identify embedded MRBLE codes. CN binding was then quantified for each MRBLE by calculating the median fluorescence intensity for bound protein associated with the outer shell of the MRBLE.

Affinity modeling (competitive binding assay):
The affinity (K d ) for each peptide in a MBRLE library was determined via a two-step nonlinear regression using a single-site binding model: where I i is the measured fluorescence intensity for each peptide, K d,i is the dissociation constant for that interaction, [CN total ] is total CN concentration, and I max is a global variable representing the fluorescence intensity once MRBLE-pep beads are saturated. First, we determined the global saturation value (I max ), by globally fitting the top 80% highest-intensity MRBLE codes. Next, we globally fit the entire data set using this I max value to yield an estimated absolute affinity (K d ) for all peptides in the library. Given that the estimated peptide concentration in these assays (~20 nM/x, where x represents the number of species probed) is significantly lower than estimated K d values of these interactions, we make the approximation [CN total ]≈[CN free ]. Differences in binding affinity were calculated relative to a reference peptide using the standard equation (Eqn. To calibrate measured affinities across multiple assays, we first determined an absolute affinity for a single highaffinity reference peptide (MAGPHPVIVITGPHEE) using the mean of the "triplicate low" value ( Fig. 2C), "triplicate high" value ( Fig. S3), and value from a binding assay in which this peptide appeared alone (data not shown, K d = 980 nM). Next, we used this reference value and calculated differences in binding affinity (ΔΔG) to estimate absolute K d values for each peptide within the calibration library (Table S3- library) and measured changes in affinity relative to these peptides to estimate absolute ΔΔG values for all peptides in each of these libraries.

Rosetta-based "Sequence Tolerance" method:
For estimating tolerated amino acid substitutions at each position in the two available CN-PxIxIT co-crystal structures with well-defined electron density (positions -1 to 9 of the PxIxIT motif) we used the generalized sequence tolerance module of the Rosetta Backrub server available at https://kortemmeweb.ucsf.edu/backrub 45 . Briefly, the protocol samples amino acid residues in different rotameric conformations on backbone ensembles generated using Rosetta Backrub simulations and records low energy amino acid sequences, from which amino acid frequencies of tolerated substitutions are derived. In contrast to the published protocol, we modified only one position in the peptide at a time, to more closely mimick the experimental measurements. We used ensembles of 100 backbone structures with a kT value of 0.228; self-energies and interchain interaction energies were reweighted using the default scaling factors of 0.4 and 1, respectively.

Rosetta-based method for estimating the energetic effects of amino acid substitutions ("flex_ddG"):
To estimate changes in binding energy upon mutation (ΔΔG), we used the Rosetta flex_ddG protocol 31 . We systematically substituted all twenty natural amino acids at each position (-1:9) for the two peptides with available crystal structures bound to calcineurin (CN-PVIVIT, CN-IAIIIT), with the remaining positions restricted to the wildtype amino acid residues in each crystal structure. Briefly, the flex_ddG protocol uses the Rosetta Talaris 2014 energy function, minimization with harmonic restraints, Rosetta Backrub simulations to generate conformational ensembles, mutation and optimization of side chain conformations, and another final retrained minimization step. We followed the protocol published in 31 , except using 10,000 Backrub steps instead of the default value of 35000 steps.

In vivo calcineurin activity assay:
PxIxIT peptides were fused to eGFP in pEGFPc1 vector. HEK293T cells were transfected with pEGFPc1 clones, pNFAT-Luc and CMV-Renilla in a 6-well plate format. 18 hours post transfection, 1uM FK506 or DMSO (vehicle) was added to the media as needed. 36 hours post transfection, cells were treated with 1mM Ionomycin and 1mM phorbol 12,13 di-butyrate to activate calcineurin and AP-1 (via PKC) respectively. 6 hours after pathway activation, cells were collected, washed in PBS and re-suspended in DMEM media. 80% of the cells were used to measure luciferase activity and renilla using the Dual-Glo assay system (Promega) with 3 technical replicates. The remaining cells were frozen and stored at -80°C. Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer. 15-20 μg of lysate was analyzed by Western for expression of GFP. GFP signal was normalized to either actin or tubulin. Luciferase activity (normalized to renilla expression) was further normalized to eGFP expression. Data represent at least 3 experimental replicates.   Table S1 for affinity references          The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 23, 2018. . https://doi.org/10.1101/306779 doi: bioRxiv preprint