Metabolic interactions between dynamic bacterial subpopulations

Individual microbial species are known to occupy distinct metabolic niches within multi-species communities. However, it has remained largely unclear whether metabolic specialization can similarly occur within a clonal bacterial population. More specifically, it is not clear what functions such specialization could provide and how specialization could be coordinated dynamically. Here, we show that exponentially growing Bacillus subtilis cultures divide into distinct interacting metabolic subpopulations, including one population that produces acetate, and another population that differentially expresses metabolic genes for the production of acetoin, a pH-neutral storage molecule. These subpopulations exhibit distinct growth rates and dynamic interconversion between states. Furthermore, acetate concentration influences the relative sizes of the different subpopulations. These results show that clonal populations can use metabolic specialization to control the environment through a process of dynamic, environmentally-sensitive state-switching.


Sample-size estimation
• You should state whether an appropriate sample size was computed when the study was being designed • You should state the statistical method of sample size computation and any required assumptions • If no explicit power analysis was used, you should describe how you decided what sample (replicate) size (number) to use Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission:

Replicates
• You should report how often each experiment was performed • You should include a definition of biological versus technical replication • The data obtained should be provided and sufficient information should be provided to indicate the number of independent biological and/or technical replicates • If you encountered any outliers, you should describe how these were handled • Criteria for exclusion/inclusion of data should be clearly stated • High-throughput sequence data should be uploaded before submission, with a private link for reviewers provided (these are available from both GEO and ArrayExpress) Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: No explicit power analysis was done prior to each experiment as these experiments rely on single cell data from thousands of individual cells which vary from experiment to experiment. Our use of 600 to several thousands of single cells in these experiments amounts to confidence levels 95% with 4% or better confidence interval per each replicate (much higher for most experiments which used thousands of cells). Each experiment was performed with at least 3 biological replicates.
The methods or figure legends explain that each experiment was repeated at least three times. This refers to biological replicates. Biological replicates used a different bacterial inoculum and were grown in different (distinct) culture vessels. For microbial pad and snapshot data from figures 2 panel C and figure 4 the raw data from three separate replicates is provided in the supplementary. For figure 2

Statistical reporting
• Statistical analysis methods should be described and justified • Raw data should be presented in figures whenever informative to do so (typically when N per group is less than 10) • For each experiment, you should identify the statistical tests used, exact values of N, definitions of center, methods of multiple test correction, and dispersion and precision measures (e.g., mean, median, SD, SEM, confidence intervals; and, for the major substantive results, a measure of effect size (e.g., Pearson's r, Cohen's d) • Report exact p-values wherever possible alongside the summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals. These should be reported for all key questions and not only when the p-value is less than 0.05.
Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: (For large datasets, or papers with a very large number of statistical tests, you may upload a single table file with tests, Ns, etc., with reference to sections in the manuscript.)

Group allocation
• Indicate how samples were allocated into experimental groups (in the case of clinical studies, please specify allocation to treatment method); if randomization was used, please also state if restricted randomization was applied • Indicate if masking was used during group allocation, data collection and/or data analysis Please outline where this information can be found within the submission (e.g., sections or figure legends), or explain why this information doesn't apply to your submission: Additional data files ("source data") • We encourage you to upload relevant additional data files, such as numerical data that are represented as a graph in a figure, or as a summary table • Where provided, these should be in the most useful format, and they can be uploaded as "Source data" files linked to a main figure or table • Include model definition files including the full list of parameters used • Include code used for data analysis (e.g., R, MatLab) • Avoid stating that data files are "available upon request" Please indicate the figures or tables for which source data files have been provided: Data is reported in the figure legends, and when numbers are reported in the main text the error and appropriate designation (mean) is included. P values for expression data, is included in supplementary tables 2 and 3.
No masking or grouping was used.