Nervous systems must be both robust and adaptable to changes in internal and external conditions. Many intertidal marine crustaceans, such as the crabs and lobsters inhabiting the North Atlantic, experience large fluctuations in ocean temperature, acidity, dissolved oxygen levels, and salinity. The Jonah crab, Cancer borealis, can often be found foraging for food in intertidal zones where it experiences temperatures between 3°C and 24°C with fluctuations as great as 10°C in a single day (Donahue et al., 2009; Haefner, 1977; Stehlik et al., 1991). As pH is temperature-dependent, ocean pH fluctuations occur over the daily, monthly, and yearly experiences of long-lived crustaceans, such as C. borealis.

In several marine invertebrates including the lobster, Homarus americanus, and the crab, Carcinus maenas, hemolymph pH varies inversely with temperature following the rules of constant relative alkalinity (Dove et al., 2005; Howell et al., 1973; Qadri et al., 2007; Truchot, 1978; Truchot, 1986; Wood and Cameron, 1985). In other words, as temperature increases, hemolymph acidifies by approximately −0.016 pH/°C to maintain a constant ratio of pH to pOH through a process of bicarbonate buffering. Maintenance of this ratio in extra- and intracellular fluids is thought to be important for stabilizing macromolecular structure and function (Reeves, 1972; Reeves, 1977; Somero, 1981; Truchot, 1973). In vitro, shifts in hemolymph pH can alter the frequency and strength of the lobster cardiac rhythm (Qadri et al., 2007). Like hemolymph, intracellular pH generally decreases as temperature rises, but has been shown to change at varying rates in different tissues in the crab, Callinectes sapidus (Wood and Cameron, 1985). Active mechanisms for the maintenance of intracellular pH have been suggested in the crab, Cancer pagurus (Golowasch and Deitmer, 1993).

Both temperature and pH alter the biophysical parameters governing the activity of ion channels and pumps in excitable membranes. Under moderately acidic extracellular conditions, attenuation of sodium, calcium, and potassium currents by up to 60% has been shown in mammalian and nonmammalian systems. (Courtney, 1979; Doering and McRory, 2007; Hille, 1968; Mozhaev et al., 1970; Tombaugh and Somjen, 1996; Wanke et al., 1979; Woodhull, 1973; Zhou and Jones, 1996). The reversible effects of pH on these channels may result from protonation of an acidic group with pK_a between 5.2 and 7.1 (Tombaugh and Somjen, 1996). Decreases in glutamatergic synaptic function (Billups and Attwell, 1996; Bloch et al., 2001; Sinning et al., 2011) and increases in GABAergic synaptic function (Sinning and Hübner, 2013) in response to extracellular acidification have also been shown.

Further, respiratory control in mammals is highly pH sensitive and important for the regulation of CO₂ and O₂ levels in the blood (Richerson, 1998) as CO₂ rapidly dissolves in and acidifies physiological solutions (Nattie, 1999). Multiple pH-sensitive ion channels and pumps, including a family of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) have been discovered in mammalian cells and are hypothesized to play a role in the maintenance of blood pH (Buckler et al., 1991; Husson and Smith, 2018; Wang et al., 2018).

Although the biophysical, ethological, and environmental implications of changing pH have been well studied, less is known about the effect of pH changes on neuronal circuits in marine invertebrates. Here, we study the effects of acute changes in extracellular pH on two well characterized neuronal circuits, the stomatogastric (STG) and cardiac (CG) ganglia, of the crab, C. borealis. These central pattern generators (CPGs) drive the coordinated and rhythmic muscle movements of the crab’s stomach and heart, respectively. Although these CPGs are driven by numerically small neuronal circuits, their dynamics involve complex interactions between many intrinsic and synaptic currents.

Previous studies have shown that the pyloric rhythm of the STG and cardiac rhythm of the CG are remarkably robust to short- and long-term changes in temperature in both in vivo and ex vivo preparations (Kushinsky et al., 2018; Marder et al., 2015; Soofi et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). Despite similarly robust activity under moderate perturbation, these experiments have revealed animal-to-animal variability in network activity at extreme temperatures (Haddad and Marder, 2018; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). Given the relative insensitivity of the STG to moderate shifts in pH (Golowasch and Deitmer, 1993), we sought to probe the robustness and variability of these circuits to extreme pH perturbation. To provide insight into the animal-to-animal variability in response to this extreme perturbation, we challenged these preparations with saline whose pH was outside the range expected in the normal ocean environment. Both the pyloric and cardiac rhythms are remarkably robust to acute pH changes within the range tested. This is surprising given the sensitivity of many ion channels to pH in these ranges and suggests that networks can be more robust to pH changes than expected.

Two neuronal networks were studied in this paper. The stomatogastric ganglion (STG) of the crab, Cancer borealis, contains the neurons that generate two stomach rhythms, the fast pyloric rhythm and the slower gastric mill rhythm. The pyloric rhythm is driven by a three-neuron pacemaker kernel – one Anterior Burster (AB) and two Pyloric Dilator (PD) neurons. The Lateral Pyloric (LP) and Pyloric (PY) neurons fire out of phase with the PD neurons because they are rhythmically inhibited by the PD/AB group (Marder and Bucher, 2007). The cardiac ganglion (CG) generates the rhythm responsible for heart contraction, and consists of four pacemaker Small Cell (SC) neurons that drive five motor Large Cell (LC) neurons (Cooke, 2002).

A schematic diagram of the stomatogastric nervous system preparation is found in Figure 1A. Intracellular recordings were made from the somata of the desheathed STG and examples of the LP and PD neuron waveforms are shown. Extracellular recordings from the motor nerves are indicated. An example of the triphasic activity of the LP, PD, and PY neurons is seen in the inset trace next to the lateral ventricular nerve (lvn). The connectivity diagram of the major neuron classes of the triphasic pyloric rhythm is given in Figure 1B.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

A schematic diagram of the crab cardiac ganglion preparation shows an example of one burst of SC and LC activity recorded from the trunk (Figure 1C). Figure 1D shows the connectivity diagram of the cardiac ganglion.

The pyloric rhythm is surprisingly robust to extreme changes in pH

To characterize the response of the pyloric rhythm to acute changes in pH, superfused saline was exchanged every 15 min in steps of approximately pH 0.5 from a control pH of 7.8 to an extreme pH of either 5.5 or 10.4. Following the first acid or base step protocol, preparations were allowed to recover for a minimum of 30 min at control pH until the frequency of the pyloric rhythm approached that of controls. Preparations were then subjected to a step protocol in the opposite direction followed by a second recovery period. Acid- or base-first protocols were counterbalanced.

Recordings and analysis from an example STG experiment with an acid-first protocol are shown in Figure 2. Each box contains simultaneous intracellular recordings of the PD and LP neurons and extracellular recordings of the lvn during the last minute at each pH step (Figure 2A). STG #1 demonstrated a normal triphasic rhythm in control saline at pH 7.8 (Figure 2A; top left). As the preparation was subjected to more acidic saline, the rhythm remained triphasic until the most acidic pH, 5.5. Control activity was recovered when the preparation was once again placed in control saline (Figure 2A; top right). The bottom row shows the same preparation in basic conditions where it remained triphasic, although with fewer spikes per burst and lower amplitude slow waves at pH 10.4. Again, the preparation recovered a canonical triphasic rhythm in control saline as seen in the bottom right.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel B, C, and D of Figure 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.004

Download elife-41877-fig2-data1-v2.zip

Measures of the pyloric rhythm burst frequency, PD spikes per burst, and PD duty cycle (the fraction of the pyloric rhythm’s period during which the PD neurons were active) were calculated for the last 8 min of each 15 min pH step. Violin plots reveal the distribution of these measures for STG #1 at each pH (Figure 2B–D). The pyloric burst frequency of STG #1 increased in acid and decreased in base (Figure 2B). The number of PD spikes per burst decreased at pH 5.5 (Figure 2C). The duty cycle of the PD neurons in STG #1 decreased slightly in base (Figure 2D).

While many preparations maintained surprisingly robust pyloric rhythms from pH 5.5 to 10.4, others exhibited disrupted patterns of activity at the most extreme pH conditions. The activity of two additional STG preparations across the range of pH tested is shown in Figure 3A. Both preparations displayed robust activity across a nearly 125-fold range of hydrogen ion concentration but became weakly active or silent at pH 5.5. At pH 10.4, STG #2 was slow and weakly triphasic while STG #3 retained a strong triphasic rhythm. These examples highlight both the animal-to-animal variability of the pyloric rhythm at control conditions and the variable effects of extreme acidosis or alkylosis on this network.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel C, D, E, and F of Figure 3 and and panel A, B, and C of Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.008

Download elife-41877-fig3-data1-v2.zip

To characterize these effects across all preparations, we defined five states of activity: (1) ‘normal triphasic’ rhythm containing PD, LP, and PY with a minimum of three spikes per burst for each unit; (2) ‘weak triphasic’ rhythm retaining all three units with some units spiking only once or twice per cycle; (3) ‘intermittent triphasic’ rhythm describing rhythmic activity with only some units active; (4) ‘all silent’; and (5) ‘atypical activity’ or activity that could not be categorized under the first four definitions (Figure 3B). Preparations were categorized systematically according to the criteria outlined in Materials and methods. The mean fraction of time that all preparations spent in these five states during the last 8 min of each pH step was analyzed (Figure 3C).

Rhythms rarely transitioned intermittently between two states. For example, once a pyloric rhythm had transitioned from normal triphasic to weak triphasic, it rarely transitioned back to normal triphasic until after recovery in control pH. Further, rhythms generally transitioned in a stereotypical pattern. The pyloric rhythm often transitioned from normal triphasic to weak triphasic to intermittent triphasic to all silent. During recovery, this transition pattern was reversed. Both acid and base significantly decreased the fraction of time that preparations were rhythmic, a combined metric of states 1 (normal triphasic) and 2 (weak triphasic) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Preparations were significantly less triphasically rhythmic at pH 5.5 and pH 10.4 compared to control pH 7.8.

To describe these effects quantitatively, measures of the pyloric rhythm frequency, the number of PD spikes per burst, and PD duty cycle were calculated. Violin plots give pooled distributions for each pH across all preparations (Figure 3D–F). Mean pyloric burst frequency was relatively invariant across pH values in the presence of acid, but varied significantly across base steps (Figure 3D). Pyloric burst frequency at pH 9.3 and 10.4 was significantly slower than that at control. Both acid and base significantly affected the mean number of PD spikes per burst (Figure 3E). The number of spikes per burst was significantly reduced at pH 5.5. Additionally, there was a significant effect of acid and base on the mean PD duty cycle (Figure 3F). Paired samples t-tests revealed a slight increase in mean PD duty cycle from control pH 7.8 to pH 6.1.

The pooled distributions for these three measures were highly variable for all pH conditions reflecting the animal-to-animal variability in the pyloric rhythm. We plotted the distributions for all 15 STG preparations at control pH 7.8 and found similarly variable activity at baseline conditions (Figure 3—figure supplement 2).

Semi-isolated pyloric neurons are sensitive to extreme pH

To determine how the intrinsic properties of neurons respond to pH, we analyzed several characteristics of the intracellular recordings from the PD and LP neurons (Figure 4). We isolated the neurons from most of their pyloric network synaptic inputs by blocking the glutamatergic inhibitory synapses with 10⁻⁵ M picrotoxin (PTX) (Marder and Eisen, 1984) (Figure 1B). We analyzed mean resting membrane potential (mV), spike amplitude (mV), and burst or spiking frequencies (Hz) for both cells in the presence of PTX as a function of pH. The waveforms of the PD and LP neurons from an example preparation are shown prior to PTX superfusion (Figure 4A; leftmost traces). Note the large LP-evoked inhibitory post-synaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the trough of the PD neuron waveform and the large amplitude inhibition of the LP caused by activity of the PD, AB, and PY neurons. Following application of PTX at control pH 7.8 (Figure 4A; center traces), the PD neuron was still bursting but the LP-evoked IPSPs were entirely blocked. Most of the inhibitory inputs to the LP neuron were blocked, leaving only the cholinergic inhibition contributed by the PD neurons. At pH 6.7, the PD neuron of this preparation lost most of its slow wave activity. It then became silent and depolarized in pH 5.5 saline. At pH 8.8, the PD burst was largely intact, and at pH 10.4, the neuron showed single spike bursts. The LP neuron fired tonically from pH 6.7 to 10.4, again showing loss of activity at pH 5.5 similar to PD.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel B, C, D, E, F, and G of Figure 4.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.011

Download elife-41877-fig4-data1-v2.zip

Violin plots show pooled values for the most hyperpolarized levels (minimum voltages) of the membrane potential for PD and LP neurons (Figure 4B,C). For moderate shifts in pH, the membrane potential was fairly stable. At extreme acid, the mean PD neuron membrane potential depolarized significantly, while the mean LP neuron membrane potential remained relatively constant (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). In contrast, the PD neuron’s membrane potential in basic saline was relatively constant, even at extreme base, but the LP neuron’s membrane potential significantly hyperpolarized. The depolarization of PD at pH 5.5 and 6.1 and the hyperpolarization of LP at pH 8.8, 9.3, 9.8, and 10.4 were significantly different from control saline.

Additionally, there was a slight effect of pH on mean spike amplitude at the most extreme pH conditions for both the LP and PD neurons (Figure 4D,E). Acid significantly affected both PD and LP neuron spike amplitude while alkylosis had an effect on LP, but not PD neurons (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). At pH 5.5, spike amplitude was significantly attenuated for both LP and PD. Additionally, LP spike amplitude was significantly decreased at pH 6.1 while PD was only moderately affected.

There was a significant effect of both acidic and basic saline on mean PD burst frequency and LP firing rate (Figure 4F,G; Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Mean PD burst frequency was significantly decreased at pH 5.5. The LP firing rate was significantly reduced in pH 5.5, 6.1, 8.3, 9.3, 9.8, and 10.4 compared to control pH 7.8.

Rhythmic gastric-like activity was elicited upon exposure to and recovery from extreme acid and base

The STG contains a second slower central pattern generating circuit known as the gastric mill rhythm (Marder and Bucher, 2007). Unlike the pyloric rhythm which contains a pacemaker kernel, the gastric rhythm is controlled by the reciprocal alternation of activity driven by descending neuromodulatory inputs (Marder and Bucher, 2007; Nusbaum et al., 2017). The principal neurons involved in the gastric mill rhythm are the Lateral Gastric (LG), Medial Gastric (MG), Lateral Posterior Gastric (LPG), Gastric Mill (GM), Dorsal Gastric (DG), and Interneuron 1 (Int1) neurons (Mulloney and Selverston, 1974a; Mulloney and Selverston, 1974b).

The gastric mill rhythm is often silent in dissected STG preparations and requires stimulation of descending and/or sensory neurons to elicit activity (Blitz et al., 1999). Interestingly, in 10 of 15 preparations a gastric-like rhythm appeared at pH 8.8 or above, and 4 of 15 showed this type of activity in acid at or below pH 6.1. Further, a strong gastric-like rhythm was elicited upon recovery from extreme acid in 5 of 15 preparations and from extreme base in 7 of 15. Preparations in which gastric rhythms were seen in one of these conditions were likely to display gastric-like activity in the other conditions.

An example preparation in control pH 7.8 saline is shown as it recovers activity after exposure to pH 5.5 saline (Figure 5). Intracellular recordings from the LP and PD neurons and extracellular recordings from five nerves – lateral ventricular (lvn), medial ventricular (mvn), dorsal gastric (dgn), lateral gastric (lgn), and inferior oesophageal (ion) – are shown. In addition to axons of the LP, PD, and PY neurons, the lvn contains the LG axon. The mvn contains axons from two neurons, the Inferior Cardiac (IC) and the Ventricular Dilator (VD). Inhibition of IC and VD was coincident with LG bursting. The dgn shows GM and DG activity and the lgn contains LG activity. Recordings from the ion reveal Modulatory Commissural Neuron 1 (MCN1) activity. One period of the gastric mill rhythm can be defined by the time from the onset of one LG burst to the next.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Over the 20 min shown, there was a clear increase in both gastric and pyloric activity with the LP and PD neurons becoming rhythmic and the emergence of strong rhythmic activity of the MCN1, LG, DG, and GM neurons (Figure 5A). At the beginning of this recovery period, both the PD and LP neurons were silent, reflecting loss of activity in pH 5.5 (Figure 5B). Strong LG neuron bursts were timed with hyperpolarizations of the LP neuron. This is consistent with previous findings that the neurons driving the gastric mill rhythm synapse onto the pyloric network and that gastric mill activity correlates with slowing of the pyloric rhythm (Bucher et al., 2007). A few minutes later, the LP and PD neurons started to recover rhythmic slow waves (Figure 5C). The LP and the second PD neuron – seen here on the lvn recording – were bursting. Both neurons became silent due to a strong inhibitory input coinciding with strong LG and MCN1 activity. Shortly thereafter, the LP and PD neurons were firing rhythmically (Figure 5D). Depolarizing inhibition resulted in tonic firing of LP and no activity on the intracellular recording of PD. Finally, the LP and PD neurons were bursting (Figure 5E). Inhibitory input coincident with LG and MCN1 activity resulted in depolarization of the PD and LP neurons and an increased duty cycle of LP bursting.

The rhythmic gastric-like activity seen here is similar to gastric mill rhythms elicited upon stimulation of the Ventral Cardiac Neurons (VCNs) (Beenhakker et al., 2007; Saideman et al., 2007; White and Nusbaum, 2011). Studies have shown that stimulation of the VCNs triggers activation of MCN1 and Commissural Projection Neuron 2 (CPN2) in the commissural ganglia (CoGs). This MCN1/CPN2 gastric mill rhythm drives the alternation of activity of the protractor motor neurons – LG, GM, MG, and IC – and the retractor neurons – DG, Int1, and VD. We see similar activity here with strong MCN1 bursts on the ion corresponding to strong LG and GM bursts on the lgn and dgn, respectively, in alternation with DG bursts on the dgn.

The cardiac rhythm is robust to acute changes in pH

To characterize the response of the cardiac rhythm to pH, we bath superfused cardiac ganglion preparations with saline between pH 5.5 and pH 10.4 using the same protocol described above for stomatogastric ganglion preparations. Example extracellular recordings are shown from the cardiac ganglia of two animals during the last minute of each pH step (Figure 6A). As shown in the top row of CG #1, the ganglion started in control saline at pH 7.8 and demonstrated a normal rhythm of Small and Large Cells bursting together. As the preparation was subjected to both acidic and basic saline, the rhythm remained. In contrast, the cardiac rhythm in CG #2 became less rhythmic in pH 5.5 and in pH 9.8 and above. A normal bursting rhythm recovered after superfusion of control saline as seen in the bottom right.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Figure 6—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel B, C, and D of Figure 6.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.014

Download elife-41877-fig6-data1-v2.zip

Measures of cardiac ganglion rhythm frequency, LC spikes per burst, and LC duty cycle were calculated for CG #1. Violin plots reveal the distribution of these measures at each pH (Figure 6B–D). The cardiac frequency of CG #1 decreased in acid and increased in base (Figure 6B). Further, the number of LC spikes per burst increased in acid (Figure 6C) while the LC duty cycle for CG #1 decreased slightly in acid and base (Figure 6D). Similar to STG #1, CG #1 retained robust activity throughout the entire range of pH tested.

To characterize these effects, we defined four states of activity: (1) ‘SC and LC bursting’ rhythm containing both units with a minimum of one LC spike per SC burst; (2) ‘SC bursting only’ rhythm containing only SC bursts with no or inconsistent LC spiking; (3) ‘all silent’; and (4) ‘atypical activity’ that could not be categorized under the first three definitions (Figure 7A). The mean fraction of time that all preparations spent in these states is plotted (Figure 7B). The cardiac rhythm usually transitioned from SC and LC bursting to SC bursting only to all silent. This transition pattern was reversed during recovery. The mean fraction of time that preparations were rhythmic (state 1 – SC and LC bursting) was significantly affected by both acid and base (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Rhythmic activity was significantly decreased at pH 5.5, pH 9.3, pH 9.8, and pH 10.4 compared to control pH 7.8.

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 7—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel B, C, D, and E of Figure 7 and panel A, B, and C of Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.018

Download elife-41877-fig7-data1-v2.zip

To describe these effects quantitatively, measures of rhythm frequency, the number of LC spikes per burst, and LC duty cycle were calculated and their distributions are displayed in violin plots (Figure 7C–E). Cardiac rhythm frequency declined in both acidic and basic saline (Figure 7C; Figure 7—figure supplement 1). At pH 10.4, the cardiac rhythm was significantly slower. The mean number of LC spikes per burst was significantly affected in both acid and base (Figure 7D). The number of LC spikes per burst was significantly increased at pH 5.5 and pH 6.1 and decreased at pH 9.8 and pH 10.4. There was a significant effect of base but not acid on mean LC duty cycle (Figure 7E).

Similar to the STG, we observed a large spread in pooled measures across all pH conditions, reflecting the animal-to-animal variability in these networks. We plotted the distributions for all CG preparations at baseline and noted highly variable cardiac rhythm activity independent of the pH perturbation (Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

The cardiac and pyloric rhythms are differentially sensitive to pH

To compare the effect of pH on the cardiac and pyloric rhythms, the distributions of the fraction of time that each preparation retained a normal rhythm were compared (Figure 8A). A normal rhythm was defined as a triphasic rhythm (a combined metric of states 1 and 2) and Small Cells and Large Cells bursting together (state 1) for the pyloric and cardiac rhythms, respectively. A comparison between the rhythmicity of these two ganglia across pH reveals similar distributions with maxima around control pH 7.8 and minima at extreme pH values. Interestingly, these distributions are asymmetrical, as the CG was more sensitive to extreme base whereas the STG was more sensitive to extreme acid. There were significant main effects of pH and ganglion as well as an interaction between pH and ganglion on rhythmicity in both acidic and basic solutions (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). The pyloric rhythm was significantly less rhythmic at pH 5.5, but significantly more rhythmic at pH 9.3 and 9.8 compared to the cardiac rhythm.

Figure 8 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 8—source data 1

Numerical data represented in panel A and B of Figure 8.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41877.021

Download elife-41877-fig8-data1-v2.zip

To understand better the amount of animal-to-animal variability in these two rhythms, the activity of individual preparations was plotted in control pH 7.8, extreme acid pH 5.5, and extreme base pH 10.4 (Figure 8B). All preparations were rhythmically bursting at control pH – indicated by darkly colored boxes – and became less rhythmic – lighter colored – in the presence of extreme acid. However, 14 of 15 STG preparations ceased firing after 15 min of exposure to pH 5.5. In contrast, only 6 of 15 CG preparations showed reductions in rhythmic activity at pH 5.5. Three of 15 CG preparations maintained a normal rhythm in every pH condition. Interestingly, STG preparations that showed decrements in activity during basic conditions were extremely susceptible to reductions in activity during extreme acid. The opposite is true in CG preparations suggesting that activity in base is a better predictor of acid activity in the STG and vice versa in the CG. This finding also suggests that some preparations were more susceptible to the effects of pH than others.

Furthermore, strong correlations are found between baseline frequency and frequency in extreme acid or base for PD neurons. Strong correlations are also found between baseline LC frequency and LC frequency in extreme acid, but not in extreme base. In other words, the preparations that are weaker or slower at control conditions remain slower at extreme pH conditions. This suggests that the variability seen here is inherent in the population and is likely not caused by the pH perturbation.

Circuit dynamics depend on the properties of the constituent neurons and their synaptic connections. Likewise, the intrinsic excitability of an individual neuron depends on the number and properties of its voltage- and time-dependent channels. Crab central pattern generating circuits are robust and adaptable to a large range of temperatures (DFO, 2009; Haddad and Marder, 2018; Rinberg et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). Previous research revealed robust activity and increasing frequency of the pyloric and cardiac rhythms in response to increasing temperature in both in vivo and ex vivo preparations (Kushinsky et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). Contrastingly, increasing pH reveals non-linear effects on activity, which may suggest more complex mechanisms.

Given that the physiological properties of ion channels are sensitive to pH (Anwar et al., 2017; Bayliss et al., 2015; Catterall, 2000; Cens et al., 2011; Cook et al., 1984; Doering and McRory, 2007; Guarina et al., 2017; Harms et al., 2017; Hille, 1968; Mahapatra et al., 2011; Marcantoni et al., 2010; Tombaugh and Somjen, 1996; Vilin et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2018), one might imagine that a neuronal circuit might be as sensitive to changes in pH as its most sensitive ion channels. Therefore, it is surprising that the central pattern generating rhythms of both the STG and the CG of the crab, C. borealis, are relatively insensitive to acute pH change from about pH 6.1 to pH 8.8 while the individual functions of many ion channels are known to be considerably altered within this range.

One possible explanation for these results is that crustacean ion channels are more robust to pH change than channels from other species. In most vertebrate animals, pH is carefully regulated. Slight acidosis or alkalosis can have deleterious effects on many aspects of vertebrate physiology (Chesler, 2003; Fencl et al., 1966; Nattie, 1999), which may be partially a consequence of the relative sensitivity of many vertebrate ion channels and synapses to pH. Unfortunately, little is known about the pH sensitivity of crustacean ion channels, but it would be surprising if it differed drastically from that seen in other animals as there is considerable homology across phylogeny in channel structure and function. Recent evidence suggests that acid-sensing ion channels are evolutionarily conserved, which presents the possibility of specialized channels for the modulation of pH in crustacean ganglia (Lynagh et al., 2018). However, the possibility remains that modest evolutionary changes in channel structure occurred to allow endothermic animals to function in high temperature and low pH conditions. Evidence of evolved pH robustness has been shown in mammals where smaller voltage-gated Na⁺ and ASIC-mediated currents likely confer greater resistance to acid-induced cell death in the naked mole-rat brain compared to that of the mouse (Husson and Smith, 2018).

Another possibility for the circuit robustness seen in this study could be that there are compensatory and/or correlated changes in the effects of pH across the population of channels in these networks. Therefore, one prediction of the relative pH insensitivity of these networks is that numerous pH sensitive changes occur across the population of ion channels, but that these circuits have evolved sets of correlated ion channels that compensate for these changes (O'Leary and Marder, 2016; O'Leary et al., 2013; O'Leary et al., 2014; Temporal et al., 2012; Temporal et al., 2014; Tobin et al., 2009). Consistent with this possibility is the finding that in mammalian thalamocortical neurons, the counterbalancing activities of HCN and TASK channels restricts the effect of extracellular acidification (pH 7.3 to 6.3) on resting membrane potential (Meuth et al., 2006).

In addition to the relative pH insensitivity of these circuits, we were surprised that the cardiac and pyloric rhythms of C. borealis are differentially sensitive to acid and base. This was unexpected as there is almost a complete overlap of ion channel genes expressed in the two ganglia (Northcutt et al., 2016; Ransdell et al., 2013a; Ransdell et al., 2013b; Schulz et al., 2006; Schulz et al., 2007; Tobin et al., 2009). This differential sensitivity could be due to differences in the burst generating mechanisms of the two networks. The pyloric rhythm depends heavily on a bursting pacemaker neuron and on post-inhibitory rebound as a timing mechanism (Harris-Warrick et al., 1995a; Harris-Warrick et al., 1995b; Hartline and Gassie, 1979). In contrast, the cardiac ganglion depends on strong excitatory drive from the pacemaker neurons (Cooke, 1988). These excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections could be differentially sensitive to pH. Additionally, although both networks are driven by bursting pacemaker neurons, the relative contribution of different ion channels to the burst generating mechanism may be sufficiently different so that the pacemakers themselves respond differently to high and low pH. A similar conclusion comes from a recent study that demonstrated that the arterioles in the retrotrapezoid nucleus, a region critical for respiratory chemosensation, and those in the cortex are differentially modulated during exposure to high CO₂/H⁺ (Hawkins et al., 2017). Together, these findings support the possibility of specialization of a circuit’s response to pH in the context of its local function.

The membrane potentials of the semi-isolated pyloric neurons, LP and PD, varied differentially with changes in extracellular pH. Semi-isolated LP neurons fired tonically and hyperpolarized in extreme base while semi-isolated PD neurons depolarized in acid. In intact preparations, we observed depolarization in acid for both neurons, suggesting an important role of circuit connectivity in regulating network activity across pH. These results illustrate the potential difficulty in generalizing the effects of environmental perturbation across neurons and circuits, even within the same animal.

Under most control conditions, the gastric mill rhythm was silent as is typically observed in STG preparations when the descending modulatory inputs are removed (Hamood and Marder, 2015). Unexpectedly, gastric mill rhythms were frequently activated upon exposure to or recovery from extreme pH. It is possible that either sensory or modulatory axons were activated by the pH changes, and it is feasible that specific sensory and/or modulatory neurons might be part of a circuit important in vivo for a response to altered pH.

In this study, we examined the effects of manipulating extracellular pH. However, the extent to which intracellular pH was affected and its contribution to changes in activity remain unclear. Neurons penetrated with intracellular recording electrodes exhibited more labile activity in response to changing pH than ones that were not penetrated with a sharp electrode. This may indicate that changes in intracellular pH would be more deleterious than what occurs in response to changes in extracellular pH alone. Golowasch and Deitmer, 1993 revealed that extracellular pH in the STG of the crab, Cancer pagurus, was reliably around 0.1 pH more alkaline than bath pH while intracellular pH was 0.3 to 0.4 pH more acidic. Further, moderate shifts in bath pH – from pH 7.4 to 7.0 or 7.8 – resulted in negligible changes in pyloric frequency and slow and low amplitude shifts in extracellular pH while NH₄Cl induced acidosis resulted in recoverable alkylosis of both the intracellular and extracellular space (Golowasch and Deitmer, 1993). These results suggest the restriction of the free diffusion of protons through the ganglion and the existence of active Na⁺-dependent mechanisms to maintain more acidic intracellular and more alkaline extracellular compartments. Golowasch and Deitmer, 1993 hypothesized that glial cells surrounding the neuronal processes in the neuropil of the STG may contain a Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger.

The results of Golowasch and Deitmer (1993) are consistent with what is known in other systems. The distribution of pH values within the brainstem during acute hypercapnia, an increase in blood CO₂, is heterogenous and location-dependent, reflecting local blood flow and pH regulatory mechanisms (Ichikawa et al., 1989). Further, it remains uncertain as to whether or not pH sensation involved in the mammalian respiratory response is extracellular or intracellular (Buckler et al., 1991; Fencl et al., 1966; Lassen, 1990; Ritucci et al., 1997). In the pulmonate snail, Helix aspersa, the effect of hypercapnic solutions on the ventilatory response was greater than that of NH₄Cl solutions of the same extracellular pH lacking CO₂, which suggests that the effects of CO₂ on intracellular pH is responsible for modulating chemoreception in this system (Erlichman and Leiter, 1993; Erlichman and Leiter, 1994). Mammalian studies have also suggested a role for glia in the modulation and maintenance of extracellular pH (Kaila and Ransom, 1998; Ransom, 1992; Wenker et al., 2012).

The ocean environment is both warming and acidifying at historic rates. Cancer borealis maintains relatively robust pyloric and cardiac rhythms in the temperature ranges it usually experiences (Marder et al., 2015; Soofi et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). The effect of temperature on ocean pH is relatively modest in comparison to the range of pH studied here; though, ocean pH can fluctuate in response to other environmental conditions. In Carcinus maenas, exposure to artificial ocean acidification produced relatively small changes in hemolymph pH (Maus et al., 2018). Therefore, unlike some ocean organisms that are very sensitive to even small ocean pH changes, we predict that the neuronal circuits in C. borealis, at least in adults, will be largely insensitive to changes in ocean pH, although the effects of pH swings may be exacerbated by changes in temperature or other environmental variables. Other physiological parameters, such as metabolic rates and hemolymph flow may be more pH sensitive (Maus et al., 2018). Moreover, network performance may be further attenuated when pH is coupled to increasing temperature and other environmental insults.

The data in this paper and in previous work on temperature reveal considerable animal-to-animal variability in response to extreme perturbations. Here, all preparations behaved predictably and reliably across more than a thousand-fold change in hydrogen ion concentration, an unexpectedly large range of robust performance. At more extreme pH, animal-to-animal variability became apparent, consistent with the responses of these circuits to extreme temperatures (Marder et al., 2015; Soofi et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2012). This animal-to-animal variability is almost certainly a consequence of the fact that similar network performance can arise from quite variable sets of underlying conductances (Goaillard et al., 2009; Grashow et al., 2009; Grashow et al., 2010; Prinz et al., 2004). What remains to be seen is whether animals that are more robust to a given extreme perturbation are less robust to others and whether there are given sets of network parameters that confer robustness to many different perturbations.

Raw data files in .abf format are available for download at https://osf.io/r7aes/. All code is available for download https://github.com/jesshaley/haley_hampton_marder_2018 (copy archived at https://github.com/elifesciences-publications/haley_hampton_marder_2018). Source data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and their figure supplements.

1. 1. Haley JA
   2. Hampton D

   (2018) Open Source Framework

   Recordings of stomatogastric and cardiac ganglia of C. borealis at varying pH.

   https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R7AES

1. 1. Anwar H
   2. Li X
   3. Bucher D
   4. Nadim F

   (2017) Functional roles of short-term synaptic plasticity with an emphasis on inhibition

   Current Opinion in Neurobiology 43:71–78.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.01.002

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bayliss DA
   2. Barhanin J
   3. Gestreau C
   4. Guyenet PG

   (2015) The role of pH-sensitive TASK channels in central respiratory chemoreception

   Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology 467:917–929.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-014-1633-9

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Beenhakker MP
   2. Kirby MS
   3. Nusbaum MP

   (2007) Mechanosensory gating of proprioceptor input to modulatory projection neurons

   Journal of Neuroscience 27:14308–14316.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4404-07.2007

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Billups B
   2. Attwell D

   (1996) Modulation of non-vesicular glutamate release by pH

   Nature 379:171–174.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/379171a0

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Blitz DM
   2. Christie AE
   3. Coleman MJ
   4. Norris BJ
   5. Marder E
   6. Nusbaum MP

   (1999) Different proctolin neurons elicit distinct motor patterns from a multifunctional neuronal network

   The Journal of Neuroscience 19:5449–5463.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05449.1999

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bloch W
   2. Addicks K
   3. Hescheler J
   4. Fleischmann BK

   (2001) Nitric oxide synthase expression and function in embryonic and adult cardiomyocytes

   Microscopy Research and Technique 55:259–269.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1175

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bucher D
   2. Johnson CD
   3. Marder E

   (2007) Neuronal morphology and neuropil structure in the stomatogastric ganglion of the lobster, Homarus americanus

   The Journal of Comparative Neurology 501:185–205.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21169

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Buckler KJ
   2. Vaughan-Jones RD
   3. Peers C
   4. Lagadic-Gossmann D
   5. Nye PC

   (1991) Effects of extracellular pH, pCO₂ and HCO₃ on intracellular pH in isolated type-I cells of the neonatal rat carotid body

   The Journal of Physiology 444:703–721.

   https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018902

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Catterall WA

   (2000) From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: the structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels

   Neuron 26:13–25.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81133-2

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Cens T
    2. Rousset M
    3. Charnet P

    (2011) Two sets of amino acids of the domain I of Cav2.3 Ca²⁺ channels contribute to their high sensitivity to extracellular protons

    Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology 462:303–314.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-011-0974-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chesler M

    (2003) Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain

    Physiological Reviews 83:1183–1221.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00010.2003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cook DL
    2. Ikeuchi M
    3. Fujimoto WY

    (1984) Lowering of pH_i inhibits Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels in pancreatic B-cells

    Nature 311:269–271.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/311269a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Cooke IM

    (1988) Studies on the crustacean cardiac ganglion

    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Comparative Pharmacology 91:205–218.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(88)90188-0

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Cooke IM

    (2002) Reliable, responsive pacemaking and pattern generation with minimal cell numbers: the crustacean cardiac ganglion

    The Biological Bulletin 202:108–136.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1543649

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Courtney KR

    (1979) Extracellular pH selectively modulates recovery from sodium inactivation in frog myelinated nerve

    Biophysical Journal 28:363–368.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85183-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. Report

    1. DFO

    (2009)

    Assessment of Jonah Crab in Lobster Fishing Area 41 (4X + 5Zc). DFO Can Sci Advis Sec Advis Rep 2009/034

    Canada: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Doering CJ
    2. McRory JE

    (2007) Effects of extracellular pH on neuronal calcium channel activation

    Neuroscience 146:1032–1043.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Donahue MJ
    2. Nichols A
    3. Shulman MJ
    4. Santamaria CA
    5. Krediet CJ
    6. Perez KO
    7. League-Pike PE

    (2009) Predation risk, prey abundance, and the vertical distribution of three brachyuran crabs on gulf of maine shores

    Journal of Crustacean Biology 29:523–531.

    https://doi.org/10.1651/08-3061.1

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Dove ADM
    2. Allam B
    3. Powers JJ
    4. Sokolowski MS

    (2005) A prolonged thermal stress experiment on the American lobster, Homarus americanus

    Journal of Shellfish Research 24:761–765.

    https://doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000(2005)24[761:APTSEO]2.0.CO;2

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Erlichman JS
    2. Leiter JC

    (1993) CO2 chemoreception in the pulmonate snail, Helix aspersa

    Respiration Physiology 93:347–363.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(93)90080-T

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Erlichman JS
    2. Leiter JC

    (1994) Central chemoreceptor stimulus in the terrestrial, pulmonate snail, Helix aspersa

    Respiration Physiology 95:209–226.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(94)90117-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Fencl V
    2. Miller TB
    3. Pappenheimer JR

    (1966) Studies on the respiratory response to disturbances of acid-base balance, with deductions concerning the ionic composition of cerebral interstitial fluid

    American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 210:459–472.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.3.459

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Goaillard JM
    2. Taylor AL
    3. Schulz DJ
    4. Marder E

    (2009) Functional consequences of animal-to-animal variation in circuit parameters

    Nature Neuroscience 12:1424–1430.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2404

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Golowasch J
    2. Deitmer JW

    (1993) pH regulation in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer pagurus

    Journal of Comparative Physiology A 172:573–581.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213680

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Grashow R
    2. Brookings T
    3. Marder E

    (2009) Reliable neuromodulation from circuits with variable underlying structure

    PNAS 106:11742–11746.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905614106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Grashow R
    2. Brookings T
    3. Marder E

    (2010) Compensation for variable intrinsic neuronal excitability by circuit-synaptic interactions

    Journal of Neuroscience 30:9145–9156.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0980-10.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Guarina L
    2. Vandael DH
    3. Carabelli V
    4. Carbone E

    (2017) Low pH_o boosts burst firing and catecholamine release by blocking TASK-1 and BK channels while preserving Cav1 channels in mouse chromaffin cells

    The Journal of Physiology 595:2587–2609.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/JP273735

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Haddad SA
    2. Marder E

    (2018) Circuit robustness to temperature perturbation is altered by neuromodulators

    Neuron 100:609–623.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.035

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Haefner PA

    (1977) Aspects of the biology of the jonah crab, Cancer borealis Stimpson, 1859 in the mid-Atlantic Bight

    Journal of Natural History 11:303–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937700770221

    • Google Scholar
30. Software

    1. Haley JA
    2. Hampton D
    3. Marder E

    (2018) Analysis package for the paper Haley, Hampton, and Marder (2018)

    GitHub.

    https://github.com/jesshaley/haley_hampton_marder_2018
31. 1. Hamood AW
    2. Marder E

    (2015) Consequences of acute and long-term removal of neuromodulatory input on the episodic gastric rhythm of the crab Cancer borealis

    Journal of Neurophysiology 114:1677–1692.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00536.2015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Harms E
    2. Stoetzer C
    3. Stueber T
    4. O'Reilly AO
    5. Leffler A

    (2017) Investigation into the role of an extracellular loop in mediating proton-evoked inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels

    Neuroscience Letters 661:5–10.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.09.039

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Harris-Warrick RM
    2. Coniglio LM
    3. Barazangi N
    4. Guckenheimer J
    5. Gueron S

    (1995a) Dopamine modulation of transient potassium current evokes phase shifts in a central pattern generator network

    The Journal of Neuroscience 15:342–358.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00342.1995

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Harris-Warrick RM
    2. Coniglio LM
    3. Levini RM
    4. Gueron S
    5. Guckenheimer J

    (1995b) Dopamine modulation of two subthreshold currents produces phase shifts in activity of an identified motoneuron

    Journal of Neurophysiology 74:1404–1420.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1404

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Hartline DK
    2. Gassie DV

    (1979) Pattern generation in the lobster (Panulirus) stomatogastric ganglion. I. Pyloric neuron kinetics and synaptic interactions

    Biological Cybernetics 33:209–222.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337410

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Hawkins VE
    2. Takakura AC
    3. Trinh A
    4. Malheiros-Lima MR
    5. Cleary CM
    6. Wenker IC
    7. Dubreuil T
    8. Rodriguez EM
    9. Nelson MT
    10. Moreira TS
    11. Mulkey DK

    (2017) Purinergic regulation of vascular tone in the retrotrapezoid nucleus is specialized to support the drive to breathe

    eLife 6:e25232.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25232

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Hille B

    (1968) Charges and potentials at the nerve surface. Divalent ions and pH

    The Journal of General Physiology 51:221–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.51.2.221

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Hooper SL
    2. Thuma JB
    3. Guschlbauer C
    4. Schmidt J
    5. Büschges A

    (2015) Cell dialysis by sharp electrodes can cause nonphysiological changes in neuron properties

    Journal of Neurophysiology 114:1255–1271.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01010.2014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Howell BJ
    2. Rahn H
    3. Goodfellow D
    4. Herreid C

    (1973) Acid-Base regulation and temperature in selected invertebrates as a function of temperature

    American Zoologist 13:557–563.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/13.2.557

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Husson Z
    2. Smith ESJ

    (2018) Naked mole-rat cortical neurons are resistant to acid-induced cell death

    Molecular Brain 11:26.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-018-0369-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Ichikawa K
    2. Kuwana S
    3. Arita H

    (1989) ECF pH dynamics within the ventrolateral medulla: a microelectrode study

    Journal of Applied Physiology 67:193–198.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1989.67.1.193

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. Book

    1. Kaila K
    2. Ransom BR

    (1998)

    pH and Brain Function

    New York: Wiley-Liss.

    • Google Scholar
43. Preprint

    1. Kushinsky D
    2. Morozova E
    3. Marder E

    (2018) In vivo effects of temperature on the heart and pyloric rhythms in the crab, Cancer borealis

    BioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/249631

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Lassen NA

    (1990) Is central chemoreceptor sensitive to intracellular rather than extracellular pH?

    Clinical Physiology 10:311–319.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.1990.tb00792.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Lynagh T
    2. Mikhaleva Y
    3. Colding JM
    4. Glover JC
    5. Pless SA

    (2018) Acid-sensing ion channels emerged over 600 Mya and are conserved throughout the deuterostomes

    PNAS 115:8430–8435.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806614115

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Mahapatra S
    2. Marcantoni A
    3. Vandael DH
    4. Striessnig J
    5. Carbone E

    (2011) Are Ca(v)1.3 pacemaker channels in chromaffin cells? Possible bias from resting cell conditions and DHP blockers usage

    Channels 5:219–224.

    https://doi.org/10.4161/chan.5.3.15271

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Marcantoni A
    2. Vandael DHF
    3. Mahapatra S
    4. Carabelli V
    5. Sinnegger-Brauns MJ
    6. Striessnig J
    7. Carbone E

    (2010) Loss of Cav1.3 channels reveals the critical role of L-Type and BK channel coupling in pacemaking mouse adrenal chromaffin cells

    Journal of Neuroscience 30:491–504.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4961-09.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Marder E
    2. Bucher D

    (2007) Understanding circuit dynamics using the stomatogastric nervous system of lobsters and crabs

    Annual Review of Physiology 69:291–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.161516

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Marder E
    2. Eisen JS

    (1984) Transmitter identification of pyloric neurons: electrically coupled neurons use different transmitters

    Journal of Neurophysiology 51:1345–1361.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1345

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Marder E
    2. Haddad SA
    3. Goeritz ML
    4. Rosenbaum P
    5. Kispersky T

    (2015) How can motor systems retain performance over a wide temperature range? Lessons from the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system

    Journal of Comparative Physiology A 201:851–856.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0975-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Maus B
    2. Bock C
    3. Pörtner H-O

    (2018) Water bicarbonate modulates the response of the shore crab Carcinus maenas to ocean acidification

    Journal of Comparative Physiology B 188:749–764.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-018-1162-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Meuth SG
    2. Kanyshkova T
    3. Meuth P
    4. Landgraf P
    5. Munsch T
    6. Ludwig A
    7. Hofmann F
    8. Pape HC
    9. Budde T

    (2006) Membrane resting potential of thalamocortical relay neurons is shaped by the interaction among TASK3 and HCN2 channels

    Journal of Neurophysiology 96:1517–1529.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01212.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Mozhaev GA
    2. Mozhaeva GN
    3. Naumov AP

    (1970)

    Effect of calcium ions on the steady-state potassium conductivity of the Ranvier node membrane

    Tsitologiia 12:993–1001.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Mulloney B
    2. Selverston AI

    (1974a) Organization of the stomatogastric ganglionin the spiny lobster. I. Neurons driving the lateral teeth

    Journal of Comparative Physiology 91:1–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181657

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Mulloney B
    2. Selverston AI

    (1974b) Organization of the stomatogastric ganglion in the spiny lobster III. Coordination of the two subsets of the gastric system

    Journal of Comparative Physiology 91:53–78.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00696156

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Nattie E

    (1999) CO₂, brainstem chemoreceptors and breathing

    Progress in Neurobiology 59:299–331.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00008-8

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Northcutt AJ
    2. Lett KM
    3. Garcia VB
    4. Diester CM
    5. Lane BJ
    6. Marder E
    7. Schulz DJ

    (2016) Deep sequencing of transcriptomes from the nervous systems of two decapod crustaceans to characterize genes important for neural circuit function and modulation

    BMC Genomics 17:868.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3215-z

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Nusbaum MP
    2. Blitz DM
    3. Marder E

    (2017) Functional consequences of neuropeptide and small-molecule co-transmission

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18:389–403.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.56

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. O'Leary T
    2. Williams AH
    3. Caplan JS
    4. Marder E

    (2013) Correlations in ion channel expression emerge from homeostatic tuning rules

    PNAS 110:E2645–E2654.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309966110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. O'Leary T
    2. Williams AH
    3. Franci A
    4. Marder E

    (2014) Cell types, network homeostasis, and pathological compensation from a biologically plausible ion channel expression model

    Neuron 82:809–821.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. O'Leary T
    2. Marder E

    (2016) Temperature-Robust neural function from activity-dependent ion channel regulation

    Current Biology 26:2935–2941.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Prinz AA
    2. Bucher D
    3. Marder E

    (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters

    Nature Neuroscience 7:1345–1352.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1352

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Qadri SA
    2. Camacho J
    3. Wang H
    4. Taylor JR
    5. Grosell M
    6. Worden MK

    (2007) Temperature and acid-base balance in the American lobster Homarus americanus

    Journal of Experimental Biology 210:1245–1254.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02709

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Ransdell JL
    2. Nair SS
    3. Schulz DJ

    (2013a) Neurons within the same network independently achieve conserved output by differentially balancing variable conductance magnitudes

    Journal of Neuroscience 33:9950–9956.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1095-13.2013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Ransdell JL
    2. Temporal S
    3. West NL
    4. Leyrer ML
    5. Schulz DJ

    (2013b) Characterization of inward currents and channels underlying burst activity in motoneurons of crab cardiac ganglion

    Journal of Neurophysiology 110:42–54.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00009.2013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Ransom BR

    (1992) Glial modulation of neural excitability mediated by extracellular pH: a hypothesis

    Progress in Brain Research 94:37–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61737-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Reeves RB

    (1972) An imidazole alphastat hypothesis for vertebrate acid-base regulation: tissue carbon dioxide content and body temperature in bullfrogs

    Respiration Physiology 14:219–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(72)90030-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Reeves RB

    (1977) The interaction of body temperature and acid-base balance in ectothermic vertebrates

    Annual Review of Physiology 39:559–586.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.39.030177.003015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. Book

    1. Richerson GB

    (1998)

    Cellular mechanisms of sensitivity to pH in the mammalian respiratory system

    In: Kaila K, Ransom B. R, editors. pH and Brain Function. New York: Wiley-Liss. pp. 509–533.

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Rinberg A
    2. Taylor AL
    3. Marder E

    (2013) The effects of temperature on the stability of a neuronal oscillator

    PLOS Computational Biology 9:e1002857.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002857

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Ritucci NA
    2. Dean JB
    3. Putnam RW

    (1997) Intracellular pH response to hypercapnia in neurons from chemosensitive areas of the medulla

    American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 273:R433–R441.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1997.273.1.R433

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Saideman SR
    2. Blitz DM
    3. Nusbaum MP

    (2007) Convergent motor patterns from divergent circuits

    Journal of Neuroscience 27:6664–6674.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0315-07.2007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Schulz DJ
    2. Goaillard JM
    3. Marder E

    (2006) Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals

    Nature Neuroscience 9:356–362.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1639

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Schulz DJ
    2. Goaillard JM
    3. Marder EE

    (2007) Quantitative expression profiling of identified neurons reveals cell-specific constraints on highly variable levels of gene expression

    PNAS 104:13187–13191.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705827104

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Sinning A
    2. Liebmann L
    3. Kougioumtzes A
    4. Westermann M
    5. Bruehl C
    6. Hübner CA

    (2011) Synaptic glutamate release is modulated by the Na⁺ -driven Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchanger Slc4a8

    Journal of Neuroscience 31:7300–7311.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0269-11.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Sinning A
    2. Hübner CA

    (2013) Minireview: pH and synaptic transmission

    FEBS Letters 587:1923–1928.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Somero GN

    (1981)

    pH-temperature interactions on proteins: Principles of optimal pH and buffer system design

    Mar Biol Lett 2:163–178.

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Soofi W
    2. Goeritz ML
    3. Kispersky TJ
    4. Prinz AA
    5. Marder E
    6. Stein W

    (2014) Phase maintenance in a rhythmic motor pattern during temperature changes in vivo

    Journal of Neurophysiology 111:2603–2613.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00906.2013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Stehlik LL
    2. MacKenzie CL
    3. Morse WW

    (1991)

    Distribution and abundance of four brachyuran crabs on the northwest Atlantic shelf

    Fish Bull 89:473–492.

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Tang LS
    2. Goeritz ML
    3. Caplan JS
    4. Taylor AL
    5. Fisek M
    6. Marder E

    (2010) Precise temperature compensation of phase in a rhythmic motor pattern

    PLOS Biology 8:e1000469.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000469

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Tang LS
    2. Taylor AL
    3. Rinberg A
    4. Marder E

    (2012) Robustness of a rhythmic circuit to short- and long-term temperature changes

    Journal of Neuroscience 32:10075–10085.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1443-12.2012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Temporal S
    2. Desai M
    3. Khorkova O
    4. Varghese G
    5. Dai A
    6. Schulz DJ
    7. Golowasch J

    (2012) Neuromodulation independently determines correlated channel expression and conductance levels in motor neurons of the stomatogastric ganglion

    Journal of Neurophysiology 107:718–727.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00622.2011

    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Temporal S
    2. Lett KM
    3. Schulz DJ

    (2014) Activity-dependent feedback regulates correlated ion channel mRNA levels in single identified motor neurons

    Current Biology 24:1899–1904.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Tobin AE
    2. Cruz-Bermúdez ND
    3. Marder E
    4. Schulz DJ

    (2009) Correlations in ion channel mRNA in rhythmically active neurons

    PLOS ONE 4:e6742.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006742

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Tombaugh GC
    2. Somjen GG

    (1996) Effects of extracellular pH on voltage-gated Na+, K+ and Ca2+ currents in isolated rat CA1 neurons

    The Journal of Physiology 493:719–732.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021417

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Truchot JP

    (1973) Temperature and acid-base regulation in the shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.)

    Respiration Physiology 17:11–20.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(73)90106-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Truchot JP

    (1978) Mechanims of extracellular acid-base regulation as temperature changes in decapod crustaceans

    Respiration Physiology 33:161–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(78)90094-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Truchot J-P

    (1986) Changes in the hemolymph acid-base state of the shore crab, carcinus maenas , exposed to simulated tidepool conditions

    The Biological Bulletin 170:506–518.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1541858

    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Vilin YY
    2. Peters CH
    3. Ruben PC

    (2012) Acidosis differentially modulates inactivation in na(v)1.2, na(v)1.4, and na(v)1.5 channels

    Frontiers in Pharmacology 3:109.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Wang X
    2. Guan R
    3. Zhao X
    4. Zhu D
    5. Song N
    6. Shen L

    (2018) TASK1 and TASK3 are coexpressed With ASIC1 in the ventrolateral medulla and contribute to central chemoreception in rats

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 12:285.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00285

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Wanke E
    2. Carbone E
    3. Testa PL

    (1979) K⁺ conductance modified by a titratable group accessible to protons from the intracellular side of the squid axon membrane

    Biophysical Journal 26:319–324.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85251-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Wenker IC
    2. Sobrinho CR
    3. Takakura AC
    4. Moreira TS
    5. Mulkey DK

    (2012) Regulation of ventral surface CO₂/H⁺-sensitive neurons by purinergic signalling

    The Journal of Physiology 590:2137–2150.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.229666

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. White RS
    2. Nusbaum MP

    (2011) The same core rhythm generator underlies different rhythmic motor patterns

    Journal of Neuroscience 31:11484–11494.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1885-11.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Wood CM
    2. Cameron JN

    (1985)

    Temperature and the physiology of intracellular and extracellular acid-base regulation in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 114:151–179.

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Woodhull AM

    (1973) Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve

    The Journal of General Physiology 61:687–708.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.61.6.687

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Zhou W
    2. Jones SW

    (1996) The effects of external pH on calcium channel currents in bullfrog sympathetic neurons

    Biophysical Journal 70:1326–1334.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79689-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Zhou Y
    2. Xia X-M
    3. Lingle CJ

    (2018) BK channel inhibition by strong extracellular acidification

    eLife 7:e38060.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38060

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Jessica A Haley

   Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Present address

   Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6282-7124

2. David Hampton

   Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8845-037X

3. Eve Marder

   Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   marder@brandeis.edu

   Competing interests

   Deputy Editor, eLife

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9632-5448

• 1,832

  views

• 201

  downloads

• 25

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.