高等学校化学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1857.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20190158
收稿日期:
2019-03-15
出版日期:
2019-09-10
发布日期:
2019-07-12
通讯作者:
冯钰锜
E-mail:yqfeng@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
YU Qiongwei,ZHENG Feng,FANG Kaimin,FENG Yuqi()
Received:
2019-03-15
Online:
2019-09-10
Published:
2019-07-12
Contact:
FENG Yuqi
E-mail:yqfeng@whu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
采用液相沉积法(LPD)制备了纳米氧化锆沉积硅胶色谱固定相(ZrO2/SiO2), 并将其应用于亲水作用色谱分离中. 考察并比较了ZrO2/SiO2、 硅胶(SiO2)和氧化锆(ZrO2) 3种色谱固定相在不同有机调节剂比例、 不同pH值及不同盐浓度的流动相条件下的色谱行为. 结果表明, 制备的ZrO2/SiO2色谱柱不仅具有SiO2色谱柱高柱效的优点, 表面沉积的纳米氧化锆还能有效屏蔽硅羟基, 有利于碱性物质的保留和分离, 表现出良好的亲水作用色谱性能. 将ZrO2/SiO2色谱柱用于4种脱氧核苷和5种碱性化合物的分离, 均得到了较好的效果, 展现出其作为色谱固定相良好的应用前景.
中图分类号:
TrendMD:
余琼卫, 郑凤, 方凯敏, 冯钰锜. 纳米氧化锆沉积硅胶色谱固定相的制备及亲水作用色谱行为. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1857.
YU Qiongwei, ZHENG Feng, FANG Kaimin, FENG Yuqi. Preparation of Zirconia Deposited Silica Stationary Phase and Its Application to Hydrophilic-interaction Liquid Chromatography†. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019, 40(9): 1857.
Sample | Surface area/<break/>(m2·g-1) | Pore volume/<break/>(cm3·g-1) | Pore diameter/<break/>nm |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 287 | 1.1 | 11 |
ZrO2/SiO2 | 260 | 1.0 | 11 |
ZrO2 | 14 | 0.07 | 18 |
Table 1 Surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of SiO2 and ZrO2/SiO2
Sample | Surface area/<break/>(m2·g-1) | Pore volume/<break/>(cm3·g-1) | Pore diameter/<break/>nm |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 287 | 1.1 | 11 |
ZrO2/SiO2 | 260 | 1.0 | 11 |
ZrO2 | 14 | 0.07 | 18 |
Fig.4 Plots of k and theoretical plate numbers vs. H2O volume fraction in mobile phase(A) SiO2; (B) ZrO2/SiO2; (C) ZrO2; (D) theoretical plate numbers of tested analytes on different columns.Mobile phase: ACN-20 mmol/L NH4Ac(pH=6.8); flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength: 254 nm.
Tested analyte | Correlation coefficient on SiO2 | Correlation coefficient on ZrO2/SiO2 | Correlation coefficient on ZrO2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | |
Deoxycytidine | 0.9179 | 0.9537 | 0.9999 | 0.8947 | 0.9866 | 0.9987 | 0.9397 | 0.9980 | 0.9984 |
Deoxyadenosine | 0.9147 | 0.9179 | 0.9998 | 0.8883 | 0.9839 | 0.9981 | 0.9771 | 0.98840 | 0.9934 |
Cytosine | 0.9015 | 0.9147 | 0.9998 | 0.8546 | 0.9670 | 0.9926 | 0.9693 | 0.9988 | 0.9987 |
Adenine | 0.8936 | 0.9015 | 0.9999 | 0.8662 | 0.9751 | 0.9987 | 0.9670 | 0.9919 | 0.9930 |
Guanine | 0.9090 | 0.8936 | 0.9998 | 0.8781 | 0.9801 | 0.9985 | 0.9207 | 0.9948 | 0.9991 |
Table 2 Correlation coefficients of the tested analytes on three columns using Eqs.(1)—(3)
Tested analyte | Correlation coefficient on SiO2 | Correlation coefficient on ZrO2/SiO2 | Correlation coefficient on ZrO2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | Eq.(1) | Eq.(2) | Eq.(3) | |
Deoxycytidine | 0.9179 | 0.9537 | 0.9999 | 0.8947 | 0.9866 | 0.9987 | 0.9397 | 0.9980 | 0.9984 |
Deoxyadenosine | 0.9147 | 0.9179 | 0.9998 | 0.8883 | 0.9839 | 0.9981 | 0.9771 | 0.98840 | 0.9934 |
Cytosine | 0.9015 | 0.9147 | 0.9998 | 0.8546 | 0.9670 | 0.9926 | 0.9693 | 0.9988 | 0.9987 |
Adenine | 0.8936 | 0.9015 | 0.9999 | 0.8662 | 0.9751 | 0.9987 | 0.9670 | 0.9919 | 0.9930 |
Guanine | 0.9090 | 0.8936 | 0.9998 | 0.8781 | 0.9801 | 0.9985 | 0.9207 | 0.9948 | 0.9991 |
Fig.5 Effects of mobile phase pH values on retention factors(k) and symmetry factors of tested analytes(A) SiO2; (B) ZrO2/SiO2; (C) ZrO2; (D) effect of pH on the symmetry factor of tested analytes on SiO2 column; (E) effect of pH on the symmetry factor of tested analytes on ZrO2/SiO2 column. Mobile phase: ACN-20 mmol/L NH4Ac(80∶20, volume ratio). Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength: 254 nm. (A)—(C) a. Proparanolol; b. berberine; c. melamine; d. deoxycytidine; e. adenine; f. benzoic acid; g. p-nitrobenzoic acid. (D) and (E) a. Propranolo; b. berberine; c. deoxycytidine; d. adenine.
Fig.6 Influence of NH4Ac concentration on the retention factor(k) and symmetry factors of tested analytes(A) SiO2; (B) ZrO2/SiO2; (C) ZrO2; (D) effect of NH4Ac concentration on the symmetry factor of tested analytes on SiO2column; (E) effect of NH4Ac concentration on the symmetry factor of tested analytes on ZrO2/SiO2 column. Mobile phase: ACN-NH4Ac(pH=6.8)(80∶20, volume ratio). Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength: 254 nm.
ZrO2 related stationary phase | Interaction mechanism | Application | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Zirconia-based stationary phase cellulose | Ion-exchange interaction | Drug control | [45] |
Tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-coatedzirconia | Chiral compounds | [46] | |
Octadecyl coated zirconia stationary phase | Ion-exchange interaction | Parabens | [47] |
N-Methylimidazolium functionalized ZrO2/SiO2-4 | Ion-exchange interaction | Inorganic and organic anions | [48] |
Adenosine 5'-monophosphate modified ZrO2/SiO2 | Hydrogen-bonding, electrostatic and <br/>ion-exchange interaction | Acidic compounds | [49] |
ZrO2/SiO2 | Adsorption and partition | Polar compounds | This work |
Table 3 Comparison of reported ZrO2 stationary phases on retention mechanism and application
ZrO2 related stationary phase | Interaction mechanism | Application | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Zirconia-based stationary phase cellulose | Ion-exchange interaction | Drug control | [45] |
Tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-coatedzirconia | Chiral compounds | [46] | |
Octadecyl coated zirconia stationary phase | Ion-exchange interaction | Parabens | [47] |
N-Methylimidazolium functionalized ZrO2/SiO2-4 | Ion-exchange interaction | Inorganic and organic anions | [48] |
Adenosine 5'-monophosphate modified ZrO2/SiO2 | Hydrogen-bonding, electrostatic and <br/>ion-exchange interaction | Acidic compounds | [49] |
ZrO2/SiO2 | Adsorption and partition | Polar compounds | This work |
Fig.7 Separation of four deoxynucleosides on ZrO2/SiO2 columnMobile phase: ACN-20 mmol/L NH4Ac(pH=6.8)(80∶20, volume ratio). Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength: 254 nm. Peak 1: thymidine; peak 2: 2'-deoxyadenosine; peak 3: 2'-deoxyguanosine; peak 4: 2'-deoxycytidine.
Fig.8 Separation of several basic analytes on ZrO2/SiO2 columnMobile phase: ACN-20 mmol/L NH4Ac(pH=6.8)(80∶20, volume ratio). Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength: 254 nm. Peak 1: theophylline; peak 2: melamine; peak 3: ractopamine; peak 4 clenbuterol; peak 5: terbutaline.
[1] | Peng X. T., Yuan B. F., Feng Y. Q., J. Sep. Sci.,2011, 34, 3123—3130 |
[2] | Dejaegher B., Mangelings D., Heyden Y. V., J. Sep. Sci., 2008, 31(9), 1438—1448 |
[3] | Alpert A. J., J. Chromatogr.A, 1990, 499, 177—196 |
[4] | Zhu B. Y., Mant C. T., Hodges R. S., J. Chromatogr. A,1991, 548(1/2), 13—24 |
[5] | Strege M. A., Anal. Chem., 1998, 70(13), 2439—2445 |
[6] | Olsen B. A., J. Chromatogr. A, 2001, 913(1/2), 113—122 |
[7] | Tolstikov V. V., Fiehn O., Anal. Biochem.,2002, 301(2), 298—307 |
[8] | Karlsson G., Winge S., Sandberg H., J. Chromatogr. A,2005, 1092(2), 246—249 |
[9] | Gianotti V., Chiurminatto U., Mazzucco E., J. Chromatogr. A,2008, 1185(2), 296—300 |
[10] | Al-Rimawi F., Talanta, 2009, 79(5), 1368—1371 |
[11] | Kawano S., Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2009, 23(6), 907—914 |
[12] | Dejaegher B., Heyden Y. V., J. Sep. Sci., 2010, 33(6/7), 698—715 |
[13] | Jian W. Y., Edom R. W., Xu Y. D., J. Sep. Sci., 2010, 33(6/7), 681—697 |
[14] | Fontanals N., Marce R. M., Borrull F., J. Chromatogr. A,2011, 1218(35), 5975—5980 |
[15] | Churms S. C., J. Chromatogr. A, 1996, 720(1/2), 75—91 |
[16] | Yoshida T., Anal. Chem., 1997, 69(15), 3038—3043 |
[17] | Yoshida T., J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 2004, 60(3), 265—280 |
[18] | Yang Y. Z., Boysen R. I., Hearn M. T. W., J. Chromatogr. A,2009, 1216(29), 5518—5524 |
[19] | McNulty D. E., Annan R. S., Molecular & Cellular Proteomics,2008, 7(5), 971—980 |
[20] | Bicker W., Wu J. Y., Yeman H., J. Chromatogr. A,2011, 1218(7), 882—895 |
[21] | Kotoni D., D'Acquarica I., Ciogli A., J. Chromatogr. A,2012, 1232, 196—211 |
[22] | Alpert A. J., Anal. Chem., 2008, 80(1), 62—76 |
[23] | Mant C. T., Hodges R. S., J. Sep. Sci., 2008, 31(15), 2754—2773 |
[24] | Lindner H., Sarg B., Helliger W., J. Chromatogr. A,1997, 782(1), 55—62 |
[25] | Persson J., Hemstrom P., Irgum K., J. Sep. Sci., 2008, 31(9), 1504—1510 |
[26] | Que A. H., Konse T., Baker A. G., Anal. Chem.,2000, 72(13), 2703—2710 |
[27] | Que A. H., Novotny M. V., Anal. Chem.,2002, 74(20), 5184—5191 |
[28] | Hosoya K., Hira N., Yamamoto K., Anal. Chem.,2006, 78(16), 5729—5735 |
[29] | Jiang Z. J., Smith N. W., Ferguson P. D., J. Sep. Sci., 2009, 32(15/16), 2544—2555 |
[30] | Jiang Z. J., Reilly J., Everatt B., J. Chromatogr. A,2009, 1216(12), 2439—2448 |
[31] | Tijunelyte I., Babinot J., Guerrouache M., Polymer,2012, 53(1), 29—36 |
[32] | Nawrocki J., Dunlap C., Li J., Zhao J., McNeff C. V., McCormick A., Carr P. W., J. Chromatogr. A,2004, 1028, 31—62 |
[33] | Kucera R., Kovaǐíková P., Klivický M., Klimeš J., J. Chromatogr. A,2011, 1218(39), 6981—6986 |
[34] | Kalafut P., Kuc era R., Klimes J., J. Chromatogr. A,2012, 1232, 242—247 |
[35] | Song Z. H., Duan C. F., Shi M., Guan Y. F., J. Chromatogr. A,2017, 1522, 30—37 |
[36] | Wang Q., Li J., Yang X., Talanta,2014, 129, 438—447 |
[37] | Yu Q. W., Fang K. M., He X. M., Zheng J., Feng Y. Q., Chinese J. Chromatogr., 2018, 36(3), 237—244 |
(余琼卫, 方凯敏, 何小梅, 郑杰, 冯钰锜.色谱,2018, 36(3), 237—244) | |
[38] | Yu Q. W., Feng Y. Q., Progr.Chem., 2011, 23(6), 1211—1223 |
(余琼卫, 冯钰锜.化学进展, 2011, 23(6), 1211—1223) | |
[39] | He H. B., Yu Q. W., Feng Y. Q., Da S. L., J. Liq. Chromatogr. Related. Tech., 2009, 32, 468—482 |
[40] | Alpert A. J., J. Chromatogr. A, 1990, 499, 177—196 |
[41] | Scott R. P., Kucera P., J. Chromatogr. A,1978, 149, 93—110 |
[42] | Jandera P., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2011, 692(1), 1—25 |
[43] | Karatapanis A. E., Fiamegos Y. C., Stalikas C. D., J. Chromatogr. A,2011, 1218(20), 2871—2879 |
[44] | Nawrocki J., Rigney M., McCormick A., J. Chromatogr. A,1993, 657(2), 229—282 |
[45] | Radim K., Jaroslav S., J. Sep. Sci., 2005, 28, 1307—1314 |
[46] | Cecilia B., Castells Peter W. C., Anal. Chem., 1999, 71, 3013—3021 |
[47] | Paola D., Katia B., Maria Lucia C., Francesco C., Giovanni D., Luigi M., J. Sep. Sci., 2007, 30, 1125—1130 |
[48] | Liang X. J., Chen Q. S., Liu X., Jiang S. X., J. Chromatogr. A,2008, 1182, 197—204 |
[49] | Wang Q., Luo Z. Y., Ye M., Xu L., Shi Z. G., Xu L. Y., J. Chromatogr. A,2015, 1383, 58—69 |
[1] | 李占峰, 刘本学, 刘晓婵, 王新强, 张晶, 于诗摩, 赵新富, 张新恩, 伊希斌. 氧化锆湿凝胶中乙酰丙酮配体的脱除机理及气凝胶复合材料的制备[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(9): 2904. |
[2] | 乔俊琴, 梁超, 曹兆明, 练鸿振. 混合离子对试剂体系下寡核苷酸的IP-RPLC保留行为[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(9): 1893. |
[3] | 宋大雷, 刘思奇, 李丰, 王艳力, 张涛, 颜永得, 张萌, 王君. 硅烷改性纳米ZrO2对镁锂合金表面环氧树脂涂层耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(1): 77. |
[4] | 吴杰, 陆艳芳, 刘杨, 于喆英, 辛柏福. 晶相可控的ZrO2纳米线的无卤制备及表征[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(7): 1403. |
[5] | 吴超超, 刘根, 徐君莉, 张霞. PVDF/ZrO2杂化膜的制备及吸附牛血红蛋白的性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2014, 35(4): 784. |
[6] | 袁剑, 张波, 汤明慧, 卢晗锋, 陈银飞. 苯乙酮氢转移反应中ZrO2 /MCM-41和 ZrO2 /AC的催化性能对比[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2012, 33(06): 1326. |
[7] | 王哲 高洪成 赵成吉 常虹 张会轩 那辉. 磺化聚芳醚酮砜/ZrO2复合型质子交换膜的制备与性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2011, 32(8): 1884. |
[8] | 储彬, 王润伟, 沈启慧, 陈璐, 万利丰, 朱广山, 裘式纶 . 立方规则孔道结构含锆介孔氧化硅的合成与表征[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2007, 28(8): 1428. |
[9] | 赵一阳, 王海鹰, 李响, 杨洋, 杨敏, 王策 . 静电纺丝法制备硫酸化的二氧化锆/二氧化硅复合纤维[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2007, 28(2): 382. |
[10] | 孟秀霞, 杨乃涛, 孟波, 谭小耀. Y2O3/ZrO2中空纤维陶瓷膜的制备与表征[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2006, 27(4): 599. |
[11] | 周宏伟, 马嘉, 李志成, 陈春海. 纳米二氧化锆改性聚醚砜的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(8): 1582. |
[12] | 李艳, 王玉和, 徐柏庆. CO2重整甲烷反应高效稳定Ni/ZrO2催化剂的纳米结构特点[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(7): 1325. |
[13] | 马中义, 董庆年, 魏伟, 陈建刚, 李文怀, 孙予罕. 不同形态ZrO2负载Co催化剂上CO+H2吸附与反应行为研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(5): 902. |
[14] | 姚礼峰, 冯钰锜, 达世禄. 多齿配体改性的氧化锆色谱固定相表面吸附方式的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(2): 244. |
[15] | 刘铭飞, 姜银珠, 高建峰, 王艳艳, 孟广耀. 单一混合固态源PE-MOCVD法制备YSZ薄膜及其表征[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(11): 1981. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||