NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Expression levels for each gene in each tissue based on Cqs

Box plot: upper and lower box limits indicate 25th and 75th percentiles, dark/light grey interface indicates the median, ‘x’ indicates the mean, and whiskers indicate the minimum/maximum values. Data was collected from six biological replicates with three technical replicates for each.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-1

GeNorm stability rankings for all candidate reference genes sorted by tissue

Genes are ranked in order from the least stable to the top two most stable.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-2

NormFinder stability rankings for all candidate reference genes sorted by tissue

Genes are ranked in order from the least stable to the most stable.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-3

BestKeeper stability rankings for all candidate reference genes sorted by tissue

Genes are ranked in order from the least stable to the most stable.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-4

Representative image of PCR products for each reference gene

The agarose gel was 2% and contained a no primer control (NPC).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-5

All raw Cq values for each gene and each tissue

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27695v1/supp-6

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Alexander P Young conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carmen F Landry performed the experiments, analyzed the data, approved the final draft.

Daniel J Jackson contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, supplied transcriptomes used to identify L. stagnalis gene sequences.

Russell C Wyeth conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The novel reference gene sequences (GAPDH, EF1a, Rapac1, UBI, VGKC) are accessible via GenBank accession numbers MH687363 to MH687367.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data set is uploaded to Figshare - https://figshare.com/articles/RefGene_ALL_Raw_Cqs_xlsx/8053544

Funding

Support was received from Canadian Foundation for Innovation (Grant 25196 to Dr. Cory Bishop, Grant to 17075 Dr. Angela Beye and Grant 19286 to RCW, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, (Discovery grant RGPIN-2015-04957 to RCW, CGS-M and a Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement to APY), The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant JA 2108/6-1 to DJJ), and St. Francis Xavier University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads