NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental file containing raw data

Data from analysis of adipokines and TG are shown in the individual tabs.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26853v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sherri Lynn Christian conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Nikitha K Pallegar performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Robert J Brown conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alicia M Viloria-Petit conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in a Supplemental File.

Funding

This work was funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research operating grants no. 126614 and 126754, with matching funds from the Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland grant 5404.1090.103 , to Sherri L Christian, and by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant 402185-2011-RGPIN to Robert J Brown. Nikitha K Pallegar is supported by a trainee award from the Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute with funds provided by The Terry Fox Strategic Health Research Training Program in Cancer Research at CIHR and by Memorial University of Newfoundland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads