Home
Resource
Behaviorism and literary modernity, 1913-2009
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(5.39 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Gang, Joshua. Behaviorism and literary modernity, 1913-2009. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3XP73P7

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleBehaviorism and literary modernity, 1913-2009
NameGang, Joshua (author); Walkowitz, Rebecca (chair); Kramnick, Jonathan (internal member); Diamond, Elin (internal member); Mao, Douglas (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2012
Other Date2012-10 (degree)
SubjectLiteratures in English, Modernism (Literature)--History--20th century, Behaviorism (Psychology) in literature--History--20th century
Extentvii, 223 p. : ill.
Description“Behaviorism and Literary Modernity, 1913-2009”constructs a history of twentieth-century literature by examining how writers incorporated behaviorism’s arguments against consciousness into discussions of aesthetics, subjectivity, and empire. Skeptical of introspective knowledge, behaviorist thinkers argued that only external behaviors—and not mental states—could be known empirically. This paradigm not only dominated twentieth-centurypsychology and philosophy but also made crucial, if unrecognized, contributions to modern literature. Examining how behaviorism circulated and competed against other psychological doctrines,this dissertation substantially alters the idea of modernism as a “turn inward.” Instead, I argue that modernism comprised an intense debate about the nature of such interiority and about the relationship of internal mental states to external aesthetic forms. Where some modernists saidthat literary forms offered unique access to mental states, others came to understand form itself as a behavior with no necessary ties to consciousness. Competing with explanations offered by psychoanalysis, structuralism, and cognitive science, behaviorism was at the heart of this debate—as well as others about the nature of subjectivity, agency, and language. Writers skeptical of depth psychology found through behaviorism new modelsof aesthetic formand political action that seemingly circumvented the problems of self-knowledge and other minds. Bringing together analysesof the New Critics, Samuel Beckett, Djuna Barnes, Bertolt Brecht, Richard Wright and JM Coetzee, this dissertationdemonstrateshowbehaviorism changed literary thinking across the globe and allows new insights into the psychological dimensions of aesthetic form, critical interpretation, and globalization.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Joshua Gang
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3XP73P7
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024