Multiplicity in Unity Plant Subindividual Variation and Interactions with Animals
by Carlos M. Herrera
University of Chicago Press, 2009
Cloth: 978-0-226-32793-8 | Paper: 978-0-226-32794-5 | Electronic: 978-0-226-32795-2
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Plants produce a considerable number of structures of one kind, like leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds, and this reiteration is a quintessential feature of the body plan of higher plants. But since not all structures of the same kind produced by a plant are identical—for instance, different branches on a plant may be male or female, leaf sizes in the sun differ from those in the shade, and fruit sizes can vary depending on patterns of physiological allocation among branches—a single plant genotype generally produces a multiplicity of phenotypic versions of the same organ.

Multiplicity in Unity uses this subindividual variation to deepen our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary factors involved in plant-animal interactions. On one hand, phenotypic variation at the subindividual scale has diverse ecological implications for animals that eat plants. On the other hand, by choosing which plants to consume, these animals may constrain or modify plant ontogenetic patterns, developmental stability, and the extent to which feasible phenotypic variants are expressed by individuals.

An innovative study of the ecology, morphology, and evolution of modular organisms, Multiplicity in Unity addresses a topic central to our understanding of the diversity of life and the ways in which organisms have coevolved to cope with variable environments.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Carlos M. Herrera is professor of research and an evolutionary ecologist at Estación Biológica de Doñana in Seville, Spain.

REVIEWS

“A thoroughly researched and thought-provoking volume. . . . This is a valuable work for advanced audiences in a wide range of disciplines in ecology, evolution, and physiological genetics.”
— Choice

Multiplicity in Unity is the only substantial book in existence whose primary focus is the within-individual trait variability of plant organs. . . . [Herrera’s book] should be required reading for anyone involved in studying plant functional traits, and particularly those who develop and use plant-trait databases. At a broader level, this book would be a most useful bookshelf addition for anyone interested in the study of variability in plant ecology.”

— David A. Wardle, BioScience

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0001
[plant modularity, evolution, lineage, metapopulations, phenotypic variance, multiplicity]
The paleontological and phylogenetic evidence have shown that the main features ultimately responsible for plant modularity were already present at a very early stage in the evolution of land plants, and are a property shared by the whole lineage. The ecological and evolutionary implications of plant modularity have frequently been highlighted following White's pioneering treatment of plant individuals as metapopulations of repeated modules. One of the consequences of plant modularity is the appearance of a distinctive source of phenotypic variance, that is, the within-plant or subindividual component. Another consequence of the multiplicity of modules is variation in the characteristics of the copies of the same organ produced on different modules of the same plant. A thesis is developed that the multiplicity of homologous structures arising from plant modularity gives rise to a subindividual level of phenotypic differences among organs of the same plant. (pages 1 - 8)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0002
[subindividual variation, within-plant heterogeneity, nutrient concentration, multiovulate ovaries, leaf features, within-crop variation]
This chapter presents a review of the variety of morphological and functional features of plant-reiterated structures that exhibit significant amounts of variation within individuals. The focus is to provide just a catalogue of features that exhibit subindividual variation, rather than quantification of such variation. Within-plant heterogeneity in subtle structural, chemical, or functional leaf features is by no means confined to heterophyllous plants exhibiting discrete variation in leaf features. Broad within-plant variation in the number of filled seeds contained in each ripe fruit seems to be the rule among species with multiovulate ovaries. Significant within-crop variation in the concentration of major mineral nutrients may be inferred from some investigations that have examined the relationship between nutrient concentration and seed size in tropical and temperate wild plants. (pages 9 - 35)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0003
[within-plant variability, morphological traits, reiterated plant structures, paired comparison method, phylogenetic correlations, taxonomic composition]
This chapter presents an overview of the within-plant variability of continuous structural and morphological traits of reiterated plant structures. It is found that all types of reiterated structures may exhibit considerable levels of continuous within-plant variation, and that, for any given structure, variability varies greatly among species. Comparisons between different structures should ideally be performed on data obtained from the same species and individuals by means of some paired comparison method, in order to avoid possible artifacts due to some combination of phylogenetic correlations and differences in the taxonomic composition of species samples. The results of the comparison between structures differ depending on the metric used to measure variability. Information from cultivated plants reveals that within-plant variation in the chemical composition of seeds can also be extensive. (pages 36 - 65)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0004
[subindiviual variability, spatial locations, multiple variants, within-plant variation, spatial analysis]
This chapter focuses on the ways in which subindividual variability is distributed in time, and among different parts and spatial locations within a plant. A sequential component arises whenever individual plants produce variants of the same organ over the same season or, in the case or perennials, in different years. The simultaneous component is generally due to plants producing multiple variants of the same organ simultaneously or over a relatively short period of time, in such a way that organ variants are borne at the same time by individual plants. The relative importance of annual variation as a component of sequential within-plant variation can be most easily examined for leaf characteristics on deciduous plants. Spatial analyses of within-plant variation in organ features reveal that after the broad-scale variation disclosed by gradient-oriented analyses has been statistically accounted for, much intraplant variation remains, occurring over very restricted spatial scales. (pages 66 - 97)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0005
[subindividual variation, genetic heterogeneity, environmental cues, phenotypic plasticity, genetic mosaicism]
This chapter explains the remote causes of subindividual variation, that is, those cases where reiterated parts vary because the organism's genes vary or the parts experience varied environments. This variation falls into two classes of genetic heterogeneity within individual and semiautonomous programmed responses of organs within individual to environmental cues, that is, developmental phenotypic plasticity of individual organs as governed by more or less rigid organ-level reaction norms. It is shown that widespread occurrence of organ-level phenotypic plasticity indicates that there is no need to invoke subindividual genetic mosaicism to account for within-plant variation in the phenotypic characteristics of all kinds of reiterated organs. The organ-level phenotypic plasticity provides the conceptual basis as a general phenomenon, which implies that a number of the organismal mechanisms that account for within-plant variation stem from the joint effects of location in the plant. (pages 98 - 130)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0006
[subindividual variation, organ traits, causal agents, proximate mechanism, within-plant variation]
This chapter describes the organization of the response of the organism to its changing environment as well as the organization that it generates in and of itself. The author finds that the subindividual variation in reiterated organ traits is widespread, extensive, and spatially organized; affects almost every conceivable trait; and is the visible outcome of a complex underlying web of remote causal agents and proximate mechanisms. This description of the mechanism of subindividual variability has laid the biological foundations for the analysis of the ecological and evolutionary implications of subindividual variation. For a given organ trait, plant species differ widely in levels of within-plant variability and in the relative contributions to this variability of differences among and within branches or stems. The comparative analyses testing hypotheses ascertain the importance of sectoriality as a cause of within-plant variation and examine whether its importance remains consistent across species or environments. (pages 131 - 185)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0007
[subindividual variability, individual property, Haldane-Roy conjecture, within-plant variation, plant phenotypes, within-individual variability]
This chapter articulates subindividual variability as an individual property in the format of the Haldane-Roy conjecture that describes within-plant variability in organ characteristics denoting a significant shift of opinion about the importance of a phenomenon. The verification of the Haldane-Roy conjecture, and its reinforcement by indications of a genetic basis of within-plant variation, should impel us to change the ways in which the individual plant phenotypes are characterized. Within-plant variance should be granted a descriptive value of the phenotype similar to the value traditionally conferred on the within-plant mean of organ trait values. Hence, acceptance of the Haldane-Roy conjecture opens the way to examining variation among characters, among species, and among populations of the same species, also from the perspective of their levels of within-individual variability. (pages 186 - 210)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0008
[within-plant variation, reiterated organs, among-plant selection, variance behaviors, short-term performance, empirical studies]
This chapter reviews the consequences for animals of within-plant variation in characteristics of reiterated organs. The vast experimental evidence on variance-sensitive animals supports the hypothesis that within-plant variation in organ traits may lead to among-plant selection by consumers. Most theoretical models and experimental results for variance behaviors are specifically concerned with responses to variability in energetic rewards, to a large extent because such models initially arose as an outgrowth of optimal foraging theory. These models suggest that as far as nonlinearities, the law of diminishing returns, and Jensen's effects are involved, variance-sensitive behaviors will also develop in response to variability in plant organ traits which, although not directly affecting the energetic rewards of animals, may affect other components of their fitness or short-term performance. Thus, empirical studies are required that explicitly look for animal responses to naturally occurring variation in the field. (pages 211 - 264)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0009
[subindividual variability, within-plant variation, division of labor, phenotypic characteristics, discontinuous variation, organ traits]
This chapter elaborates myriad mechanisms in subindividual variability in organ traits that might in the long run have some nontrivial evolutionary consequences for the plants. It is seen that the fitness effects of within-plant variation in organ traits are not much better established to date for discrete than for continuous variation. It is shown that “division of labor” exploitation of environmental patchiness or partitioning of environmental gradients need not be restricted either to discontinuous variation or to the partitioning of the physical, abiotic environment. The biotic environment represented by pollinators or seed dispersers is also susceptible to partitioning, or “division of labor,” by structures borne on the same plant performing the same function but differing slightly in their phenotypic characteristics. (pages 265 - 310)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Carlos M. Herrera
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226327952.003.0010
[evolutionary implications, within-plant variation, organ traits, ecological phenomena, phenotypic variance, subindividual variability]
This chapter focuses on evolutionary implications that can be inferred from the existence of within-plant variation in organ traits and the associated ecological phenomena mediated by interactions with animals. The adaptive levels of environmental phenotypic variance in organ traits can be maintained by selection, regardless of the mechanisms producing it. Subindividual variability often accounts for nontrivial proportions of total environmental phenotypic variance of organ traits; selection by animals on variability has the potential to modify the magnitude of environmental variance and, in so doing, shift the balance between the genetic and environmental components. It is suggested that the environmental and genetic factors may be envisaged as “competing” to produce a given level of phenotypic variance. Thus, the spatial and temporal dynamics of such competition has manifold evolutionary implications, and animals can play a driving role by shifting the balance toward one side or the other. (pages 311 - 338)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Epilogue

Literature Cited

Index