America, Compromised
by Lawrence Lessig
University of Chicago Press, 2018
Cloth: 978-0-226-31653-6 | Electronic: 978-0-226-31667-3
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.001.0001

AVAILABLE FROM

University of Chicago Press (cloth, ebook)
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

“There is not a single American awake to the world who is comfortable with the way things are.”
 
So begins Lawrence Lessig's sweeping indictment of contemporary American institutions and the corruption that besets them. We can all see it—from the selling of Congress to special interests to the corporate capture of the academy. Something is wrong. It’s getting worse.
 
And it’s our fault. What Lessig shows, brilliantly and persuasively, is that we can’t blame the problems of contemporary American life on bad people, as our discourse all too often tends to do. Rather, he explains, “We have allowed core institutions of America’s economic, social, and political life to become corrupted. Not by evil souls, but by good souls. Not through crime, but through compromise.” Every one of us, every day, making the modest compromises that seem necessary to keep moving along, is contributing to the rot at the core of American civic life. Through case studies of Congress, finance, the academy, the media, and the law, Lessig shows how institutions are drawn away from higher purposes and toward money, power, quick rewards—the first steps to corruption.
 
Lessig knows that a charge so broad should not be levied lightly, and that our instinct will be to resist it. So he brings copious, damning detail gleaned from years of research, building a case that is all but incontrovertible: America is on the wrong path. If we don’t acknowledge our own part in that, and act now to change it, we will hand our children a less perfect union than we were given. It will be a long struggle. This book represents the first steps.
 

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Lawrence Lessig is the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School, an attorney, and an activist. He cofounded Creative Commons in 2001 and is the author of numerous books, including, most recently, Republic, Lost: Version 2.0.

REVIEWS

"Lessig lays out a working definition and theory of corruption that is at once simple and comprehensive, a devastating argument that America is racing for the cliff's edge of structural, possibly irreversible tyranny."
 
— Cory Doctorow

"America, Compromised is about the country in the Trump era, but not about Trump. Indeed, Lessig would have written much the same book if Hillary Clinton were president and if Democrats had control of both houses of Congress. His focus is not on bad people doing bad things, but on how incentives across a range of institutions have created corruption, with deleterious consequences for the nation. . . . America, Compromised join[s] an impressive array of books and essays that may, someday, have a future intellectual historian using them as examples to lament the fact that his or her contemporaries are not as eloquent or important as the group that arose in the Trump era to combat the threats to our way of life."
 
— Norm Ornstein, New York Times Book Review

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0001
[institutional corruption;corruption;institutional trust]
This chapter introduces the sense of corruption that will be the focus of the book. It distinguishes between the corruption of individuals, and the corruption of an institution, and orients the argument of the book as it relates to the latter.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0002
[Congress;Umbrella revolution;Boss Tweed;tweedism]
This chapter introduces the paradigm case of institutional corruption. An institution (Congress), that has a stipulated design (to be "dependent on the people alone") that has evolved conflicting dependencies (upon the funders of campaigns) that weaken the effectiveness of the institution and weaken public trust of the institution.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0003
[rating agencies;banks;2008 financial crisis]
This chapter applies the conception of institutional corruption to the institutions of public finance in the United States. It considers the role of banks and rating agencies in the 2008 financial collapse, and concludes that, while rating agencies were institutionally corrupted, banks were not.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0004
[journalism;broadcasting;partisan journalism]
This chapter applies the conception of institutional corruption to public media, and specifically journalism. It considers the relationship between media and the technical infrastructure of access to media, and it identifies norms that might weaken the ability of journalism to serve its public purpose, given these technical changes.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0005
[medicine;psychiatry;American Psychiatry Association]
This chapter applies the conception of institutional corruption to the academy. It focuses specifically upon the professions of medicine and psychiatry, and contrasts corrupting influences within each.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0006
[prosecutors;law firms;Jesse Eisinger]
This chapter applies the conception of institutional corruption to the law. Building upon the work ofJesse Eisinger, it describes a corrupting dynamic within the field of federal prosecution and relates that dynamic to the increasing gap in pay between the public and private sectors.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0007
[behavioral economics;blinding;transparency]
Drawing upon the analysis of the previous five examples, this chapter identifies common remedies to corruption described, and considers the strengths and weaknesses of each.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226316673.003.0008
[inequality;revolving door;political antitrust]
This chapter draws together the argument of the book and relates the dynamic described throughout the book to the underlying influence of growing inequality within the United States. It argues that the corruption identified in this book is another consequence of this inequality and that the corruption is not likely remedied until we address the inequality.