The neural system regulates bone homeostasis via mesenchymal stem cells: a translational approach

Large bone reconstruction is a major clinical issue associated with several challenges, and autograft is the main method for reconstructing large defects of maxillofacial bone. However, postoperative osteoporosis of the bone graft, even with sufficient vascularization, remains a primary problem. Therefore, better understanding of the mechanisms and clinical translation of bone homeostasis is required. Neuronal innervation of the bone is an emerging research topic, especially with regards to the role of peripheral nerves in regulating bone homeostasis. Moreover, sensory and autonomic nerves regulate this process via different types of neurotransmitters, but the specific mechanism is still elusive. In this review article, the current understanding of the interaction between the peripheral nerve and the skeleton system is summarized, with a particular focus on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs), except for osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The novel application of nerve-based bone regeneration via BMMSCs may provide a new strategy in tissue engineering and clinical treatment of osteoporosis and bone disorders.


Introduction
Large defects of the maxillofacial bone caused by tumors, trauma and congenital malformation, etc., seriously affect the appearance and function of the patient. Moreover, functional reconstruction is clinically difficult, but is highly important. Tissue engineering is a promising technology, with previous cutting-edge studies showing the importance of advanced scaffold materials with controlled release or molecularly imprinted intelligence for tissue regeneration or cancer treatment [1][2][3][4][5][6], using biomaterial alignment and optimized mechanical stimulation driven by the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [7]. Autograft remains the main method for reconstructing large continuous defects of the maxillofacial bone, but severe postoperative osteoporosis can be found after non-vascularized bone grafts [8][9][10][11]. Although the effect of free vascularized bone grafts is higher compared with non-vascularized bone grafts, the postoperative spontaneous osteoporosis of the bone graft is severe and hinders the success of dental implants, even after microsurgical vascularization [8,11,12]. Currently, there is no effective preventive method and the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Hence, this has become a focus of the reparative and reconstructive surgery research field.
Based on the fact that postoperative osteoporosis, despite a sufficient blood supply,

Ivyspring
International Publisher inevitably develops in autografted bones indicates that there may be systemic factors other than just blood supply that control the internal environment of the bone graft. As the blood supply of bone is accompanied by innervation, it has been hypothesized that nerves play an important role in regulating the bone homeostasis. Previous studies have revealed that sympathetic nerves and sensory nerves affect bone metabolism and bone remodeling via certain neurotransmitters [13][14][15][16]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the peripheral nervous system is involved in bone metabolism, osteogenic differentiation, bone mineralization and bone remodeling. Our previous studies have demonstrated that the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) inhibits bone remodeling by inhibiting bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs), as well as indicating that, Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) and Substance P (SP) can promote bone formation via sensory nerves [17][18][19][20]. Therefore, based on the results of animal experiments and necropsy, our research group has investigated in the development of a vascularized iliac bone grafting method with simultaneous innervation using neurorrhaphy between the nerves innervating the iliac bone and recipient site. Our clinical retrospective study suggested that this novel method significantly decreases postoperative osteoporosis and improves the success of dental implants [21]. Moreover, a previous tissue engineering study has found that in addition to vascularization, innervation may also play an important role in promoting tissue engineered bone formation [22].
Remodeling of innervation effectively prevents osteoporosis of the bone graft, suggesting that the mechanism via which innervation regulates bone homeostasis may involve BMMSCs. Both sympathetic and sensory nerves play a crucial role in regulating bone remodeling via specific neurotransmitters. In particular, sensory neurotransmitters, such as NGF, Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide (CGRP), SP, and Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) positively regulate bone formation via BMMSCs. The present review examines how peripheral nerve regulates bone homeostasis via MSCs, which may provide a basis for translational research of systemically regulating bone remodeling, regeneration and prevention of osteoporosis.

Relationship between bone homeostasis and 'aging' BMMSCs in osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is a very common skeletal degenerative disease in the elderly and menopausal women. Moreover, it is characterized by decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and destruction of bone microarchitecture, which give rise to an increased risk of fragility fracture of by more than 40% [23,24]. Therefore, there is thus an urgent need for novel therapies to not only reduce the risk of fracture, but also to prevent the active bone loss in early disease phases. Furthermore, it is essential to identify the mechanism of osteoporosis, which may be caused by an imbalance in bone formation and resorption [23].
Osteoporosis is related to 'bone homeostasis', which mainly refers to the relatively stable state of the intraosseous environment under the precise regulation of the system network, which should be the bone remodeling balance between osteogenic activity of osteoblasts and bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. In addition, osteoporosis occurs when the activity of osteoblasts decreases and that of osteoclasts increases, due to the disturbed balance in bone homeostasis.
Bone homeostasis is closely related to the 'aging' of BMMSCs. Friedenstein et al. [25] identified a group of cells with osteogenic potential that were derived from bone marrow, and had a morphotype similar to fibroblasts, displaying rapid adherence to tissue culture vessels. These cells are referred to as 'Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)' [26]. MSCs are defined as self-renewable, multipotent progenitor cells with the capacity to differentiate into several distinct mesenchymal lineages, and are uniformly positive for CD29, CD44, CD71, CD90, CD106, CD120a, CD124, amongst other surface proteins [27]. BMMSCs, the mesenchymal progenitors for both osteoblasts and adipocytes, have two features: self-renewal and a multipotent ability [28,29]. Aging is characterized by common environmental changes, such as hormonal, immunological and metabolic disorders. Moreover, 'aged' BMMSCs refer to dysfunctional cells, with differentiations shifting toward adipogenesis rather than osteogenesis [30]. Furthermore, in an osteoporosis mouse model BMMSCs are shown to display an 'aging' phenomenon, resulting in decreased osteogenic differentiation ability, enhanced adipogenic capacity, decreased self-renewal ability and decreased ability of induced-apoptosis in osteoclasts and T cells, ultimately leading to unbalanced bone homeostasis [31][32][33]. Therefore, 'aging' BMMSCs may be an important factor involved in unbalanced bone graft homeostasis, and thus further examination of the promotion of osteogenesis differentiation should be considered. Moreover, the osteogenic activity of BMMSCs should be present in both autograft and tissue-engineered bones to avoid postoperative absorption.
BMMSCs, as key cells for bone regeneration and maintenance, have become a hot topic of research in recent years. Furthermore, there are ongoing clinical trials for treating non-union of the bone, osteonecrosis of the femoral head and other bone diseases by directly injecting autologous MSCs or implanting with carriers [34]. In addition, studies using stem-cell-based regeneration of bone with bone tissue engineering grafts and growth factors have been successful [34]. A previous study used this method with bone marrow aspirates and customized titanium cage culturing in latissimus dorsi muscle to regenerate mandibular bone, and the results provide a good example of ectopic bone formation [35]. Since additional surgery increases the risk of complications in the donor site, dental implants can be inserted into the new bone in in-situ bone formation with autologous adipose stem cells and β-tricalcium phosphate granules [36]. It has been demonstrated that BMMSCs promote cartilage regeneration to treat osteoarthritis in vitro [37]. Interestingly, MSC-based immunotherapy using systemic infusion has beneficial effects in patients with graft-versus-host disease [38]. Moreover, recipient glycemic micro-environments result in enhanced effects of BMMSCs therapy following BMMSCs infusion in an experimental osteopenia model [39]. In addition, systemic transplantation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth has been used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus in mice [40]. MSCs therapies in different diseases, including heart failure and enterocutaneous perianal fistular disease have made progress, but standardizing MSC preparation, fitness and functionality remains difficult [41].

Microenvironmental regulation of BMMSCs
Stem cells are controlled by a microenvironment called the 'stem cell niche', rather than existing independently [42]. Furthermore, there has been increasing attention on how the systematic microenvironment regulates the stem cells. It has been shown that osteoblasts differentiate from BMMSCs, while osteoclasts differentiate from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and both BMMSCs and HSCs coexist in the microenvironment of interacting stem cells [42]. Moreover, the interaction of BMMSCs with cells differentiated from HSCs, including T cells, natural killer cells and osteoclasts, influences bone remodeling [43]. The role of T cells in bone remodeling was first identified in 1983, where it was found that bone resorption occurred in T-cell-deficient nude mice [44]. Furthermore, in an osteoporosis model, T cells are demonstrated to induce apoptosis of BMMSCs and osteoblasts via the CD40/CD40L pathway [43]. It has also been shown that BMMSCs express Fas ligand (FASL) and can recruit activated T cells to promote apoptosis [42,45,46]. Moreover, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4), which is secreted by regulatory T cells, can bind to CD80/CD86 on osteoclast precursors to promote apoptosis and reduce bone resorption [47]. Receptor activator of NF-κΒ ligand (RANKL) was first discovered to regulate T cell differentiation and is an important factor in osteoclast differentiation [48]. It has also been demonstrated that osteoprotegerin (OPG) is an osteoclast differentiation inhibitor, and serves as a decoy receptor of RANKL. Furthermore, B cells can secrete OPG to inhibit RANK-RANKL binding, which slows osteoclast differentiation and stabilize bone mass [49].
Previous studies have shown that immune cells can secrete pro-inflammatory factors that damage BMMSCs and affect tissue regeneration [50,51]. For example, HSC-derived lymphocytes secrete interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α to inhibit BMMSC differentiation [43,47]. Using an ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic mice in vitro model, our previous study reported that inflammatory microenvironment can cause loss of differentiation potential of normal BMMSC and apoptosis but can also lead to a reduced ability of BMMSC to induce apoptosis of osteoclasts [32,33,46]. Moreover, TNF-α and IFN-γ negatively regulate the osteogenic capacity of BMMSC via the NFκB and Wnt pathways, and the alteration of these pathways affects runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), which are two key transcription factors regulating osteogenesis and adipogenesis, and thus causes stem cell aging [30,32]. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), differentiated from BMMSCs, can either secrete RANKL, which binds RANK on osteoclast precursor cells, or secrete macrophage -colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), which binds to its receptors expressed by osteoclast precursors, thus promoting osteoclast differentiation [47].
As nerve fibers are involved in the formation of the bone marrow stem cell niche, the regulation of stem cells by the nervous system has become an increasing focus of research [42]. Furthermore, a previous study suggested a role of the sympathetic system in regulating mobilization of HSC to the stem cell niche [13]. Zhao et al. [52] first discovered the presence of a MSC niche around a neurovascular bundle in the mouse incisor model and demonstrated that the vascular nerve bundle regulates MSC homeostasis by secreting Sonic Hedgehog protein.
Previous studies using tissue engineering have shown that innervation, in addition to vascularization, may also play a crucial role in promoting tissue engineered bone formation [22,53]. Moreover, it has been revealed that adipocytes regulate various tissues by transmitting signals to local nerve fibers [54]. The study of neurotransmitters, such as leptin, CGRP, SP and Sema3A, on bone homeostasis has been increasing [55,56], with a focus on examining, how various neurotransmitters regulate 'aging' stem cells and may reduce osteogenic capacity.

Innervation of bone
According to Hilton's rule [57], nerves innervating the muscles also innervate the attached bones. In addition, large nerve bundles accompanying blood vessels nourish bones at different locations. Therefore, the relationship between the innervation of sensory nerves and autonomic nerves and the regulation of bone homeostasis has attracted increasing attention. A large number of sensory nerve fibers, which are sensitive to mechanical stress and pain, innervate the trabecular bone and periosteum [58,59]. Furthermore, it has been shown that these sensory nerve fibers promote osteogenesis by secreting sensory neurotransmitters, such as NGF, CGRP and SP [55,60]; although detailed understanding of their function in different tissues remains elusive (Table 1). The autonomic nervous system is divided anatomically and functionally into two opposed arms, the SNS and the parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS). The SNS plays a crucial role in the connection between the central control and terminal effectors. Furthermore, norepinephrine (NE) is a major neurotransmitter of the SNS and inhibits bone formation by stimulating α-and β-receptors, while Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is regarded as an inhibitor of NE [55,61]. Moreover, the parasympathetic neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) plays a role in bone protection by activating muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors [61]. However, the precise distribution and density of the SNS and PSNS in bone are not fully understood. In general, preganglionic neurons are cholinergic, while postganglionic neurons are noradrenergic. In addition, sympathetic postganglionic neurons cover the majority of tissues in the body, along with major nerves that contain predominantly sensory and somatic motor nerve fibers.

Regulation of BMMSC by different nerve fibers via neurotransmitters
Based on the clinical discovery that patients who are paralyzed are prone to osteoporosis, the role of the nervous system in maintaining bone mass in bone metabolism has become an important research topic [62]. It has been revealed that there is a close relationship between the central nervous system and bone metabolism. Leptin from the hypothalamus is related to osteogenesis via stimulation from the sympathetic nerves and it can inhibit bone formation via the β2 receptor expressed on osteoblasts [15]. A recent study has demonstrated that leptin can also act as a physiologic signal to leptin receptor expressed by BMMSCs, thus inhibiting osteogenesis and inducing adipogenesis [63]. Moreover, sensory and sympathetic nerves promote the migration of BMMSCs to the osteogenesis front line by using different neurotransmitters, which maintains an active bone environment in osteogenesis ( Figure 1).

NGF
NGF is a member of the neurotrophic factor family and plays a critical role in the development of various types of nerve cells in the central and peripheral nervous systems [64]. It has been shown that NGF increases osteoblast differentiation, proliferation and activity, and is also involved in osteoclastogenesis [65,66]. Our previous study reported that NGF can promote the recovery of mandibular sensory nerves in distraction osteogenesis (DO) and indirectly promote bone regeneration [19,20]. In addition, our previous study found that, in the rabbit mandibular DO model, the local application of NGF during the consolidation period can accelerate wound healing to shorten this period [20]. Our previous results also suggested that using Collagen/ nano-hydroxyapatite/kappacarrageenangels to inject NGF at the DO region can achieve improved bone-promoting effects [19]. Moreover, NGF promotes osteoblast differentiation and inhibits its apoptosis for bone remodeling, as well as accelerates the recovery of inferior alveolar nerve in DO [67,68]. It has been revealed that NGF directly regulates wound repair during bone fracture healing by activating the NGF/TrkA signaling pathway, which causes loadinduced nerve sprouting, particularly in the early stage [66]. A previous study also showed that NGF binding to TrkA enhances the survival and regenerative capacity of bone marrow stromal stem cells via the upregulation of the Erk/ Bcl-2 pathway [69]. Collectively, these findings suggest that NGF promotes bone regeneration and reconstruction.

CGRP
CGRP is a 37 amino acid peptide synthesized by the CGRP gene on the short arm of chromosome 11 and is widely found in the central and peripheral nervous systems [14]. In the maxillofacial region, CGRP is secreted from the trigeminal semilunar neuron and is transported to the bone and other effector tissues via the trigeminal axons, and can perform its biological effects by binding to the main receptor transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1). Moreover, the effect of CGRP in bone metabolism has been demonstrated in osteoporosis-phenotype CGRP-knockout mice [14]. In addition, our previous study revealed that numerous CGRP-based neuropeptides promote mobilization and osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs in jaw regeneration [70]. CGRP can act on various intraosseous cells such as osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Furthermore, it has been shown that CGRP inhibits osteoclasts via RANKL/OPG pathways under the activation of TRPV1, resulting in reduced bone resorption in animal models with experimental periodontitis [71]. Previous studies have also revealed that CGRP receptors are expressed on osteoclasts and that CGRP can inhibit osteoclastogenesis in vivo and in vitro [72][73][74], especially inhibiting the differentiation of early osteoclasts [71]. The p38 signaling pathway is important for regulation of BMMSC osteogenesis, and our previous study demonstrated that jaw-derived BMMSCs mobilize to the osteogenesis front line and play an important role in osteogenesis under the effect of static strain activated p38-MAPK signaling [70,75]. Therefore, these results provide experimental evidence for enhancing DO efficiency. Moreover, based on these findings it was speculated that the CGRP neuropeptide stops the 'aging' BMMSC microenvironment, but further studies are required to investigate the potential involvement of other pathways in which CGRP may participate.

SP
SP, a neuropeptide of the tachykinin family, is a highly conserved 11-amino acid neuropeptide involved in pain perception, and has identical protein sequences in mice, rabbits and humans [76]. SP mainly binds to the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) on non-neuronal cells, including BMSCs, BMMSCs, osteoblasts and osteoclasts, and thus regulates both osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis [77]. Furthermore, SP can stimulate osteoblast osteogenesis via NK1R in advanced bone formation. It has also been demonstrated that in skull osteoblast SP induces increased mineralization and expression levels of the bone-related proteins Runx2 and osteocalcin [78]. SP stimulation also promotes osteoclastogenesis of isolated bone marrow macrophages and bone resorption activity of mature osteoclasts [14,78,79]. It has been reported that RANKL-induced cytosolic free Ca2 + signaling accelerates NF-κB nuclear translocation in osteoclasts, and SP activates NF-κB in bone marrow macrophages (BMMs), which directly facilitates RANKL-induced macrophage osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption activity [77,80]. Moreover, SP stimulates BMSCs to produce RANKL, but at concentrations that are too low to evoke osteoclastogenesis [77]. Furthermore, a lack of SP may lead to a decrease in bone resorption rate, as well as late bone formation and mineralization rate, resulting in a net bone loss due to a greater rate of bone resorption than bone formation [79,81].
In addition, previous studies have shown that SP can stimulate the proliferation of BMMSCs and the mineralization of differentiated BMMSCs in vitro [77,81]. It has been reported that SP facilitates the proliferation of BMMSC in a concentration-dependent manner: high concentrations of SP stimulate BMMSC proliferation and mineralization, while low concentrations of SP stimulate osteoblast differentiation at a later stage [77]. Our previous study also demonstrated that local injection of SP in a rat mandibular DO model can accelerate bone remodeling and bone maturity, and also increases MSC migration during osteogenesis [18]. Furthermore, systemic injection of SP increases the migration of CD29 + MSCs to the wound region, which accelerates bone remodeling and bone maturation by activating the Erk1/2 signaling pathway [18,76]. Collectively, SP stimulates the migration of BMMSCs to the osteogenesis area and promotes differentiation to increase mineralization, thus leading to bone formation. However, the appropriate concentration and signaling pathways involved in the process requires further examinations. SP can also stimulate immune cells to secrete pro-inflammatory factors, and thus acts as a mediator of adipose tissue inflammation, leading to metabolic dysfunction [54].

Sema3A
Sema3A, an axon guidance molecule, belongs to the semaphorin family and is an important member of the vertebrate sensory neurotransmitter microenvironment. In addition, Sema3A is a membraneassociated secretory protein in the central nervous system, which is involved in guiding axonal and neuronal migration [82]. It has been shown that Sema3A is also involved in organogenesis and angiogenesis [83]. Fukuda et al. [84] were the first to discover the positive role of sensory nerves in bone remodeling, and reported a low bone mass phenotype in a neuron-specific Sema3A-deficient mouse model, but normal bone formation and bone mass in osteoblast-specific Sema3A-deficient mice [84]. Thus, high expression levels of Sema3A in bone may be derived from neurons, and a decrease in Sema3A expression in nerves innervating the intraosseous is a major factor in the reduction of bone formation and increase of bone resorption. Therefore, it was speculated that Sema3A may regulate bone metabolism via peripheral nerves.
Neuropilin 1 (Nrp1), the main receptor for Sema3A, is a protein encoded by the npr1 gene, which is located at 10p11.22 and plays a broad role in angiogenesis, axon guidance, cell survival, migration and invasion. Another receptor of Sema3A Plexin A1 (PlxnA1) forms a complex with Nrp1 to protect bone [85]. Furthermore, Sema3A binds to Nrp1 to mediate signal transduction, activate osteoblast differentiation, and inhibit adipocyte differentiation, osteoclast precursor migration and osteoclast differentiation [85,86]. Nrp1 has two complement binding domains, two coagulation factor domains and one MAM domain. Moreover, Sema3A binding to the extracellular complement-binding domain causes conformational changes of PlxnA1 and activates intracellular signals to promote osteogenic differentiation [87]. It has been demonstrated that expression of Sema3A in bone participates in not only innervation but also regulation of vascular invasion, which may contribute to bone formation.
The majority of the factors regulate bone homeostasis from a single aspect, while Sema3A both inhibits bone resorption and increases bone formation to protect bone [85]. Competing with TREM2, Nrp1 binds to PlxnA1 to inhibit both osteoclast differentiation pathways ITAM and RhoA and promote the Wnt osteogenic differentiation pathway [85]. In addition, Sema3A stimulation upregulates Nrp1 expression, causing BMMSCs differentiation into osteoblasts [85]. It has also been shown that Sema3A binds to the Nrp1 receptor and specifically activates Rac1 mediated by FARP2, which leads to the accumulation of Wnt3a-activated β-catenin in the nucleus, ultimately resulting in increased osteogenic differentiation and reduced adipogenic differentiation [88]. Such increased osteogenic differentiation can be contributed by promoting osteogenesis genes such as RUNX2, whereas reduced adipogenic differentiation can be caused by inhibiting lipogenic genes such as PPAR-γ [87,89]. Furthermore, the self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation potential of BMMSCs is determined by the expression level of Wnt3a [89]. Previous studies have reported that the expression of the osteogenesis-associated gene RUNX2 is increased in stem cells that have high expression of Sema3A [90]. Thus, Sema3A signaling is important for neuronal targeting in the peripheral nervous system. In addition, neuronal-derived Sema3A can act as an autocrine factor to promote the normal development of the nervous system [84,91].

NE
The negative regulation of bone remodeling by SNS has also been previously reported [55,56,61]. NE, as a main neurotransmitter of SNS, participates in the regulation of bone homeostasis mainly via its β2 receptor, which stimulates osteoclast formation leading to bone resorption [92,93]. With regards to its underlying mechanism, noradrenergic nerve terminals in bone release NE to stimulate β2-AR expressed on osteoblasts and osteocytes. This activation leads to an increase in RANKL expression, reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption [56]. In contrast, the expression levels of the β1 and β3 receptors on osteoblast cell lines are weak to nondetectable [56]. Furthermore, application of β-blockers can reduce fracture risk [55,94]. Our previous studies reported that sympathetic nerves mainly play a negative regulatory role. In addition, the resection of sympathetic nerves down-regulates NE-β3 receptor expression and distraction stress can promote local BMMSCs, causing sympathetic nerve and endothelial stem cells to migrate to the osteogenesis front line via Stromal cell derived factor 1 (SDF-1), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP-3). Moreover, this process results in decreased bone mass via the NE/abrd3/JNK pathway [17,95].

Clinical studies using nerve-supported bone homeostasis
In the reconstruction of the jaw, the commonly used vascularized iliac bone, the DCIA flap, often undergoes severe postoperative absorption, which affects the success of dental implants. In the preparation of a conventional iliac bone flap, the ilioinguinal nerve adjacent to the vascular pedicle is usually severed or sacrificed. The ilioinguinal nerve travelling via the internal oblique muscle is attached to the ilium and innervates the internal oblique muscle, but also innervates the ilium periosteum and bone marrow. Therefore, the reconstruction of sensory nerves may play an important role in maintaining the homeostasis of the bone graft. Our previous studies developed a method of using neurorrhaphy between the ilioinguinal nerve and the inferior alveolar nerve or auricular nerve during reconstruction of the mandibular bone [21]. Moreover, this novel technique was applied in clinical setting with promising clinical results; it was found that 10/22 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction with innervation, showed less bone resorption after 12 months at the CT scan and in histomorphometric analysis of the bone graft. Furthermore, it was identified that the bone quality around the dental implant was significantly higher compared with the non-innervated group. At 12 months after mandibular reconstruction, the Hounsfield unit (HU) loss of the grafted bone in the innervated group was significantly less compared with the non-innervated group (Figure 2) [21]. Therefore, it was speculated that simultaneous innervation of a vascularized iliac bone graft can significantly reduce the risk of bone resorption after bone graft surgery. In addition, a clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03889587) is currently underway, which includes a larger sample size of patients and there are other clinical trials and studies on bone regeneration or reduction of bone graft resorption (Table 2).  Graft bone density loss in the control group was significantly higher than in the innervated group. Bone quality evaluation indicated a suitable condition for dental implantation in all patients in the innervated group. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses showed successful innervation in the innervated group but not in the control group. Osteoclast activity was significantly higher in the control group than in the innervated group. Wang et al Clinical trial (NCT03889587)

Innervation of vascularized iliac transplant avoids resorption in jaw bone reconstruction
Randomized controlled trial with 40 participants between the age of 17 to 65 years, irrespective of gender. Patients with post resection segmental defect of mandible between 5-9 cm long will be randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1 (Innervation)-There will be simultaneous innervation of vascularized iliac or fibular bone flaps through neurorrhaphy between the nerves innervating iliac or fibular bones and recipient site. Group 2 (Non-innervation)-This will be the traditional method of vascularized iliac or fibular bone flaps, and neurorrhaphy will not be performed.
The decreased ratio of the graft bone Hounsfield unit calculated by Spiral CT examination. It is used to reflect the degree of bone resorption. The index of successful innervated reconstruction. The innervation and sensation in the muscle island of innervated graft bone flap will be tested using neuroelectrophysiological and needling response examination. The graft bone samples taken by hollow drilling technique during the dental implant(s) procedure will be observed by silver staining.

Tissue engineered bone research on nerve regulating bone remodeling
As autologous bone grafts can cause damage and complications to surrounding bone and tissue in the donor site, there has been increasing research into tissue engineering of bone. Moreover, tissueengineered bone is becoming a promising novel tool and contains four key elements: a scaffold with osteoconductivity; growth factors that induce osteogenesis; seeded cells with osteogenic potential; and tissue engineered vascularization or adequate blood supply [4]. Previous studies have focused on advanced scaffold materials for bone regeneration [6], with cutting-edge research showing the importance of controlled release or molecularly imprinted intelligence for tissue regeneration or cancer treatment [1][2][3][4][5]. In addition, previous studies have shown the importance of vascularization for tissue-engineered bone, especially early vascularization to provide nutrition for the formation of bone tissue [4,96,97]. It has also been revealed that biomaterial alignment and optimized mechanical stimulation drive MSC differentiation, thus promoting osteogenesis via the stimulation of osteogenic cell recruitment to new bone formation areas [7,98]. Furthermore, studies have focused on the role of nerves in tissue engineered bone [53,98,99], and therefore, further research is required to investigate mature tissue-engineered products for the use in patients.

Conclusions
The role of central and peripheral nervous systems in bone remodeling has been proposed in the present review, and the latter system is of particular interest. Sensory and autonomic nerves regulate the peripheral nervous system via different types of neurotransmitters, but the specific mechanism is still elusive. Sensory nerves positively regulate bone remodeling via different sensory neurotransmitters acting on BMMSCs, such as CGRP, SP and Sema3A. Furthermore, sensory neurotransmitters can inhibit BMMSC aging and promote osteogenesis, which is of great significance for osteoporosis after clinical bone transplantation. Preliminary clinical studies have reported a positive role of innervation in maintaining the bone homeostasis in bone grafts. However, the innervation of bone graft requires further investigation. It is emphasized that there may be an important connection between the nervous system and bone remodeling, which will facilitate the development of bone grafting and tissue engineering. Furthermore, the novel application of nerve-based bone regeneration using BMMSCs provides a new insight in tissue engineering and clinical treatment of osteoporosis and other bone disorders (Figure 3).