透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.36.192
  • 學位論文

橘越淮為枳?歷史空間「活的保存」在海峽兩岸實踐的經驗研究

Variation in Conservation : an Empirical Study on “Living Heritage Conservation" of Historic Space in Cross Strait Cases

指導教授 : 米復國
共同指導教授 : 劉可強 黃瑞茂

摘要


本文主要探討「活的保存」模式的傳播的核心關鍵與變異機制,自1990年代以來「活的保存」作為傳統聚落、城鎮與歷史空間保存再利用的替代方法,以主張透過「社區參與」來進行建築與文化同時保存的方式。在不同時期,首先是1990年代在台灣二崁聚落保存中被納入國家文化建設計畫的操作模式,接下來在2010年代之後大陸福州市馬尾區政府也嘗試引入台灣經驗在閩安歷史文化名村的執行涉略加以嘗試落實。這種模式在1980年代中期的台灣,由於古蹟保護運動者提出反對傳統民居保護再利用被地方政府作為經濟發展優先的文化旅遊資源,並成功地被國家文化部門(當時的文建會)吸納在澎湖二崁聚落保存計畫中實施,之後更轉化為「社區總體營造」政策,在台灣全國各地加以推動。 本研究的假設是由兩部分組成,即時勢與事件;暸解「活的保存」如何對歷史建築修繕再利用的形式產生影響。 首先,筆者提出了關於「活的保存」的3種時勢條件,它包括:1. 經濟發展帶動成為古蹟保存的優先考量;2. 城鄉發展差距的擴大成為政府的重要課題;3.政府意識到社區參與公共管理是彌補政府末梢能力不足的可能方式。另方面,有關影響「活的保存」產生變異的具體機制筆者提出包括:1.國家干預,2.社區設計專家能力,3.社區人民的共識。 最後,筆者透過指出了「活的保存」模式的局限性和機會,以及它是必須經由具有社區設計能力的社區取向專業者作為載體來攜帶與傳播「活的保存」的論述基因。並進一步強調出,社區取向的專業者可以是社區的居民、政府工作人員、專業者和關心歷史空間保存和文化保護的人們。並提出通過進步的政府,地方組織的聯盟,社會運動,社區工作者作為關鍵支點來形塑他們自己的社區的保存與發展。

並列摘要


This thesis deals with the key core and the variation mechanism of Living Heritage Conservation (LHC) model, which was treated as an alternative method for traditional town and village conservation project for reviving buildings and culture at the same time. In different period the model has been practiced first in Taiwan since 1990’s and then be adopted by Fu-Zhou Ma-Wei Government to try on Min-An after 2010’s. This model was raised out during middle 1980's in Taiwan by a movement of heritage preservation which claimed to against the type of Economy Development Priority on tradition civil villages preservation and reusing. And then became as the important prototype of Community Development policy of Taiwan’s Culture Ministry, and promoted all over this country. The hypothesis of this study is consist two parts which are trends and events, which effect on LHC of the reusing form on tradition heritages. First, through cases study author offers3 conditions of trend that LHC got the soil to grow , it consists : 1. Economy development became a priority policy on culture preservation, 2. The gap between urban and rural development was came out as a big issue for government, 3. public participation management can make up for lack of ability of the government administrative mechanism was acknowledged. As to the specific impacts of variation on conservation are: 1. State intervention, 2. Community design specialist ability, 3. community people consensus. Finally, the author points out the limits and chances of the LHC model. In term of the main vector to carry and spray the gene of LHC is the community orientated participant who must have community design ability. And those participants could be community's people of government staffs, specialists and people who care the living heritage development and culture conservation. Through the progressive government, the alliance of local organizations, communities' movement, community specialists as the site and the hinges of the resistance, to form their community and development.

參考文獻


王振寰、錢永祥,1995,〈邁向新國家?民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》Vol. 20,pp.17~55。
李永展,2009,〈全球化下的台灣社區營造〉,《國家與社會》 2009年12月 第七期 ,頁1-27。
邢幼田,1990,〈進步是規畫進步嗎?—國家體制內的進步規畫師〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》3(1),pp.95-111。
何孟興,2010,〈洗島靖海 : 論明初福建的「墟地徏民」措施〉,興大歷史學報 22 2010.02,pp.1~20。
夏鑄九,1998,《臺灣的古蹟保存:一個批判性回顧》,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,第9期, P1 ~9。

延伸閱讀