透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.108.18
  • 學位論文

一心運時務:正德時期(1506-21)的王陽明

To handle the administrative matters by the heart: Wang Yang-ming(1472-1528) in the period of Zhengde Emperor(1506-21)

指導教授 : 王汎森 張永堂

摘要


本文「一心運時務:正德時期的王陽明」,旨在了解陽明在正德時期(1506-21)的思想變化,希望透過對陽明在正德年間種種作為的考證,釐清其思想與現實環境間的關係,以透顯出其思想的精神。 第一章「龍場之悟」在說明陽明「龍場之悟」的前因後果及其思想內容。從王華與陽明所參與的會社性質之變化,可以看出當時學風轉變的契機,而這反映出陽明所處的時代危機是「道德」觀念漸趨淪喪。發生在正德元年「誅八虎」計畫的失敗,不但招來往後的「丁卯之禍」,也更加證明當時的國家社會的道德秩序逐漸崩解。陽明因為要營救妹婿及朋友的關係,上疏言事,因而下獄被貶謫至龍場。在歷經「泛海」的歷程後,對其自身的出處有了堅定的看法,也因而能夠在龍場反思國家社會問題的所在,進而提出「一心運時務」的思想架構,其中心思想是「心即理」說。 第二章「『聖人之學』是『心學』」在說明陽明回到北京任官後,如何開展其「一心運時務」的思想架構,並且進而在南京時提出「聖人之學是心學」的轉變過程。由於宦官劉瑾被殺後,正義反而沒有被伸張,相反地卻呈現是非更加不明的情況,而曾經是「丁卯之禍」受害者的陽明,卻因為其父親行賄事等的披露,無形中被當權者所打壓。但陽明卻在此時積極地宣揚他的「君子之學」想法,希望重建一道德完善的社會。但由於陽明強調對於一個人「內心」的治理,使其思想被劃歸為陸九淵之學或是禪學之類。當陽明至南京時,與魏校為首的學術集團有了門戶之爭,雙方爭論的焦點即在於一個人如何能靠著內心的治理即能經綸時務呢?陽明透過對「三代之治」理論基礎的理解,提出「三代之學是心學」的口號,因此如要重復「三代之治」,就必須依靠「心學」,而陽明此言亦是在呼應皇帝廷試題目。為了要證明朱熹也是從事於「心學」,陽明編著了《朱子晚年定論》一書,來回應當時朱學學者的攻擊。 第三章「聖賢骨血:良知」在透過陽明軍功建立與其思想轉折間的關係,來說明其「良知」說的形成經過。陽明在平南贛盜的過程,逐漸瞭解到去除私欲的關鍵即是「本心之明」。而這個想法在其歷經「忠泰之變」後,有了更清楚地輪廓,透過對周敦頤及程顥思想的思考,提出判別是非的標準即是「良知」,即是「本心之明」。另外,也說明陽明新〈大學古本序〉是作於正德十六年。

並列摘要


In this article, I explain the importance of actuality in Wang Yang-ming’s thought, through dealing with the interrelationship between his achievements (shi-gong) and philosophy of Mind (hsin-hsüeh). In the chapterⅠ, I describe the process of Yang-ming’s banishment from Beijing to Guizhou, because his argument with the government. Because Yang-ming’s interpersonal relationship, he had no choice to write a memorial to the throne. Then he was punished for the action, and has a question of what is right and wrong in the morally degenerate society. In Longchang, Yang-ming realized that a person of noble character and integrity (jun zi) did not have any private desire. Yang-ming considered that if a person could drive out private desire herself, he was a person of noble character and integrity (jun zi). Yang-ming realized that the key point was the practical direction from the heart oneself. Hence, Yang-ming had a system of practice named the study of being a person of noble character and integrity ( jun-zi-chih-hsüeh). In the chapter Ⅱ, I explain the cause and effect of the slogan “sagehood is philosophy of Mind (sheng-jen-chih-hsüeh-shi-hsin-hsüeh ). When Yang-ming returned from Guizhou to Beijing, due to his own experience of political persecution, he was pained by the realization that social standards of right and wrong were turned upside down at that time. The causes for such condition, he suggested, had to do with people's selfishness. Selfishness subsequently led to various social and national problems. Investigating and reflecting upon Ch’eng-Chu’s philosophy, Yang-ming redefined the concept of sagehood (sheng-jen-chih-hsüeh). He proposed that the philosophy of Mind (hsin-hsüeh) as a way to attain sagehood in order to regain the political harmony of Three Dynasties (san-dai-chih-zhi). Yang-ming endeavored to promote the study of sagehood whenever he worked in Beijing or Nanking. Since he emphasizes the contents and importance of Mind in his thought, his viewpoints easily fell into the disputes of different approaches between Chu Hsi and Lu Chiu-yüan (Chu-Lu yi-t’ung). This was not Yang-ming’s intention. In order to clarify his ideas, he wrote a book entitled Chu-tzu-wan-nian-ding-lun (The final evaluation on Chu Hsi’s old age). In this book Yang-ming made two arguments. First, he illuminated that the philosophy of Lu Chiu-yüan is not Buddhist Zen. Second, Chu Hsi also paid attention to the philosophy of Mind. After the publication of this book, Yang-ming’s ideas had widespread impacts to the extent that scholars began to rethink the Ch’eng-Chu philosophy. In the chapter Ⅲ, I interpret the emergence of the concept of intuitive ability to know right or wrong (liang-zhi) through the relation between hostilities and thought. In the war of South Kan-chou, Yang-ming slowly realized that understanding of everyone’s hart (ben-hsin-chih-ming) could grasp the private desire herself. Yang-ming believed that everyone could drive out the private desire by the understanding of everyone’s hart. After Yang-Ming penetrated the difficulty of two persons (zhong-tai-chih-bian), he recognized that the understanding of everyone’s hart is the concept of intuitive ability to know right or wrong (liang-zhi). In the other hand, Yang-Ming used the practical methods of Zhou Dunyi (1017-73) and Cheng Hao (1032-85) to bear witness to his idea in the practice.

參考文獻


(美)田浩,《朱熹的思維世界》(台北:允晨文化,1996)
方爾加,《王陽明心學研究》(長沙:湖南教育出版社,1989)
全漢昇,《明清經濟史研究》(台北:聯經出版公司,1987)
朱鴻林,《中國近世儒學實質的思辨與習學》(北京:北京大學出版社,2005)
余英時,《中國近世宗教倫理與商人精神》(台北:聯經出版公司,1987)

延伸閱讀