透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.95.244
  • 學位論文

應用層級分析法評估建築競圖人員專業能力之研究

Assessment of Professional Competence of Participants in Architectural Design Competition by AHP

指導教授 : 王聰榮

摘要


本研究主要在瞭解建築競圖人員應具備專業能力內涵及個別之重要程度,以期作為技職教育建築專業課程安排之參考。首先在社會現況的觀察及文獻整理後,擬定專業能力層級架構。接著以模糊德爾菲問卷方式調查專家意見,統計彙整後,建構4大評估面向,8項評估要項及21項評估因子;再透過層級分析研究法之數學運算而提出以下結論:第一層級中,「設計專業」項目權重高達48.01%,最為重要。第二層級中,「環境規劃知識」項目權重高達32.61%,最為重要。第三層級中,「空間需求及使用者行為特性」項目權重高達12.08%,最為重要。研究進行中,專家群體對於建築競圖人員之專業能力看法都將其量化彙整。最後,根據研究結果對於政府組織、教學單位、從業人員及後續研究提出建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to understand the content of professional competence of participants in architectural design competition and to assessment the significance of each factor. In hopes that the establishment was to provide architectural specialized courses of technological and vocational education, as a reference. In this research, a preliminary structure of the professional competence was drafted, based on the social observational survey and literature review. Then, FDM’s questionnaire was applied to investigate the expert's opinions. After the data collection, and statistic, the structures was builded which have 3 hierarchies. There are 4 dimensions in the first hierarchy, 8 in the second, and 23 in the third. After the mathematics of the AHP was calculated, the conclusion was provided. In the first hierarchy, “Design professionalism” has the highest weight of 48.01%. In the second hierarchy, “The knowledge of environmental planning” has the highest weight of 32.61% and is the most important item. In the third hierarchy, “Space demand and the features of user behavior” has the highest weight of 12.08% and is the most important item. Summarization above results, in the research process, the experts’s opinions was quantitatived which about the professional competence of participants in architectural design competition. Finally, the aforementioned information serves as the references for government agencies, academics and future researchers.

參考文獻


35. 黃國宏,「建築設計教學助理應具備專業能力分析之研究」,中華科技大學學報,第五一期,2012,第2-16頁。
38. 曾俊達,「建築師專業責任之探討」,建築學報,第三九期,2002,第23-36頁。
39. 金文森、潘吉齡、江政憲,「營建工程職業道德課程規劃之研究」,通識教育季刊,第八卷,第一期,2001,第61-78頁。
40. 沈清松,「倫理學理論與專業倫理教育」,通識教育季刊,第三卷,第二期,1996,第1-17頁。
42. 黃忠發、李俊賢、吳佳峰,「營建業營建倫理認知與收賄意圖影響因素之研究」,建築學報,第六六期,2008,第61-78頁。

延伸閱讀