透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.141.44
  • 學位論文

以合作探究探討國小科學教師問題本位教學設計之專業成長歷程

The Professional Growth of Elementary Science Teacher on Problem-based Instructional Design by Collaborative Inquiry

指導教授 : 楊坤原

摘要


本研究目的在於以合作探究探討國小科學教師問題本位學習教學設計之專業成長歷程。本研究採用個案研究法,以桃園縣某國小的自然科學教師(合作教師)為研究對象,進行時間為一整年的上學期及下學期,每週三堂課,研究者在上學期與合作教師共同研發三個PBL教學單元,在下學期則觀察合作教師在一整年的教師專業成長改變情況。在研究過程中所使用的研究工具為「PBL設計問題評鑑表」、「PBL問題審查意見表」、「PBL教師教學設計評鑑表」、「教師專業成長自評表」以及「半結構式的訪談大綱」。所蒐集的資料來源與方法,包括:錄音帶、錄影帶、教學文件、會議記錄、晤談與教室觀察、教室觀察筆記及非正式晤談。在研究進行的過程中不斷地收集、分析資料及進行三角校正,以期真實呈現合作教師發展PBL教學的全貌。本研究具體發現分為兩個部分,一是研究者與合作教師在合作探究歷程所發展的三個PBL教學單元確實適合國小四年級學童的認知;二是在一整年的上、下學期實施PBL教學後,合作教師的教師專業成長能力有所改變,例如:「教學評量與研究」、「學科知識」、「教學知識及技巧」、「教學設計能力」、「教學統整能力」及「教學環境認知」等六個面向都有明顯的改變。

並列摘要


This study aims to the professional growth of elementary science teacher on Problem-based Learning designed by collaborative inquiry. This study uses the case study methodology with natural science teachers (cooperation between teachers) in an elementary school in TaoYuau County as the object of study. The period time of study covered two semesters a whole year, and there were three classes a week. The researcher and cooperative teacher jointly develop three PBL teaching units in the upper semester, then they did teaching observation in the next semester. Through the whole study process, cooperative teacher had changes in professional development in the full year. The research tools were:「"PBL design evaluation table", "PBL review views table", "PBL teaching design evaluation table", "teachers' professional development self-evaluation table" and "semi-structured interview outline"」. The sources and methods of data collection, included: audio and video tapes, teaching files, meeting records, interview and classroom observation, classroom observation notes and informal interviews. During the study process, the researcher and teacher continually collect and analyze data and triangular correction, with a view to show a real picture of developing PBL by cooperative teachers. This study specific discovery consists of two parts, one is researcher and cooperative teacher in studies research collaboration process has developed three PBL teaching unit that is suitable for elementary school children's cognition; second, after a full year implementation, PBL teaching teachers' professional development skills have changed, for example in the next six fields:「"introduction teaching assessment and research", "discipline knowledge", "teaching knowledge and skills", "teaching design capacity", "teaching integration capacity" and "teaching environmental awareness"」.

參考文獻


李光烈(1999)。國小自然科教師應用創造性問題解決的教學策略之行動研究。 國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所之論文,未出版,高雄。
林繼昌(1999)。問題導向學習教學之小班老師的角色和責任。醫學教育,3(1),88-91。
邱浩彰、葉建宏、陳彥正、張志華,、楊巧如(2007)。輔仁大學醫學系實證醫學的教學. 醫學教育,11(3),193-200。
侯秋玲(2005)。看見語文教育的可能性--探究取向語文課程之協同探究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系之論文,未出版,台北。 
許麗齡(2001)。問題導向學習於護理教育上之應用。護理雜誌,48(4),31-36。

被引用紀錄


喻雅蘭(2014)。實施問題本位學習法在國小五年級能源教育之行動研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2502201617122507

延伸閱讀