透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.144.32
  • 學位論文

預鑽孔植入PC樁於排水土層之受壓載重行為評估

Evaluation of Compression Behavior for Pre-bored P.C. Piles in Drained Soils

指導教授 : 陳逸駿

摘要


摘要 本研究利用蒐集國內50筆於排水土層之預鑽孔植入式PC樁軸向壓載重試驗資料,以工程界常用且具代表性的詮釋法為評估基準,進行軸向壓載詮釋法評估,討論各種詮釋法之相互關係及優劣性。再經由詮釋之量測結果分別與理論承載力預測值及規範建議值進行比較,以驗證各分析公式及規範之合理性。 在詮釋法方面,首先利用內差法可推估L1大約發生在0.53%B (B為樁徑)及平均位移量為3.4 mm,這顯示初始線性段發生在相當小之位移處。而各詮釋法與L2之平均比值為介於0.78~1.28之間,平均位移量大約是落在15~47 mm之間,Chin 法為大於64.6 mm。依平均比值及位移量觀察,各詮釋法以Chin法為最大值,DIN 4026法為最小值,Hirany and Kulhawy (L2)法屬於中間合理的範圍。 於承載力部份,量測底承力介於0.15~0.18倍預估底承力之間。而量測摩擦力介於1.39~1.60倍預估摩擦力之間,經由回饋及統計分析,建議k/ko值應採用1.65 較適合,此值明顯大於一般場鑄樁基礎之建議範圍。另觀察摩擦力與底承力隨樁深及長徑比的變化,量測摩擦力與預估摩擦力之比值有隨著樁深及長徑比的增加而減少的趨勢,但量測底承力與預估底承力之比值較無明顯的關係。 各國相關規範分析之部份,運用SPT-N經驗公式進行推估,以日本建築基礎構造設計指針較符合量測值。依本研究之統計及回歸分析植入式PC樁之經驗公式,單位面積之摩擦力建議為fs =(0.4±0.03) N (t/m2),而單位面積之底承力建議為qb =(10±0.14 )N (t/m2)。

並列摘要


ABSTRACT This study collected 50 load tests for pre-bored P.C. piles in drained soils to evaluate the axial compression behavior. The evaluation includes interpretation criteria, side resistance, and tip resistance. First, representative interpretation criteria were applied to these load test data to observe their relative merits and interrelationships. Then, the interpretation results were used to examine the analytical models of side resistance and tip resistance. For interpretation criteria, L1 occurs at about 0.53%B (B = shaft diameter) with mean displacement of 3.4 mm. The results indicate that the initial linear region is in a very small displacement. The ratios of representative interpretation criteria, all compared to L2, range from 0.78 to 1.28. The displacements of these criteria locate at between 15 and 47 mm, and the Chin method is greater than 64.6 mm. Among these criteria, the Chin method is upper bound, DIN 4026 method is lower bound, and Hirany and Kulhawy (L2) method is in the reasonable middle range. For axial capacity, the mean ratio of measure tip resistance to predicted tip resistance is between 0.15 and 0.18, while the mean ratio of measured side resistance to predicted side resistance is about 1.39-1.60. Based on the back-calculation from these load tests, the suggested K/Ko is 1.65 for pre-bored P.C. piles, which is much greater than the suggested values in drilled shafts. In addition, the ratio of measured/predicted side resistance is convergent to 1.0 when the shaft length increases. Finally, the measured results also compare with related codes using the SPT-N empirical formula. It is found that the "Architectural Institute of Japan Recommendations for Design of Building Foundation" is closer to the measured results. Based on these analyses, the suggested unit side resistance and unit tip resistance are (0.4 ± 0.03) N (t/m2) and (10 ± 0.14) N (t/m2), respectively.

參考文獻


31. 方穎忠,「場鑄樁樁底承載力及壓載詮釋法之評估」,碩士論文,私立中原大學土木工程研究所,桃園中壢,2007。
32. 朱祖宏,「場鑄樁於卵礫石層之軸向及側向載重詮釋法及承載力評估」,碩士論文,私立中原大學土木工程研究所,桃園中壢,2009。
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.” Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges”,16th Ed.,1996.
5. Chin, F.K., “Estimation of the Ultimate Load of Piles not Carried to Failure”, 2nd Southeast Asian Conference on Soil Engineering, Singapore, 81-90, 1970.
16. Meyerhof, G.G.,” Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundation ,”Journal of the Geotechnical Eng.Div.,ASCE,Vol.102, No.4,225~244,1976.

被引用紀錄


張凱鈞(2014)。樁載重試驗資料庫暨承載力分析之網路平台系統〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400928
朱亭昌(2012)。壁樁受壓載重之行為評估〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200518
吳浩瑋(2011)。樁基礎於排水土層之樁底承載力分析模式研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100813

延伸閱讀