透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.139.240.142
  • 學位論文

我國農會信用部之法制研究—以農業金融法之規範為中心—

A Study of the Legal System of Taiwan's Credit Departments of Farmers' Associations - Focusing on the Regulations in the Agricultural Finance Act -

指導教授 : 賴英照
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘 要 基於農會信用部之矛盾性格,及其本身之體質孱弱,加上外在之環境遷異,造成了經營困頓、積弊日深以及處理困難之窘境。2003年農業金融法之制頒確立了農會信用部之繼續存在,但由於上述問題未能獲得通盤解決,農會信用部如何自處,政府又應如何有效監理,即是本論文之寫作重心。 本論文分成四大部分,首先探求農會信用部之正確定性,俾利法律之適用以及改革之設計;其次針對農業金融法之主要規定進行評析,以明其旨趣,並且提出建議,以落實立法目的;再者討論農業金融法與其他相關法律之競合問題,並嘗試加以解決;最後則檢討我國問題農會信用部之處理模式,從比較法制之觀點,實務處理之經驗以及司法判決之指引,謀求建構完善之處理機制。 農會信用部積弊已久,期能藉由本論文所歸結之具體建議,獲致相當解決,是為本論文之研究目的。

並列摘要


Abstract Within the credit departments of farmers’ associations in Taiwan, there exist innate weaknesses and contradictory characteristics. These difficulties along with changes in circumstances have resulted in management difficulties within and long-term abuse of the credit departments of farmers’ associations. Although the enforcement of the Agricultural Finance Act of 2003 secured the establishment of credit departments, the problems mentioned above persist. The purpose of my research is to explore these problems and suggest how credit departments should manage themselves and how the government should exercise efficient supervision. My thesis comprises four parts. Firstly, I examine the proper characterization of the credit departments so as to determine the application of laws and design of reform measures. Secondly, I analyze the main regulations in the Agricultural Finance Act of 2003 and propose approaches to support their implementation. In the third part, I address issues of legal concurrence between the Agricultural Finance Act of 2003 and other relevant laws and present resolutions. Finally, I review Taiwan’s failing credit departments from the perspective of comparative law, examining practical cases and court verdicts. By doing this, I construct an alternative optimal handling mechanism. There is long-standing abuse of the credit departments of farmers’ associations in Taiwan. This thesis aims to propose practical solutions for the problems.

參考文獻


19、余雪明,<經營失敗銀行處理的法律分析—從美國銀行破產模式看彰化四信案>,臺大法學論叢,第二十九卷第四期(2000)
43、許宗力,<基本權程序保障功能的最新發展-評司法院釋字第四八八號解釋>,月旦法學,第五十四期(1999)
47、陳元保,<資產管理公司的濫觴-美國RTC的經驗與成效>,經濟前瞻,第七十四期(2001)
58、陳貴端,<公司治理經濟法律制度之探討 以公司內部治理結構及組織運作為中心>,律師雜誌,第三0五期(2005)
72、黃昭元,<憲法權利限制的司法審查標準:美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析>,台大法學論叢,第三十三卷第三期(2004)

被引用紀錄


林資雄(2009)。農業金融制度之研究-以農業金融法為中心-〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2009.00859

延伸閱讀