本研究採個案研究法,探討教師運用多元評量策略(包括意圖、方式、與實施)之整體圖像。研究者進入主角教師之教室現場共一學期100節課,輔以訪談、文件分析等策略,分析歸納出主角教師實施多元評量之三種圖像:1、活化:主角教師在語文課程中選用合宜的評量,有效運用訊息與資源,結合評量與教學,並將結果回饋於學生,且作為改善教學的依據。2、迷思:主角教師在數學課程中,由於學科教學知識不足,評量規劃較貧乏僵化,對於教學無所助益,有時且誤導學生學習。3、神話:主角教師在社會課程中,寓遊戲於教學中,熱鬧有趣,但實際上未達到學習目的,多元評量如同虛幻的「神話」。研究者後續提出四個議題與讀者分享討論。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the facets of classroom assessment. Case study was adopted with classroom observations, interviews, and document analysis. Three facets were found: 1. activating learning: In language art classes, the teacher effectively made use of learning resources, chose suitable assessment technique, embedded assessment within teaching, and amended scoring rubrics in accordance with students' reactions; 2. misconception: In mathematics classes, the teacher, with a lack of pedagogical content knowledge, was limited to stereotypical assessment method, and even misguided students' learning; 3.myth: In social science classes, the teacher had unrealistic expectation of assessment, and fun did not bring up students' learning. Finally, the researchers raised discussions and reflections for future studies.