透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.120.204
  • 學位論文

地震誘發邊坡崩塌位移二維分析

2-Dimentional Analysis of Landslide Displacement Induced by Earthquake

指導教授 : 林美聆

摘要


台灣位於板塊交界處,地震頻發,每當邊坡發生災害時,不僅會影響交通,造成經濟損失,甚至會影響居民生命安全,因此對邊坡受震產生之崩塌位移進行分析與研究,則可以對邊坡受震產生之破壞及崩塌影響範圍加以評估,有助於對可能受災區域進行整治與規劃。 在前人分析邊坡受震產生崩塌位移分析主要有兩種方法:一爲滑動塊體法,此法參數易取得且分析快速,常被用於分析大區域邊坡受震行爲分析。二為數值模擬動態分析,以數值分析臨界破壞面作爲滑動面,改變界面材料强度,輸入地震歷時動態分析後得到滑動塊體的滑動位移。 本研究先改變凝聚力、摩擦角、坡角建立簡單均質邊坡模型,比較對數螺線破壞面與數值分析臨界破壞面的深度與滑塊重量,通過差異比較認爲對數螺線滑塊法使用範圍為c/γH<0.037、tan⁡∅/tan⁡α:0.8~1.2。之後以殘餘界面材料强度比較二維滑動塊體法與數值模擬位移分析,通過位移模擬結果比對,當界面强度折減係數越低,兩種分析方法位移分析結果差異越大,推測造成差異的原因為滑塊法無法考慮到塊體變形及能量消散的影響。 本研究最後以大型振動台邊坡試驗與兩個現地崩塌案例,進行破壞面與滑動位移分析,並將分析結果與試驗狀況與地形剖面進行比較與討論。通過大型振動台試驗模擬與比較,發現對數螺線滑塊法與數值模擬法,在破壞面、滑動起始點、滑動位移與物理試驗具有一致性。以現地案例模擬分析中,數值分析與對數螺線破壞面分析得到崩崖距離與災害前後剖面比較結果一致,而在模擬滑動位移時以坡頂加速度歷時輸入並以界面殘餘强度分析,得到的坡頂水平位移與數值剖面地形坡頂水平變異比較差異不大,故可以使用對數螺線滑塊法與數值分析推測破壞面位置及計算滑動位移。

並列摘要


Taiwan is located at the boundary of plates, so earthquakes occur frequently. Whenever a landslide induced by earthquake, it will cause adverse effects on traffic and economy, even threaten residents’lives. Therefore, the reasearch on the landslide displacement induced by earthquake can evaluate the damage and the impact scope of the collapse, which is meaningful for the advice and planning of the high-risk areas. In previous studies, there are two methods for calculating the displacement induced by earthquakes. One is the sliding block method, which has easy access to parameters and analyzes rapidly, and is often used to analyze the seismic b ehavior of slopes. The other is the numerical simulation. The critical failure surface of numerical analysis is used as the sliding surface, the strength of the interface is changed, and the sliding displacement of the sliding block is obtained after dynamic analysis. In this study, simplified homogeneous slope models were built by changing the cohesions, friction angles and slope angles, and the depth and weight of the log-spiral sliding block and the critical failure surface in numerical analysis were compared.through the analysis,we suggest the usable range is c/γH<0.037、tan⁡∅/tan⁡α:0.8~1.2. Then the residual strength of the sliding surface is used to input the two-dimensional sliding block method and the numerical simulation, and the displacement results are compared. When the interface strength is reduced the lower the value, the greater the difference between the displacement results of the two methods. It is speculated that the reason for the difference is that the sliding block method cannot consider the influence of block deformation and energy dissipation. Then, the failure surface and sliding displacement were analyzed by the large-scale shaking table slope test and two in-situ collapse cases, and the analysis results were compared and discussed with the test conditions and terrain profiles. Through the simulation and comparison of the large-scale shaking table test, it is found that the failure surface and the starting point of the sliding and the sliding displacement result of two methods are consistent with the physical test. In the field case simulation, the numerical analysis and the log- spiral failure surface obtained the same results of the cliff collapse distance and the profile before and after the Chi-Chi Earthquake When simulating the sliding displacement, the acceleration of crest was input and the residual strength was used to analyze. There is little difference between the horizontal displacement and the horizontal variation of the topography of the slope, so the log-spiral sliding block method and numerical analysis can be used to infer the position of the failure surface and calculate the sliding displacement.

參考文獻


王元度(2005),小型振動台之模型邊坡動態試驗研究,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
藍詩婷(2014),地形對地震震波反應之影響,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
Agliardi, F., Crosta, G., Zanchi, A. (2001). Structural constraints on deep-seated slope deformation kinematics. Engineering Geology, 59(1-2), 83-102.
Arab, M. G., Kavazanjian Jr, E., Matasovic, N. (2010). Nonlinear time-domain analysis of a sliding block on a plane. In Proceedings of 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, May, Missouri University of Science and Technology Press, on CD ROM, Paper (No. 4.08).
Bray, J. D. (2007). Simplified seismic slope displacement procedures. In Earthquake geotechnical engineering (pp. 327-353). Springer, Dordrecht.

延伸閱讀