透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.142.248
  • 學位論文

生命週期評估中結合地下水傳輸模式及風險評估之研究-以封閉掩埋場為例

Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Groundwater Transport Model and Risk Assessment:A Case Study of Landfill Mining

指導教授 : 闕蓓德

摘要


生命週期評估是以「從搖籃到墳墓」的觀點,來衡量產品從原物料取得、生產、使用及處置過程中的潛在環境衝擊。此方法已被廣泛使用於評估土壤及地下水污染場址整治方案環境衝擊,以選擇對環境最友善之方案。然而目前的生命週期評估並未考量地下水污染造成的環境衝擊,且無法量化污染物的長期排放及缺乏在地化特徵因子。本研究以生命週期評估為基礎,使用地下水傳輸模式,模擬污染場址地下水的污染物長期排放量,並以多介質傳輸模式建立在地化的表水、地下水及土壤特徵化因子,建構具有時間尺度且能量化地下水衝擊之方法至生命週期評估中,使污染場址整治方案的環境衝擊評估結果更加完整。在土壤及地下水整治方案選擇中,本研究以掩埋場活化再利用為案例研究。 早期固體廢棄物處理政策主要以掩埋為主,設立多座垃圾掩埋場以解決生活垃圾處置問題;但由於環保意識不發達,掩埋場多未加設不透水布等防止污染物擴散之設備,導致後續土壤及地下水被嚴重污染。而掩埋場在掩埋容積達到飽和後,多以封閉處理,造成土地佔用與土壤及地下水持續污染等問題。 本研究探討四個不同的封閉掩埋場再利用方案,分別為(1)未整治、(2)再利用為飛灰掩埋場、(3)再利用為飛灰掩埋場及廢棄物回收效益、(4)再利用為環保公園。盤查資料參考實場整治報告及相關文獻推估資源使用量及污染物排放量,選用IMPACT 2002+衝擊評估方法作為生命週期評估基礎。評估結果顯示,衝擊最高為方案(2)再利用為飛灰掩埋場,主因為整治時分選及運輸廢棄物耗用大量電力及柴油,造成資源耗用衝擊。加入本研究量化的動態地下水人體健康衝擊後,各方案的總環境衝擊皆明顯增加,其中又以方案(1)未整治之地下水人體健康衝擊佔最高之總衝擊比例,因此未整治方案需要重視地下水污染造成的衝擊。

並列摘要


Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an applied method for evaluating the environmental impacts over the whole life cycle of a product, process, and activity.Therefore, LCA can be used as an assessing method in supporting systems for quantifying the environmental impacts regarding the remediation site.Life cycle assessment (LCA)methodologies are well-developed models for assessing environmental impacts including air emissions, surface water emissions, and emitting to upper soil layer. However, at the mention of emitting to groundwater and deep soil, these compartments have only gained little attention (Lemming et al. 2010).Groundwater, which is often used by people, raises the possibility of human exposure.Therefore, human health impacts may be underestimated when assessing soil and groundwater remediation alternatives. The aim of the study is to establish a method to quantify the impact of groundwater pollution by using human toxicity potential and groundwater transport model. The groundwater transport model was used to simulate the long-term emissions from pollutants, and the groundwater characterization factors were established through the multi-media transport model. By quantifying the dynamic groundwater impact, the performance of different remediation projects could be compared and supporting the availability for land reuse. The case study is a closed municipal solid waste landfill and the optional scenarios are (1) remaining the closed landfill and building a new one; (2) excavating the closed landfill and reusing; and (3) excavating the closed landfill as land reuse resource and building a new one. Among all the scenarios, scenario 1-no mining has the lowest environmental impacts. The human health impact through groundwater exposure pathway demonstrates the importance of quantifying pollution of groundwater. The III optimal remediation project could be implemented by including the dynamic groundwater impacts.

參考文獻


侯裕文,100年度新竹縣公有掩埋場總體檢計畫,行政院環境保護署,2011。
施秀靜,生命週期風險分析方法之研究,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2011。
譚志豪、冀樹勇、顧承宇、林坤霖,臺北盆地區域性三維地下水流動數值模擬,中興工程,第93期,p1-9,2006。
黃佳雯,地下水模式工具於污染控制場址範疇界定之研析,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2005。
黃泰元,焚化飛灰再利用情境之特性與生命週期評估,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2015。

延伸閱讀