透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.189.180.76
  • 學位論文

風險社會下之預防性羈押

The Preventive Detention of Risk Society

指導教授 : 李茂生
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


並列摘要


Comparing with detention, the purpose of preventive detention, however, is not for ensuring the proceeding of litigation procedure, but for a preventive measure and which is in similarity with a security measure. Thus, the conditions between preventive detention and detention are very different. Against the substance and the purpose of detention which lays in crime investigation, preventive detention violates the presumption of innocence with the basis of due process of law. Nevertheless, as the importance of precaution in any dangerous behaviors to society, preventive detention is still a mainly purpose of detention in many countries nowadays. In different aspects practically, although there are vary opinions and argues in the rationality of preventive detention, preventive detention is still recognized to society resulted from the identification of safeguard to the public. The thesis researches the reasonableness of preventive detention, the social demands of preventive detention, and the influences over criminal policy under the social demands of preventive detention. Presumption of innocence, due process of law and the human rights are the core issues about preventive detention; however, the influences of preventive detention over the criminal policy are much obvious under the studies of risk society. The thesis states the background of the legal progress in Taiwan for analyzing the system of preventive detention in Taiwan, and also researches into the risk society theory in western society for the possibility of defining the same in the system of preventive detention in Taiwan. The thesis holds a dissent opinion from the existence of preventive detention. Nevertheless, as it has difficulties to abolish the preventive detention system in whole under the practical legislation, the system of preventive detention shall be amended in the conditions of acceptance by society.

參考文獻


王兆鵬,刑事訴訟講義,台北:元照,2006。
朱石炎,刑事訴訟法(上),台北:三民,2001。
林鈺雄,刑事訴訟法(上),台北:元照,2010。
林俊益,刑事訴訟法概論(上),台北:新學林,2010。
黃東熊、吳景芳,刑事訴訟法論,台北:三民,2001,

被引用紀錄


吳家豪(2017)。我國監所作業之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703808

延伸閱讀


  • 蕭宏宜(2015)。預防性羈押的實然與應然東吳法律學報26(4),83-122。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02593750-201504-201508270007-201508270007-83-122
  • 張寧(2015)。羈押與具保之認知分析犯罪與刑事司法研究(24),1-31。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18104045-201512-201602160004-201602160004-1-31
  • 張君魁(2016)。論預防性國家監控之憲法界限〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201610480
  • 朱石炎(1998)。論修正之羈押規定法令月刊49(1),3-9。https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.199801_49(1).0001
  • Chen, T. F. (2014). Essays on High Order Systematic Risk [doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00139