透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.221.204
  • 學位論文

利用核磁共振影像評估巨峰葡萄催芽後之芽體水分變化

Assessing water status of ‘Kyoho’ grape (Vitis vinifera L. × Vitis labruscana Bailey) buds after chemical budforcing with magnetic resonance images

指導教授 : 李國譚

摘要


臺灣地處於熱帶和亞熱帶地區,夏季進入秋季日長變化不明顯且溫度較暖,加上巨峰葡萄花芽在5月底皆已分化完成,可利用修剪、除葉和催芽劑使芽體重新萌發,進行一年二收的產期調節。而冬季低溫需求不足造成內生休眠無法順利打破為一大困擾,利用修剪配合催芽劑使用,可使萌芽整齊且生長勢一致。本試驗欲了解於夏季與冬季進行修剪頂芽(對照組)與修剪頂芽加二氯乙醇催芽劑(處理組),對’巨峰’(Vitis vinifera L.× Vitis labrusca Baily ‘Kyoho’)葡萄芽體打破休眠之影響。利用核磁共振儀(magnetic resonance imaging, MRI )將活體盆植五年生的巨峰葡萄樹放入機器,進行芽體T2值與自由水含量的偵測,配合芽體外觀的變化。並調查萌芽率與萌芽後葡萄之生長勢。 試驗結果顯示,夏季芽體為相對性休眠的時候,催芽組並不會加速芽體T2值與自由水含量的上升,與對照組無顯著性差異。皆在處理5天後芽體T2值與自由水含量上升,核磁共振影像芽體分生組織分化形成節間與葉原體,打破相對性休眠(paradormancy),且於處理8天後萌芽。然而,對照組萌芽率66%比修剪加催芽組100%低,且夏梢生長勢較差。冬季芽體為內生性休眠的時候,催芽組芽體T2值與自由水含量上升顯著高於對照組,配合MRI影像芽體分生組織之分化,判斷催芽11天後打破休眠,比對照組提早一星期打破內生休眠,此時外表芽體的狀態為Modified E-L系統階段2,芽體開裂且膨大。二氯乙醇催芽劑也可顯著增加韌皮部之T2值。因為提早打破內生休眠的緣故,使巨峰葡萄樹體提早萌芽且生長,春梢長度與葉面積皆顯著高於修剪處理組。 根據本實驗結果,催芽組於夏季可以使萌芽整齊一致,夏梢生長勢較佳,但是無法提早打破相對性休眠。處理催芽劑於冬季內生休眠的葡萄芽體,T2值與自由水含量比對照組提早一星期上升,提早打破內生休眠,且可增加韌皮部組織的T2值,使巨峰葡萄樹體提早萌芽且生長。

並列摘要


Taiwan is located in tropical and subtropical region with a relatively long growing season. Using pruning and budforcing agent budbreak of a grapevine can be successfully induced in summer and thus a grapevine being harvested twice a year. The relation between water status and budbreak from normal dormancy season has been established. However, the relation between chemical forcing and water status in grapevine was not clearly documented. In this study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to investigate the change of water status in the compound bud of ‘Kyoho’ grapvines after chemical forcing in summer and in winter. Potted, 5-year-old, self rooted ‘Kyoho’ grapevines were pruned and then forced with 2-chloro-ethanol either in summer or in winter. Free water content of the compound bud and adjacent cane tissue after forcing was non-invasively evaluated with a MRI system equipped with a 120-mm gradient insert and configured to 70-mm RF volume coil. Bud developing stages after forcing were visually recorded and shoot growth was measured. Chemical forcing after summer pruning improved uniformity of budbreak and shoot growth but had little effect on free water status in the bud and adjacent cane tissue. Free water content in buds with or without forcing all increased five days after treatments. On the other hand, chemical forcing after dormant pruning quickly increased free water content in the bud and the adjacent phloem tissue, and advanced budbreak as well as young shoot growth. It appears that free water status is a good index for dormancy release in grapevines but is insufficient to explain the mechanism of chemical forcing.

並列關鍵字

chemical forcing bud dormancy MRI free water status

參考文獻


宋馥華、張育森. 1997. 木本植物之芽體休眠機制及其調節. 中國園藝 43:281-294.
康有德. 1976. 臺灣巨峰葡萄之果芽形成. 中國園藝 22:49-57.
張致盛. 2010. 葡萄芽體休眠與解除機制. 臺中區農業改良場九十九年專題討論專集.
張致盛、張林仁、林嘉興. 2004. 台灣葡萄生產產期調節技術. 葡萄栽培技術研討會專集:37-53.
Allan, P. 2004. Winter chilling in areas with mild winters: Its measurement and supplementation. Acta Hortic. 662:47-52.

延伸閱讀