透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.15.59.163
  • 學位論文

國中生社會支持與其健康相關生活品質之關係研究

The Relationship between Social Support and Health Related Quality of Life among Junior High School Students

指導教授 : 李蘭

摘要


國中生正值生命週期的重要階段,其健康相關生活品質的研究應受重視。為瞭解國中生的社會支持對其健康相關生活品質的影響,先自台灣北部五縣市隨機抽出十四所國民中學,然後在每所抽中學校的七至九年級,各隨機抽出一班進行問卷調查。結果研究樣本有1,349人(男生701人;女生648人)。本研究的依變項為健康相關生活品質,從主觀、客觀及整體三個面向去評量。中介變項為社會支持。自變項方面,則由個人、家庭、學校與網路特性組成。利用涵蓋前述變項之自製問卷收集資料,主要發現包括:1.客觀生活品質(生活狀況)與主觀生活品質(生活滿意度)間有顯著的正相關;國中生自評之客觀、主觀與整體性健康相關生活品質,均屬於中上程度。2.四個範疇(生理、心理、社會、環境)中,以「社會範疇」的生活品質最好;「心理範疇」之生活品質最差。3.性別比較發現男生在整體及生理、心理、環境三個範疇之生活品質優於女生;女生僅在社會範疇之生活品質優於男生。4.逐步複迴歸分析顯示自覺健康狀況、家庭支持度、與父親關係、學校支持度、家庭經濟狀況、是否為獨生子女、性別、有無固定網友、與母親關係、母親教育程度、以及與同學關係十一個變項是預測國中生整體生活品質之重要因子,共可解釋28.4% 的總變異量;其中自覺健康狀況是最重要的預測因子;可解釋15.4%的總變異量;關於社會支持方面,網路支持度與生活品質無顯著的關係;家庭支持度是第二重要的預測因子(可解釋7.2%之總變異量),其對生活品質之影響力明顯超過學校支持度(解釋變異量僅0.9%)。5.以結構方程式進行模型檢測與修正;修正後模型具好的整體適配度。模型顯示社會支持(主要是家庭支持與學校支持)對健康相關生活品質不但具直接影響效果,且亦為性別、是否為獨生子女、自覺健康狀況、家庭經濟狀況、與父親關係、與母親關係、與同學關係等自變項之中介變項;上述自變項對健康生活品質具直接與間接的影響;另家庭支持與學校支持間存在顯著的正相關。本研究結果提供了未來改善青少年健康相關生活品質之具體方向;並由研究發現建議建構更有力的社會支持、改善健康狀況及強化青少年與父母親之關係應有助於提升國中生健康相關生活品質。

並列摘要


Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is a major health issue for the junior high school students which should be emphasized. The main purposes of this study were to understand HRQoL among junior high school students and to explore its determinants. A total of 1394 subjects (male 701 and female 648) who were randomly selected from seventh, eighth, and ninth grade in fourteen junior schools in northern five Counties and Cities, Taiwan completed a self-administered questionnaire. In this study, objective, subjective, and global HRQoL were measured as dependent variables; social support was to be the mediated variable, personal, family, school, and internet use characteristics were to be independent variables to identify their relationships with global HRQoL. The main findings were as follow: (1) A significantly positive relationship was found between objective HRQoL (life conditions) and subjective HRQoL (life satisfaction). For HRQoL, including objective, subjective, as well as global HRQoL all revealed moderate high degrees. (2) Among four domains of HRQoL, the highest score was noted for ‘social domain’; whereas the lowest score was in ‘psychological domain’. (3) Gender comparison revealed that male revealed significantly good qualities in global HRQoL, as well as three domains (physical, psychological, and environmental domains); whereas female only revealed a significantly good quality in social domain HRQoL than male. (4) Multiple stepwise regression analyses on global HRQoL indicating eleven variables (perceived health status, family support, subject-father relationship, school support, family economic status, whether only child or not, gender, web-site friends, subject-mother relationship, mother’s education, and subject-classmate relationship) could be singled out as significant factors and accounted for 28. 4% of the variance. Perceived health status was the most important predictor which accounted for 15. 6% of the variance. Family support was the second important predictor and accounted for 7. 2% revealing a significantly higher importance than school support which only accounted for 0. 9% of the variance. (5) According to Structural Equation Model (SEM) analysis, a modified model was proposed with a good fit of the model. The main findings of SEM showed that social support (mainly for family and school support) not only directly influenced on HRQoL but was identified to be the mediated variable for independent variables including gender, whether only child or not, perceived health status, family economic status, subject-father relationship, subject-mother relationship, and subject-classmate relationship. These independent variables directly and indirectly affected HRQoL. Additionally, a significantly positive relationship was found between family support and school support. Based on our findings, we provide concrete direction for improving adolescents’ HRQoL. We also suggest building more strength social support, improving health status, and stressing parent-adolescent relationship would be helpful in improving HRQoL for junior high school students.

參考文獻


王榮德、游正芬、鍾智文、姚開屏(2000).二十一世紀之健康照護成效性評量--生活品質與生活品質調整後之存活分析.台灣醫學,4(1),65-74。
林正祥(1993).研究設計之樣本數決定. 中華衛誌,12,282-290.
洪永泰(2000).「國民健康訪問調查」抽樣設計.行政院衛生署國民健康局人口與健康調查研究中心。
姚開屏(2002).健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介.台灣醫學,6(2),183-192。
黃毅志(1998).社會階層、社會網絡與心理幸福.臺灣社會學刊,21,171-210。

被引用紀錄


蔡宏修(2015)。國中學生希望感、社會支持與自尊關係之研究-以桃園市為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00186
謝秀芳(2013)。從十二年國教認知情形論述國中生學習幸福感〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2013.00273
潘惠玟(2007)。護理人員之健康生活品質研究〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-0807200916274296
周俐利(2012)。家庭支持和朋友支持之改變對青少年憂鬱與偏差行為之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315285411
張秋玉(2016)。探討社會支持與台灣中部大學護生自我導向學習之相關性〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0003-1602201602194200

延伸閱讀