透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.174.168
  • 期刊

區塊鏈時代下的證券監管思維挑戰:評金管會最新證券型虛擬通貨監管方案

The Challenges to Securities Regulatory Thinking in the Blockchain Era: Comments on the Latest Regulatory Guidelines for Securities Token Offerings Issued by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission

摘要


區塊鏈技術應用於虛擬通貨之發行,創造了新興的籌資工具與資本市場生態圈,同時也對證券監管法制帶來全新的衝擊。金管會於2019年6月核定證券型虛擬通貨為有價證券,並針對小額證券型虛擬通貨發行與交易平台業者制訂初步監管方針,開啟了我國對虛擬通貨的證券監管,但諸多規範內容例如引入美國法投資契約概念定義證券型虛擬通貨、小額發行限專業投資人認購、交易平台限採議價交易、單一平台交易及專業投資人交易等,均有待商榷之處。本文以金管會的監管方案為評析對象,分別就證券型虛擬通貨的定義、小額發行及交易平台監管,透過與美國、英國、瑞士、新加坡等國之比較法研究,探討我國現行證券法制在有價證券定義、多元證券發行管道及證券交易場所監管上的諸多不足,並提出全盤修正與局部調整之建議,並且指出我國證券法制另應考量區塊鏈技術的去中心化特性,針對證券型虛擬通貨轉讓的公示要件與集中保管事業的規範另設特別規定。

並列摘要


The blockchain technology as applied to the offering of crypto assets has created new fund-raising vehicles and capital market eco-systems. At the same time, it also brings new impacts on securities regulations. In June 2019, Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission ("FSC") designated securities tokens as securities and enacted preliminary regulatory guidelines for small-sum securities token offerings and trading platforms, which commenced Taiwan's securities regulation of crypto assets. That said, many regulations, such as introducing the concept of investment contracts from U.S. laws to define securities tokens, restricting the small-sum offerings to the subscription by accredited investors, restricting trading platforms to bilateral trading, single platform trading, and accredited investor trading, require further contemplation. In this paper, I provide comments on FSC's regulatory guidelines and focus on the definition of securities tokens and the regulations of small-sum offerings as well as trading platforms. By conducting comparative legal studies with U.S., U.K., Switzerland, and Singapore, etc., I explore the inadequacy of Taiwan's securities regulations on the definition of securities, multiple securities offering channels, and regulations of securities trading venues and propose on wholesale amendments as well as partial adjustments. I also propose that Taiwan's securities regulations shall consider blockchain's characteristic of decentralization and stipulate special rules for the public notice requirement for the transfer of securities tokens and the regulation of central clearing businesses.

參考文獻


臧正運(2018),〈試論金融監理科技的分析框架與發展圖像〉,《管理評論》,37卷4期,頁19-35。
蔡昌憲(2016),〈我國股權性質群眾募資之管制發展:從創櫃板到民間募資平台〉,《臺大法學論叢》,45卷1期,頁249-313。
蔡英欣(2018),〈試論虛擬貨幣之監理與法律定位:以日本法為中心〉,《管理評論》,37卷4期,頁53-67。
林盟翔(2017),〈數位通貨與普惠金融之監理變革:兼論洗錢防制之因應策略〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,267期,頁30-75。
張冠群(2017),〈自金融監理原則與金融消費者保護觀點論金融科技監理沙盒制度:兼評行政院版「金融科技創新實驗條例草案」〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,266期,頁5-34。

被引用紀錄


莊永丞(2023)。論穩定幣之法制臺大法學論叢52(S),1085-1158。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202311/SP_52.0004
蘇凱平(2021)。當證據「上鏈」:論區塊鏈科技應用於法庭證據臺大法學論叢50(3),993-1071。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202109_50(3).0005
郭戎晉(2021)。論區塊鏈技術與歐盟一般資料保護規則之衝突臺大法學論叢50(1),69-152。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202103_50(1).0002
楊岳平(2020)。金融科技時代下的金融監管挑戰:論虛擬通貨交易平台的監管架構臺大法學論叢49(S),1309-1396。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202011/SP_49.0002

延伸閱讀