Purpose: This study aims to figure out the effective scores and execution of six apparatus a cycle from the comparison of the difference between D Scores, E Scores and the Final Scores of the individual event finals of the men's artistic gymnastics in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 World Championships and 2016 Olympic Games based on the Code of Points for Men's Artistic Gymnastics in the cycle of four years. Methods: Data was collected through the official websites of the World Championships and the Olympic Games, and their validity has been confirmed by the national judge and the Chinese Taipei Gymnastic Association before they were analyzed through single factor variance for the differences among D Scores, E Scores and the Final Scores. LSD method was then used for comparison. Results: There is only a significant difference in D Scores on the parallel bars, while there is no significant difference on E Scores or the Final Scores. Conclusions: (1) The techniques on the difficult elements of parallel bars have improved significantly due to a longer training cycle. Gymnasts have been able to execute more E value elements in the routine. This effectively improved the Effective Scores and D Scores. (2) Top gymnasts have outstanding individual performance on specific items and they were able to reach high D Score value before the change of Code of Points. (3) Gymnasts have reached high performance level on special technology accuracy and routine stability in the individual event finals. That was the reason why E Scores are similar. (4) Under the same frame of Code of Points, the individual event final scores of gymnasts in the middle and end of the Code of Points cycle are similar. There is no significant improvement.