Sun, Apr 28, 2024
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 10, Issue 1 (2-2024)
jhehp 2024, 10(1): 33-43 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farahmandkia Z, Ghorbani L, Mirshahabi H, Mehrasbi M R. The Effect of Decontamination Methods on the Functionality of N95 Respirators in Particle Removal and SARS-CoV-2 Eradication. jhehp 2024; 10 (1) :33-43
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-611-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-611-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
2- Department of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
2- Department of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract: (732 Views)
Background: During the early days of COVID-19 pandemic, due to the shortage of N95 respirators in hospitals and healthcare centers, the reuse of N95 respirators was posed as a crisis capacity strategy. Several studies have evaluated the efficacy of various decontamination methods on N95 respirators of well-known and approved brands. However, fundamental question is whether decontamination and reuse methods can be applied to all types of respirators.
Methods: Six types of respirators were selected from well-known and lesser-known brands which their manufacturers claimed to be N95. The selected respirators decontaminated with dry heat, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, and ethylene oxide methods in seven consecutive cycles and their particle filtration efficiency and pressure drop were measured before and after each decontamination cycle.
Results: As the initial measurements revealed, 4 respirators (group A) showed a sharp drop in efficiency and also, negative efficiency in removing 2.5 and 4 µm particles in most of the experiments. In these respirators (group A), the maximum efficiency in removing 0.5 µm particles was 74.4 %, while the last two respirators (group B) achieved an efficiency of 98 %. Subsequent experiments following the decontamination process revealed that the non-authentic N95 respirators within group A which were not resistant to decontamination. However, the second group demonstrated a removal rate of over 95 % of particles ranging from 0.5 to 10 µm after six consecutive decontamination cycles using all three methods. The results demonstrated that ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and ethylene oxide methods could eradicate the covid-19 virus from respirators.
Conclusion: The results indicated that decontamination can be successfully applied to original N95 respirators, not low-quality respirators, even under critical conditions.
Results: As the initial measurements revealed, 4 respirators (group A) showed a sharp drop in efficiency and also, negative efficiency in removing 2.5 and 4 µm particles in most of the experiments. In these respirators (group A), the maximum efficiency in removing 0.5 µm particles was 74.4 %, while the last two respirators (group B) achieved an efficiency of 98 %. Subsequent experiments following the decontamination process revealed that the non-authentic N95 respirators within group A which were not resistant to decontamination. However, the second group demonstrated a removal rate of over 95 % of particles ranging from 0.5 to 10 µm after six consecutive decontamination cycles using all three methods. The results demonstrated that ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and ethylene oxide methods could eradicate the covid-19 virus from respirators.
Conclusion: The results indicated that decontamination can be successfully applied to original N95 respirators, not low-quality respirators, even under critical conditions.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Environmental Health, Sciences, and Engineering
Received: 2023/12/23 | Accepted: 2024/02/1 | Published: 2024/02/7
Received: 2023/12/23 | Accepted: 2024/02/1 | Published: 2024/02/7
References
1. Cheng V, Wong S, Kwan G, Hui W, Yuen K. Disinfection of N95 Respirators by Ionized Hydrogen Peroxide during Pandemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Due to SARS-CoV-2. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105(2): 358. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Liao L, Xiao W, Zhao M, Yu X, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. Can N95 Respirators be Reused after Disinfection? How Many Times?. ACS Nano. 2020; 14(5): 6348-56. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Yan J, Grantham M, Pantelic J, De Mesquita PJ, Albert B, Liu F, et al. Infectious Virus in Exhaled Breath of Symptomatic Seasonal Influenza Cases from a College Community. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018; 115(5): 1081-6. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Lindsley WG, Blachere FM, Thewlis RE, Vishnu A, Davis KA, Cao G, et al. Measurements of Airborne Influenza Virus in Aerosol Particles from Human Coughs. PLoS One. 2010; 5(11): e15100. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Wall TH, Hansen PE. Filtering Web for Face Masks and Face Masks Made Therefrom. Google Pat. 1967. [Google Scholar]
6. Ghosal A, Sinha-Ray S, Yarin AL, Pourdeyhimi B. Numerical Prediction of the Effect of Uptake Velocity on Three-dimensional Structure, Porosity and Permeability of Meltblown Nonwoven Laydown. Polym. 2016; 85: 19-27. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Pirker L, Krajnc AP, Malec J, Radulović V, Gradišek A, Jelen A, et al. Sterilization of Polypropylene Membranes of Facepiece Respirators by Ionizing Radiation. J Memb Sci. 2021; 619: 118756. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Pan A, Liu L, Wang C, Guo H, Hao X, Wang Q, et al. Association of Public Health Interventions with the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020; 323(19): 1915-23. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Lam SC, Suen LK, Cheung TC. Global Risk to the Community and Clinical Setting: Flocking of Fake Masks and Protective Gears during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2020; 48(8): 964. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Grossman J, Pierce A, Mody J, Gagne J, Sykora C, Sayood S, et al. Institution of a Novel Process for N95 Respirator Disinfection with Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Academic Medical Center. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231(2): 275-80. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. FDA. FDA in Brief: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorizations for Certain Respirators and Decontamination Systems as Access to N95s Increases Nationwide. 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-brief-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorizations-certain-respirators-and-decontamination-systems.
12. Bergman M, Fisher EM, Heimbuch BK. A Review of Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2020; 37(2): 71. [Google Scholar]
13. Peltier RE, Wang J, Hollenbeck BL, Lanza J, Furtado RM, Cyr J, et al. Addressing Decontaminated Respirators: Some Methods Appear to Damage Mask Integrity and Protective Function. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 41(12): 1446-8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Fischer RJ, Morris DH, Van Doremalen N, Sarchette S, Matson MJ, Bushmaker T, et al. Effectiveness of N95 Respirator Decontamination and Reuse against SARS-CoV-2 Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(9): 2253. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Gilbert RM, Donzanti MJ, Minahan DJ, Shirazi J, Hatem CL, Hayward-Piatkovskyi B, et al. Mask Reuse in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Creating an Inexpensive and Scalable Ultraviolet System for Filtering Facepiece Respirator Decontamination. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020; 8(3): 582-95. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Cadnum JL, Li DF, Redmond SN, John AR, Pearlmutter B, Donskey CJ. Effectiveness of Ultraviolet-C Light and a High-level Disinfection Cabinet for Decontamination of N95 Respirators. Pathog Immun. 2020; 5(1): 52. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Yang H, Hu J, Li P, Zhang C. Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation for Filtering Facepiece Respirators Disinfection to Facilitate Reuse during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020; 31: 101943. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Rubio-Romero JC, Del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira M, Torrecilla-García JA, Calero-Castro S. Disposable Masks: Disinfection and Sterilization for Reuse, and Non-Certified Manufacturing, in the Face of Shortages During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Saf Sci. 2020; 129: 104830. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. Toomey EC, Conway Y, Burton C, Smith S, Smalle M, Chan XH, et al. Extended Use or Reuse of Single-use Surgical Masks and Filtering Face-Piece Respirators during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021; 42(1): 75-83. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Viscusi DJ, Bergman MS, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE. Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 53(8): 815-27. [Google Scholar]
21. Kumar A, Kasloff SB, Leung A, Cutts T, Strong JE, Hills K, et al. N95 Mask Decontamination Using Standard Hospital Sterilization Technologies. MedRxiv. 2020. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
22. Yan R, Chillrud S, Magadini DL, Yan B. Developing Home-disinfection and Filtration Efficiency Improvement Methods for N95 Respirators and Surgical Facial Masks: Stretching Supplies and Better Protection during the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2020; 37(1): 19. [Google Scholar]
23. NIOSH. Determination of Particulate Filter Efficiency Level for N95 Series Filters against Solid Particulates for Non-Powered, Airpurifying Respirators Standard Testing Procedure (STP). 2019. Available from: http://www. cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/TEB-APR-STP-0059.pdf.
24. Bergman MS, Viscusi DJ, Heimbuch BK, Wander JD, Sambol AR, Shaffer RE. Evaluation of Multiple (3-Cycle) Decontamination Processing for Filtering Facepiece Respirators. J Eng Fiber Fabr. 2010; 5(4): 155892501000500405. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Control of Hospital Waste. Mandell Douglas Bennett's Princ Pract Infect Dis. 2015: 3294. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. CDC. Decontamination and Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators. 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/decontamination-reuse-respirators.html.
27. 3M. Disinfection of Filtering Facepiece Respirator. Technical Bulletin. 3 (Release 2). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1990) U.S. Public Health Service Toxicological Profile for Ethylene Oxide 12 1990. 2020. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp137.pdf. [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
