CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42(04): 446-452
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.446
Original Article

Semicircular Horizontal Approach in Breast Reduction: Clinical Experience in 38 Cases

Hee Su Shin
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Yong Hae Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Sung Gyun Jung
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Doo Hyung Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Young Roe
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
,
Jong Hyun Cha
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background Various techniques are used for performing breast reduction. Wise-pattern and vertical scar techniques are the most commonly employed approaches. However, a vertical scar in the mid-lower breast is prominent and aesthetically less pleasant. In contrast, a semicircular horizontal approach does not leave a vertical scar in the mid breast and transverse scars can be hidden in the inframammary fold. In this paper, we describe the experiences and results of semicircular horizontal breast reductions performed by a single surgeon.

Methods Between September 1996 and October 2013, our senior author used this technique in 38 cases in the US and at our institution. We used a superiorly based semicircular incision, where the upper skin paddle was pulled down to the inframammary fold with the nipple-areola complex pulled through the keyhole.

Results The average total reduction per breast was 584 g, ranging from 286 to 794 g. The inferior longitudinal pedicle was used in all the cases. The average reduction of the distance from the sternal notch to the nipple was 13 cm (range, 11-15 cm). The mean decrease in the bra cup size was 1.7 cup sizes (range, a decrease of 1 to 3). We obtained very satisfactory results with a less noticeable scar, no complication such as necrosis of the nipple or the skin flap, wound infection, aseptic necrosis of the breast tissue, or wound dehiscence. One patient had a small hematoma that resolved spontaneously.

Conclusions This technique is straightforward and easy to learn, and offers a safe, effective, and predictable way for treating mammary hypertrophy.

This article was presented at the 71st Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons on November 1-3, 2013, in Seoul, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 13 December 2014

Accepted: 18 April 2015

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2015. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kalliainen LK. ASPS Health Policy Committee. ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on reduction mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. 130. 785-789
  • 2 Hidalgo DA, Elliot LF, Palumbo S. et al. Current trends in breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 806-815
  • 3 Mathes SJ. Plastic surgery. Vol. 6. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006
  • 4 Gradinger GP. Reduction mammoplasty utilizing nipple-areola transplantation. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15: 641-654
  • 5 Passot R. La correction esthetique du prolapsus mammaire par le procede de la transposition du mamelon. Presse Med 1925; 33: 317-318
  • 6 Lalonde DH, Lalonde J, French R. The no vertical scar breast reduction: a minor variation that allows to remove vertical scar portion of the inferior pedicle wise pattern T scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27: 335-344
  • 7 White CP, Hynes NM. The horizontal breast reduction: surgical tips for maintaining projection. Can J Plast Surg 2013; 21: 167-172
  • 8 Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 1955; 7: 357-371
  • 9 Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 468-479
  • 10 Maliniac JW. Arterial blood supply of the breast. Arch Surg 1943; 47: 329-343
  • 11 Palmer JH, Taylor GI. The vascular territories of the anterior chest wall. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39: 287-299
  • 12 Neligan P. Plastic surgery. Vol. 5. London, New York: Elsevier Saunders; 2013
  • 13 Berthe JV, Massaut J, Greuse M. et al. The vertical mammaplasty: a reappraisal of the technique and its complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 2192-2199
  • 14 Hidalgo DA. Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1179-1197
  • 15 Janis JE. Essentials of plastic surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Pub; 2007
  • 16 Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 748-759
  • 17 Movassaghi K, Liao EC, Ting V. et al. Eliminating the vertical scar in breast reduction-Boston modification of the Robertson technique. Aesthet Surg J 2006; 26: 687-696
  • 18 Lalonde DH, French R, Lalonde J. The no vertical scar breast reduction: how to delete the vertical scar of the standard T-scar breast reduction and produce an excellent breast shape. Perspect Plast Surg 2001; 15: 103-118