Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:03:21.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

14 - Competent vs. Incompetent Students: Polarization and Social Closure in Madrid Schools

from III - Cases of Belonging and Exclusion

Luisa Martín Rojo
Affiliation:
University of Madrid
Gerard Delanty
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Ruth Wodak
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Paul Jones
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

However, the so-called marginalized, who are none other than the oppressed, were never outside. They were always inside. Inside the structure that turns them into ‘beings for others’. Their solution, then, does not lie in ‘integrating’ them, ‘incorporating’ them into this structure that oppresses them, but rather in transforming it so that they can become ‘beings for themselves’.

Freire 1970: 80

An Ethnographic Perspective

In the last fifteen years, the Autonomous Region of Madrid, previously a traditional destination for immigration from other Spanish communities, has become one of the preferred destinations for workers coming from other countries, principally (and in this order) from Ecuador, Colombia, Romania, Peru, Morocco, Bolivia, China and the Dominican Republic. According to data from the City Council (‘Ayuntamiento’) of Madrid, students from migrant backgrounds represent about 15% of the total school population, a figure that in the city centre reaches 34% (see the Plan Madrid de Convivencia Social e Intercultural [Madrid Plan for Social and Intercultural Co-existence] 2005).

The analysis of ideologies presented in this article is supported by data collected during two research studies carried out in schools of the Autonomous Region of Madrid (‘Comunidad de Madrid’), which observed how ideologies affect classroom management and the processes of teaching and learning. An answer to how to address diversity in the classroom appears to be related to correlative questions, in particular, what is considered to be legitimate knowledge, who is considered to be a ‘normal’ student and a ‘good’ or ‘competent’ student, and what is the legitimate language of exchange.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×