Skip to main content

Practicing Resilience in Different Ways

  • Chapter
Resilience Practice
  • 4227 Accesses

Abstract

Depending on who you talk to, resilience can mean a number of things. As discussed in the introductory chapter, the four main origins of the concept lie in the fields of engineering, ecology/biology, psychology, and defense/security. Organizational resilience is now also a growing field, and it draws on the ideas developed by the other four. Resilience in economics is another area of growing interest. The literature on resilience in all these fields is large and growing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Masten, A. S. 2001. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist 56:227–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almedom, A., Tesfamichael, B., Mohammed, Z. S., Mascie-Taylor, C. G., and Alemu, Z. 2007. Use of “sense of coherence (soc)” scale to measure resilience in Eritrea: Interrogating both the data and the scale. Journal of Biosocial Science 39:91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. and Westley, F. 2011. Perspectives on resilience to disasters across sectors and cultures. Ecology and Society 16. Online at www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art4/.

  • Zellmer, S. and Gunderson, L. 2009. Why resilience may not always be a good thing: Lessons in ecosystem restoration from Glen Canyon and the Everglades. Lexington Books, Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. and Light, S. 2006. Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the Everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences 39:323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. and Hahn, F. 1971. General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L. W. 2002. Classical general equilibrium theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. and Sargent, T. 2008. Robustness. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, C. H. and Wagener, F. O. O. 2009. Complex evolutionary systems in behavioural finance. In Hens, T. and Reiner Schenk-Hoppe, K., eds., Handbook of financial markets: Dynamics and evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maler, K., Li, C. Z., and Destouni, G. 2007. Pricing resilience in a dynamic economy-environment system: A capital-theoretical approach. Beijer Discussion Papers 208, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., Friedman, B. J., Solow, R. M., and Temin, P. 2011. The financial crisis and economic policy. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 64:36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Poole, K., Romer, T., and Rosenthal, H. 2010. Political fortunes: On finance and its regulation. Daedalus, Fall 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh, J. C. 2011. Environment versus growth: A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth.” Ecological Economics 70:881–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. 1999. Luxury fever. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. 2003. Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:11176–11183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Deaton, A. 2010. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:16489–16493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggan, J. 2010. Zombie economics: How dead ideas still walk amongst us. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Brian Walker and David Salt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, B., Salt, D. (2012). Practicing Resilience in Different Ways. In: Resilience Practice. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-231-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics