Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Long Wait Times at Hospitals in Jamaica: A Potential Risk to Patient Safety

Written By

Opal Davidson, James Fallah, Denice Curtis and Chukwuma Richard Uzoka

Submitted: 21 January 2024 Reviewed: 21 January 2024 Published: 07 March 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004574

Contemporary Topics in Patient Safety - Volume 3 IntechOpen
Contemporary Topics in Patient Safety - Volume 3 Edited by Philip Salen

From the Edited Volume

Contemporary Topics in Patient Safety - Volume 3 [Working Title]

M.D. Philip N. Salen and Dr. Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Chapter metrics overview

30 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Long wait time in public emergency rooms continues to be a major challenge in the Jamaican healthcare system. The aim of the study is to investigate the risk management strategies implemented by other nations in maintaining patient safety. The research method is a descriptive analytic study using literature review design to examine current and historical data to identify solutions to the long wait time at hospitals in Jamaica. The results revealed that adequate use and evaluation of risk management strategies, continuous upgrading of national emergency care health policy, improving triage systems, decreasing overcrowding and proper use of observation units in the ER, and maximizing the use of current technology to improve patient care do decrease the threat to patient safety. In conclusion, implementation of the risk management approach developed in this study can assist in maintaining patient safety by decreasing long wait time in public hospitals across the globe.

Keywords

  • long wait time
  • Jamaica public hospitals
  • emergency care
  • patient safety
  • risk management strategies

1. Introduction

Waiting time can be defined as the period covering the arrival of the patient to the emergency department until when the patient is provided with the required treatment by a qualified medical professional. On an average the wait time for all emergency room departments in the world is four hours [1]. Long wait times in emergency rooms at public hospitals can significantly impact patient health [2]. Similarly, decreasing the waiting time at accident and emergency (A & E) departments for patients utilizing health care services at public hospitals in Jamaica is a major challenge. Despite this fact, one of the national strategic policy priorities of the Ministry of Health & Wellness (MOHW) in Jamaica is to provide quality assurance in the delivery of health services to the population. Hence, the importance of satisfactorily addressing the challenge of long wait time in public hospitals in Jamaica. However, there are several factors that do contribute to this reality of long wait time that include (1) overcrowding of patients in the emergency room may result in increased workload on staff coverage [3], (2) insufficient space and accommodation for patients, (3) shortage in beds in the emergency room, (4) insufficient labour force, (5) poor time management by medical team, (6) absenteeism of the labour force, (7) inadequate triage procedures, along with poor patient medical records management and lack of electronic medical records [4]. Additionally, the MOHW has implemented new measures that include training, installation of electronic medical recording system, and improvement in equipment and spacing to address the ongoing problem of overcrowding in the hospitals. Thus, there is the need for the ministry of health to further prioritize financial investment in the public health sector in Jamaica.

Hence, the aim of this study is to further investigate this phenomenon of long wait time in the public hospitals in Jamaica that threatens the quality of health care delivery and management. Also, from completion of the study it is intended that further recommendations will be made, on how the long wait time at public hospitals in Jamaica can be decreased or be eliminated over time. Additionally, in seeking to investigate the unfortunate phenomenon of long wait hours in the Jamaican public hospitals, risk management strategies will be identified to aid in minimizing or preventing potential risks to patient safety.

Also, it is anticipated that the findings obtained from this study when shared will be beneficial in emergency care management across the world through the World Health Organization (WHO).

Advertisement

2. Methodology

The research method for this study is a descriptive analytic study using literature review design exploring databases such as Google Scholar, reputable international journals such as Science Direct, Proquest, Pubmed, EBSCO, BMJ Open and others. Key words or themes were explored to gather the data using secondary data online that included: Risk factors to Patient safety, Long Wait Time, Jamaica Hospitals, Triage, Healthcare Management and Supervision, risk management strategies, patient safety, and accident and emergency departments in Jamaica and other countries were used to source the required information using the various online databases. The selection criteria for articles: mainly peer reviewed articles were referenced. Also, credible newspaper publications were included to support the information provided that could not be sourced elsewhere.

Advertisement

3. Background to the problem

The various challenges facing the Jamaican health care system over many years, cannot be overlooked. These major problems include growing long wait periods in patients receiving the required treatment at many of the public hospitals across the health sector in Jamaica [5].

More so, with the gradual introduction of the concept of universal coverage in the health care system of Jamaica through two main policy interventions by Ministry of Health & Wellness in Jamaica (MOHW), namely the National Health Fund (NHF) in 2003 and the removal of user fees in accessing health care services in 2008, the existing problem of long wait time has been further compounded. As a result of the implementation of these much needed interventions more Jamaicans have been accessing the health care services at the various public hospitals across the country. According to Dr. Coombs, a leading public health doctor in Western Regional Health Authority (WRHA), there has been a steady increase in the health care services offered to the general public over the past 10 years that include diagnostic services by 314% and pharmacy by 71%. With such major development in the health care sector, more individuals over time would inevitably seek medical assistance with the significant improvement seen in the health care delivery system in Jamaica over the years [6].

Recently, a reporter for the Jamaica Gleaner commented that the hospital managers must be blamed for the long wait time due to unsatisfactory organizational management of human and other resources in managing the health care services offered to patients. However, St. Andrade Sinclairs, the acting regional director of the Western Regional Health Authorities (WRHA) disagreed since he believes that “such generalization is impractical and does not apply in all cases” [7]. However, Dr. Taleya Girvan, a Pediatrician who works in the A & E department at the Bustamante Hospital for Children (BHC), contended that the long wait time for patients in A & E departments is not unique to Jamaica but it is a common phenomenon across the world. In her view, the long wait time is the result of the triage process. The less urgent the case, the waiting time will be longer. Another confounding problem identified by Dr. Girvan is the acceptance in the A & E department for all categories of illness, which further complicates the existing problem in long wait time, since patients that can be seen by their private practitioners or at the health centers are receiving treatment in the A & E departments. These patients should otherwise be seen at their health centers or be asked to attend a specialized clinic [8]. Evidently, the problem of long wait time in A & E departments in Jamaica is complex and multifaceted, so there is no one-fix solution. Hence, the importance of this study that will seek to further investigate the existing challenges the health care system faces at the present moment and to identify strategies and solutions for improving the patient-provider encounter issue.

Advertisement

4. Areas covered in the study

4.1 Ensuring patient safety

The WHO defined patient safety as ‘the absence of preventable harm to a patient during the process of health care’ [9, 10]. According to Ackroyd-Stolarz et al., there is a distinctive association between the length of wait time in the emergency room and the risk of hospital admission or death in the elderly patients [11, 12]. Thus, the importance of ensuring patient safety in hospitals in Jamaica since overcrowding in the A & E departments remains a major challenge. More so, patients have always been complaining about long wait time in hospitals across Jamaica and still such complaints have not resulted in any significant improvements in the health care system [12]. In fact, the MOHW in Jamaica has recently informed all Jamaicans to brace themselves for longer waiting time for the end of the year and going forward into 2024 [13]. Such news are not welcoming nor encouraging and so promoting the implementation of key strategies to decrease the waiting time in Jamaican public hospitals must be pursued and encouraged.

4.2 Effects of long wait time in A & E

A disorganized triage system is a major contributing factor to the long wait time of an average of over 4 hours in the emergency rooms on a global scale. Patients are often dissatisfied with the triage process and the medical teams are often disheartened by the outcome themselves [13, 14]. Also, Nyce et al., postulates that prolonged wait times are associated with worse patient experience with discharged patients from emergency departments [12, 15].

4.3 Risk management strategies

Risk management strategies in the Jamaican public hospital emergency rooms are essential in ensuring patient safety, since it requires implementing key guidelines to safeguard and alert health care providers in making needed changes, to provide the highest quality medical and nursing care in preventing patient injuries. Similarly, such strategies are crucial when caring for patients in an emergency care setting. Important to the risk management process are five common strategies for managing risk which are avoidance, retention, transferring, sharing, and loss reduction. Each technique aims to address and reduce risk while understanding that risk is impossible to eliminate completely [16]. Hence, the investigation of the long wait time in hospitals in Jamaica, should assist in identifying these key risk management strategies that should be used to improve the quality of care and patient safety on a global scale.

Advertisement

5. Original theoretical framework of risk management for A & E

As a result of the absence of a universal theoretical approach to the management of risk factors and patient safety in A & E departments on a global scale, an original theoretical framework has been developed for the purpose of this study. The concept of risk management is not new and has been used globally in the world of business with much success. Applying it to the field of health care should not be a major challenge. Therefore, it is anticipated that this model will be adopted globally, to further improve the quality of health care delivery and management. This health care delivery model will aid in the early detection and addressing of any key risk factors that may be contributing to long wait time in the emergency room setting that may negatively impact patient safety. Risk management can be defined as the process of analyzing processes and practices that are in place, identifying risk factors, and implementing procedures to address those risks [17]. More so, the World Health Organization in 2019 has approved a global patient safety action plan covering the period 2021–2030. The aim is to ensure that all health care systems are on board in promoting patient safety in health care that includes emergency care for all nations [18]. Figure 1 illustrates the risk management and patient safety model developed for A & E departments worldwide.

Figure 1.

Risk management strategies and patient safety management framework: an A & E perspective developed by Dr. Opal Davidson 27.11.2023.

5.1 Utilization of the conceptual framework

5.1.1 Assessment of risk factors

The process of assessment of risk factors impacting long wait time in A & E departments does require the coordinated effort of all members of the health team, even though it is primarily the responsibility of supervisory management. Especially, since these risk factors are many and they may occur at varying times during a work shift in the emergency room. These risk factors include (1) overcrowding may results in the increase in workload that affects staff coverage, (2) insufficient space and accommodation for patients, (3) shortage in beds, (4) insufficient labour force, (5) poor time management by medical team, (6) absenteeism of the labour force and (7) inadequate triage procedures. Early identification of these risk factors and implementation of the appropriate interventions in time to avert any major health care challenges is ultimately the ideal solution to decreasing the long wait time in hospitals [19]. However, as health care providers it is difficult to achieve this feat. Still every effort should be made to do all that is possible to safeguard the quality of health care that is provided to all patients in ensuring their safety.

5.1.2 Identification and reporting of risk factors

It is highly recommended that an established system for identifying risk factors be established in the A & E departments. A variety of formats do exist that may involve the use of technology, or a charting system using a whiteboard and other forms of documentation. Also, there must be an established protocol for reporting these identified risk factors so that the required solutions can be provided, allowing for enhanced problem-solving to occur from all levels of the health care system. This means that there must be open and efficient communication throughout the health sector. Below is a diagram that illustrates the open communication and collaboration that should exist among the various levels of the health care sector, to address the challenge for example of shortage of beds in A & E department, using Falmouth hospital in WRHA for the illustration in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Illustrates an example of the open communication and collaboration that should exist between A & E departments from the level of the wards at hospitals to the wider health care sector in addressing the existing risk factors. Developed by Dr. O. Davidson 19.12.2023.

It is important that this form of health care organized communication and collaboration include the entire health care sector, thereby, allowing the A & E departments to receive the necessary assistance in advance such as equipment, beds, and labour force to prevent major challenges in providing efficient patient care and decreasing long wait time. Also, there must be effective communication from the point of the A & E departments in Jamaica internally at public hospitals and with the wider health care sector. Effective communication means the relaying of information in regards to the need of the A & E department for example as shown in Figure 2 with the ministry of health and the private health sector. Thereby allowing the A& E departments to be linked with the required staff and equipment to ensure that health care staff, medical procedures and equipment are available to decrease the wait time for patients. Patients can also be referred to other health care facilities for further management of their health conditions.

5.1.3 Plan of action to address identified risk factors

There must be clear guidelines of how interventions regarding specific risk factors must be handled since deviations may result in the creation of unseen problems. These guidelines must be tested, tried, and proven to work in the given A & E department, since no two settings are the same. Plan of action should be a team effort to ensure the involvement of all the team members since they will be empowered, having been a part of the planning process. It is important therefore, that each team member is committed to the success of the plans that have been developed to improve patient safety in the emergency care setting.

5.1.4 Implementation of interventions

Before implementation of the plan, it must be clearly stated who is responsible for completing a particular task, which will prevent unnecessary confusion and will enable greater accountability of team members. Implementation must be time bound and properly executed for improved outcome. Communication among team members is vital at this point. Ongoing observation, documentation and follow up is crucial at this time. The literature shows that there are already proven and established steps to complete when implementing a health care intervention to enhance patient safety in Jamaican emergency rooms [20].

5.1.5 Evaluation of interventions

In order to evaluate, clear goals would have to be set in regards to the problem being addressed and an outline of the desired outcomes would have to be established. Supervisory management is responsible for this aspect, but all medical team members should be engaged in the process. Accurate determination of the outcome of health care interventions allows the healthcare team the opportunity to become more knowledgeable in order to improve the services being offered and to inform future healthcare policy making and the implementation of new protocols to maintain patient safety. Data collection is the process that is used to guide the evaluation process using various research methods, appropriate for the study. Data gathering can be obtained from varying sources that include patients’ records, direct feedback from patients, observation, and other forms of documentation [21].

5.1.6 Implementation of new interventions

On evaluation, if the desired outcome was not achieved from the intervention implemented for decreasing waiting times in the Jamaican emergency care and patient safety. It is important that reassessment of the risk factors be conducted to ensure that the medical needs of the patients are met. Therefore, a new plan of action must be considered and be implemented. If the evaluation is being achieved but more interventions are needed to achieve the desired outcome, then they should be implemented as well.

Advertisement

6. Result & discussion

6.1 Comparative waiting times in other countries including emergency care

It is essential to note that the long waiting time for patients to receive treatment in the accident and emergency department is not unique to Jamaica but is of growing concern for health care delivery on a global scale. It is important to reveal that there are three countries mentioned by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as having the shortest wait times for patients receiving health care and they are notably Switzerland, Netherlands, and Germany, with 88%, 87%, and 87% of patients, respectively, generally being seen in 1 day or less, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The top 3 ranked countries with the shortest overall wait time providing health care reported by OECD in 2023 [22].

6.1.1 Germany

This country spends very large resources on providing accessible health care for its citizens. However, the quality of healthcare is only average based on the OECD findings, thus impacting waiting times and emergency care. Since there is a gradual decline in public health care with private health care slowly taking over [20, 23]. In comparison in Jamaica the public hospitals remain the main emergency care for its citizens.

6.1.2 Switzerland

This country has a small but growing private health sector, since the health care system is primarily publicly owned. Expenditure in healthcare is high and its infrastructure is highly modernized with the installation of digitization, electronic health records, health information exchange system and telemedicine. The focus is more on ambulatory care and there is a decrease in the length of inpatient stay. Centralization of the pharmaceutical system is the focus. Challenges exist in digitization and data management due to financial constraints and labor shortage [20, 23]. Similarly, in Jamaica the private sector emergency care is not as developed and therefore the citizens rely primarily on the emergency care provided by the public hospitals.

6.1.3 The Netherlands

The Dutch government provides universal health insurance system that has a public and private insurance component. The government has modernized their health care system which is paying off. Highly modernized technology and first-class treatment exist to attract patients and has significantly decreased the waiting times for healthcare with 87% of the individuals being seen by a medical provider in 1 day or less [20, 23]. However, the concept of universal coverage in the health care system in Jamaica since 2008, does not provide insurance coverage for its citizens. The cost of emergency care in Jamaica for citizens is covered by the government, however patients with health insurance are required to pay.

6.1.4 United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has experienced an existing health care problem of long wait time that affects the quality of health care delivery and management. Therefore, the National Health Service (NHS) has sought to make improvements in the waiting time by requiring that at least 95% of patients attending A & E be admitted, transferred, or discharged within 4 hours [24]. In December 2022, an intermediary threshold target of 76% to be hit by March 2024 was introduced with further improvement expected in 2024/25. The change evidently reflected the impact of COVID -19. It is worth noting that significant changes were being made to the protocol that guides the operations in the A & E since in March 2019, the Review of NHS Access Standards was published. The review proposed that the current four-hour A & E target should be replaced by a set of access standards, including the average waiting time in A & E, time to initial clinical assessment, and time to emergency treatment for critically ill and injured patients. The aim of the changes inevitably is to ensure better monitoring of the waiting time in the A & E departments. These changes were short-lived since, in September 2022, Thérèse Coffey, the Health Secretary repealed the change so that the existing four-hour target remains [25].

6.1.5 Canada

In Canada, Lakeridge Health’s ED Wait Times Tracker was created to assist patients in getting quality health care in a shorter time span and to predict the estimated wait time to see a doctor in the ED. However, the tracker is unable to predict the length of stay since the patient may be required further tests and treatment which may increase the length of the visit [26].

6.1.6 United States of America

In the United States the average wait time in A & E departments is an hour and a half for the patient to be taken to their room and 2.25 hours before being discharged. Furthermore, the median time for receiving pain medication in the ED for patients with an extremity fracture is 72 minutes [27]. Moreover, the number of patients who leave the department without being seen has sharply increased in recent years, some of them being seriously ill. One of the reasons the patients have reported for leaving is the long waiting times in the ED (Mean = 6.4 hours) [28].

Some recommendations to fix the problem include (1) increasing the number of staff who conduct triage in the ED; (2) enabling transparency in information, (3) providing equitable workload and (4) utilizing a team-based care model [29]. More so, the implementation of quality improvement measures such as engaging the use of a data driven approach with support from senior clinicians and constant feedback on outcomes was highly recommended [30].

6.1.7 The Caribbean

Long wait time in the emergency departments in the Caribbean remains an important challenge as well. In Trinidad and Tobago in 2020 a qualitative study led by Freitas et al., investigated the flow of patients in an emergency department to identify the main contributing factors that were affecting patient turnover in that health care setting. The findings indicated organizational processes such as streaming, front loading of investigations and the transferring process of patients were major factors impacting the turnover time of patients in the emergency department [31]. The streaming process in the ED was first implemented in England to place patients into queues according to the level of acuity [32]. The study conducted by Freitas et al., used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to allocate the patients to queues. The front load of investigations refers to the point of care tests (ECGs, urine tests, X-rays for minor injuries) that should be ordered during the triage process and before the patients are allocated into queues. This approach has resulted in decreased wait times and enhanced patient satisfaction and safety.

Correspondingly, in Barbados the challenge of long wait time continues to escalate. However, the country is making every effort to address the problem through transparency. Since as recent as November 2023, the newspaper Barbados Today highlighted that there is a public notice sent by the Ministry of Health announcing that the wait time at Queen Elizabeth Hospital emergency room will be increased. The notice clearly stated the category of patients that will be seen immediately as outlined by the triage system. These patients include cases such as accidents, sight threatening complaints, gunshot wounds, heart attacks, active seizures, or patients requiring resuscitation [33].

Further studies into the healthcare management of these nations in maintaining the shortest wait time in health care should be explored and the information be made available for other nations to benefit. In addition, the impact of national health policies regarding waiting time in hospitals should be explored.

Advertisement

7. Recommended solutions

7.1 The psychological effects of long wait time

An essential study was conducted by Lee & Yoon in November, 2023 suggests patients do experience high levels of anxiety while waiting for medical care in emergency rooms. The study purports that using nature to enhance the environment while patients wait assists in significantly decreasing the level of anxiety using plants, nature images and a combination of both interventions [34].

Studies have shown that patients with mental health illness experience longer waiting times (16.5–21.5 hours) than those without a mental health disease which shows the disparity of care for this particularly vulnerable group [35].

7.2 Recommended risk management strategies

It is a fact that health care services can also benefit from shorter wait times at hospitals, since patient turnover improves on the use of resources and is more cost effective [36]. More so, the patients generally leave the health care facility more satisfied and are, therefore, more likely to return. Patients will also be more willing to encourage others to use the health care service, thereby improving their quality of life and that of others [37]. In addition, the WHO reported that many OECD countries have taken measures to reduce waiting times in hospitals through additional funding but with mixed success [38].

Therefore, to improve the wait time, every country should make an effort to develop a national health policy that includes a platform for better management of their health care issues impacting emergency care and waiting time. A risk management approach is recommended to ensure the interventions are preventive rather than corrective in nature.

Next, the use of technology in creating a reporting and alert system for A & E departments within all countries is necessary. Thus, ensuring that the needs of these emergency departments can be addressed in a timely manner.

7.3 Decreasing the psychological impact of long wait time

During COVID-19 it was evident that mentally ill patients were in need of more psychological support while waiting for completion of specific procedures such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The main reasons presented were the high level of anxiety and the increased risk of injury to the patient. A research study conducted in 2021 revealed that patients felt that their psychological needs could have been addressed more through the following implementations: acknowledgement of their concerns, peer support, and periodic communication about wait-list position, prioritization criteria and anticipated procedure date [39]. Similarly, long wait times in emergency rooms that do negatively impact the psychological state of patients requires interventions to ease the adverse effects that include anxiety, depression, increased stress levels, morbidity and even death. According to Shen & Lee 2018 a team-based approach that involves closer communication and coordination between patients and the care provider will result in more positive patient outcomes [40].

7.4 Improving triage systems

Separating critical and non-critical patients in the waiting room can help, as low-acuity patients may be able to be treated in another area [41]. Triage is a process that is critical to the effective management of modern emergency departments. Triage systems aim not only to ensure that the patient receive the required emergency care, but also to provide an effective tool for departmental organization, monitoring, and evaluation [39]. Globally, over the last 20 years, triage systems have been standardized in a number of countries and efforts made to ensure consistency of application. It is also noted that the ongoing crowding of emergency departments resulting from access block and increased demand has led to calls for a review of systems of triage. In addition, international variance in triage systems limits the capacity for bench marking [42]. The basic premise of Triage is primarily the sorting of patients for treatment in situations of least modest resource scarcity, according to an assessment of the patient’s medical condition and the application of an established sorting system or plan [43]. Defined in this way, the most common types of triage include emergency department triage, inpatient (ICU) triage, incident (multicausality) triage, military (battlefield) triage, and disaster (mass casualty) triage [44]. All the listed types of triage have distinctive elements such as: (1) modest scarcity of health care resources exists, (2) assesses each patient’s medical needs, usually based on a brief examination and (3) the use of an established system or plan, usually based on an algorithm or a set of criteria, to determine a specific treatment or treatment priority for each patient by the health care provider [44, 45]. In 2016, the Ministry of Health and Wellness in Jamaica selected the Emergency Severity Index as the triage tool to be used nationally. The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is a 5-level triage tool validated and used in more than 70% of emergency departments in the United States [46, 47]. In Jamaica, there is variability across sites, and triage may be performed by physicians and/or nurses. Not all doctors and nurses engaged in triage are trained in emergency medicine. Triage training is quite variable across the island [48, 49].

7.5 Use of technology to decrease wait time

The utilization of digital technology and simulation techniques seem to be promising strategies to decreasing waiting times. Studies have shown that applying agent-based model (ABM), queuing model (QM) and simulation techniques related to patient access and patient flow in the emergency room coupled with hospital information systems may be the answer for optimizing hospital processes and reducing bottlenecks in the ED [50, 51]. This is an area that is still evolving, but we believe it has enormous potential in reducing waiting times in the ED. Advance customer technologies empower individuals to manage their own time and optimize the queuing process with queue management software called Q-Flow that delivers next-generation customer experience and simple, effective queue management solutions [42, 52]. In countries such as the United Kingdom the use of patient safety tools that are provided by the NHS such as National Patient Safety Alerting System (NPSAS), which enables the dissemination of patient safety alerts to healthcare providers via a central alert system and a National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) for reporting serious incidents, helped improve both patient safety and waiting time at the ED [42].

7.6 Health information exchange system, telemedicine and data protection management in Jamaica

Over the period of July 2012 to March 2013 Jamaica developed an integrated National Health Information System (NHISS) that supports timely and efficient data management. This system have helped to produce quality health information for evidence based decision making at all levels of the National Health System. The main aim of this NHISS is to improve the management of the healthcare system [43].

Jamaica is listed among 125 countries in the WHO Atlas of e-Health states in which e-Health strategies, such as policies, funding, capacity-building, and necessary legislative framework to protect patients’ data, inter alia, are in place. In addition, it is mentioned the existence of telemedicine, mHealth, engagement of the population with social media, use of electronic records, use of e-learning in health sciences, and having a system in place to manage large amount of data [41]. The Electronic Management System in use in Jamaica is the first technology-driven element of its kind in Jamaica and the Caribbean region. It provides an electronic version of a patient’s medical history, including demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, vital signs, past medical history, immunizations, laboratory data and radiology reports. The intention is to provide a complete and accurate summary of an individual’s medical history that can be shared to improve the delivery of care and also provide quality data for decision-makers (health professionals, directors, researchers, citizens) across the health facilities of Jamaica [47].

7.7 Upgrading health policy for emergency care management

The main goal of safety and health programs is to prevent workplace injuries, illnesses, and deaths, as well as the suffering and financial hardship these events can cause for workers, their families, and employer especially for the emergency departments. The creation and recommended practices and policies, use a proactive approach to managing workplace safety and health, and upgrading is necessary. In Jamaica hospitals are some of the most frequented facilities based on the nature of the services they provide, and they are often overwhelmed with caring for and managing emergencies to reduce preventable mortality. Against this background, the Ministry of Health and Wellness normally request support from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), which facilitated an assessment through a survey and a two-day consensus meeting as part of an Emergency and Critical Care Assessment System. The PAHO governs the Caribbean Region and a similar approach in other Caribbean countries [42]. The Emergency and Critical Care Systems form an integral part of the broader implementation plan for the “Safe Systems Approach for Safer Roads in Jamaica,” which sets the island on a path to achieve the goals proposed for the second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030. It also comprises all other types of injuries and critical illnesses requiring urgent medical attention and establishes the care all seriously ill patients should receive in every hospital [53]. Similarly, in their upgrade of health policies The NHS and UK Government have published a new two-year delivery plan today to help recover urgent and emergency care services, reduce waiting times, and improve patient experience. The plan focuses predominantly on the need to improve hospital discharge and join-up with adult social care, reflecting the challenges of an aging population and frailty. However, we know that children’s urgent and emergency care has also faced unprecedented levels of demand and that some of the drivers of this are different than for adults. As part of the plan there are several welcome solutions to improve pediatric urgent and emergency care. These include: (1) expanding advice offered through NHS.UK and NHS111 online to support decision making for young people and families, including self-care and management, (2) roll out of acute pediatric respiratory hubs for children ahead of time for the winter, (3) expansion of virtual wards, with priority pathways for pediatrics, (4) expansion of virtual wards, with priority pathways for pediatrics, and (5) embedding family support workers in A & E settings to provide additional support to children and families presenting with non-urgent medical issues but overlapping needs [54].

7.8 Adequate evaluation process of risk management strategies

In Jamaica there is no documented established national plan for managing and evaluating emergency care risks. Therefore, the implementation of risk management strategies in emergency care at the public hospitals would be beneficial in maintaining patient safety in Jamaica [55]. However, there is a general national risk management policy that exists for the country governing all businesses [56]. Hence the importance of this study to aid in identifying the need for a national risk management policy specific for health care management. According to Gadding, to understand risk in the Emergency Department (ED), it is important to examine the workflow of the patient journey in an ED. The Emergency Department is a dynamic and often unpredictable place, which makes it a high-risk inducing environment. The staff of an ED may see anything during a shift, ranging from a common cold or upset stomach that are treated with a simple medication to a trauma or cardiac arrest that requires full resuscitation efforts. Speed, efficiency, and accuracy of assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients are essential, due to the unpredictable and often heavy flow of patients through an ED. A visit to an ED involves a complex series of decisions, interactions, and activities, which will make it vital for risk planning and assessment to be accurate. A systematic approach that facilitates fast, efficient, and accurate patient documentation and treatment within defined processes is required to minimize unexpected failures or human errors [32]. The main objective of carrying out the process of management of risk is appropriately controlling the health variables which affect the overall health condition of patients for enhancing the potential of achieving the most appropriate outcomes. Since the main reasons for accidents happening are a set of known or unknown failures in the health care system, in this regard conducting standardized approaches for the management of risks in a hierarchical framework could be very effective [57]. Moreover, preparing more accurate and standardized plans which sufficiently are investigated and prepared with continuous monitoring could be very effective in ensuring the proper management of the potential risks and damages to the patients and the emergency staff. The precise implementation of these kinds of strategies is strongly associated with the involvement of patients and the emergency staff and the overall support of administrative and Insurance organizations [58].

7.9 Decreasing overcrowding in A & Es

Empirical studies have demonstrated that overcrowding is a major risk factor to patient safety and mortality in emergency rooms worldwide. Addressing this problem has been a major challenge in emergency care for many years [58, 59]. Despite the existence of multiple interventions to address this problem, it continues to spiral out of control in many countries including Jamaica. Therefore, it is important that each healthcare system has consistent ongoing review of existing management of the influx of patients into emergency rooms. This influx may be seasonal or situational and so plans should be put in place to address the unavoidable increase in patient load. Where patients can be seen at clinics, private hospitals or medical offices they should be encouraged to do so [60, 61].

However, preventing the influx of patients in emergency rooms does not alter how patients receive emergency care. Therefore, it is essential that the emergency care provided to patients is efficient in decreasing long wait time as well. Interventions that can be employed to improve wait time in the Jamaican public emergency setting include improving hospital capacity, decreasing overcrowding by using observation units as a component of the triage process [62, 63].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

The growing problem of long wait time in the public hospitals is not a unique phenomenon but is a global health care concern with multiple contributing factors. Therefore, there is no one solution that can be employed to adequately address the health care dilemma. However, the use of a risk management approach to addressing the health care issue is highly recommended since it allows for advance planning, implementation of interventions and the evaluation of outcomes to mitigate or prevent major challenges that could negatively impact patient safety in emergency care management. Other important measures that can be taken include ongoing upgrade of national health policy in emergency care management, improving triage systems, decreasing overcrowding and the adequate use of modern technology to decrease wait time for patients to receive effective and efficient emergency health care. To achieve this feat a collaborative approach must be engaged including the involvement of the government’s public and private health care systems.

In conclusion, further studies should be done in identifying the main risk factors that contributes to the long wait time at hospitals in Jamaica. Thus, creating the opportunity for the development of universal health care policies to effectively decrease long wait time in emergency rooms in public hospitals, by employing risk management strategies.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

I would first like to thank God for giving me the opportunity to complete this project with much success. I am also grateful for the support provided by the leadership and management of the Brown’s Town Community College in St. Ann, Jamaica in the completion of this invaluable research work to improve health care practice on a global scale. I would also like to thank all the institutions that have contributed to my academic growth over the years. More so, I want to thank IntechOpen for the confidence placed in me to take on such a major project for the first time in coauthoring in a book through a globally renown journal. I am forever grateful and do anticipate further collaboration of this nature and magnitude in the future.

Advertisement

Conflicts of interest

The authors confirm that this chapter content has no conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was solicited for this project.

References

  1. 1. Biya M, Gezahagn M, Birhanu B, et al. Waiting time and its associated factors in patients presenting to outpatient departments at Public Hospitals of Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22:107. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07502-8
  2. 2. Gertz AH, Pollack CC, Schultheiss MD, Brownstein JS. Delayed medical care and underlying health in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Preventive Medical Reports. 2022;28:101882. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101882. Epub 2022 Jul 5
  3. 3. Lasater KB, Sloane DM, McHugh MD, Cimiotti JP, Riman KA, Martin B, et al. Evaluation of hospital nurse-to-patient staffing ratios and sepsis bundles on patient outcomes. American Journal of Infection Control. 2021;49(7):868-873. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 10
  4. 4. Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Guernsey J, Mackinnon N, Kovacs G. The association between a prolonged stay in the emergency department and adverse events in older patients. 2011
  5. 5. Girvan, T. Waiting in Vain? Understanding Emergency Room Priority Levels [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/health/waiting-in-vain-4/ [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  6. 6. Coombs, M. Universal Coverage in Jamaica [Internet] 2012. Available from: https://www3.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2012/COOMBS-JAM-BAR-22oct2012.pdf [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  7. 7. Thomas C. Hospital Managers Urged to Ease Wait Times [Internet] 2021. Available from: https://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/lead-stories/20210609/hospital-managers-urged-ease-wait-times [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  8. 8. Small, S. COVID-19 Cases Still on the Rise [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20230719/covid-19-cases-still-rise [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  9. 9. Emanuel L, Berwick D, Conway J, et al. What exactly is patient safety? In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches, Assessment. Vol. 1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43629/2
  10. 10. Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Guernsey J, MacKinnon N, Kovacs G. The association between a prolonged stay in the emergency department and adverse events in older patients admitted to hospital: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2011;20:564-569. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034926
  11. 11. BMJ-British Medical Journal. Long emergency waiting times linked to increased risk of adverse events. ScienceDaily. 1 June 2011. Available from: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110601204048.htm
  12. 12. Nyce A, Gandhi S, Freeze B, Bosire J, Ricca T, Kupersmith E, et al. Association of emergency department waiting times with patient experience in admitted and discharged patients. Journal of Patient Experience. 2021;8:23743735211011404. DOI: 10.1177/23743735211011404
  13. 13. Khankeh HR, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Azizi-Naghdloo F, Hoseini MA, Rahgozar M. Triage effect on wait time of receiving treatment services and patients satisfaction in the emergency department: Example from Iran. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2013;18(1):79-83
  14. 14. Goodacre S, Webster A. Who waits longest in the emergency department and who leaves without being seen? Emergency Medicine Journal. 2005;22:93-96
  15. 15. Savioli G, Ceresa IF, Gri N, Bavestrello Piccini G, Longhitano Y, Zanza C, et al. Emergency department overcrowding: Understanding the factors to find corresponding solutions. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022;12(2):279. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020279
  16. 16. Moskowitz, D. The Importance of Health Care Risk Management [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/072315/importance-healthcare-risk-management.asp#:~:text=Risk%20management%20is%20the%20process,makes%20the%20stakes%20significantly%20higher [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  17. 17. World Health Organization. Global Patient Safety Action Plan [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  18. 18. O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner KM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029954. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
  19. 19. Clarke GM, Conti S, Wolters AT, Steventon A. Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data. BMJ. 2019;365:l2239. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2239
  20. 20. Kahraman J. Europe's Hospitals in the Spotlight – A Journey Through 5 Regions [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.swisslog-healthcare.com/en-gb/company/blog/europes-hospitals-in-the-spotlight [Accessed: January 07, 2024]
  21. 21. Watt E. Risk management planning. In: Project Management for Skills for All Careers, Chapter 16 by Project Management Open Resources and TAP-a-PM. 2nd ed. Available from: https://opentextbc.ca/projectmanagement/chapter/chapter-16-risk-management-planning-project-management/
  22. 22. OECD. Healthcare wait Times by Country 2024 [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/health-care-wait-times-by-country [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  23. 23. Schut F, Varkevisser M. The Netherlands. In: Siciliani L, Borowitz M, Moran V, editors. Waiting Time Policies in the Health Sector: What Works? Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013. DOI: 10.1787/9789264179080-13-en
  24. 24. Campbell D, Duncan P. One in 10 A & E patients in England face ‘dangerous’ 12 hour waits. The Guardian [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/apr/13/accident-emergency-patients-nhs-england-dangerous-wait-times-12-hours Accessed: January 09, 2024
  25. 25. Nuffield Trust & the Health Foundation. UK Long Wait Time Statistics [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/a-e-waiting-times [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  26. 26. Lakeridge Health Department. Emergency Department Wait Times [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.lakeridgehealth.on.ca/en/ourservices/emergency-department-wait-times.asp [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  27. 27. Heilman JA, Tanski M, Burns B, Lin A, Ma J. Decreasing time to pain relief for emergency department patients with extremity fractures. BMJ Quality Improvement Reports. 2016;5(1):u209522.w7251. DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u209522.w7251
  28. 28. Baker DW, Stevens CD, Brook RH. Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician: Causes and consequences. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;266(8):1085-1090. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1991.03470080055029
  29. 29. Yuzeng S, Hui LL. Improving the wait time to triage at the emergency department. BMJ Open Quality. 2020;9(1):e000708. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000708
  30. 30. Willcox S, Seddon M, Dunn S, Edwards R, Pearse J, Tu J. Measuring and reducing waiting times: A cross-national comparison of strategies. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2007;26:1078-1087. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1078
  31. 31. De Freitas L, Goodacre S, O'Hara R, Thokala P, Hariharan S. Qualitative exploration of patient flow in a Caribbean emergency department. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e041422. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041422
  32. 32. Edwards M, Cooper A, Hughes T, Davies F, Price D, Anderson P, et al. The effectiveness of primary care streaming in emergency departments on decision-making and patient flow and safety - A realist evaluation. International Emergency Nursing. 2022;62:101155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101155. Epub 2022 Mar 23
  33. 33. Barbados Today. Public Notice: Increased wait times at the Accident and Emergency Department [Internet]. Available from: https://barbadostoday.bb/2023/11/01/public-notice-increased-wait-times-at-the-accident-and-emergency-department/ [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  34. 34. Lee J, Yoon S. Nature and patient waiting: Mediating effects of anxiety and perceived wait time on the association between nature and service perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2023;91:102113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102113. ISSN 0272-4944. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494423001615
  35. 35. Pearlmutter MD, Dwyer KH, Burke LG, Rathlev N, Maranda L, Volturo G. Analysis of emergency department length of stay for mental health patients at ten Massachusetts Emergency Departments. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2017;70(2):193-202.e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.005. Epub 2017 Jan 4
  36. 36. Fitzgerald G, Jelinek G, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Emergency department triage revisited. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2010;27(2):86-92
  37. 37. Moskop, Iserson. Triage in medicine, part II: Underlying values and principles. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2007;49(3):282-287
  38. 38. Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y. Emergency department triage: An ethical analysis. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2011;11:16. DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-16
  39. 39. French S, Gordon-Strachan G, Kerr K, Bisasor-McKenzie J, Innis L, Tanabe P. Implementing the emergency severity index triage system in Jamaican accident and emergency departments. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2019;45(2):124-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 24
  40. 40. ACF-technologies. Patient Experience: 8 Effective Ways to Reduce Wait Times and Save Money [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.acftechnologies.com/blog/8-effective-ways-to-reduce-patient-wait-times/ [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  41. 41. Shen Y, Lee LH. Improving the wait time to consultation at the emergency department. BMJ Open Quality. 2018;7(1):e000131. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000131
  42. 42. French S, Gordon-Strachan G, Kerr K, Bisasor-McKenzie J, Innis L, Tanabe P. Assessment of interrater reliability of the emergency severity index after implementation in emergency departments in Jamaica using a learning collaborative approach. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2021;47(1):58-65. ISSN 0099-1767. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.07.003
  43. 43. Campbell, A. e-Health in the J'can Public Health System: Where are We? The Jamaican Observer [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/columns/e-health-in-the-jcan-public-health-system-where-are-we/ [Accessed: January 16, 2024]
  44. 44. Yancey CC, O'Rourke MC. Emergency Department Triage [Updated 2023 Aug 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557583/
  45. 45. Ministry of Health Jamaica. National Health Information System Strengthening and e-Health Strategic Plan 2014 to 2018 [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MOH_NHIS-eHealth_StrategicPlanFINAL.pdf
  46. 46. NHS. Our National Patient Safety Alerts [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/patient-safety/patient-safety-insight/patient-safety-alerts/ [Accessed: January 05, 2024]
  47. 47. Singer SJ, Benzer JK, Hamdan SU. Improving health care quality and safety: The role of collective learning. Journal of Healthcare Leadership. 2015;7:91-107. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S70115
  48. 48. Laskowski M, McLeod RD, Friesen MR, Podaima BW, Alfa AS. Models of emergency departments for reducing patient waiting times. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6127. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006127
  49. 49. Ahmad J, Iqbal J, Ahmad I, Khan ZA, Tiwana MI, Khan K. A simulation based study for managing hospital resources by reducing patient waiting time. IEEE Access. 2020;8:193523-193531. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032760
  50. 50. Heslin SM, Nappi M, Kelly G, et al. Rapid creation of an emergency department telehealth program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2022;28(3):207-212. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20952632
  51. 51. Q-nomy Health Care Solutions. Complete Patient Flow Management Simplifies Dependency [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.qnomyhealth.com/emergency-departments#:~:text=The%20Q%2Dflow%20platform%20offers,patients%20visit%20the%20ER%2FED [Accessed: December 29, 2023]
  52. 52. Stavropoulou C, Doherty C, Tosey P. How effective are incident-reporting systems for improving patient safety? A systematic literature review. Milbank Quarterly. 2015;93(4):826-866. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12166
  53. 53. PAHO. PAHO Facilitates Assessment of Jamaica’s Emergency and Critical Care System During 2-Day Consensus Meeting [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/news/13-9-2023-paho-facilitates-assessment-jamaicas-emergency-and-critical-care-system-during-2-day [Accessed: January 16, 2024]
  54. 54. Royal College of Paediatrics and child health. The NHS and UK Government have Published a New Two-year Delivery Plan Today to Help Recover Urgent and Emergency Care Services, Reduce Waiting Times, and Improve Patient Experience [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/news-events/news/nhs-englands-plan-recover-urgent-emergency-care-services [Accessed: January 16, 2024]
  55. 55. Gadding MA. Risk Management in the Emergency Department. Omnia Health [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://insights.omnia-health.com/medical-specialities/risk-management-emergency-department [Accessed: January 07, 2024]
  56. 56. Tavirani MR, Beigvand HH. A review of various methods of management of risk in the field of emergency medicine. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019;7(23):4179-4187. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.616
  57. 57. Krist AH, Tong ST, Aycock RA, Longo DR. Engaging patients in decision-making and behavior change to promote prevention. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2017;240:284-302
  58. 58. Sachs CJ, Yu CK, Nauka PC, Schriger DL. Systems opportunities to reduce ED crowding from nonemergency referrals. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2018;33(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1177/1062860617700721
  59. 59. Pines JM, Hilton JA, Weber EJ, Alkemade AJ, Al Shabanah H, Anderson PD, et al. International perspectives on emergency department crowding. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011;18(12):1358-1370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01235.x
  60. 60. Coster JE, Turner JK, Bradbury D, Cantrell A. Why do people choose emergency and urgent care services? A rapid review utilizing a systematic literature search and narrative synthesis. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2017;24(9):1137-1149. DOI: 10.1111/acem.13220
  61. 61. Henry, O. Increased Patient Visits to Health Centres Under Reducing Waiting Time Initiative [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://jis.gov.jm/features/increased-patient-visits-to-health-centres-under-reducing-waiting-time-initiative/#:~:text=She%20notes%20that%20patients%20will%20be%20encouraged%20to,for%20visits%20to%20the%20emergency%20room%20and%20hospitalisation [Accessed: January 18, 2024]
  62. 62. Viccellio P, Hochman KA, Semczuk P, Santora C. Right focus, right solution: How reducing variability in admission and discharge improves hospital capacity and flow. In: Litvak E, editor. Optimizing Patient Flow: Advanced Strategies for Managing Variability to Enhance Access, Quality, and Safety. Oak Brook, IL: The Joint Commission; 2018. pp. 97-112
  63. 63. Baugh CW, Venkatesh AK, Bohan JS. Emergency department observation units: A clinical and financial benefit for hospitals. Health Care Management Review. 2011;36(1):28-37. DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181f3c035

Written By

Opal Davidson, James Fallah, Denice Curtis and Chukwuma Richard Uzoka

Submitted: 21 January 2024 Reviewed: 21 January 2024 Published: 07 March 2024