Advances and Challenges of Reservoir Characterization: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art

s, 1524–1526. Kochnev, I. V., V. S. Polyakov, and I. Murtayev, et al., 2007, Imaging hydraulic fracture zones from surface passive microseismic data: First Break, 25, 77–80. Kovacic, L., and E. Poggiagliomi, 2003, Integrated time-lapse reservoir monitoring and characterization of Cervia field: a case study: Petroleum Geoscience, v. 9. p. 43-52. Kuznetsov, O. L., L. N. Chirkina, and G. A. Belova, et al., 2006, Seismic location of emission centers-A new technology for monitoring the production of hydrocarbons: 68th Conference & Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, B018


Introduction
Since the first technical paper which reported works of Jahns on two-dimensional description of reservoir heterogeneity using regression analysis on well testing data in 1966 (Jahns, 1966), reservoir characterization has attracted remarkable research efforts particularly in the past three decades (Doss et al., 2001;Wang, 2008).It is widely recognized now by oil industry that reservoir characteristics such as natural heterogeneity, spatial variability of permeability and porosity, porous media properties and spatial distribution of oil & water predominantly control the flow field, reservoir performance, development strategies and hence the economic returns of investments which are most concerned by oil companies.Reservoir characterization is a combined technology associated with geostatistics, geophsics, petrophysics, geology and reservoir engineering and the main goals of reservoir characterization research are to aid field development and reservoir management teams in describing the reservoir in sufficient detail, developing 3D/4D data for reservoir development planning to obtain higher recoveries with fewer wells in better positions at minimum cost through optimization, increasing reserves, improving stimulation and completion practices and reducing to a minimum uncertainty in production forecasts (Haldorsen and Damsleth, 1993;Phillips, 1996;Johnston, 2004).In recent years, technological innovations have lead to advances of reservoir characterization through methodology and instruments.Terrestrial scanning lidar and laser technology were applied to outcrop stratigraphic mapping with extremely accurate and efficient for digital outcrop modeling (Bellian et al., 2005;Buckley et al., 2009).Seismic imaging technologies either single-sensor seismic data processing or calibration of seismic amplitude and attributes showed advantages in porosity detection and reservoir modeling (Slatt and Mark, 2002;Refae et al., 2008).Surface microseismic monitoring was also used for hydraulic-fracture monitoring in reservoir characterization of development stage (Duncan and Eisner, 2010).In this chapter, there are two main purposes of the author.One is to conduct a comprehensive review to the current state, challenges and developing trends of reservoir characterization technology.The second is trying to verify some phrases used in papers which are frequently used and affiliated to reservoir characterization and set up a practical procedure for people engaging or to be engaged in the field of reservoir characterization.seismic, geology and well logs and made the subsurface reservoir model, output of reservoir characterization study into digital 3D visible model.In this section, some technological advances were selected and introduced by the author according his knowledge degree.

Reservoir characterization and monitoring with 4D seismic
Seismic time-lapse reservoir monitoring (4D) was used to access the petrophysical properties and performance of reservoir at stage of field development in recent years (Fageraas et al., 2003;Kovacic and Poggiagliomi, 2003).Reservoir characterization and monitoring with 4D seismic data involves both comparison and analysis of repeated seismic surveys shot over the same location during the production life of a field.Compared with borehole based measurements (logs, pressure, temperature, etc), property distributions obtained from seismic attributes have more advantages in accuracy and spatial resolution.Basic methodologies, dealing with some of the most critical issues and phases encountered in a seismic time-lapse project, were developed by Kovacic and Poggiagliomi: (1) feasibility studies to assess the suitability of time-lapse seismic technology to monitor the performance of a specific reservoir.This includes fully integrating laboratory measurements performed on core samples, well data analysis (editing and normalization of well logs), rock mechanical modeling, rock physics data and petroacoustic processing and Its purpose is to assess whether acoustic changes, related to time-lapse fluid movements within the production intervals, are of sufficient magnitude to be detected seismically.; (2) accurate homogenization of legacy 3D seismic surveys by means of wavelet equalization.In this phase, two 3D surveys were processed and wavelet-equalized by extracting from all the traces in trace-sets, located at the same well position, with the same well-log derived reflectivity sequence.;(3) calibration of absolute acoustic impedance volumes to reservoir pressure and petrophysical properties (porosity, saturation, clay content, etc.) to derive the spatial pattern of fluid movements.Through reservoir characterization with 4D seismic, partially drained areas can be recognized by analysis to pattern of acoustic impedance and quantified by petroacoustic calibration.Thus, remaining reserves can be evaluated which is one of the main purposes of reservoir characterization study.

Outcrop study with application of digital data capture technology
Outcrop studies have long been employed as a mechanism of studying analogues and understanding petroleum fields (Collinson, 1970;Glennie, 1970;Breed and Grow, 1979).Depositional architectures are well preserved in outcrops and outcrop analogues offer the opportunity to enhance the understanding of subsurface reservoir architecture, geometry, and facies distributions (Pringle et al., 2006).Compared to studies of modern sedimentary events or laboratory-based experiments and process-based modeling, outcrops are more geologically comparable to the subsurface reservoir architecture and capture large enough scale of heterogeneity.Outcrop studies have developed from qualitative to quantitative.Traditional outcrop studies were focused on collecting outcrop data, such as sand width, thickness, to populate inter-well areas by stochastic or object-based methods (Dreyer et al., 1993;Bryant and Flint, 1993;Chapin et al., 1994;Clark and Pickering, 1996;Reynolds, 1999;Floris and Peersmann, 2002).However, traditional outcrop studies can hardly provide useful data especially when it needs to be integrated into reservoir engineering database or be visualized in 3D.Accurate

Reservoir characterization using downhole/surface microseismic monitoring
Microseismic imagining has been applied for downhole monitoring especially to image fracture network deformation of hydraulic fracture operations (Bailey, 1973;Duncan and Eisner, 2010;Maxwell et al., 2010).To plot the estimates of the event hypocenter locations on an event-by-event basis over time is currently the common practice for reporting the result of microseismic monitoring.As shown in Figure 2, the hypocenter locations for a multiwell frac for five horizontal wells in Marcellus Shale play are estimated.However, many researchers have developed other approaches on passive seismic emission tomography such as long-time-interval stacking similar to semblance (Kuznetsov et al., 2006;Kochnev et al., 2007) and picking the maximum amplitude of the P-wave migration as the imaging condition (Chambers et al., 2008(Chambers et al., , 2009a(Chambers et al., , 2009b;;Robein et al., 2009).A method to improve resolution for amplitude picking through recognizing the vertical distribution of false hypocenter estimates for has been purposed by Duncan et al. (2008).Surface monitoring technique of hydraulic fracture stimulation also has been developed (Abbott et al., 2007;Kochnev et al., 2007;Barker, 2009;Hall and Kilpatrick, 2009;Keller et al., 2009;Robein et al., 2009).Usually linear groups of vertical phones are laid out along the spokes of a wheel centered on the wellhead of the treatment well.Details of data gathering, processing and migration about the technique have been investigated by Duncan and Eisner (2010).

Practical procedures for reservoir characterization technology
Reservoir characterization is a comprehensive technology.The main goal of reservoir characterization is for high precision reservoir predictions and quantitative depictions of reservoir architecture and properties to aid field development and reservoir management.It involves geology, geophysics, petrophysics, and reservoir engineering.Depositional background and sedimentary environment of research area should be investigated through geological study firstly.Then the structural model and reservoir architecture is provided through outcrop analogues and 3D seismic survey.Reservoir petrophysical properties can be determined by well logs or laboratory analysis.Finally, 3D reservoir model can be obtained with integration of reservoir framework and properties.Practical reservoir characterization for compartmentalized reservoirs still presents a challenge to technical staffs.In this section, practical workflow to carry out reservoir characterization research has been conducted and it is supposed to be helpful to technical staffs or researchers.This procedure is comprised of eight steps.

Depositional background and sedimentary environment analysis
As geology is a first order control on reservoir architecture and petrophysical properties, thorough study on depositional background and sedimentary environment is the priority.Depositional mechanism and genesis study are the tools to investigate reservoir features on the macroscopic scale or for regional deposition researches.Regional structure characteristics and flooding surface fluctuation reveal much about the subsurface reservoir architecture.e.g. for large constructive fluvial-deltaic depositional system with a gentle slope and relatively low flood surface at the geological age, study reveals that the fluvial system still remains high-energy and extends forward into the lake and the mouth bar is not developed.As result of the depositional environment, sand is thin in thickness and laminated sand and shale occurs.Depositional background and flooding surface is the control factors to reservoir scale and sand distribution patterns, which provide a basis for sand distribution prediction.Study of the regional depositional background and sedimentary environment can provide basic and qualitative knowledge to reservoir architecture and is the foremost step for reservoir characterization.present, the most effective method is to establish an isochronous stratigraphic framework and conduct fine structural interpretation by means of inter-well seismic correlation, which are guided by high resolution sequence stratigraphy, and combining with core, well logs, seismic imaging and dynamic production data.High resolution sequence stratigraphy theory and its application and structure interpretation are the key techniques.Application of high resolution sequence stratigraphy theory is effective in reservoir prediction and evaluation during the mature stage of field development.Using data from core, well logs and seismic data, high resolution sequence stratigraphy framework can be established through base-level cycle identification, isochronous correlation and internal structure analysis.
Structure interpretation includes micro-structure interpretation and low-order fault interpretation.Using high precision survey and processed seismic data, techniques integrated with 3D visualization, coherence analysis and seismic horizontal slice can effectively improve the precision and identify micro-amplitude structure and low-order faults.

Establishment of reservoir sedimentary models
Genetic units, sand spatial distribution and superimposed pattern can be identified through microfacies subdivision.Microfacies analysis is the key technique in this step and study on sedimentary facies is essential throughout stages of oilfield exploration and development.
Especially in the recent years, advances in outcrop analogue, dense well correlation, well logs and seismic survey resulted in innovation in sedimentary facies study.
Microfacies subdivision gives sands the meaning of genesis.Therefore, contact relationship of different facies, sand superimposition patterns and spatial distribution pattern for different sedimentary system can be established through outcrop analogue and study of modern sedimentary events.Then reliable reservoir sedimentary model can be established which is used to provide guidance to reservoir prediction, precisely characterize sand spatial distribution pattern and investigate more subtle reservoir heterogeneity.Taking a block in Daqing Oilfield, China as an example, detailed microfacies study shows that the major oil zone develops in the delta plain environment which can be further subdivided into main distributary channel, branch distributary channel, abandoned channel, overbank sediment (natural levees and crevasse splays) and inter-distributary bay (Figure 3).Furthermore, the distributary channel sands are the major reservoir and the main target for detailed microfacies study.The distributary channel sand is characterized of sheetlike or isolated patterns.In order to thoroughly depict the sand distribution pattern, the abandoned channel can identified firstly according to some special features, such as curve shape of well logs, sand thickness variation and microfacies assemblages.Thus sheet-like sands developing in different channels can be identified and classified clearly.Point bar can be further identified which are prepared for correlation of the lateral accretion sand and thorough investigation of sand architecture.

Establishment of prototype model and geological database
The purpose to establish a prototype model and geological database is aimed to get parameters, such as sand geometry and scale (e.g.length, width, thickness and proportion) of genetic units and then provide quantitative references for inter-well sand prediction.Generally, seismic data is important for inter-well prediction, but it has limitation for low Establishment of reservoir prototype model and geological database is an important part for reservoir characterization.Quantitative characterization for sand can provide quantitative parameters for inter-well reservoir prediction and establishment of 3D reservoir model.The prototype model and geological database refers to parameters which quantitatively characterize the spatial distribution, boundary patterns and petrophysical properties of genetic units, and some qualitative sedimentary patterns.The database mainly includes lithologic/lithofacies knowledge, depositional environment and microfacies knowledge, sand geometry and diagenesis knowledge (Table 2) for a specific outcrop analogue.The primary prototype model should be study of the Gypsy profile sponsored by BP, which greatly enriches the geologic database of fluvial deposits (Doyle and Sweet, 1995).Similar study was also carried out in China on outcrop analogues in Datong and Luanping respectively.Qualitative description, quantitative measurement, sample analysis and well logs were conducted.Interior architecture of Luanping fan delta deposits and Datong braided channel deposits are thoroughly investigated.Therefore, prototype models and geological database for fan delta and braided channel deposits are established.Furthermore, in combination with stochastic modeling technique, methods for sand distribution prediction of this two kinds of deposits are developed (Jia and He, 2003).Methods for establishment of prototype model and geological databases include detailed outcrop analogue, dense well correlation, modern sedimentary event analogue and www.intechopen.com

Advances and Challenges of Reservoir
Characterization: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art 215 laboratory based experiments.Combined application of two or more methods is the best way to establish the model.But as the subsurface reservoirs are usually lack of outcrop analogous and studies of modern sedimentary events has limitation for characterization for changes in accommodation through time, commonly available data are core and well logs in oil and gas industry.Although prototype model and geological database base on study of dense well pattern development block using core and well logs data is of less precision compared with that based on outcrop analogues or modern sedimentary event analogues, it is much more practical especially for study in oil and gas industry.
Table 2. Expert knowledge and geologic database for Luanping fan delta deposits.Genetic units are qualitatively and quantitatively described.

Reservoir prediction with application of high resolution seismic
Seismic is always an important method for reservoir prediction.For reservoir characterization, seismic data provides not only fine structure interpretation but also inter-well information.
Based on the previous four steps which focus on sedimentary studies and in combination of seismic data, inter-well reservoir distribution prediction should be more reliable.
Currently, seismic resolution is still low and improvement of seismic resolution is the precondition for application of seismic data into reservoir characterization at the development stage.There are abundant data such as core, well logs and production data at the development stage which are advantages for development seismic.Therefore, seismic data processing and interpretation should incorporate existing data and geological knowledge as much as possible to improve its precision.Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP) technique is an effective method used to distinguish small structure near wellbore, identify lithology and obtain fracture parameters.Combined with the seismic data interpretation, this technique can provide near wellbore petrophysical parameters for reservoir characterization.Time lapse seismic (4D) technique is specialized in dynamic monitoring through seismic responses changing with time.This technique plays an important role in remaining reserves identification in mature field (Mezghani et al., 2004).
Inter-well seismic technique focus on reservoir lateral heterogeneity and provide inter-well peterophysical parameters for reservoir modeling (Justice et al., 2000).Applications of Interwell seismic technique in the Daqing and Shengli oilfields shows that layers with 2~3m in thickness can be identified, sometime even to 1m, and small faults have a clear response (Figure 4).In this step, reservoir architectural elements should be analyzed thoroughly.Miall et al. (1985) studied the subdivision of bounding surfaces inside reservoir architecture and proposed a full set of methods and theories about hierarchical order to the bounding surfaces.Hierarchical boundary analysis is from point view of system theory and studies the hierarchy and structure of the deposition system, highlighting isochronous and intermittent characteristics of the sedimentary process.Thus the hierarchical boundaries are compatible with the stratigraphy sequences and can be subdivided infinitely but always fitting the depositional genesis analysis.On this basis, reservoir architecture elements are widely studied for thoroughly investigation to the reservoir interior in China and aboard.
Research on fluvial deposits is highly developed.In recent years, researchers from China have carried out a lot of research in this area.Jia and Cai (1992) and Zhang (1992) introduced their ideas and methods of reservoir architecture from different aspects.Although the terminology is different, their works have much similarity in conceptual system with reservoir architecture.Hierarchies of reservoir architecture were studied.Subdivision and identification methods for architecture elements were developed.Following researchers such as Yin et al. (2001;2002), He et al. (2005a;2005b) and Liao (2006) studied the delta depositional sands from point view of reservoir architecture.These works show that researches on reservoir architecture provides a sedimentary basis and a new approach to subdivision of architecture elements.

Evaluation of reservoir petrophysical properties and fluid distribution
The previous six steps aim to establish reservoir framework model.However petrophysical properties and fluid distribution models should be integrated with reservoir framework model to obtain a comprehensive reservoir model.Methods of reservoir petrophysical properties characterization include quantitative description, influencing factor analysis, spatial distribution analysis, inter-well prediction and variation pattern analysis.Research in fluid distribution rules is defined as qualitative or quantitative descriptions for fluid types, properties and saturations.Currently, reservoir petrophysical properties are derived from laboratory-based core analysis and well logs.Reservoir fluid can be identified through seismic survey or sampling.

Establishment of comprehensive and integrated reservoir geological model
A subsurface reservoir model is a computer based representation of petrophysical parameters such as porosity, permeability, fluid saturation, etc (Pringle et al., 2006).Through previous steps, various parameters needed have been well prepared.In this step, 3D subsurface reservoir model can be finally established with calibration of existing data and the key factor is the optimization of modeling method and integration of geologist's expert knowledge.In the past two decades, different stochastic methods (pixel-based methods e.g.Gaussian-related stochastic models, object-based modeling methods e.g.Boolean models, and process-based methods) and deterministic methods have been developed for reservoir geological modeling (Hu, 2003).

Challenges and development trend of reservoir characterization technology
With everlasting high heterogeneity and diversity of reservoir rocks, characterization methods for reservoir framework, pore structure and petrophysical flow units are still great challenges.Today, there is still no substitute for high quality seismic interpretation which may reveal essential geological features and important heterogeneities.Seismic acquisition, processing and interpretation techniques have been refined steadily over the years.Methods e.g.Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP), inter-well seismic, time lapse seismic (4D) technologies etc. have been calibrated with seismic processing and interpretation.But seismic technique is still short of resolution and can not effectively diagnose small-scale structures or architecture elements.Just as Haldorsen and Damsleth (1993) remarked: The industry wants 1-m resolution at typical North Sea reservoir depths before the turn of the century!Achieve a dramatic seismic resolution improvement should still be goal of the oil and gas industry.In other words, there are still challenges in seismic survey and methods to improve resolution will be one of development trends.Crosswell (or interwell) techniques have been developed in these years.Crosswell data were calibrated into reservoir models.Crosswell seismic imaging to provide images of reflectivity, velocity and formation properties by amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion has been developed (Yu et al., 2008) and interwell seismic imaging was also developed for www.intechopen.com

Advances and Challenges of Reservoir
Characterization: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art 219 hydraulic fracture monitoring (Bailey, 1973;Duncan and Eisner, 2010;Maxwell et al., 2010) In summary, challenges of reservoir characterization remain in three aspects: resolution to identify small scale reservoir compartments, e.g.fracture, small-scale structure and thin layers, which aim to establish a detailed reservoir framework; crosswell petrophysical properties and hydrocarbon prediction, which are basis for spatial distribution of reservoir properties; characteristics of physical property dynamic changes with advances of field development, which are very important to reservoir performance.Thus, in the author's point of view, resolution improvement for seismic survey, effective methods to appropriately characterize crosswell petrophysical properties and hydrocarbon distribution and effective way to characterize dynamic changes of petrophysical properties should be three main development trends for reservoir characterization technology.

Conclusions
In this paper, discussions were carried out from four aspects and progresses of this work can be summarized as follows: (1) the words, e.g.advanced, practical, comprehensive, integrated, digital and detailed which are used to decorate the phase "reservoir characterization" , were discussed.Technique contents and features for each word (phase) were verified.(2) Three techniques have been selected and their advances have been reviewed.4D seismic, digital data capture technology applied in outcrop study and microseismic monitoring can improved reservoir characterization from different aspects.
Reservoir characterization with 4D seismic can characterize the dynamic of reservoir performance and remaining reserves can be evaluated.Digital data capture technology can be calibrated with outcrop study and it has advantages for obtaining more accurate and denser digital datasets from outcrop.Microseismic monitoring can effectively image the downhole fracture network deformation of hydraulic fracturing and capture dynamic changes of reservoir.(3) Practical procedures for reservoir characterization have been initiated.It is consist of eight steps.The technique feature and the main task were clearly defined.It is a hoped to be helpful to technical staffs or researchers.(4) Challenges and development trends were reviewed.Resolution improvement for seismic survey, effective methods to appropriately characterize crosswell petrophysical properties and hydrocarbon distribution and effective way to characterize dynamic changes of petrophysical properties should be three main development trends for reservoir characterization technology.Finally, as reservoir characterization is a comprehensive and highly integrated technology, it is important to state that the author has limited knowledge and if there is any mistake or something improper please feel free to point it out.
method have been summarized byMcCaffrey et al. (2005) Currently, ground-based LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) or laser scanning is the preferred technology(Pringle et al, 2006).Lidar scanner uses laser light to measure distance with extreme precision, whereas radar scanner uses radio waves.They use "time of travel" to measure the distance.Resolution of radar scanner is about 8mm at range of 350m and it is almost 5mm at range of 200m for lidar scanner.Data extracted from digital outcrop model can be incorporated into reservoir model.Details for scanning lidar and radar technology with its application in digital outcrop study can be referred in paper purposed byBellian et al. (2005) andBuckley et al.  (2009).www.intechopen.comAdvances and Challenges of Reservoir Characterization: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art 211

Fig. 2 .
Fig. 2. Perspective view of the microseismic monitoring results from treating five wells completed in the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania.The dots represent the estimated event hypocenters.The colors of the dots match the color of the treated well to which they correspond.(From Schisselé and Meunier, 2009; Duncan and Eisner, 2010).Maxwell et al. (2010) listed three general classes of techniques for locating microseismic events: (1) hodogram techniques based upon the particle motion of direct arrivals, which is the simplest method and using only one three-component (3C) sensor(Albright and Hanold, 1976), (2) triangulation schemes based upon arrival times of direct waves by combinations of P-and/or S-waves at multiple stations(Gibowicz and Kijko, 1994), and (3) semblance methods based upon stacking waves without arrival-time picking.All three classes of location techniques can be used in conjunction with surface or downhole sensors(Duncan and Eisner, 2010).However, many researchers have developed other approaches on passive seismic emission tomography such as long-time-interval stacking similar to semblance(Kuznetsov et al., 2006;Kochnev et al., 2007) and picking the maximum amplitude of the P-wave migration as

4. 2
Isochronous stratigraphic framework and structure modeling Stratigraphic division, correlation and structural interpretation are the basis for study of reservoir architecture.Appropriate stratigraphic framework can accurately characterize reservoir architecture and improve the precision and reliability of reservoir prediction.At www.intechopen.comAdvances and Challenges of Reservoir Characterization: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art 213

Fig. 3 .
Fig. 3. Microfacies distribution of P I31 sub-layer in a block of Daqing oilfield, Chinaresolution (usually more than 5m in thickness).Predictions for thin sand and subdivision for thick sand are still difficult for seismic survey.The key technique solving this problem is to establish a reservoir prototype model and geological database.The so-called prototype model refers to the detailed model for outcrop analogue(s) which is geologically comparable to the system being studied, dense well pattern block in mature fields or the modern sedimentary event analogues.Establishment of reservoir prototype model and geological database is an important part for reservoir characterization.Quantitative characterization for sand can provide quantitative parameters for inter-well reservoir prediction and establishment of 3D reservoir model.The prototype model and geological database refers to parameters which quantitatively characterize the spatial distribution, boundary patterns and petrophysical properties of genetic units, and some qualitative sedimentary patterns.The database mainly includes lithologic/lithofacies knowledge, depositional environment and microfacies knowledge, sand geometry and diagenesis knowledge (Table2) for a specific outcrop analogue.The primary prototype model should be study of the Gypsy profile sponsored by BP, which greatly enriches the geologic database of fluvial deposits(Doyle and Sweet, 1995).Similar study was also carried out in China on outcrop analogues in Datong and Luanping respectively.Qualitative description, quantitative measurement, sample analysis and well logs were conducted.Interior architecture of Luanping fan delta deposits and Datong braided channel deposits are thoroughly investigated.Therefore, prototype models and geological database for fan delta and braided channel deposits are established.Furthermore, in combination with stochastic modeling technique, methods for sand distribution prediction of this two kinds of deposits are developed(Jia and He, 2003).Methods for establishment of prototype model and geological databases include detailed outcrop analogue, dense well correlation, modern sedimentary event analogue and

Fig. 4 .
Fig.4.Application of inter-well seismic survey for reservoir prediction in some oilfield, China.The picture on the left shows the result of ineterwell seismic imaging and the right one is about interwell seismic interpretation.It illustrates that interwell reservoir heterogeneity can be investigated and small scale faults can be identified clearly.

From Bellian et al., 2005). and quantitative outcrop analogue supported by digital data capture technique has been developed in recent years and it realized 3D reconstruction to aid or modify
subsurface reservoir model.Varies of digital data capture techniques are listed in table 1 and application of advance techniques allow rapid acquisition of more accurate and denser digital datasets from outcrop.In table 1, accuracy, application condition, advantages and disadvantages for specific Their spatial distribution predictions are reached through seismic interpretation or extrapolation of well data.It can be found that above works are based on static data without consideration of reservoir dynamic characteristics and suitable for oilfield at exploration stage or early stage of development.But for oilfield at the middle or mature stage of development, studies on reservoir petrophysical properties and fluid distribution are more complicated, especially for oilfield through long-term water flooding.Reservoir petrophysical properties change a lot with the advance of field development.Oil zone permeability, rock cementation, production rate, oil viscosity are control factors to petrophysical property changes.High permeable channel (large pores) gradually develops in highly flooded zone, causing ineffective water circulation and seriously affecting the displacement efficiency.Remaining reserves are still abundant in non-swept areas.Whereas water blockage will take place in low permeable zone which causes additional permeability reduction.Thus, reservoir characterization at the middle or mature stage of field development should take the changes of peterophysical properties into consideration, especially distribution of high permeable channel.
. Whereas, interwell petrophysical properties of reservoir geological model are still determined by extrapolation of adjacent well data or derived directly from seismic interpretation.But because of low resolution, petrophysical properties and hydrocarbon distribution derived from seismic data usually can not fulfill the need of development planning.Crosswell petrophysical properties and hydrocarbon distribution are still great challenges.As sustained recovery of oil or gas from porous media, reservoir petrophysical properties, pressure and fluid distribution are changing with time.With initialization and development of 4D seismic technology, methods to update petrophysical properties and fluid distribution of geological model have been highlighted.Whereas fluid distribution and petrophysical properties changes a lot and becomes more complicated through field development especially for oilfield through long-term water flooding.High permeable channel (large pores) gradually develops in highly flooded zone, causing ineffective water circulation and seriously affecting the displacement efficiency.Whereas water blockage will take place in low permeable zone which causes additional permeability reduction.Remaining reserves are still abundant in non-swept areas.History matching and 4D seismic are current methods to update reservoir geological model with advances of field development.Neither history matching nor 4D seismic methods can characterize the changes of reservoir petrophysical properties.Effective way to characterize petrophysical properties changes with field development should be challenge and one of emerging trends.