Korean J Community Nutr. 2020 Apr;25(2):137-149. Korean.
Published online Apr 30, 2020.
Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
Original Article

Qualitative Study on the Perception of Community Food-accessibility Environment among Urban Older Adults

Narae Yang,1 and Kirang Kim2
    • 1Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea, Graduate Student.
    • 2Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea, Professor.
Received April 01, 2020; Revised April 16, 2020; Accepted April 17, 2020.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives

This study explored the community food environmental factors affecting food purchasing using a qualitative research methodology for the elderly as well as the various food environments under their socioeconomic diversity.

Methods

For the qualitative data collection, this study interviewed 20 elderly people aged 65 years or more, who participated in a public health program or lunch services operated by the senior welfare center in Seoul. Five dimensions, such as availability, physical accessibility, affordability, acceptability, and accommodation suggested in previous studies, were used to identify the community food environmental factors.

Results

The elderly participants showed overall similarities to the concepts derived from existing studies on the five dimensions of food accessibility environment. In addition, other important food accessibility environmental factors that were not present in previous studies, such as acceptability for a product of domestic origin, delivery service to home, and small-packaged food sales, were derived. On the other hand, the concept of some subjects differed depending on the household income and specifically for the physical accessibility concept. This showed that the close distance factor from a grocery store at home might not apply to older adults in low-income households in Korea.

Conclusions

This study found that five dimensions of the food environment suggested by previous studies could also be applied to vulnerable older adults in Korea. On the other hand, the socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and households would affect the perspectives of their local food environments differently. The findings of this study could help in the development of tools for evaluating the community food environment.

Keywords
food environment; older adults; income level; urban; qualitative study

Tables

Table 1
In-depth interview questions

Table 2
General characteristics of participants

Table 3
Factors related to community food environment for older urban adults

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019R1A2C1084372).

References

    1. Lee K, Kim SH, Heo SY, Choi JH, Park IH. In: The consumer behavior survey for food 2018. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2018.
    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019;393(10184):1958–1972.
    1. Lee CH, Lee SE, Jang MJ, Choe JS, Park YH, Kim Y. An analysis of food purchase accessibility and availability for rural households: The cases of Bibong-myeon and Maesong-myeon, Hwaseong-si. Korean J Community Living Sci 2014;25(4):581–600.
    1. Kim DH, Lee CK, Seo DY. Food deserts in Korea? A GIS analysis of food consumption patterns at sub-district level in Seoul using the KNHANES 2008-2012 data. Nutr Res Pract 2016;10(5):530–536.
    1. Haynes-Maslow L, Leone LA. Examining the relationship between the food environment and adult diabetes prevalence by country economic and racial composition: an ecological study. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):648.
    1. Shim JE, Hwang JY, Kin K. Objective and perceived food environment and household economic resources related to food insecurity in older adults living alone in rural areas. BMC Geriatr 2019;19(1):234.
    1. Momosaki R, Wakabayashi H, Maeda K, Shamoto H, Nishioka S, Kojima K. Association between food store availability and the incidence of functional disability among communitydwelling older adults: Results from the Japanese gerontological evaluation cohort study. Nutrients 2019;11(10):2369.
    1. Dean WR, Sharkey JR. Rural and urban differences in the associations between characteristics of the community food environment and fruit and vegetable intake. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011;43(6):426–433.
    1. Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Healthy nutrition environments: Concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot 2005;19(5):330–333.
    1. Boswell N, Byrne R, Davies PSW. Family food environment factors associated with obesity outcomes in early childhood. BMC Obes 2019;6(1):1–11.
    1. Bodor JN, Rose D, Farley TA, Swalm C, Scott SK. Neighbourhood fruit and vegetable availability and consumption: The role of small food stores in an urban environment. Public Health Nutr 2008;11(4):413–420.
    1. Jetter KM, Cassady DL. The availability and cost of healthier food alternatives. Am J Prev Med 2006;30(1):38–44.
    1. Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs DR. Associations of the local food environment with diet quality: A comparison of assessments based on surveys and geographic information systems. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167(8):917–924.
    1. Lytle LA. Measuring the food environment: State of the science. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(4):134–144.
    1. Bryant M, Sahota P, Santorelli G, Hill A. An exploration and comparison of food and drink availability in homes in a sample of families of White and Pakistani origin within the UK. Public Health Nutr 2014;18(7):1197–1205.
    1. Mercille G, Richard L, Gauvin L, Kestens Y, Shatenstein B, Daniel M. The food environment and diet quality of urban-dwelling older women and men: Assessing the moderating role of diet knowledge. Can J Public Health 2016;107(1):eS34–eS41.
    1. Caspi CE, Sorensen G, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. The local food environment and diet: A systematic review. Health Place 2012;18(5):1172–1187.
    1. Drewnowski A, Vernez Moudon A, Jiao J, Aggarwal A, Charreire H, Chaix B. Food shopping behaviors and socioeconomic status influence obesity rates in Seattle and in Paris. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014;38(2):306–314.
    1. Williams LK, Thornton L, Ball K, Crawford D. Is the objective food environment associated with perceptions of the food environment? Public Health Nutr 2012;15(2):291–298.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. In: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine; 1967.
    1. Strauss A, Corbin JM. In: Shin GR, editor. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (translated version). 1st ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2001. pp. 91-110.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health effects of limited access to healthy food: obesity, chronic disease, and poor nutrition [internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010 [cited 2020 Jan 10].
    1. Sharkey JR, Johnson CM, Dean WR. Food access and perceptions of the community and household food environment as correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among rural seniors. BMC Geriatr 2010;10(1):32.
    1. Glanz K. Measuring food environments: A historical perspective. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(4):S93–S98.
    1. Green SH, Glanz K. Development of the perceived nutrition environment measures survey. Am J Prev Med 2015;49(1):50–61.
    1. Pitt E, Gallegos D, Comans T, Cameron C, Thornton L. Exploring the influence of local food environments on food behaviours: A systematic review of qualitative literature. Public Health Nutr 2017;20(13):2393–2405.
    1. Love P, Whelan J, Bell C, McCracken J. Measuring rural food environments for local action in Australia: A systematic critical synthesis review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(13):2416.
    1. Gustafson AA, Sharkey J, Samuel-Hodge CD, Jones-Smith J, Folds MC, Cai J. Perceived and objective measures of the food store environment and the association with weight and diet among low-income women in North Carolina. Public Health Nutr 2011;14(6):1032–1038.
    1. Black C, Moon G, Baird J. Dietary inequalities: What is the evidence for the effect of the neighbourhood food environment. Health Place 2014;27:229–242.
    1. Lytle LA, Sokol RL. Measures of the food environment: A systematic review of the field, 2007–2015. Health Place 2017;44:18–34.
    1. Giskes K, Van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP, Turrell G. Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing: The contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods. Prev Med 2007;45(1):41–48.
    1. Vilaro MJ, Barnett TE, Mathews A, Pomeranz J, Curbow B. Income differences in social control of eating behaviors and food choice priorities among southern rural women in the US: A qualitative study. Appetite 2016;107:604–612.
    1. Park E. A comparison of community health status by region and an investigation of related factors using community health indicators. J. Korean Acad 2012;23(1):31–39.

Metrics
Share
Tables

1 / 3

PERMALINK