How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2011 Estimación de Masa de las Especies de Sparassodonta (Mammalia, Metatheria) de Edad Santacrucense (Mioceno Temprano) a Partir del Tamaño del Centroide de los Elementos Apendiculares: Inferencias Paleoecológicas
Marcos Darío Ercoli, Francisco Juan Prevosti
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

BODY-MASS ESTIMATION OF SPARASSODONTA SPECIES (MAMMALIA, METATHERIA) OF SANTACRUCIAN AGE (EARLY MIOCENE) BASED ON CENTROID SIZES OF POSTCRANEAL ELEMENTS: PALAEOECOLOGICAL INFERENCES. Sparassodonts have been described as a group with a large body-mass diversity, but few works had focused on body mass estimations. In this contribution, we calculated the centroid size of the anterior view of the distal humerus, lateral view of the proximal ulna, and proximal articular view of the tibia. This data together with the known body-mass for many current predators (marsupials and placentals) allowed us to derive new allometric equations to estimate body size in the Sparassodonta. We used comparative analyses to quantify the effect of the phylogenetic structure. The relationships between body mass, centroid size, and locomotory habits were explored. The phylogenetic effect was significant for all regressions. In the humerus analysis, we found an important relationship between body mass and locomotory habit, suggesting adaptive causes. We used the ulna and tibia regressions to predict body mass, since they were less influenced by locomotory habits. Our equations produced the following masses: Arctodictis sinclari Marshall, 39.9 kg; Borhyaena tuberata Ameghino, 36.4 kg; Cladosictis patagonica Ameghino, 6.6 kg; Lycopsis longirostrus Marshall, 29.77 kg; Prothylacynus patagonicus Ameghino, 31.79 kg; Sipalocyon gracilis Ameghino, 2.11 kg; and Thylacosmilus atrox Riggs, 117.36 kg. For Borhyaena and Thylacosmilus, we obtained values higher than previously published masses, while for Pseudonotictis pusillus Ameghino, we have made the first body mass estimation of 1.17 kg. The results suggest that the guild of the santacrucian predators was structured by the body mass and other variables, such as diet and locomotion.

Marcos Darío Ercoli and Francisco Juan Prevosti "Estimación de Masa de las Especies de Sparassodonta (Mammalia, Metatheria) de Edad Santacrucense (Mioceno Temprano) a Partir del Tamaño del Centroide de los Elementos Apendiculares: Inferencias Paleoecológicas," Ameghiniana 48(4), 462-479, (1 December 2011). https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.v48i4(347)
Received: 2 June 2010; Accepted: 21 February 2011; Published: 1 December 2011
KEYWORDS
Body-size
comparative method
Edad Santacrucense
Método comparativo
Paleoecología
Paleoecology
Santacrucian Age
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top