Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005, 149(1):127-139 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2005.015

RESULTS OF SELFMONITORING ON GLUCOMETER SYSTEMS ADVANCE AND OPTIUM IN DAILY ROUTINE

Rudolf Chlupa,b, Martin Paynec, Jana Zapletalovád, Stanislav Komendad, Blanka Doubravováe, Martina Řezníčkováa, Ludmila Chlupováf, Pavel Sečkařg
a Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc
b IInd Dept. of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University & Teaching Hospital, Olomouc
c Hypoguard Limited, Woodbridge, United Kingdom
d Department of Biometrics, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc
e Institute of Neurology and Geriatrics, Moravský Beroun, Czech Republic
f Department of Special Education, Pedagogical Faculty, Palacký University, Olomouc
g Department of Health Insurance, Teaching Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic

The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the results of B-glucose estimations performed simultaneously on glucometer Advance (with Micro-draw strips) and Optium (G3 strips) by lay healthy volunteers under non-standardized conditions of everyday life, to assess the difficulties dealing with lay - handling of these systems and to demonstrate the possibilities of the software Glucobalance (Hypoguard) and PC-Link (Medisense/Abbott) for the analysis of selfmonitoring. In the course of 5 days, a total of 721 pairs of measurements were carried out on 10 pairs of glucometer Advance and Optium by 10 healthy volunteers aged 16-40 years. The data transfer of all values into computer from glucometer Advance using the Glucobalance software and from glucometer Optium using the PC-Link was carried out to determine the results. The correlation of B-glucose measured on the glucometer Advance and Optium was strong (r = 0.73). Glucometer Advance brings values about 0.21 ± 0.06 mmol/l lower than glucometer Optium. The average difference found within each pairs of glucometers Advance - Optium varied. Nevertheless, these differences are acceptable for routine selfmonitoring. The handling of glucometer Advance is not difficult for lay persons. The Glucobalance software simplifies the result evaluation by each tested person. Even though there are some advantages in comparison with the PC-Link, it should be further developed.

Keywords: Glucometer Advance, Glucometer Optium, Selfmonitoring, Precision, Software Glucobalance, Software PCLink

Received: April 10, 2005; Accepted: May 18, 2005; Published: July 1, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chlup, R., Payne, M., Zapletalová, J., Komenda, S., Doubravová, B., Řezníčková, M., Chlupová, L., & Sečkař, P. (2005). RESULTS OF SELFMONITORING ON GLUCOMETER SYSTEMS ADVANCE AND OPTIUM IN DAILY ROUTINE. Biomedical papers149(1), 127-139. doi: 10.5507/bp.2005.015
Download citation

References

  1. Alamia V Jr, Jaekle R, Royek A, Meyer BA. (1998) Accuracy of portable glucose meters for rapid determination of amniotic fluid glukose levels. J Maternal - Fetal Med 7, 183-189. Go to original source...
  2. American Diabetes Association. (2002) Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 25, 597-599. Go to original source...
  3. American Diabetes Association. (1994) Self-monitoring of blood glucose (Consensus Statement). Diabetes Care 17, 81-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dillon AE, Menard MK, Rust P, Newman RB, VanDorsten JP. (1997) Glucometer analysis of one-hour glucose challenge samples. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177, 1120-1123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Dohnal L, Frýdecký B, Zima T, Kalla K, Škrha J. (2000) Doporučení č. 2 České společnosti klinické biochemie ČLS JEP, Referenční laboratoře pro klinickou biochemii MZ ČR a České diabetologické společnosti: Zabezpečování jakosti měření glukometry při použití v režimu point-of-care testing. Klin Bioch Met 9/30, 78-79.
  6. Dybkaer R. (1999) From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainly of measurement of unbiased results. Accred Qual Assur 6, 401-405. Go to original source...
  7. Fazel A, Koutoubi Z, Sorg TB, Mehrotra B. (1996) Influence of sample temperature on reflectance photometry and electrochemical glucometer measurements. Diabetes Care 10, 771-774. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fink KS, Christensen DB, Ellsworth A. (2002) Effect of high attitude on blood glucose meter performance. Diab Technol Therap 4, 627-635. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Fogh-Andersen N, DOratio P, Kunze K, Kuelpmann W, Mager G, Latson L. Recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose. http://www.ifcc.org/ejifcc/voll2no4/voll2no4a4.htm
  10. Frýdecký B. (2001) Laboratorní diagnostika diabetu a požadavky na měření koncentrace glukózy. Klin Bioch Met 9/30, 173-177.
  11. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan D, Peterson CM. (1995) Test of glycemia in diabetes (Technical Review). Diabetes Care 18, 896-909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Haag BL, Leed I. (1999) Suceptibility of two new glucose test strips to testing errors. Diabetes 48 (Suppl. 1), A415.
  13. Chee F, Fernando T, van Heerden PV. (2003) Closed-loop glucose control in critically ill patients using continuous glucose monitoring systém (CGMS) in real time. IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine 7, 43-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Chlup R., Bartek J, Malá E, Doubravová B, Pukowietz L, Zatloukal P, Chlupová L, Zapletalová J. (2004): Uživatelská studie o správnosti a přesnosti měření glukometrů Advance, Card a Optium (Useroriented study on accuracy and precision of glucometer systems Advance, Card and Optium). Klin Bioch Metabol 12, 171-178.
  15. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, DAgostino RB Jr, Ferrara A, Liu J, Selby JV. (2001) Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanent Diabetes Registry. Am J Med 111, 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kellner A, Waldenstroem J. (1999) Estimation of total uncertainly of glucose measurements. Clin Chem Lab Med 37, Spec. Suppl. S14.
  17. King JM, Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri S. (1995) Effect of ambient temperature and humidity on performance of blood glucose meters. Diab Med 12, 337-340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Kurahashi K, Maruta H, Usuda Y, Ohtsuka M. (1997) Influence of blood sample oxygen tension on blood glucose concentration measured using an enzyme-electrode method (comment). Critic Care Med 25, 231-235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Lewandrowaki KB, Dan L. (2002) Effects of small sample volume and interfering substances on two glucose meters (Vliv malého objemu krve v testovaném vzorku a obsahu příměsi na dva měřicí přístroje pro diabetiky). Diabetes 48 (Suppl.1), A387.
  20. Payne M. (2004) Hypoguard Advance Micro-draw Performance. Klin Bioch Metabol 12, 202.
  21. Puentmann I, Wosniok W, Haeckel R. (2003) Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach. Clin Chem Lab Med 41, 809-820. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rumley AG (1997) Improving the quality of near-patient blood glucose measurement (comment). Annals Clin Bioch 34 (Pt 3), 281-286. Go to original source...
  23. Stahl M, Jorgensen LGM, Hyltoft Petersen P, Branslund I et al (2001) Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 61, 169-180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Thai AC, Ng WY, Lui KF, Yeo PP (1989) Three new glucose reflectance meters: Diascan, Glucometer II, and Reflolux II. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 7, 75-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...