Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2013 43(1): 27-33 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2013.003

Relative age effect in junior tennis (male)

Adrián Agricola, Jiří Zháněl, Ondřej Hubáček
Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc

Background: The issues of the age effect (the theory of the age influence) have been shown in sport sciences since the 1980s. The theory of age effect works on the assumption that athletes born in the beginning of a calendar year are, particularly in children's and junior age, more successful than athletes born in the end of the year. This fact has been proved by a number of research studies, mainly in ice hockey, soccer, and tennis but also in other sports.

Objective: The submitted contribution is aimed at verifying of the age effect in junior tennis. The research objective was to find out the distribution of birth date frequencies in a population of tennis players' in individual months, quarters, and half-years in the observed period 2007-2011 and to check the significance of differences.

Methods: The research was conducted on male tennis players aged 13-14 (N = 239), participants of the World Junior Tennis Finals. From the methodological point of view, it was an intentional selection. The birth dates of individual tennis players were taken from official materials of the ITF, the research data were processed using Microsoft Excel. The personal data were processed with the approval of players and the hosting organization (ITF).

Results: Testing of the hypothesis on the significance of differences in the distribution of frequencies between individual quarters (Q1-Q4) has proved statistically relevant differences between Q1 and Q3, Q1 and Q4, Q2 and Q3, and Q2 and Q4; a statistically relevant difference has been also found in the distribution of frequencies between the first and second half of the year. On the basis of the results of the presented research, the age effect in the studied population of junior male tennis players can be regarded as significant.

Conclusions: The results of the analysis of the research data confirm the conclusions of similar studies in other sports and prove that in the population of elite junior players, participants of WJTF 2007-2011, there is a pronounced dominance of players born in the first and second quarters, i.e. in the first half-year. The mentioned conclusions show the necessity of reflecting the age effect in sports practice as it can influence sports performance, especially at the junior level.

Keywords: date of birth, age, tennis, male players, World Junior Tennis Finals

Prepublished online: March 31, 2013; Published: January 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Agricola, A., Zháněl, J., & Hubáček, O. (2013). Relative age effect in junior tennis (male). Acta Gymnica43(1), 27-33. doi: 10.5507/ag.2013.003
Download citation

References

  1. Bäumler, G. (2000). The relative age effect in soccer and its interaction with chronological age. Sportonomics, 6(1), 25-30.
  2. Barnsley, R. H., & Thompson, A. H. (1988). Birthdate and success in minor hockey: The key to the NHL. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20(2), 167-176. Go to original source...
  3. Barnsley, R. H., Thompson, A. H., & Barnsley, P. E. (1985). Hockey success and birth-date: The relative age effect. Journal of the Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, 51, 23-28.
  4. Baxter-Jones, A. D. (1995). Growth and development of young athletes. should competition levels be age related? Sports Medicine, 20(2), 59-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. M. (2009). Annual age grouping and athlete development: A meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Medicine, 39(3), 235-256. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Del Campo, D. G., Vicedo, J. C., Villora, S. G., & Jordan, O. R. (2010). The relative age effect in youth soccer players from Spain. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(2), 190-198.
  7. Delormé, N., Boiché, J., & Raspaud, M. (2010). Relative sports effect in elite sports: Methodological bias or real discrimination? European Journal of Sport Science, 10(2),91-96. Go to original source...
  8. Edgar, S., & O'Donoghue, P. (2005). Season of birth distribution of elite tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(10), 1013-1020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., & Van Winckel, J. (2000). Effect of a change in selection year on success in male soccer players. American Journal of Human Biology, 12(6), 729-735. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Helsen, W. F., Van Winckel, J., & Williams, M. A. (2005). The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 629-636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hohmann, A., Lames, M., & Letzelter, M. (2010). Úvod do sportovního tréninku (T. Studený, Trans.). Prostějov: Sport a věda. (Original work published 2007).
  12. Kovář, R., & Blahuš, P. (1989). Aplikace vybraných statistických metod v antropomotorice. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
  13. Lames, M., Augste, C., Dreckmann, C., Görsdorf, K., & Schimanski, M. (2008). Der "Relative Age Effect" (RAE): Neue Hausaufgaben für den Sport. Leistungssport, 38(6), 4-9.
  14. Lames, M., Augste, C., Dreckmann, C., Görsdorf, K., & Schimanski, M. (2009). The relative age effect in German youth sports: Football, handball and ice-hockey. E-Journal "Bewegung und Training". Retrieved from www.sport.uni-augsburg. de/.../050lames/R...HS.../RAE_submitted.doc
  15. Musch, J., & Grondin, S. (2001). Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: A review of the relative age effect in sport. Developmental Review, 21(2), 147-167. Go to original source...
  16. Musch, J., & Hay, R. (1999). The relative age effect in soccer: Cross-cultural evidence for a systematic discrimination against children born late in the competition year. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16(1), 54-64. Go to original source...
  17. Puhani, P. A., & Weber, A. M. (2007). Persistence of the school entry age effect in a system of flexible tracking. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen. Go to original source...
  18. Rodenberg, R. M. (2010). Is there (still) relative age effect in tennis? Intercollegiate Tennis Association. Retrieved from http://www.itatennis.com/Page3508. aspx
  19. Schorer, J., Baker, J., Büsch, D.,Wilhelm, A., & Pabst, J. (2009). Relative age, talent identification and youth skill development: Do relatively younger athletes have superior technical skills? Talent Development and Excellence, 1(1), 45-56.
  20. Simmons, C., & Paull, G. C. (2001). Season of birth bias in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(9), 677-686. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.