Mitigation of salinity stress in canola plants by sodium nitroprusside application

Salinity is a global issue threatening land productivity and food production. The present study aimed to examine the role of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on the alleviation of NaCl stress on different parameters of canola (Brassica napus L.) plant growth, yield as well as its physiological and anatomical characteristics. Canola plants were grown under greenhouse conditions in plastic pots and were exposed to 100 mM NaCl. At 50 and 70 days from sown, plants were sprayed with SNP (50 and 100 μM) solutions under normal or salinity condition. Growth and yield characters as well as some biochemical and anatomical changes were investigated under the experimental conditions. Salinity stress caused an extremely vital decline in plant growth and yield components. A significant increase was found in membrane permeability, lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide, sodium, chloride, proline, soluble sugars, ascorbic and phenol in canola plants under salinity stress. Under normal conditions, SNP application significantly increased all studies characters, except sodium, chloride, hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxidation, membrane permeability that markedly reduced. Application of SNP to salt-affected plants mitigated the injuries of salinity on plant growth, yield, and improved anatomical changes. The present investigation demonstrated that SNP has the potential to alleviate the salinity injurious on canola plants. Additional keywords: antioxidants; Brassica napus L.; osmoprotectants; ultrastructure; yield. Abbreviations used: ARC (Agricultural Research Centre); AsA (ascorbic acid); DFS (days from sowing); DW (dry weight); EC (electrical conductivity); FBN (flowering branches number/plant); ELP (electrolyte leakage percentage); FN (fruit number/plant); FW (fresh weight); LA (leaf area); LBT (leaf blade thickness); LN (leaf number); LP (lipid peroxidation); LRWC (leaf relative water content); MDA (malondialdehyde); MP (membrane permeability); PPT (palisade parenchyma thickness); ROS (reactive oxygen species); SDW (shoot dry weight); SFM (seedling fresh weight); SI (seed index '100 seed weight'); SL (seedling length); SN (seed number/pod); SNP (sodium nitroprusside); SPT (spongy parenchyma thickness); SY (seed yield/plant); TMR (thickness of midrib region); TP (total soluble phenol); TSC (total soluble carbohydrates); TW (turgid weight); VBT (vascular bundle thickness); VBW (vascular bundle width); WC (water content). Authors’ contributions: Both authors contributed equally in the design and performance of the experiments, statistical analysis of the experimental data, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Citation: Farouk, S.; Arafa, S. A. (2018). Mitigation of salinity stress in canola plants by sodium nitroprusside application. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, Volume 16, Issue 3, e0802. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018163-13252 Received: 31 Mar 2018. Accepted: 05 Oct 2018. Copyright © 2018 INIA. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-by 4.0) License. Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Correspondence should be addressed to Saad Farouk: gadalla@mans.edu.eg


Introduction
Vegetable oils are an important part of the human diet.Nowadays, cultivation of vegetable-oil producing crops covers about 270 million hectares and produces 170 million tons, which accounts for approximately 75% of world production (FAO, 2014).Egypt's selfsufficiency of vegetable oil declined from 95 % in early 1960's to less than 30 % in 2004, resulting in an increase in the importation of processed vegetable oil (Hassan & Shafique, 2011).In 2011, Egypt spent about US$ 1.875 billion on the importation of vegetable oils (FAOSTAT, 2011).The United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Foreign Agriculture Service, reported in 2013-2014 that Egypt's total oilseeds planted area only covers 3-5% of Egypt's total edible oil consumption.Expanding into edible-vegetable oil production in Egypt is limited due to the limitation of agricultural land and water supplies.Therefore, expanding cultivation into newly reclaimed areas, while developing new high-yielding varieties, as well as minimizing agricultural inputs, might be the only formula for Egypt to fulfill its vegetable oil need.Canola (Brassica napus L.) is considered a specialty crop in Canada and USA.In Egypt, canola can contribute to reducing oil deficiency gaps.Additionally, it grows vigorously within the northern part of Egypt, newly reclaimed soil.
Salinity is a global issue threatening land productivity and food production.Globally, about 900 million ha are affected by salinity and salinization is predicted to impact 50% of all arable lands by 2050 decreasing the major crop yield by over 50% (FAO, 2014).Under salinity stress, reduction in crop productivity, as well as changes in anatomy and ultra-structure, are sometimes interlinked with concomitant changes in a variety of biochemical, physiological, and molecular responses (Ahmad et al., 2018).Salinity also acts as pro-oxidant and induces oxidative burst through hyper-accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause injuries to cellular ultra-structure, organic compounds and impaired a variety of metabolic reactions (Gupta et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018;Kaya et al., 2018;Kholghi et al., 2018;Rahmani et al., 2018).
Currently, there are many strategies for improving plant productivity under salinity, like genetic modifications, and/or using some inducers (Gupta et al., 2017;Akram et al., 2018).Sodium nitroprusside (SNP, nitric oxide donors) is a small diffusible bioactive signaling molecule, plays multifunctional roles in plant growth, productivity under normal or stressed conditions (Akladious & Mohamed, 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018;Hanafy et al., 2018).SNP can alleviate salt stress by directly scavenging ROS throughout the formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO-) (Beligni & Lamattina, 2002), that is less toxic than peroxides and conjointly by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and metabolites (Sheokand et al., 2010).Moreover, SNP application stimulates activities of proton-pump within the tonoplast and increasing the K + /Na + ratio (Beligni & Lamattina, 2002), additionally regulates proteins at the post-translational level needed for cellular division (Sheokand et al., 2010).
Due to very few reports on inducing salt tolerance of canola plants by SNP, the present study is of special interest for improving canola production.The hypothesis of work is that SNP would improve canola salt tolerance by activating the processes would lead to attenuation of the cellular damage caused by salinity.
The aim of the current investigation was to assess the protective role of SNP for the alleviation of NaCl stress on different parameters of canola plant growth, yield as well as its physiological and anatomical characteristics.

Experimental layout and treatments
Two pot experiments were carried using a clay loam soil throughout 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 win-ter seasons at the Agricultural Botany Department Experimental Farm, Mansoura University.Water content (WC) at field capacity (30.8% and 31.0%),WC at the permanent wilting point (24.4 and 24.6%), dry bulk density (1.38 and 1.37 g/cm 3 ), pH (7.1 and 7.2), organic matter content (1.2% and 1.1%), and electrical conductivity (EC) (1.10 and 1.11 dS/m) of the experimental soil in both years respectively were determined.The experiments were performed in a completely randomized design.
Plastic pots (40 cm in diameter) containing homogeneous air-dried soils were divided into six groups consisting of 10 pots for each.Phosphorous as calcium super-phosphate at the rate of 2 g/pot and 1 g/pot potassium fertilizers as K + sulfate was added and mixed into the upper 3 cm of the soil of all pots before planting.We used canola cv Pactol seeds certified by the ARC, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt.Ten sterilized (soaking in 0.001 HgCl 2 for 1 min, then washed several times with distilled water) air-dried seeds were planted in each pot on 10 th November in both seasons.After full emergence (20 days from sowing), the seedlings were thinned to leave 4 healthy and homogenous plants per pot.The nitrogen fertilizer was added at three intervals after 20, 30 and 60 days from sowing as ammonium nitrate at the rate 0.5, 2 and 0.5 g/pot, respectively.
The pots were divided into six groups.The first group, irrigated with water alone, served as control.The second and third groups were foliar sprayed separately with 50 and 100 µM SNP respectively.The fourth group was salinized with 100 mM NaCl through the irrigation water.The fifth and sixth groups were salinized with 100 mM NaCl and sprayed with 50 and 100 µM SNP respectively.Tween 20 at 0.05% as a surfactant was added to the SNP solution before application, the spraying was done twice at 50 and 70 days from sowing (DFS) until runoff throughout late afternoon hours using the hand-held sprayer.Plant samples were randomly harvested at 90 DFS to assess morphological, physiological and anatomical trials and at 150 DFS for yield and its components.

Morphological characteristics
Ten randomly canola plants were harvested for determination of shoot length, number of leaves/plant, leaf area, shoots fresh and dry weights.Leaf area (cm 2 ) was measured using Leaf Area Meter, AM 300 (ADC Bioscientific Ltd).

Physiological and biochemical characteristics
-Photosynthetic pigments were extracted from the 3 rd terminal upper leaf for 24 h at the lab.temperature with methanol, then the optical density of the extracts was recorded at 470, 653, 666 nm spectrophotometrically (Spekol 11, UK); photosynthetic pigment concentration was calculated by the equation introduced by Lichtenthaler & Wellburn (1985) and expressed as mg/g fresh weight (FW).
-Water status and osmoprotectants: The WC% was assessed according to Fernandez-Ballester et al. (1998).Meanwhile, leaf relative water content percentage (LRWC%) was assayed using the Kaya et al. (2013) methodology through the equation LRWC (%) = [(FW-DW/(TW-DW)]×100, where DW is dry weight and TW turgid weight.In brief, leaf discs were immediately weighted to record FW, then the discs were submerged in distilled water for 6 h, and then weighted again to record TW, and finally, the leaf discs were oven-dried at 60 o C for 24 h to record DW. Proline concentration (mg/g FW) was assessed using the procedure described in Arbona et al. (2003) using acid ninhydrin reagent.Total soluble carbohydrate concentration (mg/g FW) was estimated using the anthrone reagent (Watanabe et al., 2000).
-Leaf potassium, sodium and chloride concentration: K + , Na + and Cl -ions were extracted with boiling water for 2 h followed by the methods of Chaudhary et al. (1996).Na + and K + quantities were estimated by a Flame Photometer.Na + and K + concentrations were calculated based on a standard calibration curve and expressed as a percentage.On the other hand, chloride concentration in the water extract was calculated by titration against 0.01 N silver nitrate solution using 5% K + dichromate (K 2 CrO 4 ) as an indicator as described by Fatma et al. (2014) and expressed as mg/g DW.
-Oxidative impairment and stress injury: Lipid peroxidation was quantified by assessing malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, a breakdown product of lipid peroxidation (Shao et al., 2005), using thiobarbituric acid reaction.The concentration of MDA in µmol/g of FW was estimated using the extinction coefficient of 155 mM -1 cm -1 .Hydrogen peroxide (mg/g FW) was assessed by the formation of a titanium-hydro peroxide complex (Rao et al., 1997).
Electrolyte leakage percentage (ELP) assessment was employed to examine membrane permeability following the protocol of Goncalves et al. (2007).Leaf disks were placed in a test tube containing 25 mL of distilled water then placed at room temperature for 4 h, and the electrical conductivity (EC 1 ) of the solution was determined; after that the samples were subjected to 100 o C for 1 h, then the sample was brought down to laboratory temperature and the EC 2 measured.The ELP was calculated using the equation: FLP=EC 1 /EC 2 × 100.
-Assay for ROS scavenging (non-enzymatic): Ascorbic acid (mg/g FW) was extracted and determined following Sadasivam & Manickam (1996) by titration against 2,6-dichlorophenol indo phenol.Total phenolic compounds were quan tified by the protocol of Julkenen-Titto (1985), using Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, with concomitant formation of a blue complex; the values were expressed as mg gallic acid/g FW.

Leaflet anatomy and transmission electron microscopy
Leaf segments (1-2 mm 2 ) were fixed overnight in cold 5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), washed twice within the same buffer for 30 min and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO 4 ) for 4 h at 4 o C. Further samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series, then in propylene oxide, then infiltrated in a mixture of Durcupan resin andpropylene oxide (1/1, v/v), finally embedded in Durcupan resin.The semi-thin and ultrathin sections were cut with a glass knife, mounted on copper grids (400 meshes) and stained for 10 min with toluidine blue for semithin sections and uranyl acetate and lead citrate for ultrathin sections, and observed by light microscope and transmission electron microscope (Jeol JEM 1010) operating at 100 kV.At least 10 sections of each of the prepared samples were examined.

Yield and its components
At 150 DFS, the total yield per plant and yield components represented as flowering branch number /plant, silique number/plant, seed number/silique, seed index "100 seed weight", and seed yield/plant were determined.Seed oil percentage was calculated after extraction with Soxhelt's apparatus using hexane as an organic solvent according to AOAC (1990).

Statistical analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (CoHortSoftware, 2008).The standard error was calculated and an analysis of variance was performed to determine the least significant difference between treatment means with the level of significance of p≤0.05.Means marked with different letters are significantly different.

Photosynthetic pigments
The effect of salinity and SNP alone or in combination was assessed on the photosynthetic pigment concentration in canola 3 rd upper fully expanded leaves (Table 1).Canola plants treated with salinity showed a significant reduction in chlorophyll a (by 28% and 19%), total chlorophyll (by 18% and 15%), total carotenoids (by 55% and 35%), and a non-significant decrease in chlorophyll b and the ratio of chlorophyll a:b as compared with control plants in either the first or second seasons, respectively.
The exogenous application of various concentrations of SNP (50, 100 µM) markedly increased the photosynthetic pigment concentration under normal conditions.Compared with salt treatment, exogenous application of SNP increased the photosynthetic pigment concentration.Moreover, plants treated with SNP alone additionally increased photosynthetic pigment concentration compared to the control.

Morphological characteristics
The impact of salinity and SNP, as well as their interactions on plant growth, was recorded (Table 1).We determined that salinity stress significantly (p<0.05)decreased canola plant growth characteristics, as compared to control treatment in each season.Salinity decreased the shoot length by 35% and 39%, leaf number per plant by 27% and 27% and leaf area per plant by 70% and 43%, shoot FW by 57% and 52% and shoot DW by 58% and 53% in the first and second season, respectively, as compared to control (Table 1).However, foliar application of SNP significantly (p<0.05)increased all tested growth traits compared with control plant.In saline conditions, with the lowest level of SNP (50 µM), plant growth increased almost up with the growth obtained from the non-saline control treatment or gave values of shoot FW and leaf area higher than control plants.

Oxidative impairment and stress injury as well as some antioxidant metabolites
The exposure of canola plants to salinity significantly (p<0.05)increased the membrane permeability (80.494 and 84.800%); lipid peroxidation (22.478 and 17.799 μmol/g FW) and hydrogen peroxide concentration (61.25 and 63.36 mg/g FW) than control plant (45.98 and 50.28%; 10.021 and 8.653 μmol/g FW; 29.40 and 27.51 mg/g FW respectively in each growing season).A different pattern of response was observed once electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation,

Water status and osmoprotectants
Data presented in Table 2 show that WC and LRWC percentages significantly decreased with salinity stress, meanwhile increased with SNP application as compared with control.On the other hand, application of SNP under salinity stress counteracted the deleterious effect of salinity on WC% and LRWC% that increased it as compared with untreated salinized plants.
Proline and soluble carbohydrate concentration exhibited a rise in response to salinity, compared to the control (Table 2).The spray of SNP on unstressed plant significantly increased its concentration; the foremost effective in this concern was 50 µM.However, in association with NaCl, it elevated the quantity of proline and total soluble carbohydrates above the control or stressed conditions.The maximum concentration of each was found within the plants which were subjected to NaCl stress and subsequently sprayed with 50 µM SNP (Table 2).

Leaf K + , Na + percentageand Cl -concentration
The results represented in Table 2 discovered a substantial decrease in K + % and K + /Na + ratio concomitant to the accumulation of Na + % and Cl - Table 2. Effect of salinity and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and their interactions on water status percentage, osmoprotectants concentration (mg/g FW), sodium and potassium percentage, potassium/sodium ratio and chloride concentration (mg/g DW) in the shoot of 90-day old canola plants on the first (1 st ) and second (2 nd ) season.and hydrogen peroxide accumulation were studied in SNP treated plants, in the presence and absence of NaCl (Table 3).Under control conditions, SNP, mainly in the concentration 50 µM, significantly decreased membrane permeability, hydrogen peroxide, and MDA concentration as compared to control treatment.However, the follow-up treatment of the stressed plants with SNP reduced the ionic leakage and lipid peroxidation and leveled the values with those of the control.
Data in Table 3 indicate that salinity caused significant increment (p≤ 0.05) within the total phenols and ascorbic acid in the canola shoot as compared with control plants.Application of SNP significantly rised (p≤ 0.05) total phenols and ascorbic acid concentrations.Generally, SNP at 50 µM treatment appears to be the foremost effective treatment in increasing total phenols and ascorbic concentrations in stressed canola plants.

Leaf anatomy
Canola plants sprayed with 50 and 100 µM SNP under non-salinized conditions had improved leaf anatomy compared to control plants (Table 3 and Fig. 1).In general, the most effective SNP level was 50µM, that increased thickness of midrib region, length and width of the main vascular bundle by 47.5, 60.7 and 160.7%, respectively, meanwhile application of 100 µM SNP increased leaf blade thickness, palisade parenchyma thickness, spongy parenchyma thickness by 47.6, 101.2 and 14.4% compared to the controls.
Salinity stress decreased all anatomical characteristics, additionally; the application of SNP under salinity stress helped in counteracting the deleterious effect of salinity on leaf blade and spongy parenchyma thickness as compared with salt-affected plants.

Leaf ultrastructure
Ultrastructural micrograph observation showed canola leaf mesophyll cells with a delimited cell wall, and continuous cell membranes, having a granular cytoplasm with numerous organelles (Fig. 2).Chloroplasts exhibited a typical structure, an ellipsoidal shape with well-arranged granum, wellarranged thylakoid membranes, together with many starch grains (1-2 per chloroplast) and an absence of plastoglobules (Fig. 2B).The mitochondrion structure observed was typical, with good membranes Table 3.Effect of salinity and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and their interactions on oxidative impairment and antioxidants metabolites concentration on the first (1 st ) and second (2 nd ) season as well as leaf anatomical characteristics (µm) in the 3 rd upper leaf on the second (2 nd ) season of 90-day old canola plants.(Fig. 2C).A clear nucleolus and well-developed nuclear envelope were noticed in the nucleus (Fig. 2C).
Cells from salt-affected plants showed some noticeable ultrastructural alteration of the organelles and cellular injuries (Fig. L-P), like nucleus condensation, protoplasm degeneration, and smaller organelles.The chloroplasts were nearly elongated and swelling, with an increased plastoglobules number and a very small sized starch grain (Fig. 2M).The chloroplasts became deformed, grana stacking were less frequent, and therefore the thylakoids were loosened and distorted (Fig. 2M).The mitochondria were very small and its number similar to control.The nucleus was a triangle in shape with a distorted nuclear (Fig. 2N).
Plants treated with SNP alone, showed a typical chloroplast ultrastructure with no significant changes, having large number (1-3) of big size starch grains, with some plastoglobules (Fig. 2F).The highest number of chloroplasts per cell was observed under low concentration of the SNP (Fig. 2E).Also, ultrastructure changes in mitochondria were inconspicuous.The number of mitochondria per cell was increased and elongated in the high SNP concentration (Fig. 2H).The nucleus was elongated, with the nucleolus and smooth and continuous envelope (Fig. 2G).
Foliar application of SNP to NaCl stressed plants reversed the structural changes of micro-organelles.Observation assessed that the form of chloroplast changed slightly from the elongated ellipse to almost oval, well aligned internal lamellar system and fewer plastoglobules (Fig. 2T-U).Ultrastructural changes in mitochondria were inconspicuous.The cells had a large number of mitochondria in special with 50 µM SNP (Fig. 2T).The mitochondria elongated under 50 µM SNP, meanwhile at 100 µM SNP appeared with oval shape and internal structures (Fig. 2T-W).Additionally, cell nucleolus was clear and apparent along with intact nuclear membranes (Fig. 2S-V).

Yield and its components
Exogenous application of SNP significantly increased the yield and its components represented as flowering branch number/plant, fruit number per plant, seed number per fruit, seed index, seed yield per plant and oil percentage compared to the controls (Table 4).The SNP level of 50 µM was most effective, exceeding the control values.Salinity stress significantly decreased all yield and its components as compared with untreated control plants.Meanwhile, under salinity stress application of SNP, especially at 50 µM alleviated the bad effect of salinity on yield and its components.

Discussion
Salinity considerably hampered crop growth that is in harmony with earlier reports (Gupta et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018;Hanafy et al., 2018;Kaya et al., 2018).These could be attributed to a multifaceted action of salinity on vital processes like water absorption, ion uptake, photosynthesis, etc.
This reduction may be due to: (1) accumulation of salts within the leaves that causes an irreparable damage to the chloroplasts as observed in the current investigation, resulting in metabolic limitations of photosynthesis (Gong et al., 2018); (2) the osmotic effects resulting from salt stress, that causes increases in abscisic acid and decline in indole acetic acid and gibberellic acid, and consequently inhibition of growth (Gupta et al., 2017;Hanafy et al., 2018); (3) decreasing in cell elongation ensuing from the repressing impact of water shortage on growth promoting hormones (Banon et al., 2006).SNP supplementation counteracts the injurious impact of salinity on canola plant development that is in agreement with previous findings in different crops (Ghadakchiasl et al., 2017;Gupta et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018;Akram et al., 2018;Hanafy et al., 2018;Rai et al., 2018).SNP plays a very important role in inducing plant growth of many plants exposed to environmental stresses by modulating a variety of metabolic alterations affecting plant's tolerance to salt stress, including: (1) scavenging ROS through induction of antioxidant system (Ahmad et al., 2018;Akram et al., 2018;Rai et al., 2018); (2) SNP as signal molecule induces changes in the expression of stress-responsive genes, involved in enhancing crop growth (Gill et al., 2013); (3) inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis (Zhu et al.,2008).
The reduction in chlorophyll concentration under salinity stress may be due to one or more of the following processes: (1) disruption chloroplasts ultrastructure and activated chlorophyllase enzyme (Nazar et al., 2014); (2) reduced uptake of some micronutrients like Fe that plays a vital role in chlorophyll biosynthesis (Santos, 2004); (3) oxidation of chlorophylls coupled with the instability of the pigment-protein complex (Tariq et al., 2011).Increased photosynthetic pigments due to SNP treatment has already been observed in salt-affected plants (Ghadakchiasl et al., 2017;Gupta et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018;Hanafy et al., 2018).It was noted that SNP impairs the activity of the chlorophyllase and Mgdechelatase that might have decreased the chlorophyll degradation (Shi et al., 2016).Moreover, SNP might control Fe uptake in root and increased Fe availability within the cell organelles, by modulating the chlorophyll synthesis gene expression (Simontacchi et al., 2012).
It is well documented that salinity stress perturbs water status and reduces either WC or LRWC in many plants (Ahmad et al., 2018;Kholghi et al., 2018), that we also observed in this experiment.This decrease can be attributed to lower water availability; or to lose the plant roots their ability to catch up on the water through a reduction of the absorbing surface (Yildirim et al., 2008).However, supplementation of SNP has a positive impact on WC and LRWC of canola plants under salt stress, fact supported with previous reports (Ghadakchiasl et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018).That is still unclear, however SNP is able to maintain LRWC in stressed plants and the rise in water retention induced by exogenous applied SNP in stress-treated plants could also be connected to stomatal closure, a reduced transpiration rate, and/or promoted adventitious root development.
Crop plants accumulate compatible osmolytes that facilitate to regulate turgor and water acquisition under stress conditions (Ahmad et al., 2018;Kaya et al., 2018;Kholghi et al., 2018).Proline has been related to the relief of cellular osmotic stress, stabilization of proteins and/or membranes and improving the enzyme stability (Reddy et al., 2015).It is additionally served as a safe guard chloroplast and acts as energy storage under salinity (Reddy et al., 2015).The regulatory function of SNP in proline biosynthesis has conjointly been verified by inducing of 1-pyrroline -5-carboxylate synthetase activity, the key enzyme of proline biosynthesis; additionally by proline dehydrogenase activity impairment against salinity stress (Ahmad et al., 2018).Accumulation of total soluble carbohydrates has been widely reported in plants as a response to salt stress (Rahmani et al., 2018) or SNP application (Hanafy et al., 2018).Soluble carbohydrates have a vital role in plant metabolism not only by acting as osmoprotection, stabilizing cellular membrane, but also as signal molecules, involved in ROS balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants (Nasrin et al., 2010).
Salinity causes the impairment of ion equilibrium mechanism by hyper-accumulating toxic ions (Na + and Cl -) and remarked reduction in useful ions (K + ) leading to decreasing K + /Na + ratio, in numerous plant species (Gupta et al., 2017;Kaya et al., 2018;Kholghi et al., 2018).Sodium toxicity is related to its competitive nature with K + for binding essential sites that carry normal cellular function.Additionally, Na + accumulation contributes to depolarization of the plasma membrane Table 4. Effect of salinity and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and their interactions on yield and its components of 150 day old canola plants on the first (1 st ) and second (2 nd ) season.and subsequent opening of K + outward rectifier channels that triggers an excessive loss of K + from the interior of the cell (Bose et al., 2015).Exogenously, applied SNP lowered toxic ions (Na + and Cl -), yet enhanced K + in canola plants under saline conditions that are in keeping with many earlier reports (Gupta et al., 2017;Hanafy et al., 2018).SNP, additionally maintains a high K + /Na + ratio within the cytosol (Table 2) by inducing expression of H + -ATPase, and Na + /H + antiporter which facilitate Na + compartmentation under salinity (Shi et al., 2016).
Our investigation assessed that salt-stress provokes an over-accumulation of H 2 O 2 , which clearly explains salt-mediated oxidative burst.However, the application of SNP effectively eliminated the high levels of H 2 O 2 , and thus played an important role in mitigating oxidative stress.These findings also demonstrate the direct ROS quenching role of SNP under salt stress, reported in several plants (Ghadakchiasl et al., 2017;Gupta et al., 2017;Ahmad et al., 2018).The protective role of SNP may be explained due to (1) reaction with lipid radicals, that stops the generation of lipid peroxidation; (2) SNP might operate as a signal molecule, that activates the cellular antioxidant enzyme-encoding genes leading to higher enzyme activities possible by post-translational modification that renders the plants stress tolerant (Graß et al., 2013); (3) SNP acts as an antioxidant that reacts with ROS resulting in generation of short lived peroxynitrite (ONOO -), which is less toxic in the cellular environment and thus limits cellular damage.
The hyper-accumulation of ROS in plants is among the most important injuries induced by environmental stresses.The cellular components most degraded by ROS are the membrane lipids.As a consequence, MDA concentrations can increase, which is a symptom of membrane injury in a plant cell (Kaya et al., 2018;Rahmani et al., 2018).This increment in MDA could also result in the short coming of antioxidants to neutralize ROS ensuing from salt stress.In contrast, exogenous SNP reduced MDA and H 2 O 2 concentrations within the plant exposed to salinity.This finding was in accordance with those of other studies that indicated that MDA and H 2 O 2 were reduced by SNP treatments throughout abiotic stress as salt (Gupta et al., 2017;Akram et al., 2018;Hasanuzzaman et al., 2018;Rai et al., 2018).
The cell membrane is one of the most important cellular targets common to different stress conditions.Salt stress induces lipid peroxidation, thus making the membranes leaky as evidenced by increase electrolyte leakage, while SNP alleviates the injuries of NaCl on MDA concentration and membrane permeability percentage.These results are in accordance with those obtained by Ahmad et al. (2018), Kaya et al. (2018) and Kholghi et al. (2018).These studies suggest a reduction in electrolyte leakage that may be explained on the basis of the role of SNP facilitated maintenance of membrane functions through induction of antioxidant metabolites, thereby protecting the plants against oxidation damage on membrane permeability (Akram et al., 2018;Rai et al., 2018).
Under salt stress plant posses a range of nonenzymatic antioxidant molecules (Shafiq et al., 2014;Ghadakchiasl et al., 2017) to scavenge ROS.Phenolic substances will serve as molecular antioxidants through their ability to destroy free radicals as well as substrates of many antioxidant enzymes (Blokhina et al., 2003).Accordingly, Franco et al. (2008) stressed that the existence of many hydroxyl groups bonded to associate an aromatic ring provides the molecule with the ability to donate a proton to a radical, thus acting as potential chain-breaking molecules or antioxidants upon secondary oxidation.
Salinity excited the build-up of ascorbic acid (AsA) as compared with that of the non-salinized control.These results harmonize with those reported by Shafiq et al. (2014).Moreover, the application of SNP markedly induced the accumulation of AsA in canola plants under normal or salinized conditions.Hasanuzzaman et al. (2018) andRai et al. (2018) assessed that SNP raises the amount of AsA as the results of an increase within the capability of SNP to scavenge ROS and should account partially for the lower concentration of H 2 O 2 .
Investigating the plant cell ultra-structural changes under salinity may be a useful tool for unveiling the fundamental strategies involved in conferring salt tolerance (Atkin & Macherel, 2009).Salinity caused the major changes in chloroplasts including swollen of thylakoids, loose shapes of the part of internal lamellae thylakoids, although most of granal thylakoids were destroyed.These results were confirmed by Naeem et al. (2012).The distortions of grana stacking and swelling of thylakoids caused by salinity within this investigation were probably due to a change within the ionic composition of the stroma.
The increment in the plastoglobule number assessed in the present study may be a formal indicator of environmental stress effects (Austin et al., 2006).The physical coupling between the plastoglobules and thylakoid membranes permits the free exchange of lipid molecules among the plastoglobules and thylakoids (Austin et al., 2006).The increased plastoglobule size and number observed within the salt-treated plants may be one of the adaptive mechanisms which prevent the oxidative damages caused by severe salinity.However, reduction in starch grains will even be attributed to increased conversion of starch into soluble sugars, which are considered as compatible solutes and play a vital role in osmotic adjustment.On the other hand, SNP relieved this structural damage by protecting the photosynthetic membrane system from oxidative stress.Large chloroplasts with no swelling and only minor dilations of the thylakoids in SNP and NaCl treated plants are the concrete indication of less oxidative stress.Another distinction within the chloroplast of the plants grown under salinity and SNP application along was that the dimension of starch grains increased.This means that the plants accumulate starch under favorable growth conditions which they metabolize a large amount of starch under saline to possess an appropriate pool of osmolytes (Ahmad et al., 2018).Comparatively less number of plastoglobuli in chloroplasts of plants treated with NaCl and SNP along is another indication of lesser oxidative stress (Zhang et al., 2010).
Under control conditions, the mitochondria had wellorganized cristae and an intact structure and were of comparable size and appearance.On the other hand, cells from salt-affected plants had a very small and the lowest number of mitochondria as well as a loss of the integrity of the outer mitochondrial membranes.Similar results have been reported by Zhang et al. (2010).However, SNP application increased the dimensions and number of mitochondria under control or stressed conditions.The higher mitochondrial number and size meet the increased needs of ATP under unfavorable conditions, when photosynthesis is generally suppressed (Silva et al., 2010), and additionally these organelles responses to stress by synthesis of various specific mitochondrial stress proteins (Rizhsky et al., 2004).
Salinization severely affects the agricultural productivity of crop plants.The annual global income losses due to salinization of agricultural land were estimated in US$ 11.4 billion in irrigated land and US$ 1.2 billion in non-irrigated areas (Zhu et al., 2008).The reduction in seed yield is basically due to a reduction in seed set within the fruit which can be attributed to a decrease in the pollen viability or in the stigmatic surface receptivity, or both (Khatun & Flowers, 1995).A decreasing in the supply of carbon assimilate produced by decreased leaf area per plant (Table 1) is additionally responsible for the reduction of the yield components.Abscission of flowers or young fruit due to ethylene induction by salinity could explain the reduced pod set observed (Chrominski et al., 1989).SNP-improving stress tolerance and rise yield have been observed in numerous crops (Kausar & Shahbaz, 2013).Improvement salinity tolerance in numerous plants/crops has been shown to be connected with an increased growth and yield as well as multiple metabolic adaptations, including low accumulation of ROS (Fayez & Bazaid, 2014), low uptake of toxic ions and high accumulation of vital osmoprotectants (Kaya et al., 2013).The present study asserted that exogenous application of SNP significantly increased yield and its components of the canola plant under normal and saline conditions.This increase could also be due to reduced accumulation of Na + and increased that of K + enhancing photosynthetic pigments, resulting in increased dry matter accumulation.It has been found that exogenous application of SNP causes stronger stem and roots, improved branching, earlier flowering and a greater number of silique due to increasing water use efficiency.Moreover, SNP-induced high biomass production could also be ascribed to low uptake of Na + as well as low accumulation of ROS (Ahmad et al., 2018;Hasanuzzaman et al., 2018;Rai et al., 2018).Finally, application of SNP induced some structural protecting changes within the conductory tissues through increasing the phloem and xylem area, particularly with 50 µM resulting in a fast translocation of photoassimilates from the leaves towards the developing seeds.
In conclusion, exogenous application of SNP proved to be useful in enhancing plant growth and yield characters under normal or salinity conditions.The growth increment under SNP application was found to be associated with increasing photosynthetic pigment concentration, reduced lipid peroxidation-linked membrane deterioration, reduced the accumulation of Na + and Cl − and prevented salt-induced K + leakage thereby maintaining a higher K + / Na + ratio.Based on the results of the current work, it can be concluded that SNP sprayed plants can postpone the salinity injuries by peroxide/phenolic/ascorbate system which is involved in scavenging the ROS produced during salt stress and improved biochemical processes and anatomical traits that increased plant growth and yield.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Ultrastructure of leaf mesophyll cells from the canola grown under control treatment (A-D), 50 µM sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (E-H); 100 µM SNP (I-K); 100 mM NaCl (L-P); 50 µM SNP and 100 mM NaCl (Q-T); and finally 100 µM SNP and 100 mM NaCl (U-W).A: General view and detail of control cells, showing many chloroplasts and smooth cell walls.B: Well organized chloroplasts with larger starch grains.C: Dispersion of nucleolus and chromatin in nucleus matrix of control with smooth and continuous membrane.D: Smooth and continuous cell wall as well as mitochondria.E: A general view of mesophyll cells having a huge number of chloroplasts with numerous starch grains.F: Chloroplasts with numerous starch grains.G: A nucleus with nucleolus and good nuclear envelop.H: Numerous mitochondria within the cell.I: General view of mesophyll cell having a less number of chloroplasts.J: Chloroplasts with starch grains.K: Elongated ellipsoidal nucleus with continuous nuclear envelope: L: overview of salt affected cells showing a destruction of cell organelles.M: Vacuolated and swelling chloroplasts with dilations of the thylakoid membranes, reduction in starch granules, relatively more plastoglobules.N: Mesophyll cell having a destroyed nucleus.O: Destruction of cell wall.P: multivesicular bodies in the vacuoles.Q: Mesophyll having a well-organized nucleus.R & U: Well-structured chloroplasts.S & V: Well organized nucleus with smooth nuclear envelop.T & W: Well organized mitochondria.
Means within columns followed by different letters are significantly different (p< 0.05); df for each analysis was 11, 35.Means (±SE) were calculated from five replicates for each treatment.WC: water content.LRWC: leaf relative water content.Pro: proline.TSC: total soluble carbohydrates.Cl -: chloride.Na + : sodium.K + : potassium.
Means within columns followed by different letters are significantly different (p< 0.05); df for each analysis was 11, 35.Means (±SE) were calculated from five replicates for each treatment.FBN: flowering branches number/plant.FN: fruit number/plant.SN: seed number/pod.SI: seed index (100 seed weight).SY: seed yield/plant.