Journal of Biosystems Engineering

Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery (한국농업기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensing Technologies for Grain Crop Yield Monitoring Systems: A Review

  • Chung, Sun-Ok (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Moon-Chan (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Ho (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Joo (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Jung (Rural Human Development Center, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Li, Minzan (China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2016.11.22
  • Accepted : 2016.11.25
  • Published : 2016.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Yield monitoring systems are an essential component of precision agriculture. They indicate the spatial variability of crop yield in fields, and have become an important factor in modern harvesters. The objective of this paper was to review research trends related to yield monitoring sensors for grain crops. Methods: The literature was reviewed for research on the major sensing components of grain yield monitoring systems. These major components included grain flow sensors, moisture content sensors, and cutting width sensors. Sensors were classified by sensing principle and type, and their performance was also reviewed. Results: The main targeted harvesting grain crops were rice, wheat, corn, barley, and grain sorghum. Grain flow sensors were classified into mass flow and volume flow methods. Mass flow sensors were mounted primarily at the clean grain elevator head or under the grain tank, and volume flow sensors were mounted at the head or in the middle of the elevator. Mass flow methods used weighing, force impact, and radiometric approaches, some of which resulted in measurement error levels lower than 5% ($R^2=0.99$). Volume flow methods included paddle wheel type and optical type, and in the best cases produced error levels lower than 3%. Grain moisture content sensing was in many cases achieved using capacitive modules. In some cases, errors were lower than 1%. Cutting width was measured by ultrasonic distance sensors mounted at both sides of the header dividers, and the errors were in some cases lower than 5%. Conclusions: The design and fabrication of an integrated yield monitoring system for a target crop would be affected by the selection of a sensing approach, as well as the layout and mounting of the sensors. For accurate estimation of yield, signal processing and correction measures should be also implemented.

Keywords

References

  1. Arslan, S., F. Inanc, J. N. Gray and T. S. Colvin. 2000. Grain flow measurements with X-ray techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 26:65-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00074-0
  2. Arslan, S. and T. S. Colvin. 1998. Laboratory test stand for combine grain yield monitors. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 14(4):369-371. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.19396
  3. Bae, Y. H., S. W. Searcy, J. K. Schueller and B. A. Stout. 1987. Determination of spatially variable yield maps. ASAE Paper No. 871533. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  4. Berbert, P. A and B. C. Stenning. 1996. On-line water content measurement of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 65(4):287-296. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1996.0102
  5. Birrell, S. J and K. A. Sudduth. 1995. Corn population sensor for precision farming. ASAE Paper No. 951334. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  6. Birrell, S. J., K. A. Sudduth and S. C. Borgelt. 1996. Comparison of sensors and techniques for crop yield mapping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 14:215-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1699(95)00049-6
  7. Blackmore, B. S and C. J. Marshall. 1996. Yield mapping:errors and algorithms. In:Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp.403-415. Madison, WI:ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
  8. Chaplin, J., N. Hemming and B. Hetchler. 2004. Comparison of impact plate and torque-based grain mass flow sensors. Transactions of the ASAE 47(4):1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.16557
  9. Choi, M. C. 2016. Development of a grain yield monitoring system for 55 kW full-type multi-purpose combines. Ph.D. Dissertation. Daejeon, Republic of Korea:Chungnam National University, Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering.
  10. Colvin, T. S and S. Arslan. 2000. A review of yield reconstruction and sources of errors in yield maps. In:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (unpaginated), Madison, WI:ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
  11. Demmel, M. 2013. Site-specific recording of yields. In:Precision in Crop Farming:Site-Specific Concepts and Sensing Methods:Applications and Results, pp. 313-329. Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer Science and Business Media.
  12. Domsch, H., M. Heisig and K. Witzke. 2008. Estimation of yield zones using aerial images and yield data from a few tracks of a combine harvester. Precision Agriculture 9:321-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9076-y
  13. Ferrari, E and D. Pessina. 2012. Measurement of cereal moisture content with an experimental acoustic device. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 28(3):441-446. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41483
  14. Fulton, J. P., C. J. Sobolik, S. A. Shearer, S. F. Higgins and T. F. Burks. 2009. Grain yield monitor flow sensor accuracy for simulated varying field slopes. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 25(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25425
  15. Han, S., S. M. Schneider, S. L. Rawlins and R. G. Evans. 1996. A bitmap method for determining effective combine cut width in yield mapping. Transactions of the ASAE 40(2):485-490. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21267
  16. Hummel, J. W., B. M. Lobdell, K. A. Sudduth and S. J. Birrell. 2002. Sensing corn population-another variable in the yield equation. In:Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (unpaginated). Madison, WI:ASACSSA-SSSA.
  17. Iida, M., T. Kaho, C. K. Lee, M. Umeda and M. Suguri. 1999. Measurement of grain yields in Japanese paddy field. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 48(3):293-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2002.10409204
  18. Kocsis, L., U. Schelemm, H. Richter, J. Mellmann and I. Farkas. 2008. On-line microwave measurement of the moisture content of wheat. In Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, pp.631-635. Laxenburg, Austria:International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC).
  19. Koichi, S and K. A. Tsuneo. 2011. A Mini Grain-yield sensor and in-situ non-linear calibration impact-by-impact sensing to compensate for it's own drift and to preserve non-linearity for enhanced accuracy. ASAE Paper No. 1111161. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  20. Kormann, G., M. Demmel and H. Auernhammer. 1998. Testing stand for yield measurement systems in combine harvesters. ASAE Paper No. 983102. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  21. Lawrence, K. C., D. B. Funk and W. R. Windham. 1999. Parallel-plate moisture sensor for yellow-dent field corn. Transactions of the ASAE 42(5):1353-1358. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13297
  22. Long, D. S. and J. D. McCallum. 2015. On-combine, multi-sensor data collection for post-harvest assessment of environmental stress in wheat. Precision Agriculture 16:492-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9391-z
  23. Lotfi, M and H. Darvishi. 2015. In-line measurement of the moisture content of wheat by acoustic method. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 8(2):163-167.
  24. Maertens, K. P Reyns and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2004. On-line measurement of grain quality with NIR technology. Transactions of the ASAE 47(4):1135-1140. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.16545
  25. Missotten, B. 1998. Measurement Systems for the Mapping and the Evaluation of Crop Production Performance. pp.302. Leuven:Katholieke Universiteit Press.
  26. Morgan, M. T and D. Ess. 2010. The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturists. 3rd ed. Waterloo, IW, USA:Deere & Company.
  27. Murphy, D. P., E. Schnug and S. Haneklaus. 1995. Yield mapping-a guide to improved techniques and strategies. In:Proceedings of Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems, pp.33-47. Madison, WI:ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
  28. Nelson, S. O., S. Trabelsi and M. A. Lewis. 2016. Microwave sensing of moisture content and bulk density in flowing grain and seed. Transactions of the ASABE 59(2):429-433. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11377
  29. Perez-Munoz, F and T. S. Colvin. 1996. Continuous grain yield monitoring. Transactions of the ASAE 39(3):775-783. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27560
  30. Pfeiffer, D. W., J. W. Hummel and N. R. Miller. 1993. Real-time corn yield sensor. ASAE Paper No. 931013. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  31. Reitz, P and H. D. Kutzbach. 1996. Investigations on a particular yield mapping system for combine harvesters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 14:137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1699(95)00044-5
  32. Reyns, P., B. Missotten, H. Ramon and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2002. A review of combine sensors for precision farming. Precision Agriculture 3:169-182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013823603735
  33. Schrock, M. D., D. L. Oard, R. K. Taylor, E. L. Eisele, N. Zhang, Suhardito and J. L. Pringle. 1997. A diaphragm impact sensor for measuring combine grain flow. ASAE Paper No. 97AETC107. St. Joseph, MI:ASAE.
  34. Searcy, S. W., J. K. Schueller, Y. H. Bae, S. C. Borgelt and B. A. Stout. 1989. Mapping of spatially variable yield during grain combining. Transactions of the ASAE 32(3):826-829. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31077
  35. Shrestha, D. S and B. L. Steward. 2003. Automatic corn plant population measurement using machine vision. Transactions of the ASAE 46(2):559-565.
  36. Singh, M., A. Verma, A. Sharma. 2012. Precision in grain yield monitoring technologies:a review. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America 43:50-59.
  37. Simonovic, V. D. Markovic, I. Markovic and S. Kirin. 2016. Impact of sensor readings of grain mass yield on combine speed. Tehnicki Vjesnik 23(1):157-162.
  38. Srinivasan, A. 1999. Precision farming in Asia:progress and prospects. In Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp.623-627. Madison, WI:ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
  39. Stafford, J. V., B. Ambler and H. C. Bolam. 1997. Cut width sensors to improve the accuracy of yield mapping systems. In Proceeding of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp.623-627.
  40. Stark, R., A. Gitelson, U. Grits, D. Rundquist and Y. Kaufman. 2000. New technique for remote estimation of vegetation fraction:Principles, algorithms and validation. Aspects of Applied Biology 60:241-246.
  41. Strubbe, G., B. Missotten and J. De Baerdemaeker. 1996. Performance evaluation of a three-dimensional optical volume flow meter. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 12(4):403-409. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25664
  42. Sudduth, K. A. 1998. Engineering for precision agriculture-past accomplishments and future directions. SAE Paper No. 98-2040. Warrendale, PA, USA:Society of Automotive Engineers.
  43. Sudduth, K. A., S. J. Birrell and M. J. Krumpelman. 2000. Field evaluation of a corn population sensor (unpaginated). In:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (unpaginated). Madison, WI:ASACSSA-SSSA.
  44. Zandonadi, R. S., T. S. Stombaugh, S. A. Shearer, D. M. Queiroz and M. P. Sama. 2010. Laboratory performance of a mass flow sensor for dry edible bean harvesters. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 26(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29466
  45. Zhao, Z., Y. Li, J. Chen and J. Xu. 2011. Grain separation loss monitoring system in combine harvester. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 76:183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.016
  46. Zhou, J. B. Cong and C. Liu. 2014. Elimination of vibration noise from an impact-type grain mass flow sensor. Precision Agriculture 15(6):627-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-014-9359-4