Published December 31, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Victoriocambala Verhoeff 1944

Description

Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944

Zoobank LSID. http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:

330CE9AA-124D-47EF-BCCC-6B60BE370A96

Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944: 35, 41; Jeekel, 1971: 115; Hoffman, 1980: 91; Jeekel, 1981: 40; Jeekel, 1985: 106, fig 4; Mauriès, 1987: 196, 198; Korsós & Johns, 2009: 3; Jeekel, 2009: 35; Edward & Harvey, 2010: 5; Korsós & Read, 2012: 46.

Type species. Victoriocambala buffalensis Verhoeff, 1944, by monotypy.

Remarks. Verhoeff (1944, p. 41) noted that his new, monotypic Victoriocambala was most closely related to Amastigogonus Brölemann, 1913, a then-monotypic Tasmanian genus to which he added two new Tasmanian species. By the time Jeekel (2009) described a second Victorian Victoriocambala species, the number of Tasmanian Amastigogonus species had increased to four (Hoffman 1972; Mauriès et al.. 2001), and I have since added another six Tasmanian species (Mesibov, 2017). Consistent and taxonomically useful differences between species in the two genera are listed in Table 1.

The two Victoriocambala species share several characters with the Tasmanian endemic Equestrigonus tasmaniensis Mesibov, 2017. In all three cases, there is an apical fringe of long setae on the anterior gonopod telopodite, the leg 7 coxa is not elongated, there is a prominent tab anteriorly on the leg 1 prefemur and the leg 2 coxa, and prefemoral tabs begin on ring 5. E. tasmaniensis differs from the Victoriocambala species in diplosegment sculpture (suture weakly defined, longitudinal metazonite striae curving upwards towards suture), having a prominent setal crown on the posterior gonopod and the coxite process on the anterior gonopod directed posterodistally rather than parallelling the telopodite and protecting the pseudoflagellum (Mesibov, 2017). It seems likely that in a three-taxon molecular phylogeny, Equestrigonus and Victoriocambala would be more closely related than either is to Amastigogonus.

Notes

Published as part of MESIBOV, ROBERT, 2017, Notes on Victorian Iulomorphidae (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida), pp. 113-120 in Memoirs of Museum Victoria 76 on page 115, DOI: 10.24199/j.mmv.2017.76.02, http://zenodo.org/record/8065156

Files

Files (2.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:13941dd2713deefa4ce1a3b10f564ca3
2.5 kB Download

System files (18.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5bdca6ad0d61ba4c869806aafb1eb6b0
18.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Iulomorphidae
Genus
Victoriocambala
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Spirostreptida
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Verhoeff
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944 sec. MESIBOV, 2017

References

  • Verhoeff, K. W. 1944. Zur Kenntnis der Cambaliden und uber einige neue australische Formen derselben. Zoologischer Anzeiger 145: 27 - 45.
  • Jeekel, C. A. W. 1971 (1970). Nomenclator generum et familiarum Diplopodorum: A list of the genus and family-group names in the Class Diplopoda from the 10 th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Monografieen van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging 5: i - xii, 1 - 412.
  • Hoffman, R. L. 1980 (1979). Classification of the Diplopoda. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle: Geneva. 237 pp.
  • Jeekel, C. A. W. 1981. Australia Expedition 1980: Legit C. A. W. Jeekel and A. M. Jeekel-Rijvers. List of collecting stations, together with general notes on the distribution of millipedes in eastern Australia and Tasmania. Verslagen en Technische Gegevens, Instituut voor Taxonomische Zoologie (Zoologisch Museum), Universiteit van Amsterdam 30: 1 - 59. http: // www. repository. naturalis. nl / document / 550141
  • Jeekel, C. A. W. 1985. The distribution of the Diplochaeta and the " lost " continent Pacifica (Diplopoda). Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 55 (1): 100 - 112. http: // www. repository. naturalis. nl / document / 547773
  • Mauries, J. - P. 1987. Cambalides nouveau et peu connus d'Asie, d'Amerique et d'Oceanie. II. Pseudonannolenidae, Choctellidae (Myriapoda, Diplopoda). Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 4 th series, section A 9 (1): 169 - 199. http: // b i bl i o t h e q u e s. m n h n. f r / E X P L O I TAT IO N / i n fo d o c / digitalCollections / viewer popup. aspx? seid = BMAZO _ S 004 _ 1987 _ T 009 _ N 001
  • Korsos, Z., and Johns, P. M. 2009. Introduction to the taxonomy of Iulomorphidae of New Zealand, with descriptions of two new species of Eumastigonus Chamberlin, 1920 (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Epinannolenidea). Zootaxa 2065: 1 - 24.
  • Jeekel, C. A. W. 2009. Millipedes from Australia, 24: Iulomorphidae from Victoria, with the description of two new species (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida). Myriapod Memoranda 11: 31 - 41.
  • Edward, K. L., and Harvey, M. S. 2010. A review of the Australian millipede genus Atelomastix (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Iulomorphidae). Zootaxa 2371: 1 - 63. http: // www. mapress. com / zootaxa / 2010 / f / zt 02371 p 063. pdf
  • Korsos, Z., and Read, H. J. 2012. Redescription of Zinagon chilensis (Silvestri, 1903) from Chile, with a species list of Iulomorphidae from the Southern Hemisphere (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Epinannolenidea). Zootaxa 3493: 39 - 48.
  • Brolemann, H. W. 1913. The Myriapoda in the Australian Museum. Part II. Diplopoda. Records of the Australian Museum 10 (6): 77 - 158, 5 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.10.1913.899
  • Hoffman, R. L. 1972. On the identity of three genera of cambaloid millipeds from the Australian region (Spirostreptida). Psyche 79 (3): 200 - 208. https: // doi. org / 10.1155 / 1972 / 86103
  • Mesibov, R. 2017. Iulomorphid millipedes (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Iulomorphidae) of Tasmania, Australia. ZooKeys 652: 1 - 36. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 652.12035