Democratic Processes at Local Level for International Public Authority

It opens the way for the international public authority to draw legitimacy from the democratic processes taking place at the local level. We are concerned about the limited ability of such approaches to deal with problems of political inclusion; While we share with constitutional pluralism the pluralist view that citizens and other communities see as subjects of legitimacy, it is proper to be concerned about the limited ability of such approaches. Constitutionalism places a primary emphasis on analyzing how various forms of government affect individual civil liberties. On the other hand, every behavior that makes people question its validity is not a violation of human rights. This will be an extremely limited focus. Constitutional methods often do not have a separate language, making it difficult for these approaches to grasp the wide variety of phenomena associated with global government. A third strategy, inspired by administrative law thinking rather than constitutionalism, for dealing with the phenomenon of global governance in an explicitly legal way is a method of solving the problem. Here again, many varieties appear. The global administrative law project is likely to have the most far-reaching effects. This idea suggests that a significant part of global governance can be conceptualized as governance and requires that this aspect of global governance be governed by administrative law principles such as transparency, participation, reasoned decision making and review mechanisms. While some scholars are concerned with the induction of such principles, others are more concerned with the deductive development of such principles. Both approaches receive help from the normative reserve of national or European administrative law.