Published December 31, 2022 | Version v1
Book Open

Entrepreneurship in the context of institutional transformation of the economy

Creators

  • 1. Fergana Polytechnic Institute

Description

The monograph examines the theoretical foundations of entrepreneurship development: the formation of scientific and theoretical ideas about entrepreneurship, the institutional environment of small entrepreneurship, its opportunities and limitations are analyzed; concepts and models of entrepreneurship development are studied. The methodological foundations of institutional changes in the field of small business, methodological approaches to the analysis of the institutional environment of small business, factors and directions of development of institutions in the field of small business are identified, ineffective rules and barriers in the institutional environment of small business are characterized. Attention is paid to the design of the components of the institutional environment of small business, as well as ways to assess and predict the development of institutions in the field of small business. The author proves that it is the institutional approach that makes it possible to combine the efforts of economic, legal, social and other sciences in the study of entrepreneurship as a complex socio-economic phenomenon.

The book is of interest to students, researchers, and anyone interested in entrepreneurship.

Notes

The monograph is recommended for publication by decision of the Council of the Fergana Polytechnic Institute. Protocol No. 4 dated December 28, 2022.

Files

Kurpayanidi K.I., Entrepreneurship in the context of institutional transformation of the economy_monograph.pdf

Files (4.0 MB)

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Book: 978-9943-8579-6-4 (ISBN)

References

  • 1. Abdullaev, A. M., & Khudaykulov, A. (2020). Challenges of coping with the economic consequences of the global pandemic COVID-19. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 5(85), 1. 2. Abdullaev, A. M., & Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2014). Socio-economic aspects of functioning of small business entities in the system of institutional transformations. New University. Series "Economics and law", (2 (36)). 3. Abdullaev, A. M., & Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2019). Actual issues of activization of financial factors development of entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan. Kazakhstan Science Journal, 2(3), 49-58. 4. Abdullaev, A., Kurpayanidi, K., Teshabaev, A., & Solieva, D. (2020). Research of Enterprise Management Systems: Essence, Methods and Problems. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(2), 182-192. 5. Abdurakhmanova, G. K. (2011). Small business in providing population employment in Uzbekistan. Of the Plekhanov Russian university of economics. 6. Aguzarova, L.A. (2002) Institutional adaptation of entrepreneurial structures: autoref. D. in Economics: 08.00.01. - Rostov n/Don. 7. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American economic review, 62(5), 777-795. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1815199 8. Andrianov, V. (1996). Without special economic zones it is difficult to integrate into the world economy. Business World. 74. 9. Arslanov, SH. D. (2020). Gosudarstvennaya investicionnaya politika regiona: problemy formirovaniya i realizacii. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, (9 (119)), 57-62. 10. Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of michigan Press. 11. Artur, B., & Dorota, W. (2021). The importance of training and certificates in the access of university graduates to the labour market. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 26(1). 12. Ashurkov, O. A., & Orlova, N. A. (2020). Osobennosti formirovaniya sistemy pravovogo regulirovaniya investicionnoj deyatel'nosti. Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskih issledovanij, (2 (18)), 112-121. 13. Auzan, A. A. (2020). The economy under the pandemic and afterwards. Population and Economics,4(2), 4-12. 14. Auzan, A. A., Doroshenko, M., Ivanov, V., Eliseev, A., & Kaliagin, G. (2011). Institutional economics: new institutional economic theory. Textbook. Moscow: INFRA-M, 415. 15. Auzan, A., Kryuchkova, P. (2001). Administrative Barriers in the Economy: Tasks of Unblocking. Voprosy ekonomiki. 5. 16. Avtonomov, V., & Avtonomov, Y. (2019). Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 179-194. 17. Babchinskij, YU. (2020). Osobennosti investicionnoj politiki regional'nogo razvitiya. In Mezhdunarodnyj konkurs studencheskih nauchno-issledovatel'skih rabot po ekonomike (Vol. 4, pp. 15-21). 18. Bachtler, J., Martins, J. O., Wostner, P., & Zuber, P. (2019). Towards Cohesion Policy 4.0: Structural transformation and inclusive growth. Routledge. 19. Basareva, V.G. (2002). Institutional peculiarities of small business development in the regions of Russia. - MOSCOW: EERC 20. Baumol, W. J. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of business venturing, 8(3), 197-210. 21. Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of business venturing, 2(1), 79-93. 22. Belyaeva, N. (2011). Analysts:"Consultants" or "Independent Policy Actors". Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 48(5), 125-140. 23. Biggs, T., Grindle, M. S., & Snodgrass, D. R. (1988). The informal sector, policy reform and structural transformation. Employment and Enterprise Policy Analysis Project, Harvard Institute for International Development. 24. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of labor Economics, 16(1), 26-60. 25. Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 680-691. 26. Blinov, A. O., & Magdanov, P. V. (2018). Management Theory. NV Ugryumova-M.: Dashkov and K. 27. Borland, C. M. (1975). Locus-of-control, need for achievement and entrepreneurship. The University of Texas at Austin. Brockhaus, R. H. (1975, August). IE locus of control scores as predictors of entrepreneurial intentions. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1975, No. 1, pp. 433-435). 28. Bounie, David and Camara, Youssouf and Galbraith, John W., Online Commerce, Inter-Regional Retail Trade, and the Evolution of Gravity Effects: Evidence from 20 Billion Transactions (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3624723 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624723. 29. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Pandey, J., & Tewary, N. B. (1979). Locus of control and achievement values of entrepreneurs. Journal of occupational psychology, 52(2), 107-111. 30. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). The effect of job dissatisfaction on the decision to start a business. Journal of Small Business Management (pre-1986), 18(000001), 37. 31. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(3), 421-440. 32. Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 16(2), 165-180. 33. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (2003). What is public choice theory. Rationalizing capitalist democracy: The cold war origins of rational choice liberalism, 133. 34. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., & Carland, J. A. C. (1988). "Who is an entrepreneur?" is a question worth asking. American journal of small business, 12(4), 33-39. 35. Chernyshev, A. A. (2019). Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka investicionnyh proektov v promyshlennosti (zarubezhnyj opyt i rossijskaya praktika) (Doctoral dissertation, MGIMO University (Russia)). 36. Cheryamyanina, V. (2003). State regulation of the institutional environment in the system of self-organizing entrepreneurial activity. М. 37. Cinpaeva, F. S., & Abdullaeva, Z. M. (2019). Sovremennaya politika modernizacii: institucional'nye aspekty regional'nogo razvitiya. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, (9 (107)), 61-66. 38. Clark, J. M. (1918). Economics and Modern Psycholoy: I. Journal of Political Economy, 26(1), 1-30. 39. Collection of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2016, No. 40, art. 467 40. Commons, J. R. (2017). Legal Foundations of Capitalism: With a new introduction by Jeffe. Biddle & Warren J. Samuels. Routledge. 41. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(1), 7-26. 42. Croitoru, A. (2012). Schumpeter, JA, 1934 (2008), The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology, 3(02), 137-148. 43. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American economic review, 75(2), 332-337. 44. Davis, L. E., North, D. C., & Smorodin, C. (1971). Institutional change and American economic growth. CUP Archive. 45. Deakins, D., & Freel, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Small Firms 6e. McGraw Hill. 46. Degtyarev, A., Malikov, R, Grishin, K. (2014), Institutional Configurations of Regional Business Environment: Projection Parameters [Institutsional'naya konfiguratsiya regional'noy delovoy sredy: parametry proektirovaniya], Economy issues, Vol. 11, pp.83–94. 47. Demin, A. A. (2003). Lidery mirovogo biznesa. St. Petersburg. (in Russian). 48. Demsetz, H. (1974). Toward a theory of property rights. In Classic papers in natural resource economics (pp. 163-177). Palgrave Macmillan, London. 49. Demsetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisisted. JL Econ. & Org., 4, 141. 50. Demsetz, H. (2002). Toward a theory of property rights II: The competition between private and collective ownership. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2). 51. Deryabina, M. (2001). Institutional Aspects of the Post-socialist Transition Period. Voprosy Economiki, 2. 52. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160. 53. Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. http://dspace.vnbrims.org:13000/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/4729/Innovation%20and%20Entreprenurship.pdf?sequence=1 54. Drucker, P. F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 80(8), 95-102. 55. Earle, J. S., & Sakova, Z. (1999). Lessons on the entry decision into self employment from transition economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economy (No. 145). Working Paper. 56. Eggertsson, T. The economics of institutions in transactions economies. Word Bank discussion papers; 241. Institutional changes and the public sector in transitional economies, 19-42. 57. Eggertsson, T., Eggertsson, Þ., & Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics. Cambridge University Press. 58. Elbing, A. O. (1974). On the applicability of environmental models. Contemporary Management/JW McGuire, en.–Englewood Cliffs, 283. 59. European Commission - 2019 SBA Fact Sheet - France. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38662/attachments/11/translations/en/renditions/native (accessed on 20.12.2020) 60. Ferraz, J. C., & Coutinho, L. (2019). Investment policies, development finance and economic transformation: Lessons from BNDES. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 86-102. 61. Fonseca, R., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Pissarides, C. A. (2001). Entrepreneurship, start-up costs and employment. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 692-705. 62. Gafarov, I.R. (2001). Development of the institutional environment of the modern Russian economy: autoref. D. in Economics: 08.00.01. – Kazan 63. Galati, G., & Moessner, R. (2013). Macroprudential policy–a literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(5), 846-878. 64. Galbraith, J. K., Weidenbaum, M. L., Hession, C. H., Deckard, B., Sherman, H., & Thompson, C. C. (1975). Economics and the public purpose. Journal of Economic Issues, 9(1), 87-100. 65. Gibadullin, R.V. (2000). Entrepreneurial layer - the most important element of the socio-economic system. - М. 66. Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 212-220. 67. Gray, Sh. (2006). The fight against corruption in the transition period-2. Corruption in relations between enterprises and the state in the countries of Europe and Central Asia in 1999-2002: Scientific works / Sh. Gray, D. Helman, R. Reiterman. - Moscow: The Whole World, 115 p. 68. Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., & Moodysson, J. (2019). Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy, 48(4), 1048-1061. 69. Gritsenko, A. A. (2005). Institutional architectonics: object, theory and methodology. Post-Soviet Institutionalism: monograph, 49-74. 70. Gulyaeva, G. G. (2015). Sushchnost' innovacionno-investicionnoj politiki. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii, (9-1), 189-192. 71. Haidarova N. Japanese way - productive tandem of small and big business // Small and Medium Business. - 2005. - №1 (9). - С. 26-27. 72. Hamilton, W. H. (2007). Institutional approach to economic theory. Terra Economicus, 5(2), 110-117. 73. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2017). Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2, 261-280. 74. Harsanyi, J. C. (2013). Papers in game theory (Vol. 28). Springer Science & Business Media. 75. Hass, J. K. (1999). The great transition: The dynamics of market transitions and the case of Russia, 1991-1995. Theory and Society, 28(3), 383-424. 76. Hatch, J., Zweig, J., Zweig, J. (2000). Entrepreneurs: what is the stuff of an entrepreneur? Ivey Business Journal, 65 (2), 67. 77. Hikmatov, A., Trostyansky, D. (2002). Development of small business as a factor of economic growth in Uzbekistan. Society and economy. 2. 78. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Pr Hollenbeck, JR, e Klein, HJ (1987). 79. Hisrich, R. D. (1990). Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship (Vol. 45, No. 2, p. 209). American Psychological Association. 80. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage. 81. IfM Bonn: Unternehmensbestand. KMU im EU-Vergleich [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.ifm-bonn.org/statistiken/mittelstand-im-einzelnen/#accordion=0&tab=8 (accessed 10.05.2021). 82. Ikramov, M. A., & Alimov, G. A. (2019). The formation of demand as a factor in the innovative development of Uzbekistan. In Russia's Economic Growth: Problems and Strategic Prospects (pp. 38-44). 83. Ikramov, M., Eshmatov, S., Ashurov, A., Fayzullaev, S., Bobojonov, B., & Boboerova, M. (2021). Practical Issues of Advertising Ethics. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 8175-8182. 84. Ivanovich, K. K. (2020). About some questions of classification of institutional conditions determining the structure of doing business in Uzbekistan. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 10(5), 17-28. 85. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1994). The nature of man. Journal of applied corporate finance, 7(2), 4-19. 86. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2017). Economic theory of property rights (methodology, basic concepts, circle of problems). 87. Kathuria, S., Yatawara, R. A., & Zhu, X. O. (2021). Spotlight on Outward Foreign Investment and Foreign Direct Investment Policies. 88. Khosking, A. (1993). Kurs predprinimatel'stva. Moscow. (in Russian). 89. Kleiner, G. B. (2005). Modernization of the economy and the" cultivation " of institutions: a view "from below". Access mode: https://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/guvsi-2005.pdf (accessed: 27.07. 2021). 90. Kleiner, G. B. (2017). System modernization of domestic enterprises: theoretical background, motives, principles. Ekonomika regiona, (1), 13-24. 91. Kleiner, G.B. (2005). Institutional Change: Design, Selection or Prosthetics? Post-Soviet Institutionalism: A Monograph. Ed. by R.M. Nureyev, V.V. Dementiev. Donetsk: Kashtan. 92. Kleiner, G.B. (2005). Institutional Change: Design, Selection or Prosthetics? Post-Soviet Institutionalism: A Monograph. Ed. by R.M. Nureyev, V.V. Dementiev. Donetsk: Kashtan. 93. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit (Vol. 31). Houghton Mifflin. 94. Knight, F.H. (2003). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Delo. 95. Kockx, M. M., McCleland, M., & Koeppen, H. (2021). Microenvironmental regulation of tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy. The Journal of Pathology. 96. Koichuev, T., & Koichueva, M. (2001). Theory and practice of economic development in the Transition Period. Reform, Bishkek.-2001. 97. Kolesnikova L.A. Formirovanie gosudarstvennogo sistemy razvitiya predprinimatel'stva v transientnii ekonomike: autoref. D. in Economics: 08.00.01. - Moscow, 2001. 98. Kolodko, G. W. (2020). After. Economics and politics of the post-pandemic world. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (5), 25-44. 99. Koslowski, P., & Buchanan, J. M. (1996). Ethics of capitalism and critique of sociobiology. Springer Science & Business Media. 100. Kouz, R. G., Gal'perin, V. M., & Pinsker, B. S. (2000). Priroda firmy. Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli, 2, 11-32. (in Russian). 101. Krabbe, J. J. (1988). Menger's Valuation of Nature: An Atomistic and "Organistic" Approach. Journal of economic studies. 102. Krivoruchko, O. N., Zaĭt︠s︡ev, A. A., & Lobanov, S. N. (2000). Stanovlenie predprinimatelʹskoĭ ėkonomiki v Rossii. Ėkonomika. 103. Kurpayanidi, K. (2021). Aktualnye voprosy cifrovizacii v industrialnom sektore jekonomiki Uzbekistana. Obshhestvo i innovacii, 2(4). 104. Kurpayanidi, K. (2021). National innovation system as a key factor in the sustainable development of the economy of Uzbekistan. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 258, p. 05026). EDP Sciences. 105. Kurpayanidi, K. (2021). Scientific and Theoretical Issues of Entrepreneurship Development. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(6), 345-352. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33619/2414- 2948/67/38 106. Kurpayanidi, K. (2021). Scientific and Theoretical Issues of Entrepreneurship Development. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(6), 345-352. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33619/2414- 2948/67/38 107. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2015). Entrepreneurship in a modern institutional environment. Monograph. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 108. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2017). "Doing Business 2017: Equal Opportunities for All" as a Driver of Entrepreneurial Environment Regulation. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 16(3 (462)). 109. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2018). World bank DB2018 rating and its place in the development of the roadmap for entrepreneurship development in Uzbekistan. In International scientific review of the problems of economics and management (pp. 21-28). 110. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2020). To the problem of doing business in the conditions of the digital economy. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 9(89), 1. 111. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2021). Financial and economic mechanism and its role in the development of entrepreneurship. Theoretical & Applied Science, (1), 1-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.01.93.1 112. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2021). The evolution of scientific and theoretical ideas about entrepreneurship. Logistics and economics. Scientific electronic journal.3. 178-185 pp. 113. Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2021). The institutional environment of small business: opportunities and limitations. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 09 (101), 1-9. 114. Kurpayanidi, K. I., & Ashurov, M. S. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic sharoitida tadbirkorlik va uni rivozhlantirish masalalari: nazaria va amaliyot. Monograph. GlobeEdit Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4046090 115. Kurpayanidi, K. I., & Mukhsinova, S. O. (2021). The problem of optimal distribution of economic resources. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 01 (93), 14-22. 116. Kurpayanidi, K.I. (2021). Analysis of scientific and theoretical ideas about entrepreneurship. Nazariy va amaliy tadqiqotlar xalqaro jurnali, 1 (1), 50-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5731500 117. Kurpayanidi, K.I. (2022). Issues of regulation of small business development in the region. Proceedings of the XV International Multidisciplinary Conference «Prospects and Key Tendencies of Science in Contemporary World». Bubok Publishing S.L., Madrid, Spain. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32743/SpainConf.2022.1.15.331624 118. Kurpayanidi, K.I. (2022). On the problem of developing an investment policy strategy in the context of institutional transformation. Nazariy va amaliy tadqiqotlar xalqaro jurnali, 2 (2), 119. Kurpayanidi, K.I. (2022). Teoreticheskie aspekty razvitiya predprinimatel'stva. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika, 3 (85). 120. Kusainov, H. (2002). Reforms and barriers in the economy. Alpari. 6. 121. Kusurgasheva, L., Muromtseva, A., Prokopenko, E., & Yakunina, Y. (2020). Trends and Potential of the Reindustrialization of the Mining Region. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 174, p. 04022). EDP Sciences. 122. Kuz'minov, I. Y., Bendukidze, K. A., & Yudkevich, M. M. (2006). Course of institutional economics: institutions, networks, transaction costs, contracts. Izd. House HSE. 123. Lapusta, M. G., & Starostin, Y. L. (1998). Small entrepreneurship. Moscow: Infra, 220. 124. Lapusta, M. G., Porshnev, A. G., Starostin, Yu. L., & Skamai, L. G. (2000). Entrepreneurship: textbook/ed. MG 125. Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of world business, 35(4), 401-416. 126. Leonovets, A. G., Parshutkin, S. I., & Severukhin, V. S. (2020). Free economic zones: the US experience. In Actual problems of the global economy (pp. 96-101). https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44599888_70836465.pdf 127. Litvintseva, G. P. (2003). Institutional economic theory. Litvintseva, NGTU, Novosibirsk. 128. Litvintseva, G. P., Kryukov, V. A., & Khairullina, M. V. (2016). Conditions for Innovation Development: The View from Siberia. Problems of Economic Transition, 58(7-9), 598-603. 129. Lyakin, A. N. (2003). Rossiiskaya privatizatsiya i formirovanie natsional'noi modeli korporativnogo upravleniya. Poisk, (in Russian). 130. Margianti, E. S., Ikramov, M. A., Abdullaev, A. M., Kurpayanidi, K. I., & Misdiyono, M. , Khudayqulov, A. (2020). Role of goal orientation as a predictor of social capital: Practical suggestions for the development of team cohesiveness in SME's. Monograph. Gunadarma Pulisher, Indonesia. 131. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science. M.: Progress, 2, 310. 132. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Norstrand Company. Inc., 196l. 133. Mesure, H. (2007). Thorstein Bunde Veblen as precursor of business and society field. Society and Business Review. 134. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363. 135. Minguzzi, A., & Passaro, R. (2001). The network of relationships between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 181-207. 136. Minlibaev, A. D., & Mirzagalyamova, Z. N. (2018). Problemy privlecheniya inostrannyh investicij v rossijskuyu ekonomiku. Kazanskij vestnik molodyh uchyonyh, 2(2 (5)), 118-122. 137. Mitchell, R. E. (2001). Thorstein Veblen: Pioneer in environmental sociology. Organization & Environment, 14(4), 389-408. 138. Mitchell, W. C. (1941). Business cycles and their causes. In Business Cycles and Their Causes. University of California Press. 139. Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of business venturing, 16(1), 51-75. 140. Muller V. K. (2021). Russian dictionary, New English-Russian, Russian-English dictionary. M.: DROFA. 141. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic management journal, 14(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140205 142. Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. 143. National Legislative Database, 09.06.2020, No. 07/20/4742/0736; 10.02.2021, No. 09/21/6165/0104; 06.05.2021, No. 06/21/6221/0428 https://lex.uz/ru/docs/4849605 144. Nikitina S.K. The role of the state in the development of Russian entrepreneurship (IX-XX centuries): autoref... D. in Economics: 08.00.01. - SPb., 2002. 145. North, D. C. (1986). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (jite)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 142(1), 230-237. 146. North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World development, 17(9), 1319-1332. 147. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press. 148. North, D. C. (2018). Institutional change: a framework of analysis. In Social Rules (pp. 189-201). Routledge. 149. Novickij, N. A. (2018). Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya investiciyami na osnove GCHP i novogo kachestva gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Instituty gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: strategicheskie vyzovy i tendencii razvitiya, 170. 150. O special'nyh ekonomicheskih zonah. Zakon Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 17.02.2020 g. № ZRU-604. Nacional'naya baza dannyh zakonodatel'stva, 18.02.2020 g., № 03/20/604/0175 151. O Strategii razvitiya Novogo Uzbekistana na 2022-2026 gody. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan, ot 28.01.2022 g. № UP-60. Elektronnyj resurs. URL: http://lex.uz//ru/docs/5841077 152. On improving the organization of the activities of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan № PP-3068 of June 19, 2017,// Collection of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2017, № 26, Art. 578). 153. On measures to radically improve the system of state protection of legitimate interests of businesses and the further development of entrepreneurial activity. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan N UP-5087 of 19.06.2017. Collection of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, June 27, 2017, N 25, Art. 522. 154. Orlov, A. K. (2017). Arrangement and planning of developer's activities in the course of construction megaprojects implementation. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 106, p. 08013). EDP Sciences. 155. Pejovich, S. (1996). The market for institutions versus the strong hand of the state: The case of Eastern Europe. Economic institutions, markets and competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 11-126. 156. Polonkoeva, F. YA., Kitieva, M. I., & Orckhanova, M. A. (2020). Rol' gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya investicionnyh processov. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika, (11-2), 198-200. 157. Polterovich, V. M. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Economics and mathematical methods, 35(2), 3-20. 158. Popov, R. A., Sekisov, A. N., & Shipilova, N. A. (2016). The Economics of innovation in modern Russia: practice, problems and prospects. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(8S), 184-188. 159. Proceedings of the Forum on Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]. – URL: http: www.rcmse.ru 160. Pujiati, D., & Misdiyono, E. S. M. (2020). Meta Analysis of Management Control System, Strategy And Perfotmance of Business Units. 161. Qiang, C. Z., Liu, Y., & Steenbergen, V. (2021). An Investment Perspective on Global Value Chains. World Bank Publications. 162. Radaev, V. V. (2001). Deformalization of Rules and Tax Evasion in Russia Economic Activity. Problems of Economics, (6). 163. Raschety na osnove dannyh Vsemirnogo banka za 2019 g. 164. Rizzello, S., & Turvani, M. (2002). Subjective diversity and social learning: A cognitive perspective for understanding institutional behavior. Constitutional political economy, 13(2), 197-210. 165. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1. 166. Rozmainsky, I. V., Lozhnikova, A.V., Kichko, N. I., & Khloptsov, D. M. (2017). Dacha in post-Soviet Russia: institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Studies( Journal of Institutional Studies), 9(2). 167. Rube, V. A. (2014). Institutional aspects of the organization of small business in developed countries and in Russia: a study guide for university students enrolled in economic specialties. Textbooks of the economic faculty of Moscow State University named after MV Lomonosov, 23. 168. Rudd, M. A. (2004). An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 109-124. 169. Runov, A. B. (2003). The genesis of the Russian firm in the post-Soviet institutional space. Economic entities of post-Soviet Russia (institutional analysis)/ed. RM Nureeva. M.: Moscow Public Scientific Foundation, 33. 170. Santo, B. (1990). Philosophy of Entrepreneurship. Problems of Theory and management practices, (3), 96-101. 171. Schreiner Self-employment, microenterprise and the poorest Americans //Social Service Review. - 1999. - № 73 (4). - р. 500. 172. Schreiner, M., & Woller, G. (2003). Microenterprise development programs in the United States and in the developing world. World development, 31(9), 1567-1580. 173. Schumpeter J., Mileikovsky AG, Bomkin VI (1982) Theory economic development: (Study of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and the cycle of conjuncture). with him. - Progress, 1982. 174. Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capita I, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Routledge. 175. Schumpeterб J. (2021). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. N.Y., http://139.59.56.236/bitstream/123456789/478/1/schumpeter-joseph-a-capitalism-socialism-and-democracy.pdf 176. Shamkhalov, F. (2011). Small business in the system of market Reforms: Problems of Growth or Survival. Issues of Economics, 10. 177. Shane, S., Kolvereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of business venturing, 6(6), 431-446. 178. Shapero, A. (1975). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. Psychology today, 9(6), 83-88. 179. Shapero, A. (1975). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. 180. Shastitko, A. E. (2010). New institutional economic theory. Moscow: Teis. 181. Shastitko, A. E. (2013). Methodological status of the new institutional economic theory. Journal of Economic Theory, (4), 36-47. 182. Shastitko, A. E. (2013). Methodological status of the new institutional economic theory. Journal of Economic Theory, (4), 36-47. 183. Shastitko, A. E. (2019). Institutions do matter" vs."only (formal) institutions matter. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (12), 90-110. 184. Shastitko, A., & Ménard, C. (2017). Discrete institutional alternatives: Theoretical and policy issues (Celebrating the 80th anniversary of Ronald Coase's "Nature of the Firm"). Russian Journal of Economics, 3(2), 200-220. 185. Shastitko, A.E. (1997). Economic Theory of Institutions. - Moscow: Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University, TEIS. 186. Shastitko, A.E. (2010). New Institutional Economics, Moscow: TEIS. 187. Shavans, B. (2003). Types and levels of rules in organizations institutes and systems. Economic surveys, (6), 21. 188. Shavkat Mirziyoyev: Everything will be in vain unless lower-level executives change their outlook and become friends with the entrepreneur. https://president.uz/ru/lists/view/4278 189. Shchepakin M.B. Entrepreneurship as a system-forming factor in the transitional economy: doctoral thesis. D. in Economics: 08.00.01. - Krasnodar, 2002. 190. Shirov, P. N., & Danilova, V. O. (2020). Priorities of investment policy of the state in the system of ensuring economic security of the real sector of the economy. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 13(1), 55. 191. Small and Medium Entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan (SME). [Electronic resource]. URL: https://stat.gov.kz/official/industry/139/statistic/6 192. Smith, A. (2019). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (No. 1, pp. 1-2). Liberty Classics. 193. Social'no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Respubliki Uzbekistan v 2021 godu. T.: Goskomstat, 2022. 194. Sonin, C. (2000). Inequality, property rights, and economic growth in transition economies. 195. Soto, E. D. (1995). Other way: Invisible revolution in the third world. М.: Catallaxy. 196. Sukharev, O. (2002). The concept of economic dysfunction and the evolution of the company. Problems of Economics, 10, 70-81. 197. Tambovtsev, V. L. (2019). Ideas and interests, economic policy and institutions. Voprosy ekonomiki, (5), 26-45. 198. Tambovtsev, V. L. (2019). The interaction of "institutions-technologies" and economic growth. Journal of new economy, 20(2). 199. Tambovtsev, V. L. (2021). Methodologies Of The New Institutional Economic Theory: Do We All Mean The Same Thing? Questions of Theoretical Economics, (3), 52-74. 200. Tambovtsev, V.L. (1997). Theoretical Issues of Institutional Design. Voprosy ekonomiki. - 3. 201. Tambovtsev, V.L. (2000). Institutional market in the transitional Russian economy. Scientific reports of the Center for Management and Institutional Research of the Faculty of Management of St. Petersburg State University. SPb. STATE UNIVERSITY 202. Tarasevich, V. N. (2005). Institutional theory: methodological searches and necessary hypotheses. Post-Soviet institutionalism / ed. RM Nureeva, VV Dementieva.- Donetsk: Chestnut, 480. 203. Tateisi, K. (1992). Eternal spirit of entrepreneurship. K.: Ukrzakordonvizaservis. 204. Thailand's economic growth strategy focuses on small businesses. URL: https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/analysis/ground-small-business-heart-government-growth-strategy#:~:text=SMEs%20account%20for%2080.3%25%20of,%25)%20and%20Indonesia%20(15.7%25). 205. The Collection of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012, No. 29, Art. 328; 2013, No. 36, Art. 477. 206. Tkach, D. V., & Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2020). Some questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of business entities. Theoretical & Applied Science, (11), 1-4. 207. Toksanova A.N. Development of the management system of small business in the Republic of Kazakhstan: autoref. Doctor of Economics: 08.00.05. - Astana, 2000. 208. Tolmacheva, A. E. (2019). Problemy privlecheniya inostrannyh investicij v rossijskuyu ekonomiku. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra, 9(6-1), 233-239. 209. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1993). Riding the waves of culture (London, Nicholas Brealey). 210. Tsoy, D., Tirasawasdichai, T., & Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2021). Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Risk Perception during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Theoretical Review. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 7(2), 35-41. 211. Tuunanen, M., & Hyrsky, K. (1997). Innovation preferences among Finnish and US entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 1-11. 212. United States Small Business Profile, 2020. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/04144214/2020-Small-Business-Economic-Profile-States-Territories.pdf 213. Veblen, T. (1998). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4), 403-414. 214. Vlasova, O. V. (2019). Investicionnyĭ krizis kak prichina stagnacii ekonomiki Rossii v usloviyah sankciĭ. Vestnik NGIEI, (5 (96)), 86-94. 215. Vogel, R., Göbel, M., Grewe‐Salfeld, M., Herbert, B., Matsuo, Y., & Weber, C. (2022). Cross‐sector partnerships: Mapping the field and advancing an institutional approach. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(3), 394-414. 216. Volkov, A. T., Degtyareva, V. V., & Ustinov, V. S. (2017). Features of innovative entrepreneurship in the context of the development of the national technological initiative. Innovations, (11 (229)). 217. Welsh, D. (2014). Creative cross-disciplinary entrepreneurship: A practical guide for a campus-wide program. Springer. 218. Williamson, O. E. (1971). The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 112-123. 219. Williamson, O. E. (1985). Reflections on the new institutional economics. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, (H. 1), 187-195. 220. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of economic literature, 38(3), 595-613. 221. Wustrow, P. (2018). Entrepreneurial information search behavior for opportunity recognition: Measurement, antecedents, outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen). 222. Yudanov, A. Y. (2010). Carriers of entrepreneurship: Gazelle firms in Russia. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii, 5(5), 91-108. 223. Бессонова, О. Э. (2019). Контрактный раздаток и солидаризм-новая веха российской матрицы. Мир России. Социология. Этнология, 28(1), 7-31. 224. Вайсман, Е. Д., Подшивалова, М.В. (2017). Институциональная среда малых промышленных предприятий: методологические аспекты идентификации. Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и менеджмент, 11 (2), 28-35. 225. Дорошенко С.В., & Джабиев В.В. (2021). Эффективность институциональных механизмов развития предпринимательства на экономически изолированных территориях. Управление в современных системах, (4 (32)), 16-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-1313-32-16-27 226. Кирдина-Чэндлер, С. Г., & Круглова, М. С. (2019). «Общество»,«государство» и институциональные матрицы: опыт междисциплинарного мезоанализа. Социологические исследования, (10), 15. 227. Клейнер, Г.Б. (2005). Институциональные изменения: проектирование, селекция или протезирование? Постсоветский институционализм. Донецк, Каштан, С. 408 – 432. 228. Клюня, В. Л., & Черновалов, А. В. (2009). Институциональная среда Республики Беларусь и эффективность хозяйственного законодательства. Веснiк Беларускага дзяржаўнага ўнiверсiтэта. Сер. 3, Гiсторыя. Фiласофiя. Палiталогiя. Сацыялогiя. Эканомiка. Права. 1. - C. 95-103. 229. Козловская, В. Н. (2015). Институциональная теория и предпринимательство в современной науке. Веснік БДУ. Серыя 3, Гісторыя. Эканоміка. Права. - Мінск : БДУ, 2. - С. 49-53. 230. Курбатова, М. В., & Левин, С. Н. (2010). Деформализация правил в современной российской экономике (на примере взаимодействия власти и бизнеса). Terra economicus, 8(1), 27-50. 231. Курпаяниди, К. И. (2015). Некоторые вопросы оценки качества институциональной и предпринимательской среды в Узбекистане. Экономический анализ: теория и практика, (14 (413)). 232. Курпаяниди, К.И. (2022). Факторы и направления развития институтов в сфере малого предпринимательства. Проблемы современной экономики, 3. 233. Латов, Ю. В. (2021). Институциональное доверие как социальный капитал в современной России (по результатам мониторинга). Polis: Journal of Political Studies, (5). 234. Минервин, И. Г. (2011). Культура и этика в экономике: социокультурные факторы экономического роста. Культура и этика в экономике: социокультурные факторы экономического роста, (2011), 1-245. 235. Нуреев, Р. М., & Ореховский, П. А. (2021). Дискуссии об азиатском способе производства (Политэкономия социализма: когнитивный тупик 1970-х). Journal of Economic Regulation (Вопросы регулирования экономики), 12(2), 6-21 236. Подшивалова, М. В. (2017). Методологические принципы исследования институциональной среды малых предприятий промышленности. Экономика. Информатика,42(9(258)),32-41. 237. http://mironov.ru/publikatsii/sergej-mironov-sotsialnoe-predprinimatelstvo-v-rossii-neobhodimo-zashhitit-spetsialnym-zakonom/ 238. http://www.mrdoors.co.uk/ 239. https://cbu.uz/ru/monetary-policy/analysis/ 240. https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/foreign-direct-investment-index 241. https://invest.gov.uz/ru/investor/sez-i-mpz/ 242. https://regnum.ru/news/economy/2528065.html 243. https://stat.uz/ru/?preview=1&option=com_dropfiles&format=&task=frontfile.download&catid=328&id=1516&Itemid=1000000000000 244. https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2021/04/09/gsp/ 245. https://www.genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online? =tabelleErgebnis&selectionname=48121-0001#abStatistisches Bundesamthttps://www.genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online? =tabelleErgebnis&selectionname=48121-0001#ab[Electronic resource]. URL: https://wwwhttps://www.genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/genesis/online?sequenz=tabelleErgebnis&=tabelleErgebnis&selectionname=48121-0001#ab (=48121-0001#abaccessed 10.05.2021) EU methodology data. 246. https://www.globalvillagespace.com/history-of-special-economic-zones-in-china/ 247. https://www.moscowtorgi.ru/news/bolshaia_dvadtcatka/48/#:~:text=%D0%AF%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%E2%80%93%20%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0,%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%2099%25%20%D0%B8%D1%85%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%20%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0 248. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/cpi-2020-global-highlights\ 249. https://www.vsemirnyjbank.org/ru/publication/global-economic-prospects