Published April 12, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis on Turbulent Kinetic Energy Distribution of NACA 0018 Airfoil at Two Reynolds Number

  • 1. Department of Mechatronics and Industrial Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh
  • 2. Jalalabad Gas Transmission & Distribution System Ltd., Bangladesh
  • 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh

Description

The aerodynamic attributes of an airfoil must be evaluated both computationally and experimentally in order to improve its design and performance. The turbulence kinetic energy of a symmetric airfoils NACA 0018 was investigated in this study for two separate low Reynolds numbers of 300,000 and 700,000. This computational simulation work, which was carried out using the Ansys FLUENT 14.5 software, yields some interesting results. The distribution of turbulence kinetic energy across airfoil surfaces at various angles of attack and under two different airstream velocities is illustrated in this paper. Due to flow separation, there has been a big amount of turbulence observed after the stall angle [2]. The final results show that the NACA 0018 airfoil produces significant turbulence as the thickness of the airfoil increases, there is more friction with the air particle. In the second comparison, in terms of Reynolds number or airstream velocity, higher velocity produces more turbulence, as shown by the red zone in the figures. As turbulence is always expected to be as low as possible in aircraft [14], therefore, it is recommended not to use NACA 0018 airfoil in aircraft applications and rather it can be l in vertical axis wind turbine or horizontal axis wind turbine applications where turbulence is of less importance.

Files

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis.pdf

Files (730.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:57ce3bc16aa8e5a9970efb09fcfa1a18
730.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Hassan, G. E., Hassan, A., & Youssef, M. E.(2015). Numerical investigation of medium range re numbers aerodynamics characteristics for NACA0018 airfoil. CFD letters, 6(4), 175-187.
  • Hoffmann, J. A., (1991). Effect of Freestream Turbulence on the Performance Characteristics of an Airfoil. AIAA Journal, 29: 1353-1356.
  • Sereez, M., Abramov, N., & Goman, M. (2016, July). Computational Simulation of Airfoils Stall Aerodynamics at Low Reynolds Numbers. Royal Aeronautical Society, Applied Aerodynamics Conference.
  • Ladson, C. L. (1988). Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section.
  • Ahmed, M. Rafiuddin & Narayan, Sumesh & Zullah, Asid & Lee, Young-Ho. (2011). Experimental and Numerical Studies on a Low Reynolds Number Airfoil for Wind Turbine Blades. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology. 6. 357-371. 10.1299/jfst.6.357.
  • Abbott, I. H., & Von Doenhoff, A. E. (1959). Theory of wing sections, including a summary of airfoil data. Courier Corporation.
  • Abdus Shabur, Afnan Hasan, & Mohammad Ali. (2020). Comparison of Aerodynamic Behaviour between NACA 0018 and NACA 0012 Airfoils at Low Reynolds Number Through CFD Analysis. Advancement in Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 1–8.
  • Jacobs, E. N., & Sherman, A. (1937). Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number.
  • Timmer, W. A. (2008). Two-dimensional low-Reynolds number wind tunnel results for airfoil NACA 0018. Wind engineering, 32(6), 525-537.
  • Brendel, M., & Mueller, T. J. (1988). Boundary-layer measurements on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of aircraft, 25(7), 612-617.