Published December 31, 2009 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Lerista rochfordensis Amey & Couper, 2009, sp. nov.

Description

Lerista rochfordensis sp. nov.

(Figs 1 and 2)

Material. HOLOTYPE QMJ84790, Rochford Scrub, Queensland, Australia (20° 06’ 49” S 146° 37’ 03” E) collected 11-12 Dec 2006 in pitfall trap. PARATYPES QMJ44385–6, Boori Stn, Queensland, Australia (20° 01’ S 146° 46’ E) collected 15 Nov 1983, method unknown; QMJ85002, Rochford Scrub, Queensland, Australia (20° 07’ 01” S 146° 37’ 49” E) collected 11 Dec 2006 – 11 Feb 2007 in pitfall trap; QMJ85007, Rochford Scrub, Queensland, Australia (20° 07’ 05” S 146° 37’ 43” E) collected 11 Dec 2006 – 11 Feb 2007 in pitfall trap. All types are lodged at the Queensland Museum.

Diagnosis. Readily distinguished from all other Lerista by; forelimb absent with no groove or other indication, hindlimb 5–8% SVL with a single clawed digit, and five supraciliaries.

Measurements. Sample size is five unless otherwise noted: SVL = 40–82 mm (average = 64 mm), HL = 8–12% SVL (average = 9%), HW = 55–61% HL (average = 59%), L2 = 5–8% SVL (average = 6%), TL = 79–98%SVL (average = 88, n = 2).

Scalation. 16 midbody scale rows, three supraoculars, five supraciliaries, two loreals, single preocular, 0–2 presuboculars (mode = 1), 4–5 palpebrals (mode = 5), single postocular, single postsubocular, five supralabials, third supralabial entering eye, five scales between last supralabial and ear, five infralabials, one infralabial contacting postmental, rostral dome-shaped when viewed from above with apex of dome anterior, nasals in half contact, nostrils placed antero-laterally, frontonasal narrower than long, frontoparietals separate, prefrontal contacts preocular, loreal, frontonasal, frontal and first supraciliary; first supraciliary contacts preocular, loreal, prefrontal, frontal, first supraocular and second supraciliary; temporal contacts fourth and fifth supralabials, postocular, pretemporal, parietal and second temporal; frontoparietals and interparietal free (not fused into a single shield), 8–10 nuchals (mode = 10), 93–95 paravertebrals (mode = 93), 4–6 subdigital lamellae (mode = 5), 3–4 supradigitals (mode = 4), 88–97 subcaudals (average = 93, n = 2).

Osteology. 45–47 presacral vertebrae (mode = 46, n = 5), 50 caudal vertebrae (n = 1).

Colour pattern (in spirit). Pale beige to grey, head scales with varying amounts of dark brown to black edging and flecking, dorsum with a narrow, irregular dark brown to black longitudinal line medially along each scale line, 8–10 lines in total, lateral lines thickest, ventral-most line sometimes lacking. Belly immaculate cream, tail usually with heavier markings.

Holotype. Measurements and scale counts for the holotype are as follows: SVL = 74.99 mm, TL = 68.35 mm (not original), L2 = 4.38 mm, HL = 6.71 mm, HW = 4.06 mm, SE = 1.36 mm, five scales between last supralabial and ear, ten enlarged nuchals, four palpebrals, 16 midbody scale rows, 94 paravertebrals, five subdigital lamellae beneath toe, four supradigitals, dome-shaped rostral, prefrontal contacts preocular, loreal, frontonasal, frontal, first supraocular and first supraciliary, first supraciliary contacts preocular, loreal, prefrontal, first supraocular and second supraciliary (frontal contact lacking), single presubocular. Otherwise as for description above.

Variation in paratypes. Two paratypes (QMJ85002 and QMJ85007) are dehydrated from their initial field preservation in ethylene glycol (they were collected in entomological pitfall traps which are filled with glycol). In one specimen, the prefrontal contacts the presubocular, while in another (in addition to the holotype), it contacts the first supraocular. First supraciliary contact is more variable, in one specimen it contacts the presubocular but fails to contact the loreal, in another it fails to contact the second supraciliary and in another it fails to contact the loreal. Otherwise, variation in morphometric and scale characters is as noted in the description.

methods, scale definitions as in Horner (1992). Characters not overlapping with L. rochfordensis sp. nov. are highlighted

in bold. Given for each character state are range, average, mode (for meristics only) and sample size.

continued next page.

Lamellae 5–8 Absent 4–8 4–7 3–5 4–6 Absent or 4–7

6–7 Mode 8 6 5 4 5 5 Sample size 7 4 10 19 8 5 9 22 Comparison with other species. This species would key to L. cinerea in Cogger (2000) and L. karlschmidti in Wilson (2005). From L. cinerea it is distinguished by usually possessing 16 midbody scale rows (vs. 18 in L. cinerea), two loreals (vs. single), three supraoculars (vs. two), five supraciliaries (vs. four) and postmental contacting single infralabial (vs. two). From L. karlschmidti it is distinguished by five supraciliaries (vs. absent in L. karlschmidti), prefrontals present (vs. absent), 8–10 nuchals (vs 3–5), postmental contacting single infralabial (vs. two), 93–96 paravertebrals (vs. 98–110) and 45–47 presacral vertebrae (vs. 48–49). This diagnosis applies equally to Northern Territory and Queensland populations of L. karlschmidti. For comparison with other species examined, see Table 1.

Distribution. Known only from two closely adjacent localities, Rochford Scrub (20° 07’ S 146° 37’ E) and Boori Station (20° 01’ S 146° 46’ E) both south-east of Charters Towers, north-eastern Queensland, Australia (see Figure 3).

Habitat. The holotype and one paratype (QMJ85002) were collected in “Lancewood [Acacia shirleyi] and Bendee [Acacia catenulata] vinescrub” and another paratype (QMJ85007) from “Bendee”. QMJ44385 and QMJ44386 were in “semi-evergreen vine thicket on sandy soil”. Nothing further is known of this species’ habits. The vine thickets of this area (more properly known as dry rainforest), are described in detail by Fensham (1995; 1996) and Kahn and Lawrie (1987).

Etymology. Named for the type locality, Rochford Scrub.

Notes

Published as part of Amey, Andrew P. & Couper, Patrick J., 2009, A new limb-reduced skink (Scincidae: Lerista) from the dry rainforest of north Queensland, Australia, pp. 19-30 in Zootaxa 2173 on pages 20-26, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189272

Files

Files (6.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f0cf5cb96e1f4a14a5c4a487506b33f6
6.7 kB Download

System files (61.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a79c29523446c9cd4e33bf09ba587a59
61.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Scincidae
Genus
Lerista
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Squamata
Phylum
Chordata
Species
rochfordensis
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Lerista rochfordensis Amey & Couper, 2009

References

  • Horner, P. (1992) Skinks of the Northern Territory. Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences Handbook Series, Vol. 2. Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences, Darwin, 174 pp.
  • Cogger, H. G. (2000) Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia, 6 th ed. Reed New Holland, Sydney, 808 pp.
  • Wilson, S. K. (2005) A Field Guide to Reptiles of Queensland. New Holland Press, Sydney, 256 pp.
  • Fensham, R. (1995) Floristics and environmental relations of inland dry rainforest in north Queensland, Australia. Journal of Biogeography, 22, 1047 - 1053.
  • Fensham, R. (1996) Land clearance and conservation of inland dry rainforest in north Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation, 75, 289 - 298.
  • Kahn, T. P. & Lawrie, B. C. (1987) Vine thickets of the inland Townsville region. The Rainforest Legacy. Australian National Rainforests Study, Vol. 1. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, pp. 159 - 199.