Published January 5, 2016 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Bryocoropsis Schumacher 1917

Description

BRYOCOROPSIS SCHUMACHER

Figures 8, 10H, 11D, 12A, 15A–H, 18G–J, 23

Bryocoropsis Schumacher, 1917: 453 (gen. nov.; type species Bryocoropsis laticollis by monotypy); Bergroth, 1922: 53 (cat.); China, 1944: 179 (key to gen.); Carvalho, 1952: 60 (cat.); Carvalho, 1955: 41 (key to gen.); Carvalho, 1957: 143 (cat.); Odhiambo, 1962: 298 (disc.); Lavabre, 1977a: 51 (key to gen.); Schuh, 1995: 526 (cat.); Schuh, 2002 –2013 (cat.); Namyatova et al., in press (phylogeny).

Diagnosis: Bryocoropsis belongs to the Odoniella - complex and can be distinguished from other genera in this group by the following characters: coloration mostly brown, body oval (Fig. 8), ASII distinctly incrassate towards apex, with tip not swollen or only slightly swollen; ASIII–IV distinctly clavate (as in fig. 9F in Namyatova et al., in press); eyes stalked, distinctly directed laterally (as in Fig. 10H); pronotum and scutellum often with shallow tumescences (Fig. 11D); setae on pronotum very rare; long and flattened setae on hemelytron; scutellum distinctly swollen, not exceeding pronotum height, nor divided into lower and upper regions (as in Fig. 12A); spermathecal gland attached to right of midline (Fig. 18G, I).

Redescription: Male: Length c. 5–7 mm. COLORATION (Fig. 8). Mostly brown to dark brown with yellow markings on pleura and appendages, sometimes abdomen and legs with reddish tinge. TEXTURE. Vertex often with two pairs of tubercles on vertex anteriorly and a third pair near posterior margin of eye, sometimes some or all tubercles indistinct; flattened areas on vertex often distinct, sometimes indistinct; wrinkles on head laterally absent; ASI without tubercles; pronotum and scutellum covered with distinct punctures, sometimes mixed with wrinkles; collar with two pairs of tubercles; shallow tubercles on posterior part of pronotum and scutellum often present, sometimes those tubercles more or less upraised or indistinct; pair of punctures between mesoscutum and scutellum, punctures on clavus and on R + M absent; striations on lateral margins of scutellum indistinct or present only anteriorly; semicircular depression between scutellum and mesoscutum absent. VESTITURE. Body clothed with setae shorter than width of hind tibia; head, pronotum, scutellum, thoracic pleura and abdomen clothed with simple short suberect setae, those setae on dorsal side of head, pronotum, scutellum and thoracic pleura very rare; hemelytron clothed with dark and pale flattened setae, sometimes only slightly flattened; ASI with rare pale or darkened adpressed setae, sometimes flattened; ASII–IV and legs with more or less dense semiadpressed spine-like setae, setae on ASII– IV dark, setae on legs usually pale, sometimes dark; black spinules on femora and tibiae irregularly distributed (as in fig. 18F in Namyatova et al., in press). STRUCTURE. Head. Distance between eye and pronotum shorter than eye diameter (as in Fig. 10F, H); occipital region not delimited with depression; longitudinal depression on vertex absent or very short and shallow; eyes stylate, directed outwards (as in Fig. 10F, H), c. 0.15–0.2× as wide as head; distance between antennal fossa twice as long as antennal fossa width; frons distinctly swollen with paired outgrowths (as in fig. 4C in Namyatova et al., in press), without ridges or longitudinal depression; anterior view of head c. 1.7– 1.9× as wide as high; eye as long as or slightly longer than distance between eye and apex of clypeus; antennal fossa oval, diameter c. 0.5–0.7× as long as eye height, not raised (as in fig. 3B Namyatova et al., in press); inferior margin of fossa placed near inferior margin of eye; base of clypeus placed at halfway of antennal fossa height; delimited with depression; head flat form lateral view; gula as long as or shorter than buccula length, slightly convex. Labium. Almost reaching or slightly surpassing anterior margin of metasternum; LSI c. 2–2.5× long as wide; LSII c. 3–4× as long as wide, subequal or slightly longer than LSI; LSIII c. 3–4× as long as wide, subequal to LSII; LSIV 5–6× as long as wide, c. 1.5× as long as LSIII. Antenna. Reaching apex of clavus; ASI c. 1.5× as long as wide, c. 0.25–0.35× as long as head width, widened basally (as in Fig. 10F–H); ASII c. 5–6× as long as ASI, c. 0.7– 0.9× as long as head and pronotum combined, widened towards apex or swollen apically, without any swellings basally and medially (as in fig. 8E in Namyatova et al., in press); ASIII c. 0.6–0.7× as long as ASII, widened towards apex; ASIV c. 0.6–0.8× as long as ASIII, clavate (as in fig. 8F in Namyatova et al., in press). Thorax. Collar fused with callosite region or rarely delimited medially, flat; calli separated, flat; depression delimiting calli posteriorly absent (as in fig. 4C in Namyatova et al., in press); humeral angles of pronotum slightly or distinctly dilated, not serrate; posterior margin of pronotum distinctly concave, forming right angles (as in Fig. 10G, fig. 4C in Namyatova et al., in press); scutellum swollen, not covering base of pronotum, trapeziform, not divided into parts, obtuse apically (Figs 11D, 12A) with or without longitudinal depression medially, without outgrowth or ridge; metepimeron enlarged, c. 1.5–2× as high as long, angulate, subtriangular (as in Fig. 13E); metasternum with medial projection to abdominal segment II (as in Fig. 17A in Namyatova et al., in press). Hemelytron. Costal margin straight or slightly rounded; claval commissure c. 0.5–0.7× as long as scutellum, straight (as in Fig. 12E in Namyatova et al., in press); R + M distinct only anteriorly, not reaching posterior margin of corium; medial fracture strongly inclined towards midline; corium without swelling posteriorly; cuneus c. 1.8–2.5× as long as wide, c. 0.4–0.7× as long as pronotum, medial margin slightly concave (as in fig. 13B in Namyatova et al., in press); membrane cell slightly or distinctly surpassing apex of cuneus, forming right angle, c. 0.7–0.9× as long as pronotum (as in fig. 13B in Namyatova et al., in press); auxiliary vein absent or very short present; distance from cell to apex of membrane c. 0.7× as long as cell length. Legs. Forecoxae contiguous (as in fig. 17A in Namyatova et al., in press); femora barely swollen apically, straight; foretibia shorter than head and pronotum combined; tibiae without swellings; segment I of hind tarsus slightly longer than segment II, subequal to segment III; claw curved in apical half; basal tooth of claw elongate, slightly concave (as in fig. 3F, I in Namyatova & Cassis, 2014). Genitalia (Fig. 15A–H). Genital capsule as long as wide or slightly longer than wide, without outgrowth(s), ventral wall not shortened anteriorly; left paramere r-shaped, c. 2–2.5× as long as right paramere; phallobase sclerite of primary gonopore subtriangular or heart-shaped, without outgrowth(s); ductus seminis not sclerotized basally, with or without elongate sclerite bounding secondary gonopore, shorter or as long as phallotheca, with coils forming wide tube, attached to phallobase medially; sclerotized part of phallotheca broad, occupying almost entire dorsal portion, slightly tapering, rounded apically, without ridge or outgrowths(s); endosoma with or without suboval sclerites.

Females: Length c. 7–8 mm. Coloration, surface, vestiture and structure as in male, but females slightly larger than males (Fig. 8). Genitalia (Fig. 18G–J). DLP with a single sclerotized ring anteriorly, more than 3× as long as wide; two large areas of striations present, equal in diameter or right one distinctly larger than left; lateral oviducts attached at middle of those striated areas, widely separated, placed near lateral margin and at midpoint of DLP; spermathecal gland placed posteriorly, orientated slightly to right-hand side; posterior wall with small tubercles, without outgrowths and sclerotization; base of second valvula straight or slightly curved; ventral wall membranous.

Distribution: Known from tropical Africa (Fig. 23).

Host plants: Species of this genus are known to feed on cocoa (Leston, 1970; Entwistle, 1977), as well as from some species of the family Annonaceae (Piart, 1977).

Notes

Published as part of Namyatova, Anna A. & Cassis, Gerasimos, 2016, Systematic revision and phylogeny of the plant bug tribe Monaloniini (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Bryocorinae) of the world, pp. 36-136 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 176 (1) on pages 86-88, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12311, http://zenodo.org/record/5356719

Files

Files (9.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:870c03039d0a5b89609d810f41de8f68
9.0 kB Download

System files (47.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:00c0f4fb5ec937066d44c5598057e297
47.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Miridae
Genus
Bryocoropsis
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Hemiptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Schumacher
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Bryocoropsis Schumacher, 1917 sec. Namyatova & Cassis, 2016

References

  • Schumacher F. 1917. Neue athiopische Bryocorinen (Hemiptera-Heteroptera Miridae). Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft der Naturforschenden Freunde zu Berlin 7: 447 - 454.
  • Bergroth E. 1922. List of the Ethiopian Bryocorinae (Hem. Miridae) with notes and descriptions. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines 10: 51 - 61.
  • China WE. 1944. New and little known West African Miridae (Capsidae) (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Bulletin of Entomological Research 35: 171 - 191.
  • Carvalho JCM. 1952. On the major classification of the Miridae (Hemiptera). (With keys to subfamilies and tribes and a catalogue of the world genera). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 24: 31 - 110.
  • Carvalho JCM. 1955. Keys to the genera of Miridae of the world (Hemiptera). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Zool 11: 1 - 151.
  • Carvalho JCM. 1957. A catalogue of the Miridae of the world. Part I. Arquivos do Museu Nacional 44: 1 - 158.
  • Odhiambo TR. 1962. Review of some genera of the subfamily Bryocorinae (Hemiptera: Miridae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology 2: 245 - 331.
  • Lavabre EM. 1977 a. Systematique des Miridae du cacaoyer. In: Lavabre EM, ed. Les mirides du cacaoyer. Paris: Institut Francais du Cafe et du Cacao, 47 - 70.
  • Schuh RT 2002 - 2013. On-line systematic catalog of plant bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Available at: http: // research. amnh. org / pbi / catalog.
  • Namyatova AA, Cassis G. 2014. Revision of the Australian endemic plant bug genus Volkelius Distant, 1904 (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Bryocorinae). Austral Entomology doi: 10.1111 / aen. 12106; online version.
  • Leston D. 1970. Entomology of the cocoa farm. Annual Review of Entomology 15: 273 - 294.
  • Entwistle PF. 1977. World distribution of Mirids. In: Lavabre EM, ed. Les mirides du cacaoyer. Paris: Institut Francais du Cafe et du Cacao, 35 - 46.
  • Piart J. 1977. Plantes hotes et preferences alimentaires chez le Mirides du cacaoyer. In: Lavabre EM, ed. Les mirides du cacaoyer. Paris: Institut Francais du Cafe et du Cacao, 212 - 221.