Published February 3, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Ischyrocerini Kroyer 1838

Description

Key to genera of the Ischyrocerini

1 Urosome 1 bearing 3 dorsal teeth or cusps (Fig. 35a).................................. Bathyphotis Stephensen, 1944

– Urosome 1 without dorsal teeth although there may be a pair of short setae (Fig. 35b)............................... 2

2 Pereopods 5–7, ischium posteriorly winged (Fig. 35c). Uropod 3 uniramous, ramus ending in a cluster of spines (Fig. 35e).................................................................................. Alatajassa Conlan, 2007

– Pereopods 5–7, ischium not posteriorly winged (Fig. 35d). Uropod 3 biramous (Fig. 35f)...............................3

3 Pereopods 3–4, propodus prehensile (Fig. 35g)......................................... Isaeopsis K.H. Barnard, 1916

– Pereopods 3–4, propodus rectangular or oval and not expanded distally (Fig. 35h).....................................4

4 Coxa 4 posteriorly excavate (Fig. 35i)........................................................................5

– Coxa 4 not posteriorly excavate (though it may be shallowly concave) (Fig. 35j)......................................7

5 Gnathopod 1, carpus longer than the propodus (carpus:propodus length ~125%). Gnathopod 2, female, propodus massive, length ~175% the length of the propodus of gnathopod 1, palm toothed (Fig. 35k)............. Veronajassa Vader and Myers, 1996

– Gnathopod 1, carpus subequal to or shorter than the propodus (carpus: propodus length ~45–95%). Gnathopod 2, female, propodus not massive, length ~125% the length of the propodus of gnathopod 1, palm not toothed (Fig. 35l)....................6

6 Eyes absent. Maxilla 1, inner plate with a long apical seta (Fig. 36a). Coxa 1 more than half the depth of coxae 2–4. Gnathopod 1, carpus length ~95% the length of the propodus; propodus, palm shallowly excavate (Figs 36c, d)................................................................................................. Myersius Souza-Filho & Serejo, 2014

– Eyes present. Maxilla 1, inner plate without a long apical seta (Fig. 36b). Coxa 1 ± half the depth of coxae 2–4. Gnathopod 1, carpus length ~45–50% the length of the propodus; propodus, palm convex (Figs 36e, f)........... Microjassa Stebbing, 1899

7 Gnathopod 1, carpus ~100% the length of the propodus. Pereopods 3 and 4, dactyl ~175% the length of the propodus (Fig. 36g)................................................................................ Scutischyrocerus Myers, 1995

– Gnathopod 1, carpus shorter than the propodus. Pereopods 3 and 4, dactyl ±90% the length of the propodus (Fig. 36h)........8

8 Uropod 3 with a cluster of distolateral setae beside the outer ramus (Fig. 36i). Jassa group..............................9

– Uropod 3 without a cluster of distolateral setae beside the outer ramus Fig. 36j)......................................13

9 Antenna 1, accessory flagellum absent or scale-like (Fig. 37a)................................ Parajassa Stebbing, 1899

– Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 2 articles, the second minute (Fig. 37b)............................................10

10 Gnathopods and pereopods 3–4 clothed in abundant, long plumose setae (Fig. 3). Gnathopod 2, either sex, propodus, palm bearing a central tooth and a second tooth at the palmar angle, with or without a single large spine at the palmar angle (Fig. 37c)............................................................................................. Plumulojassa n. gen.

– Gnathopods and pereopods 3–4, setae simple or finely pectinate except in the palm of the male gnathopod 2 where the setae may be plumose (Figs 17, 22, 25 and 27– 29). Gnathopod 2, either sex, propodus, palm sinuous, concave or with a pronounced thumb defining the palm proximally, spines if present grouped in triplicate or if single, very small (Figs 37 d–f)..................11

11 Gnathopods 1 and 2, propodus, palm defined by 1 spine. Gnathopod 2 without a gill. Pereopod 5, carpus with a cluster of spines posterodistally. Pleopods, rami very short, length ± depth of the pleon (Figs 22–28)....................... Pleojassa n. gen.

– Gnathopods 1 and 2, propodus, palm defined by multiple spines (usually 3–4). Gnathopod 2 with a gill. Pereopod 5, carpus not spinose posterodistally. Pleopods, rami long, length> depth of the pleon (Fig. 17)....................................12

12 Gnathopod 2, propodus, both sexes producing a thumb at adulthood, palmar defining spines, if present, at the thumb tip (Fig. 37e), juvenile palm sinuous, without a thumb; pereopods 3 and 4, carpus <25% overlapped by the merus; uropod 3, outer ramus with many minute cusps proximal of the dorsally recurved terminal spine but without additional larger cusps (Figs 17–21)............................................................................................. Hemijassa Walker, 1907

– Gnathopod 2, propodus, only the male producing a thumb at adulthood, palmar defining spines, if present, proximal of the thumb tip (Fig. 37f), juvenile palm concave or sinuous, without a thumb; pereopods 3 and 4, carpus 80–100% overlapped by the merus; uropod 3, outer ramus with 2 (usually) larger cusps in addition to minute cusps proximal of the dorsally recurved terminal spine (Figs 35b,d,f,h, 36 h,i and 37f)................................................................ Jassa Leach, 1814

13 Uropods 1, 2 and/or 3, peduncle with lateral row of setae (Fig. 37g)..................... Ruffojassa Vader and Myers, 19961

– Uropods 1, 2 and/or 3, peduncle without a lateral row of setae...................................................14

14 Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 3–4 articles, the last minute. Uropod 3, outer ramus with one to several medial setae projecting dorsally (Fig. 37h)................................................................ Ventojassa J. L. Barnard, 1970

– Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 1–2 articles, the last minute. Uropod 3, outer ramus without medial setae projecting dorsally.........................................................................................................15

15 Gnathopod 1, carpus longer than the propodus (carpus ~120% of the propodus length). Known only from subantarctic islands and Brazil, 44–1058 m......................................................... Pseudischyrocerus Schellenberg, 1931

– Gnathopod 1, carpus shorter than the propodus (carpus ~50–95% of the propodus length). Various locations and depths......16

16 Mandibular palp, article 3 slender, ventrally convex and broadest centrally, tip acute (Fig. 37i). Antennae 1 and 2, length Ξ85% of the body length (headlobe to end of uropods), antenna 2 not stouter than antenna 1. Pereopods 3 and 4, merus not overlapping the carpus anteriorly. Uropod 2, outer ramus, length 65% of the inner ramus....................... Paradryope Stebbing, 18882

– Mandibular palp, article 3 broad distally, end rounded (Fig. 37j). Antennae 1 and 2, length ±65% of the body length (headlobe to end of uropods), antenna 2 stouter than or similar to antenna 1. Pereopods 3 and 4, merus overlapping 10–100% of the carpus. Uropod 2, outer ramus, length 75–80% of the inner ramus.......................................................17

17 Adult male gnathopod 2 grossly lengthened and pendulate, length 190–350% of the length of gnathopod 1, propodus slender, length 180–400% of its width at the centre, dactyl 50–100% of the length of the propodus (Figs 38 a-c). Uropod 3 with 1–2 rows of mid-dorsal spines but without a corona of multiple spines on the distal margin (Fig. 38d). Warm temperate and tropical, Northern and Southern Hemisphere, known from 9– 40°N and 5– 34°S, 0–16 m depth................... Neoischyrocerus Conlan, 1995

– Adult male gnathopod 2 variable in length but not pendulate, length 100–220% of the length of gnathopod 1, propodus variably slender or stout, length 120–290% of its width at the centre, dactyl 33–75% of the length of the propodus (Figs 38 e-g). Uropod 3 with 1–2 rows of mid-dorsal spines and a corona of numerous spines on the distal margin 3 (Fig. 38h). Cold temperate and polar, primarily Northern Hemisphere, known from 36– 81°N and 42°S, 1–2000 m depth............... Ischyrocerus Krøyer, 1838

Notes

Published as part of Conlan, Kathleen E., 2021, New genera for species of Jassa Leach (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and their relationship to a revised Ischyrocerini, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4921 (1) on pages 61-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4921.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4496015

Files

Files (9.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d11138e6f3b7f006aab66bb15b345eef
9.1 kB Download

System files (79.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:57962fdcc07070739f0c96ad7d23674f
79.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Ischyroceridae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Kroyer
Taxon rank
tribe
Taxonomic concept label
Ischyrocerini Kroyer, 1838 sec. Conlan, 2021

References

  • Stephensen, K. (1944) Crustacea Malacostraca. VIII. (Amphipoda IV). Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (13), 1 - 51.
  • Conlan, K. E. (2007) Alatajassa (Amphipoda, Corophiidea), a new genus from the Pacific coast of North America. Crustaceana, 2007, 1339 - 1354. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854007782605574
  • Barnard, K. H. (1916) Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 5. The Amphipoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 15 (3), 105 - 302. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10646
  • Vader, W. & Myers, A. A. (1996) Amphipods living in association with hermit crabs in SE Australia. I. Five new Ischyroceridae. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 20, 263 - 292.
  • Souza-Filho, J. F. & Serejo, C. S. (2014) On the phylogeny of Ischyroceridae (Amphipoda, Senticaudata, Corophiida), with the description of a new genus and eight new species from deep-sea Brazilian waters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170, 34 - 85. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / zoj. 12099
  • Stebbing, T. R. R. (1899) Revision of Amphipoda (continued). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4 (21), 205 - 211. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222939908678185
  • Myers, A. A. (1995) The Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Madang Lagoon: Aoridae, Isaeidae, Ischyroceridae and Neomegamphopidae. Records of the Australian Museum Supplement, 22, 25 - 95. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.22.1995.121
  • Walker, A. O. (1907) Crustacea. III. Amphipoda. National Antartic Expedition 1901 - 1904. Natural History 3, 1 - 39.
  • Leach, W. E. (1814) Crustaceology. Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7, 385 - 437.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1970) Sublittoral Gammaridea (Amphipoda) of the Hawaiian Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 34, 1 - 286. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.34
  • Schellenberg, A. (1931) Gammariden und Caprelliden des Magellangebietes, Sudgeorgiens und der Westantarktis. Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903, 2 (6), 1 - 290.
  • Conlan, K. E. (1995) Thumbing doesn't always make the genus: revision of Microjassa Stebbing (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ischyroceridae). Bulletin of Marine Science, 57, 333 - 377.
  • Kroyer, H. (1838) Gronlands amfipoder beskrevne af Henrick Kroyer. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematiske Afhandlinger, 7, 229 - 326. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 13747