World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
Published February 5, 2016 | Version 10004120
Journal article Open

Multivariate Analysis of Students' Performance in Math Courses and Specific Engineering Courses

Creators

Description

The aim of this research is to study the relationship between the performance of engineering students in different math courses and their performance in specific engineering courses. The considered courses are taken mainly by engineering students during the first two years of their major. Several factors are being studied, such as gender and final grades in the math and specific engineering courses. Participants of this study comprised a sample of more than thousands of engineering students at Lebanese University during their tertiary academic years. A significant relationship tends to appear between these factors and the performance of students in engineering courses. Moreover, female students appear to outperform their male counterparts in both the math and engineering courses, and a high correlation was found between their grades in math courses and their grades in specific engineering courses. The results and implications of the study were being discussed.

Files

10004120.pdf

Files (176.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7076b391e1df62881f811328c35a8bc5
176.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Borba, R. (2005). Math Failure Rate High. The Collegian, October 3, 2005. California State University, Fresno. Retrieved December 3, 2009, from http://www.csufresno.edu/Collegian/archive/2005/10/03/news/math.shtml.
  • Brandell, G., Leder, G., & Nyström, P. (2007). Gender and Mathematics – Recent Development from a Swedish Perspective. ZDM, 39.
  • Douglas, R.G. (1998). Today's Calculus Course is Too Watered Down and Outdated to Capture the Interest of Students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 34, B1-B3.
  • Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender Differences in Mathematics: An Integrative Psychological Approach. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garton, B. L., Dyer, J. E., King, B. O., & Ball, A. L. (2000). Predicting College Agriculture Students' Academic Performance and Retention: A Trend Study. ERIC. ED462292.
  • Gurian, M., Henley, P., & Trueman, T. (2001). Boys and Girls Learn Differently! United States of America: Wiley.
  • Gynnild, V., Tyssedal, J., & Lorentzen, L. (2005). Approaches to Study and the Quality of Learning. Some Empirical Evidence from Engineering Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 587-607.
  • Gynnild, V., Tyssedal, J., & Lorentzen, L. (2005). Approaches to Study and the Quality of Learning. Some Empirical Evidence from Engineering Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 587-607.
  • Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). Exploring Alternative Ways of Assessing Prior Knowledge, its Components and Their Relation to Student Achievement: Mathematics Based Case Study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 320–337. [10] Kaiser, G. (2003). Feminist Frameworks for Researching Mathematics Education. In: N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA, 1, 157–160. Honolulu University of Hawaii. [11] Lax, P. D. (1990). Calculus Reform: A Modest Proposal. Undergraduate Mathematics Education Trend, 2(2), 1. [12] Li, Q. (2004). Beliefs and Gender Differences: A New Model for Research in Mathematics Education. Interchange, 35(4), 423–445. [13] Mendick, H. (2006) Masculinities in Mathematics. Maidenhead, Open University Press: Mendick discusses how the alignment of mathematics with masculinity creates tensions for girls and women doing the subject. She illuminates what choosing mathematics means for students drawing on interviews with young people studying mathematics in England. [14] Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., & Schuster, J. (1999). Predicting the Retention of University Students. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 355– 371. [15] Sazhin, S. S. (1998). International Journal of Engineering Education, 14, 145-152. [16] Tsui, M. (2007). Gender and Mathematics Achievement in China and the United States. Gender Issues, 24, 1– 11. [17] Walkerdine, V. (1998) Counting Girls Out (second edition). London, Falmer: [18] Wedege, T. (2007). Gender Perspectives in Mathematics Education: Intentions of Research in Denmark and Norway. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39, 251– 260. [19] Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction (6th ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [20] Yudariah M. Y., & Roselainy A. R. (1997). An Assessment of the Modular Approach in Teaching and Learning First Year Calculus at UTM. Conference on Science and Technology Education, Kuala Lumpur, 15– 6 December. [21] Yudariah M. Y., & Roselainy A. R. (1997). An Assessment of the Modular Approach in Teaching and Learning First Year Calculus at UTM. Conference on Science and Technology Education, Kuala Lumpur, 15– 6 December.