Published May 9, 2024 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Caenophidia Hoffstetter 1939

Description

Parvorder CAENOPHIDIA Hoffstetter, 1939

Diagnosis. The vertebral synapomorphies of crown Caenophidia include well-developed prezygapophyseal accessory processes, synapophyses that are well-differentiated into para- and diapophyseal articular facets, the presence of pleurocentral hypapophyses throughout the precloacal vertebral column, the presence of one or more paracotylar foramina, a condyle and cotyle that are relatively small (compared to Constrictores) and circular to ovoid and elongate in cross section, and well-developed paralymphatic channels that define the lateral margins of a distinct hemel keel (Holman, 2000; Head et al., 2016).

Remarks. The vertebral morphologies of Caenophidians is markedly different from that of Booidea, including many of the most notable components of a snake vertebrae (e.g., neural spine, centrum, synapophyses, etc.). The works of Head (2015) and Head et al., (2016) to provide fossil calibration dates for snakes also summarize the morphological synapomorphies that differentiate these groups after the taxonomic restructuring of Caenophidia by Zaher et al. (2009), and Constrictores by Pyron et al. (2014), and Georgalis and Smith (2020).

Notes

Published as part of Jacisin Iii, John J. & Lawing, A. Michelle, 2024, Fossil snakes of the Penny Creek Local Fauna from Webster County, Nebraska, USA, and the first record of snakes from the Early Clarendonian (12.5 - 12 Ma) of North America, pp. 1-42 in Palaeontologia Electronica (a 2) (a 2) 27 (1) on page 9, DOI: 10.26879/1220, http://zenodo.org/record/10962250

Files

Files (1.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fb83b03956ad31fc310faa3cbda0280e
1.6 kB Download

System files (9.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8e06bfa9cc27d29d536593b33362b27a
9.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Squamata
Phylum
Chordata
Scientific name authorship
Hoffstetter
Taxon rank
parvOrder
Taxonomic concept label
Caenophidia Hoffstetter, 1939 sec. Iii & Lawing, 2024

References

  • Hoffstetter, R. 1939. Contribution a l'etude des Elapidae actuels et fossiles et de l'osteologie des ophidians. Archives du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon, 15: 1 - 78.
  • Holman, J. A. 2000. Fossil snakes of North America: Origin, evolution, distribution, paleoecology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  • Head, J. J., Mahlow, K., and Muller, J. 2016. Fossil calibration dates for molecular phylogenetic analysis of snakes 2: Caenophidia, Colubroidea, Elapoidea, Colubridae. Palaeontologia Electronica, 19.2.2 FC: 1 - 21. https: // doi. org / 10.26879 / 625
  • Head, J. J. 2015. Fossil calibration dates for molecular phylogenetic analysis of snakes 1: Serpentes, Alethinophidia, Boidae, Pythonidae. Palaeontologia Electronica, 18.1.6 FC: 1 - 17. https: // doi. org / 10.26879 / 487
  • Zaher, H., Grazziotin, F. G., Cadle, J. E., Murphy, R. W., Moura-Leite, J. C. D., and Bonatto, S. L. 2009. Molecular phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia) with an emphasis on South American Xenodontines: a revised classification and descriptions of new taxa. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia (Sao Paulo), 49: 115 - 153.
  • Pyron, R. A., Reynolds, R. G., and Burbrink, F. T. 2014. A taxonomic revision of boas (Serpentes: Boidae). Zootaxa, 3846: 249 - 260. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3846.2.5
  • Georgalis, G. and Smith, K. 2020. Constrictores Oppel, 1811 - the available name for the taxonomic group uniting boas and pythons. Vertebrate Zoology, 70: 291 - 304. https: // doi. org / 10.26049 / VZ 70 - 3 - 2020 - 03