Published May 15, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Strategies for the Protection of Ceramic Intellectual Property Rights under the Notarisation System for the Preservation of Evidence

  • 1. Jingdezhen Vocational University of Art

Description

On 1 June 2021, China's Patent Law of the People's Republic of China came into force, Article 11 of which explicitly provides for infringement of intellectual property rights of patents. The introduction of this provision demonstrates the exclusivity and monopoly of patents and the importance China attaches to the protection of intellectual property rights in patents. The present ceramic patent intellectual property rights of particularly serious infringement. The notary public notarisation of ceramic evidence preservation notarisation is not standard, notarial instrument effectiveness is insufficient and other issues, proposed to improve the preservation of evidence notarisation notarisation method, play the notary public evidence of natural credibility. Through the mainland China preservation of evidence notarisation and China Taiwan preservation of evidence notarisation for notary public for notarial field work documentary effectiveness, intellectual property protection function comparison research, this research draws on China Taiwan notary public for notarial field work documentary effectiveness, notary public for intellectual property protection function diversification of the advantages of notary public for notary public preservation of evidence notarisation in mainland China in the deposition of the problem of notary public for the protection of intellectual property rights business to extend the notary public for the protection of intellectual property rights business.

Files

v2n3a02.pdf

Files (458.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:710f0aefaed69c8ca9b57bb4483a5b27
458.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] Cui, Qifan & Song, Yan (2021). Evidence preservation system of intellectual property litigation in Taiwan and its reference. Straits Law Journal (04), 3-9.
  • [2] Ding, L. & Chen, H. C.. (2021). Typology of cases of difficult notarisation. China Notary (07), 18-23+49.
  • [3] Duan, W. X.. (2020). Insufficiency and Improvement of Preservation Evidence Notary Service in Intellectual Property Protection. Law and society (27), 35-36.
  • [4] Hu, M. . (2022). The application of blockchain judicial deposit and its regulation. Modern Law (04), 158-170.
  • [5] Li Yong. (2020). Ruminating on the security of notarial evidence. Law and Economy (10), 86-87.
  • [6] Li, Jinghai. (2018). Analysis of the relevant contents of notarial evidence. China Notary (09), 55-59.
  • [7] Li, Yuan Yuan. (2024). Combining judicial data to analyse the patent pre-litigation evidence preservation procedure. Legal Expo (03), 79-81.
  • [8] Lin, Yang. (2018). On the Formal Evidential Power of Notarial Evidence Preservation. Journal of Henan University of Finance and Economics and Law (01), 115-123.
  • [9] URL source: Web page of Nanfang Notary Office, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, 17 March 2024, 11:35:32, http://www.nfgzc.org.cn/ArticleDetail.aspx?NavID=10&FID=2&id=116
  • [10] Wang Qinhao. (2020). Application trends and development of blockchain + rule of law. People's Forum-Academic Frontier (20), 120-123.
  • [11] Wu, Jianhua. (2022). The importance of evidence preservation notarisation and its development proposal. Legal Expo (24), 98-100.
  • [12] Wu, Xiaofei. (2024). Measures to improve the service capacity of notary public in the field of intellectual property protection. Legal Expo (05), 106-108.
  • [13] Xia, Xianhua. (2020). Theoretical review of notary's participation in the reform of judicial auxiliary affairs under multi-dimensional theory. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition) (04), 32-38.
  • [14] Xu Yujia. (2023). Analysing Article 7 of the Provisions on Intellectual Property Evidence. Journal of Ningbo Open University (01), 66-70.
  • [15] Yu, Jinlan. (2022). Exploring the way of shopping preservation notarisation--an analysis based on judicial big data. China Notary (03), 26-29.
  • [16] Zhang Wen. (2021). Discussion on deepening the role of notary public in the field of intellectual property protection. Legal Expo (17), 112-113.
  • [17] Zhang Xi. (2023). Development of intellectual property notary services in the context of the new provisions of the Civil Code. China Notary (07), 44-46.
  • [18] Zhang, J. F.. (2023). Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures for the Development of Ceramic Intellectual Property Service Industry in Jingdezhen under the Background of National Pilot Area. Journal of Jingdezhen College (02), 122-125.
  • [19] Zhou, Xiangjun. (2023). Research on the proof effect of notarisation of preservation evidence--and notarisation of preservation electronic data. Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law (04), 130-145.
  • [20] Zou, Lidan & Pan YiShan. (2023). Regulation and development of notarial business of preservation of evidence. China Notary (03), 49-51.