Published March 8, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Index based on DRASTIC Model for Sustainable Management of Ground Water Resources using Remote Sensing Techniques and GIS Approach of Delhi, Northern India

Description

In many of the cities and industrial clusters one of the most rising concerns is pollution of ground water due to industrial and municipal wastes which if once penetrates the system is very difficult to remediate and also in developing countries like India such remediation may practically be impossible. Needless to mention that for sustainable thriving of human race pure and pollution free water is indispensable. Thus, it is important to delineate areas susceptible to contamination from anthropogenic sources for sustainable management of groundwater resources. Vulnerability Assessment of Groundwater is one such approach to secure the quality of the valuable Ground Water resource which is undoubtedly a precious asset. This is achieved by evaluating the weak spots which are at highest risk of easy infiltration and exposure. This in turn provides an excellent opportunity to delineate zones which needs protection in priority to prevent their exploitation before they may be exposed and contaminated to unrepairable level. Preserving the groundwater quality has been a major challenge and the same is addressed by the concept of vulnerability assessment. The assessment of groundwater vulnerability to contamination acts as an effective tool for water resource management. Different approaches are used for estimating groundwater vulnerability. The present research aims at estimating vulnerability index of ground water using DRASTIC model which considers seven parameters viz. depth to water level, net recharge, aquifer material, soil material, topography, impact of vadose zone and aquifer’s hydraulic conductivity out of which depth to water level affected the vulnerability most. DRASTIC Vulnerability estimation method may be visualized as a tool for evaluation of ground water protection and it works by step-by-step systematic analysis of different hydrological and geological parameter that has a potential impact on aquifer pollution.

Files

Assessment of Groundwater vulnerability index corrected.pdf

Files (740.4 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Aller, L., & Thornhill, J. (1987). DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Baalousha, H. (2006). Vulnerability assessment for the Gaza Strip, Palestine using DRASTIC. Environmental Geology, 50, 405-414.
  • Baghapour, M. A., Talebbeydokhti, N., Tabatabee, H., & Nobandegani, A. F. (2014). Assessment of groundwater nitrate pollution and determination of groundwater protection zones using DRASTIC and composite DRASTIC 404 (CD) models: the case of Shiraz unconfined aquifer. J. Health. Sci. Surveill. Syst., 2, 54–65.
  • CGWB (2016) Aquifer Mapping and Ground Water Management plan of NCT Delhi, Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India
  • Daly, D. and Drew, D. (1999). Irish methodologies for karst aquifer protection, in: Beek B (ed) Hydrogeology and engineering geology of sinkholes and karst, Balkema, Rotterdam, 267–272.
  • Saha, D., & Alam, F. (2014). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and Pesticide DRASTIC models in intense agriculture area of the Gangetic plains, India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 186, 8741-8763
  • Robins, N., & Smedley, P. (1998). The Jersey groundwater study.
  • Ghazavi, R., & Ebrahimi, Z. (2015). Assessing groundwater vulnerability to contamination in an arid environment using DRASTIC and GOD models. International journal of environmental science and technology, 12, 2909-2918
  • Ghosh, T., & Kanchan, R. (2016). Aquifer vulnerability assessment in the Bengal alluvial tract, India, using GIS based DRASTIC model. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 1-13.
  • Verma, K. (2006). M. Israil Mufid al-hadithi 2, DC Singhal 2, Bhishm Kumar 3, M. Someshwar Rao 3 and S. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 6(1).