[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
International Editorial Board
Editorial Board of Iranian University
Aims & Scopes
Indexing & Abstracting
Open Access Policy
Financial Policies
CrossMark Policy
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Instructions for Authors
Submission Form
Principles of Publishing Ethics
Ethical Code: Psychologic Study
Ethical Code: Medical Research
Ethical Consideration
Peer Review Policy
Declaration Form
Article Processing Charges
For Reviewers::
Policies of Peer Review
Registration::
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 3 (Vol8 No3 Fall 2021- 2021) ::
J Child Ment Health 2021, 8(3): 87-101 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Cold and Hot Executive Functions in Female Students with and without Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Mahboobeh Javid1 , Nurallah Mohammadi * 2, Changiz Rahimi2 , Habib Hadianfard2
1- Faculty of Psychology & Education Sciences, Shiraz University, Iran
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Education Sciences, Shiraz University, Iran
Abstract:   (1679 Views)
Background and Purpose: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is a common clinical disorder in children and adolescents. Children and adolescents with ODD have some deficiencies in emotion and cognition. The purpose of this study was to compare cognitive emotion regulation and cold and hot executive functions in female children with and without ODD.
Method: This research was a causal-comparative study. The population consisted of all female middle school students with and without ODD in Shiraz during the 1st semester of 2019- 2020 academic year. The study sample included 60 female students (30 students with ODD and 30 normal students). The participants were selected by random cluster sampling, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Oppositional Defiant Disorder Rating Scale) ODDRS); Hommersen, Murray, Ohan & Johnston, 2006), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003), Wisconsin card Sorting Task (WCST; Shahgholian, Azadfallah, Fathi-Ashtiani & khodadadi, 2012) and Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART; Lejuez, 2002) were used to collect the data. The collected data were analyzed by independent t-test and Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) by using SPSS Software.
Results: Results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between students with and without ODD in terms of reappraisal (F=13.76, P<0.01), but not about suppression (P>0.05). Also, there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of some executive functions. Also, Results showed that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of cold executive function but there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of hot executive function (t= 2.37, P<0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, students with oppositional defiant disorder have problems with emotion regulation. They have also deficits in hot executive function and they are more risk-taking.
Article number: 7
Keywords: Cognitive emotion regulation, cold and hot executive functions, oppositional defiant disorder
Full-Text [PDF 1124 kb]   (579 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/12/15 | Accepted: 2021/09/21 | Published: 2021/12/21
References
1. Steiner H, Remsing L. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007; 46(1): 126-141. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/01.chi.0000246060.62706.af]
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Fifth edition. Washington, DC: American psychiatric association; 2013, pp: 461-466. [Link] [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
3. Merikangas KR, Nakamura EF, Kessler RC. Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009; 11(1): 7-20. [Link] [DOI:10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.1/krmerikangas]
4. Mohammadi MR, Salmanian M, Hooshyari Z, Shakiba A, Alavi SS, Ahmadi A, et al. Lifetime prevalence, sociodemographic predictors, and comorbidities of oppositional defiant disorder: The National Epidemiology of Iranian Child and Adolescent Psychiatric disorders (IRCAP). Braz J Psychiatry. 2019; 42(2): 162-167. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0416]
5. Mitchison GM, Liber JM, Hannesdottir DK, Njardvik U. Emotion dysregulation, ODD and conduct problems in a sample of five and six-year-old children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020; 51(1): 71-79. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10578-019-00911-7]
6. Kargar-barzi H, Shishehfar S, Jafari A, Ghorbanian E, Choobdari A. The comparison of executive functions with the attachment styles in students with and without ODD. SALĀMAT-I IJTIMĀĪ (Community Health). 2017; 4(4): 269-278. [Persian]. [Link]
7. Shabahang R, Sedighian SF, Rahimi Nezhad A, Soltani Shal R. Role of Difficulties in emotional regulation and alexithymia in prediction of bullying. J Child Ment Health. 2019; 6(3): 40-50. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.6.3.5]
8. Muratori P, Milone A, Levantini V, Pisano S, Spensieri V, Valente E., ... & Masi G. Narcissistic traits as predictors of emotional problems in children with oppositional defiant disorder: a longitudinal studyJ Affect Disord.‏ 2020; 274: 494-499. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.075]
9. Burke JD, Hipwell AE, Loeber R. Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder as predictors of depression and conduct disorder in preadolescent girls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49(5): 484-492. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.01.016]
10. Burke JD. An affective dimension within ODD symptoms among boys: personality and psychopathology outcomes into early adulthood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012; 53(11): 1176-1183. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02598.x]
11. Cavanagh M, Quinn D, Duncan D, Graham T, Balbuena L. Oppositional defiant disorder is better conceptualized as a disorder of emotional regulation. J Atten Disord. 2014; 1-9. [Link]
12. Burke JD, Loeber R, Lahey BB, Rathouz PJ. Developmental transitions among affective and behavioral disorders in adolescent boys. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005; 46(11): 122-1210. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00422.x]
13. Derella OJ, Johnston OG, Loeber R, Burke JD. CBT-enhanced emotion regulation as a mechanism of improvement for childhood irritability. J Clin Child Psychol. 2019; 48(1): 146-154. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15374416.2016.1270832]
14. Koole SL. The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cogn Emot. 2009; 23(1): 4-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02699930802619031]
15. Gross JJ. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. J Psychophysiol. 2002; 39: 281-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0048577201393198]
16. Lantrip C, Isquith PK, Koven NS, Welsh K, Roth RM. Executive function and emotion regulation strategy use in adolescents. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2016; 5(1): 50-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/21622965.2014.960567]
17. Balzarotti S, John O, Gross JJ. An Italian adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. European journal of psychological assessment. 2010; 26(1): 61-67. [Link] [DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000009]
18. Webb TL, Miles E, Sheeran, P. Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies. Psychol Bull. 2012; 138: 775-808. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0027600]
19. Hughes EK, Gullone E, Dudley A, Tonge B. A case control study of emotion regulation and school refusal in children and adolescents. J Early Adolesc. 2010; 30: 691-706. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0272431609341049]
20. McRae, K. Gross, JJ. Emotion regulation. Emotion. 2020; 20(1): 1-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/emo0000703]
21. Mashhadi A, Mirdoraghi F, Hasani J. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in internalizing disorders of children. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2011; 3(11): 29-30. [Persian]. [Link]
22. Leibenluft E, Blair R, Charney DS, Pine DS. Irritability in pediatric mania and other childhood psychopathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003; 1008(1): 201-218. [Link] [DOI:10.1196/annals.1301.022]
23. Brandon J, Schmeichel BJ, Tang D. Individual differences in executive functioning and their relationship to emotional processes and responses. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015; 24(2): 93-98. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0963721414555178]
24. Zelazo PD. Executive function and psychopathology: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020; 16: 431-454. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072319-024242]
25. Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO. A meta- analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000; 20(1): 113-136. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00096-8]
26. Peterson E, Welsh MC. (2014). The development of hot and cool executive functions in childhood and adolescence: Are we getting warmer? In: Goldstein, S. Naglieri, JA. (Eds.), Handbook of executive functioning. Springer Science + Business Media: 2014 P: 45-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-8106-5_4]
27. Ardila A. On the evolutionary origins of executive functions. Brain Cogn. 2008; 68(1): 92-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.003]
28. Gil-Fenoy MJ, García-García J, Carmona-Samper E, Ortega-Campos E. Antisocial behavior and executive functions in young offenders. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.). 2018, 23(1): 70-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.psicoe.2017.10.001]
29. Antonini TN, Becker SP, Tamm L, Epstein JN. (2015). Hot and cool executive functions in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015; 21(8): 584. ‏[Link] [DOI:10.1017/S1355617715000752]
30. Oosterlaan J, Scheres A, Sergeant JA. Which executive functioning deficits are associated with AD/HD, ODD/CD and comorbid AD/HD+ ODD/CD? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005; 33(1): 69-85. ‏[Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10802-005-0935-y]
31. Hobson CW, Scott S, Rubia K. Investigation of cool and hot executive function in ODD/CD independently of ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011; 52(10): 1035-1043.‏ [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02454.x]
32. Birmaher B, Ehmann M, Axelson DA, Goldstein BI, Monk K, Kalas C, ... & Guyer A. (2009). Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS-PL) for the assessment of preschool children-a preliminary psychometric study. J. Psychiatr. Res., 43(7): 680-686. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.10.003]
33. Ghanizadeh A, Mohammadi MR, Yazdanshenas A. Psychometric properties of the Farsi translation of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version. BMC Psychiatry. 2006; 6(10): 1-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-6-10]
34. Hommersen P, Murray C, Ohan JL, Johnston C. Oppositional defiant disorder rating scale: preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. J Emot Behav Disord. 2006; 14(2): 118-121.‏ [Link] [DOI:10.1177/10634266060140020201]
35. Sharifi Daramadi P, Bagian Kulehmarz M, Padervand H, Geravand F. The effect of impulse control training on impulsiveness and reduce the symptoms of students with oppositional deficit disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2013; 5(4): 29-41. [Persian] [Link]
36. Mashhadi A, Ghasempour A, Akbari E, Ilbaygi R, Hassanzadeh S. The role of anxiety sensitivity and emotion regulation in prediction of social anxiety disorder in students. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 2017; 14(52): 89-99. [Persian] [Link]
37. Kamel Attar kar N. Khalkhli V, Amiri Majd M. Comparison of executive function and educational satisfaction in primary school students with normal hearing and hearing impaired with and without cochlear implanted. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2019; 8(2): 200-209. [Persian] [Link]
38. Shahgholian M, azadfallah P, Fathi-Ashtiani A, khodadadi M. Design of the wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) computerized version: theoretical fundamental, developing and psychometrics characteristics. clinical psychology studies. 2012; 1(4): 110-134. [Persian] [Link]
39. Ekhtiari H, Janati A, Moghimi A, Behzadi A. The farsi version of the balloon analogue risk task: an instrument for the Assessment of riskful-decision making. advances in cognitive sciences. 2003; 4(4): 9-11. [Persian] [Link]
40. Nejati V, Alipour F, Bodaghi A, Agaziarati A. The psychometric properties of the test of balloon analogue risk taking task (BART) among Iranian youth. Quarterly of Applied Psychology. 2017; 11(1): 121-136. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Javid M, Mohammadi N, Rahimi C, Hadianfard H. Comparison of Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Cold and Hot Executive Functions in Female Students with and without Oppositional Defiant Disorder. J Child Ment Health 2021; 8 (3) : 7
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1077-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Vol8 No3 Fall 2021- 2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645